₦airaland Forum

helinues:
You people are the one making allegations, back your allegations up with evidence. Abi no be same you people that are known to be lying ridiculously without feeling any remorse

It's a former APC chieftain who's making the allegations, unam .

Which one is "you people"? Long head like traditional marriage calabash!

LordAdam16:
I b tok am say Axis don pass stage of cho cho cho.

If you no one buy, no buy.
If you 1 fight, buy your coffin.

You can feel the animosity from the choice of words.
The Hegemony do be doing too much.

-Lord

You have to be an eediot of elephantine proportions to take a billion (plus) persons' market for granted all in the guise of satisfying your miniscule ego.

And today's world has gone beyond that point where you can bully any serious sovereign nation into submission.

That strategy might seem like it's paying off the Trump's administration, even if in small measure for the time being, but the ripple effects of this his continued gloating, will most certainly be felt beyond this his cinematic reign🤡.

From Mexico to Canada to China to India to Iran, everyone is calling his bluff with a sturdy middle finger . Now it looks like his only come-back is being at the center of settlements between Russia and Ukraine. But as always, Trump and Americans will learn the hard way.

WriteerNg:
Please we beg you to be the bearer of bad news. As long as it concerns Britain and the west.

You too like problem .

ddippset:
Na the b00bi do am for her

No be agbero behavior anything.

And that her boobi fine eh !

shoodboi2:
Where is the sense in this? Was Twitter around thousands of years ago when Moses was here? Or how is this relevant?

23jerryking:
Your own reasoning should actually muzz you more🤣🤣🤣.
Is like saying why didn't God trend because Moses went to meet him?

See analogy wey comot normal person for brain .

People wey dey argue/discuss with you for this thread dey try sha.

obedience4:
You don't know how twitter trends work dude, If Trump was visiting Russia, he would be the talking point among the Russian citizens in Russia on social media Vice visa

The Visiting head president is the talking point for the host citizens, When XI visited the US, XI was the number one trending, Same thing happened when BIBI visited the US.

All this are normal twitter trends

Twitter algorithm has spoken .

23jerryking:
Trending only because of the man he'd come to meet. And how much has the trend added to your bank accounts?

So why's the man he went to meet, not trending ? Una reasoning dey always muzz me.

Mikasaobi:
I see you mileowisky.

WriterrNg:
⚡Trump and Putin meet in Alaska.

Apparently, the Russian aircraft that was being monitored by over 300K viewers on flight radar was even a decoy .

The king flew in an aircraft that had its transponder turned off until he was right in the Alaskan airspace.

Then there was Trump giddily waiting and clapping for Putin as he walked towards him on the red carpet. Trump is sure going to have wet and orgasmic dreams tonight😹.

AntiChristian:
How did APC actively sabotage JEG administrator's efforts to procure ammunition and equipment?

Such a dumb question. Were you born yesterday ?

Alamkiir:
Half the world? How many nuclear war head una get, wey una small nyash dey shake

shoodboi2:
Allow me to rephrase my argument about freedom of speech being absolute: What I mean is that there is no freedom of speech anywhere in the world. That is why I said freedom of speech is either there or it is not.

What we have instead are limitations on what you can and cannot say. The west calls these limitations “freedom” but that is just another political word.

Specifically, it is a glittering generality, which refers to words used to appeal to people’s emotions. Words like democracy, values, and freedom are all glittering generalities. They appeal to emotions and have different meanings to different people.

It is true that “freedom of speech” (if we can call it that) has limitations everywhere in the world. But these limitations are more about protecting the government and less about protecting the freedoms of people.

Many of the pro-west supporters will use arguments about threats and violence to justify these limitations. But these are extremes. Plus, let us not forget that at no point in human history has anyone ever considered threatening someone or calling for violence against a person or group of people as “freedom of speech.” So, that’s that.

The issue is that the west has always positioned itself as the gatekeeper of freedom of speech and has repeatedly used it for morality and propaganda purposes. But we have seen the same west repeatedly arrest people for making statements that don't sit well with them.

For instance, during the coronation of King Charles, multiple people were arrested for protesting his crowning and daring to question the existence of the monarchy. If that happened in Saudi, Iran, Russia, or China, we all know what the western newspaper headlines will say about freedom of speech. But it happened in the UK, so it’s all good.

Overall, freedom of speech should be absolute to be sincere. But it is not absolute anywhere in the world, and so it doesn’t exist. Instead, what we call “freedom of speech” is basically another word to describe what the government allows and doesn’t allow.

That is not a problem on its own but becomes one when the west continues to call out other countries over their lack of “freedom of speech” while the west itself continues to arrest people, sanction them, imprison them, threaten them, fire them from jobs, and refuse them their college certificate for daring to speak up on issues and events that implicate the west.

In the end, freedom of speech is just another lie. What we call “freedom of speech” is less a universal right and more a selectively applied privilege that is granted when convenient, revoked when uncomfortable, and wrapped in language meant to disguise the difference.

shoodboi2:
So, what you are saying now is that the government gets to determine what should be considered freedom and what shouldn’t be. So let me ask: if a government is the one to determine what should be freedom, then is that freedom?

Let us be frank with ourselves: There is no freedom of speech anywhere in the world. What you have instead are limitations to what you can and cannot say. That is not freedom.

Gbadebo19:
What exactly is difficult in answering the question: Do you not realize that for your point to be valid, such crack down or restriction on freedom must be seen as "unreasonable"? Only then can you validly say that the government is using the law to crack down on what they consider an "abuse to that right"

Gbadebo19:
FBI broke in and kicked down doors. The said individuals were arrested. How many of them are in jail? For the FBI to have been involved, there is no doubt that the actions of such individual or individuals was considered a crime.

Now, how many of those said individuals are in jail? Answer me.
What saved them? Nothing but that the court considered their utterances and post to be moderate (Freedom of speech).

In a country like NK, we both know those people would never see sunlight again. Kim Jong Un and Pootin would kpai them if they did what they did in America.

E no go tire us. We will keep doing our best.
As long as what an individual has done or said is considered a threat to the security of the state, FBI can do it.

Even in Nigeria, security agencies have the right to break in and break out of any apartment if they reasonably suspect that an individual has committed a crime.

So, your soft spot of breaking down people's door is a well accepted practice in most parts of the world.

I perfectly understand your argument about government using law to crack down on what they consider to be "abuse of that right"

This argument of your boils down to a shallow understanding of government or democracy.
If your position is correct, kindly tell me at least one instance where the restriction placed on freedom of speech or human rights in general is NOT reasonable in a TRULY democratic society

Of you know you can't answer the question, just pass and don't start with your usual shenanigan of I can't do this and that.

This is why discussing with you is horrendous and tiresome.

You're using ten paragraphs to dance around with words only to make the same points I already pointed out, and lucidly too.

Wetin dey worry you sef?! Is it that you just love to argue ?

Gbadebo19:
By your first paragraph, are you implying that the poster you are referring to does n🚫t have komon sëñße? Na honest question ooo

Even though say na r🚫biß you talk by bringing checks and balance into the equation, we will at least agree that u are n🚫t totally løst in Hades. There is still some hope of redemption.

Putindbutt:
You're the most pathetic person ever?, why mock a person in need?, do you think you can't be the one in that position tomorrow or you think you're better than those who had an accident?. How do you even know who he voted for?, do your kinsmen not seek for help?. Did your fake Messiah eradicate poverty in Anambra?, are they not the ones engaging most in rituals and oke ite?
I don't know the kind of sense you have posting someone's else situation & pictures on Nairaland, to prove what exactly?. How about your tribesmen who are also in need, can you do this to them?.

Let me know when you're done lamenting !