₦airaland Forum

NgeneUkwenu:
The court has no business in impeachment processes... The order is therefore invalid.

The court has power to interfere in anything. But the one they should do, they will not do.

Unholywood and Nollywood and Bollywood

Pride; Tesla, Rolls Royce, Ferrari, Benz, Lexus, Landcruiser, Hillux with tinted glasses. Cars with full tinted glasses, Spending 4mill in the club. Betting 5mill on sports.

Gluttony: weed, drinking 2 bottles of 50k wine in 2 hours, 3someing, oloshoing and womanizing.etc

correctguy101:
I wonder o...

This is a result of what the leaders want for their country. The masses would always follow.

Over here, some self hating civilians believe it's the handiwork of civilians to start reforms and create governable environment.

The president is called number one citizen for a reason as he's like the root. Anything wey no go well or wey go well for a country is a result of the sitting government enabling it either consciously or non consciously, na him get the whole blame. So look around ya country or any country doing well or not doing well, the difference starts from the ruling class.

These animals, no matter how much you tell dem Dem no fit hear.

Dem no won hear.

Mattswaggz:
I don't wonder why when I can clearly see your likes who make selective justice, implement double standards and overlook certain behaviors based on stupid sentiments.....as far as ur likes are en masse in this world....one doesn't need to wonder anything....the answer has already revealed itself.

So, now you have the world you want where kids slap their elders and children kill their parents, siblings and neighbours. So, children, mattswaggs, says blesses your slappings and killings

Buratashi:
I pray God takes absolute control

Also, go for check up for something is wrong

Tenrack:
what if he dies early?

That one is even worse for him

Mattswaggz:
Dumb talk ....another child is free to retaliate as well if assaulted.

And then you wonder why the world is full of bad people to the point that you people no longer want to marry or have kids.
Anyway, you like it, so I bless you with it.

Kaczynski:
Finally a country that understands basic infrastructure maintenance. Maybe if we spent less time being shocked and more time not living like feral raccoons we’d have clean roads too. But no let’s just keep marveling at competence like it’s magic.

If you pay them I'm sure they'll more than wash your roads

Lilith is still Eve bro.

https://www.nairaland.com/8189794/lilith-still-same-eve-adams#131588723

KBdownloads:
An omnipotent God doesn't need mass drowning to achieve a clean slate.

An omnipotent God could achieve a clean society by preventing the wicked from being born, instantly erasing them from existence, changing their hearts (like he did with Pharoah, but in reverse). Instead, he chose drowning, which is intentional, unnecessary suffering when other painless alternatives existed. That's evil by definition.

You're comparing God to the Nigerian government, but Nigeria isn't omnipotent. If it were, it could simply make bandits disappear with a thought. Nigeria has to work within physical constraints, an omnipotent God has none. If God needed to use drowning like a powerless human government, then he's not all-powerful. If he is all-powerful, then he chose unnecessary cruelty. Which is it?

You have moved away from the point.

You said God had options of dealing with the criminals.

Now you have moved post away from dealing with the criminals to the pre-criminal period/prevention of crime.

Which means you are asking God to change the past instead of directly dealing with the criminals already on ground.

So, you see you have gone into the unreasonability of wishful thinking and a dictating to God how He should deal with a matter. Meanwhile, a judge and king has full discretion rights of how He intends to handle a matter before Him, just like you do in your own matters.

Of which it is clear that you are wishing a painless death whereas, like bandits, you have given others pain. Whereas, you called it just that a thief is knocked down.

It is clear that this thread was created because you real eyes that you are culpable and guilty and rather than repent, you had to make it worse by attacking Him and impliedly called Him evil, because He created evil, in your wish to blame evil

Forgetting that those who blamed the devil, or the woman you gave me or the serpent, still did not escape judgement.

Of which you people always laughed at criminals who always blamed the devil for their crimes. Now you still did the same thing.

KBdownloads:
Ok let me clarify.when I said evil is anything that causes unnecessary harm or suffering, I meant intentional unnecessary harm. Evil requires agency ; someone choosing to cause harm when they don't have to.
So yes, if one bandit intentionally shoots another bandit unnecessarily, that's evil.

If a thief gets knocked down and immobilized, that's justified harm. But if after he's been immobilized, someone then intentionally runs him over with a car, that's unnecessary harm and therefore evil.

Ok. You have now moved post to add "intentional" to your definition.

Do note in your bandit example "intentional" and"unnecessary" cannot go together. If a bandit already has the motive and intention of shooting another bandit, then it is necessary to him.

So, if a driver intently and deliberately parked under a tree to rest, then a branch from the tree falls and staked him to death, is it evil?

KBdownloads:
I didn't take Isaiah 45:7 out of context, I quoted it directly. If you think I'm misunderstanding it, then explain what it actually means. Show me the context that makes the words '' I create evil" mean something other than what it plainly says...
If God is real and good, he should be able to withstand basic questions about his own words. The fact that you respond to scrutiny with threats of eternal torture tells me everything I need to know about the kind of person you are. You've been taught not to think, just to threaten anyone who does.

I did not respond with threats but with direct questions flowing from your own words, yet you have refused to answer them.

You raised the issue of capacity to do evil, so I asked

Do we not see the evil capacity of the gun and the poison in action? How are they different from the evil God created especially as Kalashnikov created the gun as God created the evil?

So, point out the difference between the two manufacturers since both of them created what we all call evil things

KBdownloads:
You keep ignoring the core issue: an omnipotent God didn't need to use drowning at all. He could have achieved his goal without killing anyone. The 'they had a choice' argument doesn't address why an all-powerful God chose a method that required mass death when other options existed..

Is His goal not clearly, a clean slate? How else can you achieve a clean society whilst criminals are still alive? Eg how do you solve the bandits problem in Nigeria without killing the bandits?

Clearly pastor don promise and fail dis one

Shimran:
On what basis have you come to this conclusion of yours?
Do you know that we have mere followers and learned individuals among the religious people?
You know controlling emotions isn't just about being religious or not but individual traits/ability?

By ignorance, what are you referring to really? Ignorance about their religion or world happening or your own nonreligious happening/matters/subjects?

I don't what have the atheist, agnostic, humanist and the irreligious take religious people for? They are all human and hence not infallible. Just because I'm religious never prevented completely from having the bad side of myself. Religion only comes in to guide you to a way of life that you believes in and you seem it fits you best (after checking and ticking out the boxes completely).

All you have mentioned are all relatable to all human and not just religious people.

He knows. Just that life is flogging him silly meanwhile he looks over and sees that Christians are happy. So he is very angry and in pain wondering how they can be happy despite all the pains he lives in.

Deepspirituals:
. Go and Write today's date down ...You already have the Person that Would kill you under your Roof ...it's a matter of Little time ..Keep Harbouring her ,You love her right ...Na that same love Go kill U ...What a funny Question you are asking ..Instead of you to Quietly take your things and move out of that House right away and go and look for a other Apartment in a Different Environment that she doesn't know only you would stay to save your life ,You are still Planning with her ..Don't Worry ,You hear ..

Maybe it is his punishment. How does a person end up being hooked to a devu?

brain54:
Seems this is the first time she has thrown such tantrums...


Better put your foot 🦶 down if you don't want it to continue.


If you are the one from whose pocket the rent is coming from and the one wearing the pants then this matter shouldn't confuse you as to what to do.

The sooner you recover and stand your ground the better for you. Give in and be ready to always have to bow to her tantrums


There are just some things that a man shouldn't tolerate or accept!

Put which foot down? Devu don show herself and you are telling your brother to hang around?

Flangelo12:
Voila, he appears.

Did you notice that Kobojunky avoided this thread?

I think you are a very bad person but you just hide it by staying away from people, hence why you are an introvert.

You feel because you have gone through sh.... , then you have a right to behave as you like.

So, your bad nature showed because in spite of your withdrawal, your uncle still came into your personal zone. And so like a cobra in its hole, you just had to spring and bite.

Anyway, just know that another child is going to do it to you

LordIsaac:
You don't slap anyone under any circumstances besides self defense, not even your uncle! There are sane and legal means of resolving all conflicts! Go and apologize to him.

You people and your "under any circumstance" when in fact there are always circumstances that firing back a slap is the only right course

Buratashi:
Your se second point is not valid, cos if I had wanted her to have a baby soonest is for Me to bribe her superiors in her office but wanted due process.. my fear hence this tread to know if it's natural or something wrong with me hence I can go n seek medical help so that once the proper time reaches I won't be firing blank. That's my point, I never intended ending her career

You are wasting your time trying validate yourself from that guy. He made himself minister of women affairs and is blindly biased on it exactly how he is on all subjects

To your case, the truth you know is that there is a pregnancy problem between you and your wife. Either 1 or both of you have a problem.

It is not normal that you you dump your boys into her and yet no pregnancy at all

BigYash:
If the truck wasn't there, atleast the lives of those guys would have been spared. Like they said he was overtaking, probably he felt he could pass in-between the truck and the car he was overtaking. Now use your common sense here,if it's still working o. Now imagine the truck wasn't there. What do you think would have happened?

Same as saying that Anthony Joshua should not have bought the Lexus; for if he had not bought the Lexus but had bought a Beatle, none of these would have happened.

Or we can blame the road, that if the road was removed, then none of these would have happened.

.

Sk5050:
Note that driver is in a serious mess by not having drivers license and that's a criminal offence to drive without license he risk going to jail

You see that drivers licence thing ehn,... it is unlawful and it can be challenged. Driving is my natural right. No one has a right to give me permission or licence to my right as Fela said, exactly as I do not require a licence to walk.

But, this is where you see that govt and bandits are the same.

AbuAeesha:
FSince charging him is injustice, But you also didn't state where he has the funds to compensate families of the dead.

His village people will help him

kennyz247:
X

If the driver has what it takes to compensate the family of the dead and replace Joshua's car,hm go still go do driver work?

Hin village people go help am

BondRiv:
You clearly do not understand criminal law.

Is it your criminal law that sent a person who protected himself from death to prison?

aribisala0:
He has no liability to replace the vehicle
The owner of the vehicle should have insurance for that

What is the meaning of accident?

In your mind you have said something meaningful and sensible

Was the offence od dangerous driving written into our criminal Code overnight because of him?

Is there any country you know of that does not have a crime of
CAUSING DEATH BY DANGEROUS DRIVING

Yet, how many are successfully prosecuted? Of course you don't know that in the criminal code accident is a defence. That is why as many as fatal accidents are yet it is not the same number of persons convicted for them

BigYash:
...The useless road safety and police talking now,why didn't they tow the truck,while it was stationed there in the first place?

The truck did not do anything to anybody. It was on its own. Funny, you did not say that they should tow the house a truck ran into sometime last year.

Mikuni:
Reckless driving plus bad road plus bad traffic control system in Nigeria caused their death.

I honestly wouldn't even blame the driver. Which sane driver would drive recklessly knowing the caliber of people in his vehicle??

There was no traffic on that spot. It is because the driver knows the car is too much so he blasted it only that it did not work that day. It has worked on other days but not that day

OBEHIOYE:
Your first sentence na rubbish talk.
The truck has been there for weeks.
It was still there 3days after the accident.
If the truck wasn't there, they would've had space to maneuver.

The truck has a right to be there whether 1 hour or 1 year.

If it's like that then you should blame Joshua for buying the SUV instead of a Beatle, because if it was a Beatle now, the driver would not have tried overtaking at all.

bunmioguns:
FRSC: excessive speed.
Police: tyre burst.
Court: ₦5m bail.
Victims: buried.
Nigeria: case adjourned.
Everybody don play their part 👏

Excessive speed, tyre burst, who we go believe? Who is in charge of accident investigation?

dokyOloye:
The truck was parked well off the road.
Looks like d driver was trying to overtake from the right.

From the extreme right even, the part that is on the bush. He must have been been overtaking 2 vehicles when he faced the truck because he felt the car could do it