₦airaland Forum

diggz:
Meanwhile, special shout out to Micheal Jackson! My guy don shut me up.

Don't allow airmark see this.

diggz:
Chaiiiii....I dey pleasantly surprised by Maresca ball. Ogun must punish Poch walahi.


Honestly, I've never liked Fofana since day one. He’s not an elite defender at all, and he doesn’t really fit the bill. He’s always a step away from getting himself injured or picking up a yellow card with his reckless play. For the amount he was signed, he definitely doesn’t deserve to wear the Chelsea shirt.

And then there's Colwill—let's just say the less said about him, the better. Out of all the youth defenders we had, he was the last one I expected to remain with us. He’s like the defender version of our useless goalie, Sanchez. Sure, he has a few bright moments, but he makes so many silly mistakes that end up costing us games we should have easily won.

Fofana, colwill and Sanchez no suppose remain as starters for this team. Nonsense.

Airmark here is your mannest man analysing our superb defence.

Anything to say?

airmark:
Read from where our argument started.. It's not about age alone but the complaint about his errors for Barca last season and his shaky start at the Olympics.

You like jumping in from nowhere to ask foolish questions. No offense.

Is Yamal rushed to career death when he was taken to Euros? I don't care what your argument is.

You said a young player of 17 isn't taken to Euros because that will mean rushing him to career death. Is that the case with Yamal?

popizaino:
When your attackers keeps missing like Jackson,it won't be long your defence will drink goals.

Case in point when Chelsea attackers were doing rubbish upfront against Barcelona in 2009,didn't pressure later burst our pipe?

Which match are you talking about? Let me believe it's not the match that Chelsea had at least 5 solid penalty shouts denied? Is that the match you said Chelsea attackers were doing rubbish upfront?

Oga, I no get your time this morning abeg. Just grab your L peacefully and park one side.

Melvyn11:
You are typing too much epistles which shows you didn't watch the first half. Let me bring comments here to show you what was going on during the first half. Play that match again 10 times and we win 7/10.

Is this the luck you are talking about? Lol. Did Lewandowski not miss his own clear chances? Can we now argue that Madrid was lucky that the 2nd half was "just" 4 goals?

Oga dem beat you black and blue. Move on. It happens in football. Everybody dey collect once in a while. Die that "lucky" yarn...

Melvyn11:
Anybody that watched the first half won't be asking such questions. I said what I said.

Scoring 4 goals and keeping a clean sheet away from home, against your eternal rival is NOT luck.

If the scoreline was a "parking the bus" 1-0, if the goal was controversial, if it was a penalty goal, if Madrid was red carded, if injury happened to a key player like Vini during the match..... Then you can claim luck.

But this is a comprehensive victory. Move on bro.

Melvyn11:
Barca were lucky in the first half which changed the outcome of the match. Madrid should have been 2:0 up going into half time. 4:0 is a flattering result. Replay that match again 10 times and we win 7/10.

How exactly were they lucky?

airmark:

Not taking anything away from him, but there's a reason he wasn't taken to the Euros. He is still learning the ropes and must not be rushed to career death.

Your last line is ludicrous, as Mbappe had like 3 1v1s with keeper but fumbled them. That's not a CB keeping him quiet if you ask me.

I'm curious. How old was Lamine Yamal when he was taken to the Euros, not as a squad player, but a key member of the squad?

Melvyn11:
Keep deceiving yourself. You guys were lucky yesterday. Imagine Praising a defense that conceded 4 clear cut chances. It's Mbappe and Vini that caused all these nonsense. You won't be lucky next time.

Please explain how 4-0 win a luck? Na wao..

The way Mbappe and Vini missed goals is the same way Lewandowski and Barca missed goals too.

BTW I supported Madrid, but let's be realistic. 4-0 is NOT luck. The superior team on the day won.

popizaino:
Ancelotti is not losing to any fucking German tonight.

Do with this statement anything you want.

How I wish this statement is Oraimo cord, I would have used it and do anything I want

Na your neck for hear am.

popizaino:
No carvajal,No courtois. We can see the outcome.

Really? So absence of these defence is the reason why the game didn't end 6-4 in favor of Madrid?

Airmark, is this true?

Unlimited22:
This is the result of English clubs in Europe so far this season.


Raumdeuter, please come and give us the stats of a certain team in the country that has Berlin as its capital.


After checking your mail, of course 😉😉

BTW Manyoo have contributed exactly zero of these wins.

They are unbeaten with zero win.

nateevs:
Please stop these theories guys. It doesn't make sense.

You know, you should always concede 2 goals per match and let your attack come back and win with 3 or more goals.....Every. Single. Match

I missed the deadline. And I have Jota in my line up. Thankfully, Rogers is my first bench.

nateevs:
That Nkunku change looks like the only song thing Maresca did this game. We lost that element of pace on the left flank.

Nkunku centre, Palmer right, Neto maintain left.

That's what I thought the change was about.

swiz123:
Gusto should be in a mental facility; I have seen enough to diagnose him with schizophrenia.

Calm down man. This is a RB playing LB and inverting.

drisham:
This is why city win leagues

Injuries to rodri,debruyne
Foden and Haaland out of form...still.yet

Spot on.

So true true, Rodri is Man City's best player. Not Haaland, not KDB.

raumdeuter:
I'm hearing Victor Boniface survived an accident

Thank God oh

How? No be just yesterday him play match?

Na wao oo..

The man a.k.a sha...

My igbo brethren will understand more

airmark:
You are irritating.

Even when Pedro Neto confirmed that he would have more options playing as RW (more comfortable wing) and his coach confirmed that he is a RW, you are still embarrassing yourself forcing LW as his main position because he could play there.

Stop this show of shame.

Why did you put him in LW in your recommended team if you don't see him as LW? And stop the crap about available players.

All our players was available that GW.

airmark:
This is how I will start against City, if Osimhen doesn't join.

Jorgensen


Gusto Tosin Colwill Cucurella



Caicedo Enzo Lavia



Palmer Guiu Neto

Who else is missing from this match day squad that will force you to play Neto, a new signing, out of position only to play Palmer, an AM, out of position also in place of Neto's position?

There is Nkunku, Jackson, Madueke, Mudryk all available but you prefer a new RW signing to play out of position to accommodate an AM to play RW in the same match, against the best team in the league.

How terrible can you be Airmark?

airmark:
You had to post my suggested lineup based on what we had on ground on August 11, to prove what?

Because Fraudiola drafted Stones to play from the midfield in some matches, made Stones to be a permanent midfielder, right?

You've lost it completely.

Are you okay?

Neto was just sign and have played 0 mins for Chelsea. He is a RW according to you. And you suggest we play him out of ppsition against almighty Man City? Meanwhile his preferred position according to you is occupied by another player OUT OF POSITION.

What kind of coach are you?

It's either you are a terrible coach or you see Neto as a LW.

At bolded.... So you know that some players are comfortable in multiple positions but when it's Neto as LW, you start posting some nonsense images to pin that player on one particular position?

airmark:
You are still asking this mumu question when Maresca already confirmed Neto is for RW as below? You should learn when to keep mute and accept you goofed.

If you, airmark, see Neto as RW, why then did you put him on the left in this your recommended lineup? Why not RW?

You had to use Palmer on the right while Neto, a RW on the left

Is Palmer a RW?

airmark:
This is how I will start against City, if Osimhen doesn't join.

Jorgensen


Gusto Tosin Colwill Cucurella



Caicedo Enzo Lavia



Palmer Guiu Neto

BlueMann:
Saw some stuff about him and rape but he's cleared it

Oh...

airmark:
Neto wasn't signed as LW, he was signed as a RW. Can you see how you always goof and argue blindly?

Are you sure about this?

BTW what is Cole Palmer's position and what position have he played predominantly for Chelsea?

BlueMann:
What's up with Mbappe

What's up with him?

airmark:
Who was the LW we signed?

Your post on August 28, was more consequential than the one you posted long before.

My August post aligned with the February post.

In February, I recommended a LW. We signed Neto, and in August, I stated that I don't want another LW..... My posts are straightforward, unlike you.

I'm waiting for you on the Neto matter. You are so predictable, but I'm waiting for you, let me tie you up

airmark:
When you asked us not to sign the only LW we wanted to sign.

After we have already signed a LW?

How about the post where I recommended a LW, why are you avoiding that post?

airmark:
Neto's manager, always arguing blindly based on faulty premise.

Even when his manager tagged him a right winger, you couldn't stop embarrassing yourself.

Stop running away from a simple question.

When you were accusing me here, was it about Sancho as a player or LW as a position? When was I strongly against the signing of 1 LW?

airmark:
Maybe you didn't have data when I was asking for 1 LWF that could dribble in tight spaces and Timbros was strongly against it.

Had we got a clinical finisher, we would have beaten Crystal Palace and be leading the table now and become a strong contender for the trophy after spending over 1bn on players.

My opinion on football is too complex for casuals and my high expectation of a striker is alien to Gen Z Chelsea fans. But that's not my problem.

Jackson burying this chance would have seen us topping the table today, but most of you wouldn't see it.

airmark:
I was asking for a LW that fits that profile and we got Sancho. You were against getting Sancho or any LW by August 28.

It's funny that you are the one turning Amala here and still pointing finger. If Sancho has been ghosting, you would have come here to claim expert analyst. But now you are hiding from your ish.

You wanted a wastepipe, Morata, to continue to torment us. You defended Jackson and his wastefulness. You don't want us to get a better LW, and stick to unimpressive Mudryk.

You are anti-Chelsea, that's why Dayo likes you.

You are still lying against me.

LW is one position I recommend we recruit. I have shown you proof over and over again.

Since you don't know the difference between "any" and "another", I'll break it down for you.

If I say I don't want any LW, it means I don't see that position as priority for us to strengthen. But if I say I don't want another LW, it means we have recruited in that position and it's already enough. In that my comment to Ibime you keep quoting, I said below that we need to trim down the squad. Did you read that part? We already have enough recruitment so we don't need another LW.

Funny enough, I have nothing against Sancho as a player (If you have any evidence that I don't like Sancho, please feel free to provide it). I don't mind having him in the squad as long as he improves the team. However, when I made the comment was made, we already have signed Neto who is a LW. We do not need another LW which happens to be Sancho. I am a Chelsea fan. I support ANYONE who wears the blue jersey. I am not like you who pick players to support, not the club. The moment Sancho was signed, did you see me criticise the signing?

Having said all that, please show me where you were asking for 1 LW and I was strongly against it.

And, was this your comment talking about Sancho as a player or LW as a position?

airmark:
Maybe you didn't have data when I was asking for 1 LWF that could dribble in tight spaces and Timbros was strongly against it.

Had we got a clinical finisher, we would have beaten Crystal Palace and be leading the table now and become a strong contender for the trophy after spending over 1bn on players.

My opinion on football is too complex for casuals and my high expectation of a striker is alien to Gen Z Chelsea fans. But that's not my problem.

Jackson burying this chance would have seen us topping the table today, but most of you wouldn't see it.

airmark:
You asked us not to sign Sancho, a new LW. True or false?

You are not a true Chelsea fan. You always want our downfall.

Were you talking about Sancho here?

You should know me by now that your amala turning doesn't work for me.

Were you talking about Sancho here?

airmark:
Maybe you didn't have data when I was asking for 1 LWF that could dribble in tight spaces and Timbros was strongly against it.

Had we got a clinical finisher, we would have beaten Crystal Palace and be leading the table now and become a strong contender for the trophy after spending over 1bn on players.

My opinion on football is too complex for casuals and my high expectation of a striker is alien to Gen Z Chelsea fans. But that's not my problem.

Jackson burying this chance would have seen us topping the table today, but most of you wouldn't see it.