₦airaland Forum

You wrote all this heavy oyibo/queens English just to completely dodge the most critical fact of this entire conversation.
1. The Private CofO nonsense: You keep trying to sound smart by comparing these mansions to standard salaries, pensions, or office desks. Judges earn salaries…they do not earn free mansions from the executive branch. They need office desks to work…they do not need free mansions to work. Why do they deserve salary annnd free mansion?

That's a massive false equivalence. There’s news online that Wike unabashedly hands over the CofO of the houses to the judges on national tv. So these luxury potentially bugged mansions are issued directly in the personal names of these individual judges for permanent private ownership.

A judge's salary doesn't buy them a lifetime luxury estate in Abuja. Comparing a massive, real estate asset transfer to standard statutory welfare is the real absurdity here. The National Assembly (representing the people) appropriates funds to all 3 branches of government (national assembly, executive, judiciary) but the executive branch turns around to use its own allocation to build mansions for judiciary. How does that make sense? Could it be that they are doing it because they frequently want favorable treatment from that said arm of government?

2. Autonomous Procurement: Nobody said the judiciary should collect taxes or print money. The public treasury funds the entire government, but the Executive doesn't physically award contracts, construct, and hand out private houses to legislators, do they? The National Assembly gets its statutory allocation and handles its own internal procurement.

CharlesCNG:
My brother, please stop abusing the word "gaslighting." Disagreeing with you is not gaslighting. The word has become the intellectual equivalent of a smoke bomb: throw it when the arguments become inconvenient.

Now to your points.

First, separation of powers does not mean separation of funding. If it did, the judiciary would collect taxes, issue bonds and generate revenue independently. That is not how constitutional democracies work. The three arms are separate in function, not in the source of public finance.

Second, you say the judiciary should "build or buy whatever they need themselves." With what? The judiciary does not print money. It receives appropriations from the same public treasury that funds the Executive and Legislature.

Third, your argument about bugged houses and secret cameras is astonishing. We have now left constitutional law and entered the realm of spy movies. By that logic, judges should not use official cars, official phones or official offices because microphones might be hidden there too.

Fourth, if the houses are tied to office and acquired through lawful public processes, they are institutional provisions, not personal gifts from Bola Tinubu or Nyesom Wike. The President does not withdraw money from his personal account to buy judges mansions.

Fifth, your argument proves too much. If official residences compromise judges, then salaries compromise judges. Pensions compromise judges. Security details compromise judges. At some point, your theory collapses into absurdity.

Finally, separation of powers was never intended to mean hostility between the branches of government. It means checks and balances, not economic isolation.

As the proverb says:

"A man who fears rain should not suspect every cloud of conspiracy."

Institutional integrity is important.

But institutional paranoia is not constitutionalism.

And no, disagreeing with you is not gaslighting.

It is simply disagreeing with you.

The constitution as amended in 1999 set up NJCs funding precisely so the Judiciary wouldn't have to go to beg the President or his ministers for money, cars, or buildings or luxury houses.

NJC is directly funded by the federation to manage all capital and recurrent expenditures for federal courts, the money to build judicial housing already belongs to the Judiciary. By having the executive branch step in, withhold those infrastructure funds from the judiciary's direct control, and use the FCT Ministry to build and hand out personal CofO luxury mansions, they are completely hijacking a process that should be handled independently through the NJC's statutory allocation. It is a deliberate choice calculated to foster personal dependence on the Executive branch instead of upholding institutional autonomy.

Does Akpabio ask minister Wike for free duplex? Have other ministers received free duplex? Are they also not part of the government? People should really stop defending this nonsense

And no one is saying the 3 co equal branches of government need to be hostile to each other. What Nigerians are saying is making one branch subservient or subordinate to the executive branch should never happen.

CharlesCNG:
My brother, please stop abusing the word "gaslighting." Disagreeing with you is not gaslighting. The word has become the intellectual equivalent of a smoke bomb: throw it when the arguments become inconvenient.

Now to your points.

First, separation of powers does not mean separation of funding. If it did, the judiciary would collect taxes, issue bonds and generate revenue independently. That is not how constitutional democracies work. The three arms are separate in function, not in the source of public finance.

Second, you say the judiciary should "build or buy whatever they need themselves." With what? The judiciary does not print money. It receives appropriations from the same public treasury that funds the Executive and Legislature.

Third, your argument about bugged houses and secret cameras is astonishing. We have now left constitutional law and entered the realm of spy movies. By that logic, judges should not use official cars, official phones or official offices because microphones might be hidden there too.

Fourth, if the houses are tied to office and acquired through lawful public processes, they are institutional provisions, not personal gifts from Bola Tinubu or Nyesom Wike. The President does not withdraw money from his personal account to buy judges mansions.

Fifth, your argument proves too much. If official residences compromise judges, then salaries compromise judges. Pensions compromise judges. Security details compromise judges. At some point, your theory collapses into absurdity.

Finally, separation of powers was never intended to mean hostility between the branches of government. It means checks and balances, not economic isolation.

As the proverb says:

"A man who fears rain should not suspect every cloud of conspiracy."

Institutional integrity is important.

But institutional paranoia is not constitutionalism.

And no, disagreeing with you is not gaslighting.

It is simply disagreeing with you.

Oga - Your attempt to play smart by saying "the NJC is not a construction company" is a malaria infested argument. Im sure you went to school and I’m sure you know that nobody said the NJC should buy cement and lay blocks. You literally listed their function yourself:
control and disbursement of judiciary funds."

If Tinubu and Wike wanted a truly independent judiciary, those multi-billion naira housing funds would be moved directly into the judiciary's autonomous budget. The head of the Court of Appeal would award the contracts and manage the procurement.

Instead, the Executive (via Wike and the FCTA) chooses to hold the cash, award the contracts, build the luxury estates, and physically hand over the keys as discretionary gifts to the judges.

You keep hiding behind the word "welfare" to justify a compromised institutional structure. It’s not welfare. Judges are very well paid! And a lot of them hold jobs for a very long time in a Nigeria where it’s hard to get jobs so they have job security. So don’t bring up that welfare nonsense.

When a frequent litigant (the Executive) directly controls and gifts luxury properties to the people meant to judge them, it is a conflict of interest, full stop. Quit making excuses for the government that put Nigeria in bad shape and face the constitutional reality.

Legislators don’t get free mansions as soon as they become senators. Ministers don’t get free mansions as soon as they become ministers. Only the president gets to live in Aso rock with his team but it’s still not a free house with CofO to the president. So only these judges get free mansion with clear CofO just for being a judge in a court of law where the federal government frequently goes to. Shameful.

CharlesCNG:
I am sorry but you are confidently wrong.

The NJC is not a construction company. It does not build judges’ houses, procure official quarters, award housing estates or manufacture vehicles.

The NJC’s core constitutional functions are appointment recommendations, discipline, removal processes, control and disbursement of judiciary funds. It is also involved in pensions/gratuities for retired federal judicial officers. Its powers are set out under Paragraph 21 of Part I of the Third Schedule to the 1999 Constitution.

So saying “let them get houses through NJC” sounds neat, but it misunderstands how government infrastructure works.

Also, comparing official judicial residences to “frequent litigants buying judges gifts” is a false equivalence. A litigant secretly buying a judge a car is bribery. Government providing institutional accommodation tied to judicial office is welfare.

One is private inducement.

The other is public institutional provision.

If you cannot distinguish between the two, then the problem is not the house; it is the reasoning.

Judges should not collect gifts from litigants. Agreed.

But judges should also not be left economically vulnerable in the name of fake purity.

Judicial independence is protected by transparent welfare, not by poverty.

There’s already a more independent way of granting them their benefits! Giving them free duplex is not “their benefit”. They are not entitled to free duplex from the executive branch.

Flangelo12:
I agree.

There should be a more independent way of granting them their benefits.

Misterone:
Wike is the FCT minister. Even with all these rubbish, Tinubu is still winning 2027 election

Also what exactly do you call rubbish? People complaining about the blatant subversion of the judiciary?

Misterone:
Wike is the FCT minister. Even with all these rubbish, Tinubu is still winning 2027 election

In a free and fair election he should not win because the suffering in the land is just too much. Don’t let them gaslight you into thinking your votes don’t count. They should count.

NJC is supposed to do it for the judges not directly from the executive branch. Which branch of government gives houses directly to its members?

Even legislators don’t get CofO of their quarters unless or until the legislature sells those properties to them. Wike is handing CofO directly to the judges right from the get go. So they are gifts.

Gifting luxury homes to a judge, any judge, creates a tough situation for that said judge to be impartial. If 40 vs 4000 is your argument then can start small by gifting other people the same welfare but on a smaller scale. Build them room and parlor and dash them. They’ll take too.

That’s an absurd argument. Please don’t support someone using your tax dollars to clearly curry favor from the judiciary. If you sue the government the same judge that received those houses would preside over your case. You would think they would do the honorable thing and recuse themselves from the case? No they would preside over that case and you, the individual, would expect a fair judgement?

Think of these things carefully people!

Menclothing1:
Judges no reach 40 all over
Doctors are over 40000
Judiciary is an arm of government
Only executive legislators and feeding fat b4
When we have 3 arm

All arm of government should hv government quarters

NJC is supposed to do these welfare things for the judiciary, not the executive branch. Have you heard of the judiciary building and gifting houses to the legislative branch? Or the judiciary building houses to the executive branch? Stop defending this nonsense please

Flangelo12:
3 tiers of power.

You want the executive to abandon the judiciary?

Haba!!

Kanwulia:
Meanwhile 55,000 doctors only for over 200 million Nigerians without houses of their own. This life ehn?😂

And people are here defending this nonsense

If the new houses to the judiciary are bugged then we are finished. Are they bugged? What if the executive branch is doing this to completely capture the judiciary then which branch would become the last hope of the common man? To be fair, if I were the president…and I want to be a dictator, the first thing I would do is capture the courts so no one would issue any unfavorable rulings. Then next thing is make the National Assembly super docile and completely subservient to me and my cronies. Nigerians really need to start seeing Nigeria as their own cherished property.

There’s NJC. If judges want cars they can get it through them. Imagine if frequent litigants start buying houses and cars and flights and expensive gifts for judges, how would you feel? Please don’t defend this nonsense.

If they paid you to defend them please go give it back to them because it’s not worth the destruction of the country you love.

CharlesCNG:
My brother, thank you for reading my "epistles." At least unlike some comments, they contain arguments.

Now to your points.

First, an official residence for judges is not "extravagance." By your logic, military barracks are extravagant. Legislative quarters are extravagant. Presidential villas are extravagant. In every serious country, certain offices come with institutional accommodation.

Second, you say judges are being rewarded "more than they deserve." According to who? A Court of Appeal judge handles election petitions, constitutional disputes and multi-billion-naira cases. You want such a person worrying about rent and landlords?

Third, if a judge's conscience can be bought by an official residence, then your problem is not with the house but with the judge. By the same logic, legislators and ministers should be incapable of scrutinizing the executive because they too enjoy official perks.

Fourth, your "what about doctors, soldiers, police and teachers?" argument is a classic case of false choice. Improving judges' welfare does not require worsening that of others. In fact, I support better welfare for doctors, soldiers, police and teachers too. One good policy is not invalidated because another group also deserves attention.

Finally, I find it amusing that you describe official quarters as "extravagant." Apparently, in your ideal democracy, judicial independence is best protected with leaking roofs and overdue rent notices.


A judiciary weakened by financial vulnerability is far more dangerous than one strengthened by institutional dignity.

And please, if my "epistles" do not hold water, kindly stop drinking from them. 😁

Nice attempt at gaslighting, but you completely missed the point.

My arguments are passionate because I actually want Nigeria to work. Nobody is asking for the judiciary to be impoverished. We, the unbiased Nigerians, are asking for Separation of Powers.

In a proper democracy, the Executive branch doesn't directly manage and hand out luxury real estate to the Judiciary as welfare packages. The judiciary's funds should be statutory and independent so they can build or buy whatever they need themselves. They won’t need Tinubu to approve and build them houses.

Let me break it down to you so you understand why giving houses to judiciary is bad. Who knows if those houses were bugged so the executive branch can completely listen into everything the judiciary does? Who knows if the executive put secret cameras in those homes to track the judges and their families? These are some of the things we Nigerians worry about when we say we want judiciary independence.

When Nyesom Wike and the Presidency act as the direct real estate agents by distributing mansions to judges, it creates a toxic culture of dependence. I heard that the judges get the CofO so that means the houses belong to them even at retirement.

A judge who owes their retirement luxury to the goodwill of the Executive cannot be trusted to be fully impartial when that same Executive is a party or litigant in the same courts the judges preside over. So my friend, its about institutional integrity, not poverty.

CharlesCNG:
Your argument sounds emotionally appealing, but it collapses under scrutiny.

First, you have quietly moved from "bribery" to "average Nigerians are suffering." These are two different arguments. The existence of poverty does not mean institutions should be weakened. By that logic, we should abolish legislators' salaries, military barracks and presidential security because many Nigerians are poor.

Second, you speak as though judges are receiving secret gifts from Bola Tinubu's personal account. They are not. These are institutional provisions funded through public resources, just like the salaries, vehicles and official residences provided to the Executive and Legislature.

Third, your phrase "free mansion" betrays a misunderstanding. A judge does not become compromised because he occupies an official residence any more than a senator becomes compromised because he lives in legislative quarters.

Fourth, no serious democracy relies on impoverishing judges to guarantee impartiality. Quite the contrary. Mature democracies understand that adequate remuneration and welfare are anti-corruption measures. A desperate judge is easier to intimidate, easier to induce and easier to compromise.

Fifth, gratitude is not the basis of judicial ethics. If judges cannot distinguish between constitutional duty and official welfare, then we have a problem much deeper than housing.

And finally, I find it amusing that some people trust judges with election petitions involving trillions of naira, but suddenly believe an official residence is enough to buy their conscience.

That says more about their view of judges than it does about the houses.

As the proverb says:

"You do not strengthen the roof of a house by removing its pillars."

A vulnerable judiciary is not an independent judiciary.

Poverty is not judicial reform.

And welfare is not bribery.

I just googled it and it looks like they get CofO of the houses! Wow. So it’s their own. It belongs to the judges. This is insane.

adenigga:
To add to your stand, at their retirement they will vacate the building then next promoted judge will pack in.

.

yarimo:
This is very commendable from the FG

Which other branch of government gets free brandnew housing in FCT?

Authoreety:
I know this APC kindergartens will come and support this arrant nonsense

It’s absolutely ridiculous that anyone could defend this. No way Nigeria is a real place.

Exactly my question. If they care so much for the welfare of Nigerians they should be building these houses for other sectors too not just judiciary! And the crazy thing is that the judiciary is supposed to be independent! Wow this is absurd. I can’t believe people are defending this obvious/transparent gift to the judiciary. How will the judiciary reward the government for this house they received from the FG? What leverage does the judiciary have that they could pull to benefit any group?

Breaker001:
When will they improve the living conditions of teachers, police officers and/or the military?

This nonsense has been going on for years and it's destroying the country. The judiciary is supposed to be a completely independent check on executive power, not a subsidiary branch funded by executive generosity.

Naija people really need to open their eyes and start seeing acts like this as a straightforward act to erode the fabric of independent judiciary. Are the judges going to pay for the houses? Are the houses free or subsidized for them? If they are free or subsidized, how will the judges reciprocate the generosity from the federal government?

How can any ordinary citizen expect a fair hearing against the Federal Government when the presiding judges are living in multi-billion naira houses gifted by that same government? If the state wants to improve judicial welfare, build a transparent, institutional budget for the judiciary.

Gifting individual mansions directly from the presidency is a strategic move to compromise neutrality, period.

Imagine calling a multi-billion naira Abuja mansion 'welfare.'

If the executive is so passionate about
welfare packages, let them extend that same luxury energy to the doctors, teachers, and civil servants who are actually keeping the country alive on starvation wages.

They only look after the judges because they know they'll need them when election petitions roll in. It looks exactly like institutional bribery, plain and simple, and it has probably completely eroded public trust in our courts. Nigerians really need to band together to stop this systemic corruption. No one else will come fix Nigeria for us…it’s us alone oh and the earlier we recognize that the better.

Menclothing1:
The house is not for them it’s official residence that any judge will stay government go and come

Welfare package for Appeal Court judges? Who are they trying to deceive? Average Nigerians are struggling to eat, buy fuel, or afford basic rent, but the executive arm has billions to gift luxury mansions to the judiciary. No true democracy allows judges to accept massive financial favors from the very government whose policies and elections they are supposed to scrutinize. Dr. Baba-Ahmed is 100% right, this is likely a systemic inducement disguised as charity. You cannot expect a judge to be blind to justice when they are looking at the executive with gratitude for a free mansion.

CharlesCNG:
Calling judges’ official accommodation a “bribe” is cheap sensationalism.

First, welfare is not bribery. Proper housing for judicial officers is part of strengthening institutions. A judge handling multi-billion-naira disputes should not be living in uncertainty or begging landlords.

Second, judicial independence is not protected by poverty. A poorly housed, poorly paid and economically vulnerable judge is easier to compromise. Welfare is actually an anti-corruption tool.

Third, these are not private gifts secretly handed to judges in envelopes. They are official government-provided residences tied to office and institutional welfare. That distinction matters.

Fourth, if improving judges’ welfare is now bribery, then salaries, official cars, security, medical care and retirement benefits must also be called bribes. That is absurd.

Fifth, perception matters, yes. But perception cannot replace logic. The solution is transparency, not hysteria.

Baba-Ahmed’s argument sounds clever, but it collapses under scrutiny. You cannot demand an independent judiciary while opposing the material conditions that make independence possible.

Judges should be well paid, well housed and well protected — not because they are above citizens, but because justice itself must be insulated from desperation, intimidation and inducement.

Poverty is not judicial reform.

A vulnerable judge is a dangerous judge.

Jayhome24:
Your tears dey sweet me. I swear I'm not expect otherwise from somebody used already in obi coven. Ndooh, you will be alright.

Even Lucifer sef have his own defense league. Ndooh!!!

You will be alright las las.

Bro you know what? I'm not interested in your epistle of jargons.

Wrote from.tofay till 2099, brosie, obi will never smell our as rock, ok.

Look at you celebrating lack of logic. Typical! When the legal facts of the case hit you over the head, you immediately switch to "your tears dey sweet me" and "epistle of jargons" because you actually either have zero intellectual capacity to defend Kenneth's weak legal letter or you simply didn’t have enough time to read it before just going straight to name calling.

You're here crying about "Obi coven" and "Agulu landlord association" to console yourself from the reality of the situation. Kenneth Okonkwo maybe thought he was still acting a Nollywood script when he went on TV to spill unverified gossip against PO. Now that reality has set in and his legal team is panicking with 4 pages of stories, you're here chanting "Aso Rock till 2099."

Write from now till 2099, a court of law doesn't run on Nairaland logic or emotional vibes. If you accuse a man of a multi-billion naira crime on national TV, you better have receipts or get ready to pay heavy damages for libel.

Let's see if Kenneth's grammar will save him from the judge. Simple!

PigTormentor:
When is the Agulu fraudster going to sue the Gazette newspaper for his religious war tape since 2023?
The lying clown is yet to sue as promised because it was him on the tape yet he claimed that wasn't him.
Him Tu lie the China man..

Your bitterness is showing, and it's quite funny. You people will always try to drag tribalism, Agulu, and Ohanaeze into everything just because you lack a sound logical argument. It just seems like a coordinated push on PO.
Kenneth Okonkwo went on Channels TV to cap defaming lies, got hit with a heavy legal demand notice, and now his lawyers are writing a whole book trying to shift the blame to a disgruntled party aspirant. If Kenneth is so confident, why did his lawyers spend half the letter crying about a leaked phone number instead of proving the actual allegations? Face the legal facts and leave your seeming obsession with Agulu out of it.

Look at you conflating constructive criticism with malicious allegations of a multi-billion naira scam.

Going on national TV to look into the camera and call someone a fraudster without a single shred of proof isn't "criticism," it's a straight-up textbook defamation.
If Tinubu chooses not to sue people for libel, that's his business. Peter Obi has a right to protect his hard-earned reputation from clout-chasers who think they can use his name for media traffic without consequences.

Let Kenneth take that long, rambling 4-page essay to court and see if the judge will accept "someone told me" as a legal defense.

Jayhome24:
Oh really, and that is the person who you want to vote as your ohanaeze president, someone who h8te criticism, someone who always threatens people with defamatory letters ba? E go tey you and your obi I swear.

So if Tinubu has to be writing defamatory letters then by now all obi supporters and obi should be on life imprisonment by now from all kinds of defamatory fired agai St Tinubu..

As I said obi will only rule over Agulu land lord Association or Okrika sellers assocition as their president or ohanaeze president but NEVER NIGERIA presdent its a promise we will keep and execute if even Jesus beg us we won't listen.

Classic diversion tactics. Kenneth Okonkwo knows he messed up big time on Channels TV, so now his lawyers are trying to shift the goalposts to internal party primary drama to confuse the public. If Obunike has a grievance with the NDC party executives over ₦10M, he should face the party secretariat. Trying to pin everyday party administration issues on Peter Obi just proves the obsession and malice behind the initial interview.

Such a long response from Kenneth Okonkwos lawyers.

naptu2:
Kenneth Okonkwo @realkenokonkwo






Source

Let’s go!! It’s go time! This should be across the entire nation.

Bobloco:
A nationwide protest has been scheduled for June 12 against worsening national insecurity, severe economic hardship, and a sharp drop in living standards across the federation.

Human rights lawyer and Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Femi Falana, has partnered with 16 civil society organizations to lead the mass mobilization.

The coalition—comprising trade unions, youth groups, social movements, and faith-based organizations—noted that the demonstration is timed to coincide with Nigeria’s annual Democracy Day.

Recall that the date was designated by the federal government to honor Chief MKO Abiola, the presumed winner of the annulled June 12, 1993, presidential election.

According to the organizers, widespread administrative failures leave ordinary citizens with nothing to celebrate on this anniversary.

A joint statement signed by Falana in his capacity as National Chairman of the Alliance on Surviving COVID-19 and Beyond (ASCAB), alongside Hassan Taiwo Soweto of the Lagos State #EndBadGovernance Movement and Yinka Folarin, National President of the Committee for the Defence of Human Rights (CDHR), expressed deep concern over the expansion of insecurity in the country.

The leaders observed that entire communities are currently subjected to continuous trauma from unpunished banditry, terrorism, and mass abductions.

“Innocent Nigerians are being killed, abducted, displaced and traumatized while government responses have remained largely inadequate and ineffective. We express solidarity with families of victims of terrorism, banditry and kidnapping across the country. We demand immediate and concrete action to secure the release of all Nigerians held captive by criminal groups in Oyo, Borno, Katsina, Kwara, Ekiti, Zamfara, Kaduna, Niger and other states where citizens have been abducted. The Nigerian people deserve a pro-people government that places protection of lives and property at the core of governance.”

The organizers criticized official security narratives, arguing that promises of safety have been consistently contradicted by the realities faced by rural farmers, commuters, and schoolchildren.

The declaration attributed the country’s severe economic crisis directly to the neoliberal policies introduced under President Bola Tinubu’s administration. The statement detailed the negative impacts of currency devaluation, electricity tariff increases, and the removal of the petroleum subsidy, noting that these measures have triggered historic food inflation and crippled small businesses despite increased statutory allocations to state governments.

Characterizing the upcoming June 12 demonstration as the initial stage of a prolonged series of public actions, the leaders urged widespread citizen participation. They called on workers, market women, unemployed youth, students, and professionals to coordinate grassroots mobilization efforts within their respective neighborhoods and workplaces to demand an immediate policy reversal.

“This protest is about the lives of our children and teachers in captivity. It is about the collective survival of ordinary Nigerians. The coalition therefore calls on civil society organizations and progressive groups to unite and mobilize the collective power of Nigerians to demand the release of all captives and oppose anti-people policies of the Tinubu administration that continue to increase poverty. The time has come for Nigerians to speak with one voice and demand security, dignity and a decent standard of living. Enough of the killings. Enough of the kidnappings. Enough of the hunger. Enough of the suffering


https://politicsnigeria.com/2026/06/10/breaking-nationwide-protest-set-for-june-12-over-insecurity-hunger/

Reloadedisraelp:
no they should kill themselves with guns ..

If that happens then I think a different part of the law applies

Prettychild:
After Ngwa, an Isuikwuato person will become governor to balance the word Abia

Left for me that guy and his family should be in charge of Abia state government for as long as they still have great ideas. If it’s 20+ years, so be it

This is very serious. How is every Nigerian not on the streets protesting?

SmartPolician:
Guys, there's a big problem

That URL is the backend of INEC server.

If APC has access to INEC backend, what will happen in 2027 is not an election. INEC will manipulate everything for them.

The opposition must be ready to come together to form a parallel government if the results are tempered with. Nobody will go to any court that APC has already hijacked.

It's obvious that due process cannot be used to save this country anymore

This is actually crazy. So does that mean that they can just upload whatever results they want?!

Ukpaka:
MASS PROTESTS LOOM: Electorate Demands Direct Resignation of INEC Chairman Over Backdoor Security Breach
https://247ureports.com/2026/05/mass-protests-loom-electorate-demands-direct-resignation-of-inec-chairman-over-backdoor-security-breach/
-
ABUJA — A sweeping wave of national fury is building across Nigeria as civil society coalitions, opposition parties, and transparency advocates call for an immediate nationwide lockdown until the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Chairman and all top ICT directors step down from their positions.

The radical demand follows the explosive data privacy scandal where an All Progressives Congress (APC) operative leaked a citizen’s private registration details directly from inside the commission’s restricted administrative database (cvradmin.inecnigeria.org).

Voter coalitions argue that the breach has completely destroyed the credibility of the entire electoral system, proving that the keys to the nation’s digital vault have been handed over to the ruling party long before the 2027 general elections.

Let’s read between the lines. The Accountant-General is claiming we are canceling it because the World Bank takes too long to approve funds, but the World Bank report explicitly states the project performance was 'Moderately Unsatisfactory' because Nigeria failed to meet agreed reform milestones. Who is fooling who? They couldn't meet the conditions, the money was stuck, so they had to request a cancellation before the World Bank officially disgraced them. The real victims here are ordinary Nigerians who will continue to live in darkness.

"Justice delayed is justice denied" is a legal maxim. It means that if legal redress or equitable relief to an injured party is available, but is not forthcoming in a timely fashion, it is effectively the same as having no remedy at all.

This principle is the basis for the right to a speedy trial and similar rights which are meant to expedite the legal system, because of the unfairness for the injured party who sustained the injury having little hope for timely and effective remedy and resolution.

Copied from Wikipedia

Which way Nigeria? Nigerians need to be Citizens of Nigeria.