airmark:
Timbros is not watching, he will come and blame defenders for that Jackson's miss.

timbros:




If I can get ONLY 3 players with 200m, I'll get a CB and CF. The last spot will be either of LW/RB/LB.

Fofana, Chilwell, James all have terrible injury records. Silva is already semi retired. These are defensive positions that needs reinforcement critically. I have not even mentioned the goalkeeper department.

Our left and central side of attack currently needs upgrade.

So you see that our problem is not just attack.

And apart from just signing players, we need a coach that can actually upgrade the players we currently have. A different coach can come in and change these crop of players to monsters and drop the jaw of football world. These are young players that can be moulded.

Mourinho came into Chelsea in 2004 and suddenly Geremi became solid. Terry became a rock. Lampard already have the talent but he became much much more better. Joe Cole became a terrorist. Even soft Glenn Johnson deliver wenever he was called upon..... All these are players Mourinho met in Chelsea. So apart from his signings, he still improved the players he met in the club.

Chelsea issue is not just attack.

timbros:


I have been saying it that the team needs balance, score more and concede less. It's not like I absolve the attack of blame entirely. If you have been following this talk since, you will know that's my stand. But airmark said no. That our defence is okay. Who does that?

You are shameless.

Bounce Oga.

nihilistjnr:
Burnley are trashing this useless Sheffield already, but Timbros will be blaming defence and the ancestors instead of being sensible.

How can anybody be looking for cleansheet against this useless club ffs. Thank God Ice Cold turned up last week to show what Chelsea should be doing to most defences in EPL.

If I reply you now, you will resort to insult. Can you please respectfully quit quoting me on this? Thank you.

airmark:


He will be honoured mainly based on his exploits in Epl and not because he scored against carpenters from Boro. Experts will hammer on his great performances against the top teams in Epl, while Timbros will be looking for what's not lost in Middlesbrough and Doncaster.

Why do you love to lie?

BlueMann:


I'd still keep my hopes down cos they've been underwhelming this season.

Loss to Man United and Arsenal in those Cup games just dey pain me.

airmark:


Hand dey pain you to check your Google?

I don't evaluate players based on his performance against the Warrington FC of this world. Our major tournament this season is Epl and I have showed you your useless Sterling's output in it - 10 G+A in 27 matches, you should be ashamed.

If Palmer's stat against the 9th placed championship team is part of the numbers that is giving him a great season, why can't Sterling's presence in the pitch against same 9th placed championship team count?

Dey play

BlueMann:


We've actually held on for the win. Massive result, I did not see this coming.

Wow!

Massive win... Can the girls deliver UWCL as goodbye gift to Emma Hayes?

BlueMann:
Interestingly, our women currently lead Barca 1-0 at halftime. They've really limited the Spanish giants, who have managed just four shots in the game.

UWCL?

I no know say dem dey play today

airmark:


Palmer has 29 G+A in 28 Epl matches.

Sterling has 10 G+ A in 27 Epl matches.

Guess who is collecting 300k+ per week? Your useless Sterling. We will chase both of you out of Chelsea next month.

I asked you another thing you are replying another thing.

What's is Palmer's total G+A this season?

swiz123:
Popizaino, because of RM cowardly approach, UEFA is trying to scrap penalty shoot outs. Knock out ties will now be decided by XGs if the tie ends in a draw.

According to them, the better and most exciting team should win.

Kudos to UEFA for supporting our stand on the death of negative football. Football should be enjoyed, not endured.

Disregard please.
The idiott poster is doing April fool on 20th of April

This is nonsense. UEFA should not try this.

As long as its not illegal, win your match the way you can. No one should define how football should be played.

Oh... April fool sef

swiz123:


Popizaino 's takes has been very disappointing for the last one month.

He doesn't even watch matches anymore, just dropping takes after takes after checking livescores and confirming what he likes through YouTube highlights.

Why evuls

airmark:


What does Palmer's G+A has to do with your Sterling's uselessness?

Palmer's G+A has something to do with the useless 9th placed championship team

BlueRayDick:
So it was Kepa that advised Lunin on how to catch Bernardo's PK ?

I knew There was just something unusual about how Lunin saved that Pk casually

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C570qClIuY3/?igsh=eWhiYXY2ZXo4MzBx

I said it here that night that Lunin went straight to Kepa, the PK specialist to recieve tutorials.

airmark:


I didn't know you could be so shameless to be considering a non-league match against a 9th-placed team in Championship.

I hope you won't cry when we chase your useless Sterling away next month.

How many G+A does Palmer have this season?

Let me see how you will twist this simple direct question.

Unlimited22:

You people are allowing him get away with his words

Simply tell him to produce the video of Erling Haaland scoring a hattrick vs Madrid

I no just wan put mouth for him matter, but that PTSD own off me. I can't fit hold back

Android17:


I have no regrets whatsoever.
Incase you've forgotten City won a treble last season.

And FYI, suffering PTSD just means the RM players will be nervous and stressed about playing City because they know they'll suffer based on past events. Don't ask me if they did, just read what all their players said after the game.

Go to school you won't. Olodo.
Swerve mofo.

Wow! I never knew someone suffer PTSD before an event.

This guy dey cap sha...

airmark:


Most of those matches could have ended 3-2, 4-2 in our favour, so why should I check the appropriateness of your claim?

Show me where Sterling played a league match for us and we scored 6 goals or shut up.

Just shut up!

I have showed you where we scored 6 goals with Sterling on the pitch.

You are a disgrace for modifying anything now. After schooling you, it's now your slow brain realise what to type.

You should have dared me on bringing our your comments on the Leicester game nah, as you know something. Let's test this your "context" claim.

airmark:


Why would I check when I knew 2 goals conceded were inconsequential ifwe're not missing like 6 big chances per match?

Nothing concerns me with goals scored against one Boro team. It's you that got to cloud 9 because we scored against a 9th placed team in Championship. You were not even ashamed of posting the result.

You asked when Chelsea scored 6 goals with Sterling on the pitch and I showed you. You goofed. Accept it and move on. You won't die.

Look at me very well. I am not someone you will turn amala with.

When you asked about 4 goals conceded, you added a clause, red card, to protect you. You would have added a clause in this one if you had remembered. But your slow brain let you down. Now you are looking for amala to turn.

When Chelsea went on a run of 7 games conceding 2 or more goals, you never brought "context" in.

Context kee you there

BlueMann:
Omo what is happening o Leverkusen

West Ham wan kill dem, from the stats I'm seeing

Hangover.

I predicted it.

airmark:


It's about me telling you how our attack has been wasteful with your Sterling leading the line. I even told you that for now we should be outscoring our opponents and nothing concerns me with number of goals conceded, until summer when we chase your Sterling away, get a striker and a Silva's replacement.

After our 6 goals against Everton in Epl, I asked you when Sterling was on the pitch and we scored 6 goals. But in your desperation, you shamelessly went to bring a result against a 9th placed Championship side. You are shameless.

After the Sheffield game in EPL, I mentioned that Chelsea have conceded 2 or more goals in 7 consecutive matches, was I right or wrong? Why didn't you challenge the statement because it's an EPL game that was just concluded?

airmark:


It's about me telling you how our attack has been wasteful with your Sterling leading the line. I even told you that for now we should be outscoring our opponents and nothing concerns me with number of goals conceded, until summer when we chase your Sterling away, get a striker and a Silva's replacement.

After our 6 goals against Everton in Epl, I asked you when Sterling was on the pitch and we scored 6 goals. But in your desperation, you shamelessly went to bring a result against a 9th placed Championship side. You are shameless.

I didn't even bother to continue reading after the first line.

I have been telling you how wack our defence is. The attack you were criticising have been scoring consistently but defence is letting us down. When I was saying that Chelsea have conceded 2 or more goals in 7 consecutive matches, did you challenge the statement? Was it 7 consecutive EPL games I was talking about?

Should I bring out your comments after the Leicester victory? Should I? Since you want to claim it's only EPL you were on about. Dare me now, let me bring out your comment after the Leicester game.

airmark:


It's about me and not you.

You were the one mentioning goals conceded and I remember informing you about your Sterling's big miss against Burnley that could have given us 3 points. What concerns me with outcome of a match with a Championship side, that expectedly we should win?.

You are desperately looking for how to defend your useless Sterling, but as usual you failed like you did on Morata.

You are shameless as without your Jamaican, we scored 6 in a league match.

So you mean you have been conversing with yourself all this while? Really? So you have been telling yourself how leaky your defence is, and you have been arguing back that attack is the problem?

Wait, airmark so it have been you arguing with yourself all this time? Wow!

airmark:


In what competition was I discussing rejigging our attack and we scored 6 against Everton? Didn't you see that I was discussing Ucl on another paragraph? You be olodo.

So, no Epl match to show but had to go to a cup match against a 9th placed team in Championship to prove that Sterling made us to score 6 goals, right? You a bundle of embarraments.

Since Sterling joined us, he never played any Epl match in which we scored 6 goals. You are shameless for bringing a match against a Championship side when all our convos were about our embarrassing attack in Epl.

You are a disgrace.

When we mention matches that we concede two goals or more consecutively, was Leicester 4-2 and Leeds United 3-2 not included? Mr Context.

Was this stretch of games only EPL?

The more you type, the more you tie up yourself.

airmark:




Comprehension is your problem. Hensben and digzz said it before.

Read my request well, the context of our convo and delete the mumu result against a championship side asap.

Shut up! What was your request below?

Was the match played in the forest or on the pitch? Was Sterling not on the pitch? How many goals did Chelsea score?

You wan hide under the umbrella of context. Which context? Were we discussing any competition in particular? If yes, which competition? UCL? Because you referenced UCL in this your particular post. So tell me which context you are talking about.

airmark:


When did we score 6 goals with your useless Sterling on the pitch?

I don't know why you are attracted to useless attackers. Yesterday, we saw how Morata missed an almost open net to help Athletico into the semis. This is the same Morata you almost cried when as I wanted, was shipped out of Chelsea for ruining our seasons with his big misses.

You should be learning Arabic as we will throw both you and your useless Sterling to Saudi, by summer.

You asked when we scored 6 goals with Sterling on the pitch.

That is how you were asking when we conceded 4 goals, without red card, thinking it was only against Newcastle we shipped 4. You slyly added the red card clause but your slow brain forgot the Man City classic.

Continue embarrassing yourself.

Thazard:
You don start. If Airmark should come for you,abeg no run oh.

Run? From who? Airmark that keeps embarrassing himself on daily basis?

Look me well o, maybe you are mistaking me for someone.

airmark:


Will you bench Vinicius for Sterling? Will you bench Rodrygo for Mudryk?

Which of Real's defenders cost as much as Bellingham? You dey whine yourself, if you think Madrid would have qualified from the group with your useless Sterling leading their line.

How far with Rudiger? I thought it was community defending that was helping him in Chelsea?

That reminds me, how far with Sterling, 6 goals, on the pitch? Dey play

But airmark will say no.....Fix the attack. Finish.

This is from one of the best attackers the game have seen.

Airmark do you know that your Haaland is still stuck inside the 'flop' Rudiger's pocket till now?

drisham:

Yes he did

Zizou was the coach in 2021

raumdeuter:


thats why its better for keepers not to just jump about


Easy PK like that you will miss it

It works both ways to be fair. Sometimes if keeper wait till last second, he won't know where to dive to

larride:


Why Kepa no dey pitch? Make I no throw you and Kepa go dustbin o

Kepa na PK specialist. It's no secret.

larride:


The way Lunin take dust the ball just dey funny me. Silva just dey fume.

Panenka dey sweet if e enter, but if e fail, lol, you will look like a clown

larride:
Lunin sabi PK sha. Well done to him.

You no see when him go take tutorials from Kepa sharp sharp immediately the final whistle blow?

larride:
That Bernado Silva PK is criminal. Wtf

Panenka gone wrong ...lol