₦airaland Forum

Was really thinking and remembered during AW pre-match interview at liverpool where he stated that whoever mans the sticks against liverpool will be this seasons number1. if only i took his word, i never would have expected a new goalie today.

anyways Almunia one more chance for you to shine better use it wisely cos Schwarzer may be coming for free next season.

HNIC:
It's 6 o'clock
Wenger!!!
Where is our Goalkeeper

I can't believe this. Is this a dream? Someone should please wake me up.

HNIC:
in other news,
Hleb back in the EPL with Birmingham

A typical example of going from Grace to Grass. His career started dwindling since he left arsenal what a pity

on the other hand Silvestre is still moving on.

Just asking, is focus nigeria still on or its gone just as the report says?

Mark Schwarzer has held Hughes hostage in his office trying to force a move.

Fulham are now asking for E65m for Schwarzer. Our desperation has caused us this.

mukina2:
I enjoy watching teams teach you guys a lesson but me to support you never!!!!!!!!!

useless team na wigan go comot una cloth for body , in your own home

I LAUGH.

Ibime:
hehehehehe. . . . classic. . .


Meanwhile Dutch FA are saying RVP is out for "several weeks". . .

believe all you want, for me he will be out for atmost 2wks. Expect him against bolton.

debosky:
@ Specialist

We thank God for the ability to have such debates. . . .if we lost against Blackburn some people would've been calling Amadioha's wrath on Wenger's head.

Less than 36 hours to go in the transsfer window. . . . . .I still hope Schwarzer gets signed but not too optimistic at the moment.

If we don't get anyone else in, we will have to back Almunia 100%.

learnt Almunia threw his jersey and armband to the crowd after the match. Is that a good buy or what? I am actually feeling for him now. Sincerely, he had a good game at blackburn.

can we all lay this argument to REST. Theo this, Diaby that, IT IS ENOUGH.

Glad we finally WON. UP GUNNERS.

lalaboi:
Nice win sha. . . Nor be say una spectacular oh. . .Una just lucky ni. , nice hating on y'all  

we didn't need to be spectacular, all we needed was to win and that was just what WE DID.

dayokanu:
Nothing do you. Expect another trophyless season in may

A prophet of baal has spoken and shouldn't be taken seriously.

sure win today for ARSENAL.

Sangman:
@blank:
My comments were for those who think that marriage is solely for procreation. While I agree that having children in the context of marriage is the optimal situation, and better for societal structure, I don't think the title of "naughty person" still has much weight, beyond stigma. Do children born out of wedlock still face insurmountable hurdles? I doubt.
But not to veer too far off topic, marriage is about the couple primarily, and the children are an addition blessing.

Sangman:
@blank:
My comments were for those who think that marriage is solely for procreation. While I agree that having children in the context of marriage is the optimal situation, and better for societal structure, I don't think the title of "naughty person" still has much weight, beyond stigma. Do children born out of wedlock still face insurmountable hurdles? I doubt.
But not to veer too far off topic, marriage is about the couple primarily, and the children are an addition blessing.

another affirmation.

Now we've got voice confirmation still awaiting picture confirmation

Goalie is for final day of transfer if at all there will be any.

up till now na one signing we dey wait for for 3days. If him don fail medicals tell us make we know.

With this kind leg that mean say if at all we go sign goalie na final day of transfer be that.

Biblically it is said they become 1 i.e the couples. Which for me is the sole reason, the second reason is for procreation.

Digressing a little the husband is supposed to love his wife even more than his children. Do i have opposers on this?

Elpieda:
Marriage i=should not be solely based on having kids, What if the couples never have kids for one reason on the other, will the man divorce the woman and vice-versa, as important as kids are, a man and woman should find other reasons why they choose to come together to marry, God is the one who gives kids and if for some reason, you are not given kids, you should still be able to stick with each other,

For me love comes first, companionship and then both combined to gether will bring in the kids in God's time, Cos as important as kids are, i ahve noticed that in Africa, women tend to devote too much attention to her kids and neglect her husband and a lot of women have not learnt to balcne both and then the spice in the relationship levaes becuase your focus is divided and then trouble starts btw man and woman, So I willa dvocate for couples trying to spend more time together as a "married couple" before popping kids because when the kids come,t hings will cahnge and the things u normally loved to do together might not happen so easily anymore, Also think about when your kids get older and levae your house, what will you and your hubby doIf your marriage was based on friendship love and companinonship, you guys will be able to fall back to that when your kids eventually leave to pursue their dreams but if u married just to have kids then, hmmmm

TELL THEM

dayokanu:
Ppl marry for different reasons.

Elin married Tiger Woods with a different intention (Money and fame)

Tiger probably married her for love.

Making babies is left for the couple to decide. Ppl get married and not have babies while ppl make babies and not get married, It depends on your goals.

Lately i heard there are political reasons for getting married (senator sani yerima to an egyptian minor). Is this for love or procreation?

yousouph:
The transfer not yet confirm by the official website

thats what we've been waiting for, it is taking too long a period.

KenGali:
@Poster please do not spread useless western values that are currently ruining their societies, this is the reason why they have population issues and cannot even define what marriage is and what it isn't.

Tommorrow you may soon ask if the extended family is useful at all or just a useless burden.

If marriage is just about companionship or even if companionship is the first consideration, then no one should point fingers at gay people who seek to christian their associations as marriage.

Any body can find companionship with any other person, even humans and animals could be companions. Marriage is primely about procreation. I can only add that we often find companionship in marriage or that marriage is best when it is generated from mutually desired companionship (or what we call love).

Is love a must for marriage: NO, but love makes marriage heaven on earth so should be desired.

extended family has no place in your marriage, their work ends after you are joined even your immediate family the only reason you may invite them is only when you have driven your mariage into troubling waters and you need a third party to settle your differences. If you can't do without your family be it extended or immediate YOU ARE NOT YET DUE FOR MARRIAGE.

soft girl:
marriage is not for babies making but for love but children spices the home and as u enjoy your self in marriage don't forget that the result is kids

thats the point.

slimshay:
Wait oh, wait oh. I know Toto is old, but haba he suppose don waka reach Emirates by now nah. Abi, Baba Ijebu wagwan?!!

me no understand the kind medical them dey do o.
Or probably they are still negotiating wages ofcourse you know baba ijebu will win.
Any news yet on the goal keeper front?

[quote author=omolola1. link=topic=501643.msg6629419#msg6629419 date=1282640570]not sort of, yes![/quote]sort of 'cos we all have individual reasons for going into marriage.
Bear in mind that some make children without marrying, while some want it for just companionship though some reasons could neither be children or companionship.

chiozor:
marriage is strictly about babies! procreation! a generation after yours!!
if it is for companion, then no need for marriage as boyfriend-girlfriend is already a companion.

how much companionship does boyfriend-girlfriend provide. [quote author=omolola1. link=topic=501643.msg6629226#msg6629226 date=1282638613]lol! marriage is 4 both companionship and procreation~[/quote]sort of.

queeneve:
Hmm mmmm @ good sex,


(shaking and twitching)

ofcourse, NO DULLING. No room for dull moments.[b][/b]

Nautillus:
IMHO, babies are positive additions to a marriage, one should get married for companionship, "i need you, you need me" topped with love and a good dose of great sex, kids are always welcome BUT its not the reason for the union.

thats what i mean there. Allow yourselves to enjoy all the good love and great great sex without disturbance.

With the signing of squillaci almost complete, can we say we are numerically balanced defensively? Wenger has said with the high wages Man City player collect will put Given beyond our reach, imo Given would want to take a pay cut to play for us.

Heard gallas signed for 60k a week at spurs while he rejected our 80k. Sharpness kills, after travelling round europe looking for a better deal he was told money don't grow on trees. He succeeded in playing himself 2-0

An average african man's thought of marriage is making babies which IMO is wrong. Babies come as part of the marriage.

IMO Marriage is about the couples, rather what we see in africa is the couples rush quickly to make babies, some even want babies before registering in for the marriage which isn't the idea of marriage. In our african tradition 9 months after marriage without a baby or a bulging belle is seen that there's a problem with conceiving. One question is ask is why the rush? There are some reasons behind it which are: late age of marriage, parents pressure for grandchildren, neighbourhood thought etc.

For me atleast give yourselves two at least one year to flex yourselves, enjoy your marriage before distractions starts coming i.e babies starts coming. For me they come with marriage and not the main reason for marriage.

Your opinions are welcome, what are your thoughts?

slap1:
Th state unis in the South East are already on strike for about a month now. [s]I wish others would join us to amplify the publicity[/s]

glad to meet a fellow Ikenga.
How are you flexing the strike, do you have an idea if the parties involved have met already or are even meeting?

With the one we are in already NUC are still breathing down on our neck, giving us a two week ultimatum, threatening to withdraw our license should we not stop MCQ.

Funnily, Almunia was completely on break today, i don't remember him saving any ball today. Bottom line, our defence was solid

pappilo:
Yall probably wont believe this but Marlon Harewood's mum sits behind me at work.

i believe you. You've tried.

i'm impressed. Walcotts' engine is ON today, hope it doesn't OFF tomorrow.

Dr Kitaun:
Would Chamakh be able to work Chelsea or Manure backline in same manner?

Hopefully.