Politics › Re: The Bitter Truth About Fulani Terrorism No One Wants To Address by Ttalk: 9:29am On Jun 02 |
LibertyRep: You're triggered, sorry.
History shouldn't have been discontinued so that people like you would know where missed it as a country. This thread is not about history that is available to anyone that can read, It is about raising the consciousness and awakening the docile mind of the enlightened who have refused to use their brain because of political correctness, Life is precious and more important than the politics the Southerners play for political gain, where is the legacies of Awolowo, Azikwe and others who fought for independence when the end products is massacre and abduction of Southerners.? |
Politics › Re: Does the president truly stay awake till 3am? by Ttalk: 9:08am On Jun 02 |
That has always been his nature for donkey years, there are millions of Nigeria that do that too.
Many confined thier working time to middle of the night when Nepa only bring light in their area, na everyone they sacrifice for Nigeria where terrorism and corruption has been taking the lives of the citizen since the inception of this country |
Politics › Re: The Bitter Truth About Fulani Terrorism No One Wants To Address by Ttalk: 7:41am On Jun 02 |
LibertyRep: Nigeria should at best be left to function in the regional mode it had earlier.
Only God knows what Aguiyi Ironsi was thinking when he promulgated the Unification Decree.
If we had maintained the regional system, the competition would have been fierce and I doubt it anyone from God knows where will have the effrontery to turn the forests in another man's region to kidnapping hub. Keep shut if you don't have any meaningful things to contribute. You can go and wake Aguiyi Ironsi to come and correct the deed of over 60years when you have leaders who should make the change. Allowing yourself to be used for political gain is accepting defeat when you can actually change the trend. |
Politics › Re: The Bitter Truth About Fulani Terrorism No One Wants To Address by Ttalk: 7:31am On Jun 02 |
However their selfish entitlement in Nigeria space out weight their consideration for human lives. Those that prop up political debate and ethnic identity with Tinubu and Obi narratives are just tool used by the elite to continue to plunge the country. The fat allocation, and unfair advantage they get in one Nigeria is their priority than the lives of Nigerians that are being daily terrorised.
Shame on all the Southern leaders who ignore the agony and helplessness of their people to pursue a political gain |
Politics › Re: The Bitter Truth About Fulani Terrorism No One Wants To Address by Ttalk: 7:26am On Jun 02 |
WizardOfNG: I actually y agree with your conclusion below. I have stayed same i.e the North must be taken to task before the region destroys Nigeria.
I said it recently that focus on election is myopic and convening a sincere conference of leaders from all regions to hash out solutions for Nigeria, where conclusions will be immediately implemented, is crucial.
'One Nigeria's is actually the cause of virtually all the major problems of Nigeria. A 1hour meeting of Southern leaders will put a stop to this barbarism Let all the elected and appointed Southern leaders lock themselves in a room and tell themselves the bitter truth that no amount of patching the security crises will stop these invaders, what will stop it is a resolution backed by action. That South is tired of killing being perpetuated by one ethic group, terrorising the entire nation. That going forward that the South will no longer accept a single abduction or killing in any part of the South. That the South will withdraw from Nigeria if any of such terror is carried out in any part of their land. That the immediate action of withdrawal of all elected and appointed leaders of southern extraction will be swift and total That no room for dialogue that create avenue for continuous abduction and killing will be available That the South will now defend its territorial space and cut off any access whatsoever to outsider. That any other region who share in their conviction will be welcome |
Politics › Re: The Bitter Truth About Fulani Terrorism No One Wants To Address by Ttalk: 6:36am On Jun 02 |
"I quite agree with you and want to emphasis that the Southern leaders both from the Eastern region and the Western region were complacent and very parochial in their position, there wa no justification at all to have allowed the north to be joined to the South, there was no basis for it that it will benefit the future southerners.
Fast forward to 1979 constitution that was crafted to favour the north and later fused into the 1999 constitution that has been the albatross of the crises bedeviling the country today,
The question is what were the Southern leaders thinking that made them agree to a worthless document that only favour one section of the country.
It is on this premises that one should conclude that the Southern leaders only acted to suit their parochial and persona interest at the expense of the Southern populace.
Presently, the same selfishness is driving the Southern leaders and their lackey followers who abandon the pressing danger the South face in the hand of the Fulani that are killing, maiming and taking the land of the indigenous people of the country.
For how long will the South continue to look helplessly when it is glaring that the agenda is to subjugate the South and overun them?
What stops the Southern leaders from taken a decisive decision over the killing and kidnapping of their people by declaring to go their way if the killins is not stopped?
What future is the present Southern leaders building for their generation unborn?
Like past leaders, like the current ones, the Southern leaders have failed if they can't agree to put a permanent stop to the insecurity in Nigeria. Yes, I blame the South for enduring abnormality when it is clear that it will only get worse." |
Politics › Re: 2027: Tinubu Will Win Landslide, I Won’t Support Peter Obi – Babachir Lawal by Ttalk: 12:28am On Jun 02 |
Justnation: “Tinubu will win with landslide. If the parameter for winning the election in Nigeria is rigging, nobody can face Bola Tinubu
This is exactly what Mr Babchair lawal said. Don't misquote him and mislead people into thinking Babchair lawal is supporting tinubu. From his statement he is saying that tinubu is a master rigger of elections and can only win through rigging and loose woefully in a free and fare election. He is not happy that Atiku Abubakar manipulated the ADC to emerge as the presidential candidate. He would have preferred the ticket is zoned to the south for future political harmony. That's exactly what will come to the mind of average person, especially third class loquacious political analysts on Nairaland. Babachar mentioned of 'rigging' was not directed to Tinubu, it was directed to Atiku who rigged the ADC primary, while the second part of the sentence only suggest that Atiku cannot rig in an election that involved Tinubu. That's doesn't mean Tinubu is going to outrig Atiku |
Politics › Re: Kano Youths Harass Kwankwasiyya Over Obi/Kwankwaso Ticket (Video) by Ttalk: 5:46pm On Jun 01 |
|
Politics › Re: Between Obi And Kwankwaso's Ideological And Religious Battle by Ttalk: 5:39pm On Jun 01 |
Just want to know what will happen when Obi take one chilled Hero beer from his car fridge to cool body after hectic NDC campaign in Kano, will Kwakwaso call his Hisbah alcohol enforcer to prosecute Obi the way they deal with common people they caught drinking beer or will he just pretend it's non of his business? |
Politics › Re: Babachir Lawal Leaves ADC Over Atiku's Emergence As ADC Presidential Candidate by Ttalk: 2:20pm On Jun 01 |
AMINDA: I think you have more to worry about than Atiku. Happening right now in Ibadan, the ancestral home of Yorubaland. At this point, the Southwest is not sure for Tinubu.
Tell me the insecurity in Nigeria doesn't concerns you and your Atiku, na only SW people e consign. Every supporter of the insecurity in Nigeria will not go unpunished |
Politics › Re: Babachir Lawal Leaves ADC Over Atiku's Emergence As ADC Presidential Candidate by Ttalk: 2:12pm On Jun 01 |
One by one dem don dey japa. Na only Atiku and Aminda go remain for that party las las, if you no believe ask Iweida |
|
Politics › Re: The Kidnapping In Oyo State Is Political by Ttalk: 7:57am On Jun 01 |
helinues: Forget about the bandits narration, that kidnapping is political and was carried out by the locals.
How Oyo and Osun state have been handling their matter is just worrisome .
As the election is approaching, the politicians are so desperate to do anything for the election Can you tell us how you arrived at this conclusion that the abduction was carried out by the Oyo people. Your blind assertion here should be probed. You can do better than this |
Politics › Re: The Yorubas Are About To Share Same Fate With The Igbos by Ttalk: 6:54am On Jun 01 |
esnbrutality: You so much LOVE SE affairs but keep mute when your own people are killed senselessly by both Fulani terrorists and your own people. Dont you know that by being quiet you tactically support the killings of your own people.
SE doesn't need your care , they ain't complaining to you are they?
Save the Children in OYO.  So I should start crying on SMlike you always do. Fulani terrorist are killing in all region of Nigeria including your SE. Stop making it as if your SE is immune to terrorist invasion. There are countless report of Fulani killing in Enugu, Imo and other SE state, because it is in SW today doesn't mean you are immune from the Fulani invasion, stop making yourself happy over the agony in other region, go and bury your dead and stop mourning the dead of your enemies. Remember to declare a mourning day also for the lives taken away by the ESN Life is turn by turn |
Politics › Re: The Yorubas Are About To Share Same Fate With The Igbos by Ttalk: 6:41am On Jun 01 |
FxMasterz: There are two lies in your post.
1. Yoruba created Amotekun before Kanu created ESN.
2. ESN was killing fellow Igbos. They didn't fight any Fulani militia. The government crushed them for being a criminal organization. Moreso, Kanu is not part of government. Only government can create a regional outfit. Not a layman like Kanu. Thank you for setting the record straight and debunking the lies in the OP writeup. Amotekun was created before Kanu created his security outfit, but instead of the security outfit to target the Fulani, it became an enforcer of sit at home who kill and maim his own people. |
Politics › Re: Southern Heavyweights Shun Atiku’s VP Slot As Running Mate Crisis Rocks ADC by Ttalk: 9:05pm On May 30 |
Ukpaka: Southern Heavyweights Shun Atiku’s VP Slot as Running Mate Crisis Rocks ADC https://247ureports.com/2026/05/southern-heavyweights-shun-atikus-vp-slot-as-running-mate-crisis-rocks-adc/ - ABUJA — Fresh trouble has hit the presidential campaign of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) following revelations that its flagbearer, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, is facing a severe crisis in securing a credible running mate from Southern Nigeria.
The development, leaked by political insiders on Saturday, indicates that prominent Southern political figures are systematically turning down or avoiding invitations to join Atiku on the ticket ahead of the 2027 general elections.
The rejection wave highlights Atiku’s shrinking national appeal and underscores the deep anxieties Southern leaders hold regarding his octogenarian status and controversial regional ambitions. They should give it to Dele Momodu, he has been shouting on SM, it's now time to test his popularity |
Politics › Re: How We Saved Nigeria From Bankruptcy” – Tinubu by Ttalk: 9:56am On May 30 |
IsraeliAIRFORCE: Tinubu came into power before the Argentine president, whose country went into bankruptcy. Today, Argentina has managed to curb inflation and improve its economy, showing measurable progress. In contrast, Tinubu has led Nigeria into debt and is now discussing bankruptcy. Determining which economic reform has yielded "better" results depends entirely on whether you look at macroeconomic metrics like inflation reduction and fiscal surpluses (where Argentina leads) or macroeconomic growth stability and debt management (where Nigeria leads). Both President Javier Milei of Argentina and President Bola Ahmed Tinubu of Nigeria took office in 2023, inheriting heavily distorted economies and pushing aggressive shock-therapy reforms including currency floating and subsidy cuts.An overview of their metrics reveals a stark contrast in their reform models:At-a-Glance Reform ComparisonMetric / IndicatorArgentina (Javinomics / Chainsaw Approach)Nigeria (Tinubunomics / Gradualist Stabilization)Primary StrategyAggressive public spending cuts, massive state layoffs, strict balanced budget tracking.Fuel subsidy removal, exchange rate unification, tax base expansion, and internal financing.Inflation TrajectoryDrastic Reduction: Plummeted from a peak of over 211% in 2023 to around 31.5%.Moderating: Peaked at 34.8% in late 2024 and has since cooled down toward the low 22% region.Fiscal BalanceAchieved its first budget surplus in 12 years via extreme austerity.Operating on a deficit, but saved trillions by avoiding ballooning fuel subsidies.Debt ProfileHigh Risk: Heavily indebted to international bodies, with a debt-to-GDP ratio hovering above 80–90%.Sustainable: More resilient debt profile with a lower debt-to-GDP ratio (under 54%).GDP Growth OutlookStagnant to slow recovery following massive internal demand drops due to wage freezes. Positive Outlook: The IMF has upgraded Nigeria's growth forecast to 4.4%.Social ImpactSevere human cost, though urban poverty recently began dipping back under 40% from over 52%.Extreme microeconomic pressure, with over 60% of citizens hit by food and cost-of-living insecurity.Where Argentina Yielded Better Results: Inflation & Fiscal DeficitsThe "Inflation Miracle": Argentina’s shock therapy focused on choking off central bank money printing. According to reports tracked by The Conversation, annual inflation nose-dived from over 211% down to ~31.5%.Slashing Fiscal Waste: By freezing public infrastructure projects and cutting government ministries, Milei forced a state budget surplus out of sheer willpower.Poverty Reversal from Peak: After initially spiking, targeted rollouts helped pull urban poverty down to 38.1% from a staggering 52%. Where Nigeria Yielded Better Results: Debt & Economic GrowthAvoiding Default: Unlike Argentina, which remains heavily dependent on massive multi-billion dollar IMF Extended Fund Facility bailouts to stay afloat, Nigeria finances its structural adjustments internally and boasts a vastly safer debt-to-GDP landscape. Thriving Capital & Investments: Nigeria's reforms have successfully averted a total balance-of-payments collapse. The country is on track to attract nearly $20 billion in foreign investments in diversified sectors like tech startups and renewable energy.Growth Rebound: The economy is stabilising faster in real productivity terms. This is evidenced by the IMF upgrading Nigeria’s forward economic growth outlook.VerdictIf "better results" means halting hyperinflation and balancing the government's books at all costs, Argentina's reforms have been more effective. However, if "better results" means steering a massive nation clear of sovereign bankruptcy while building an internationally backed, investment-friendly growth path, Nigeria's model shows a safer structural foundation. Both nations continue to battle severe cost-of-living crises at the microeconomic household level.AI can make mistakes, so double-check responses My Economic Reforms Are Yielding Positive Results |
Politics › Re: Can Any President Stop Insecurity In Nigeria? What Will You Do? by Ttalk: 9:46pm On May 29 |
1vandragon: The present rate of insecurity requires immediate action. How long do you think it would take to overhaul the security architecture?
Saying the present command does not have the capacity for swift responses is not true.
Do you think if it was a governor's child that was kidnapped that the security forces will.not take swift and decisive action?
Is Nigeria as big as texas? Maybe you don't know what it means to have drones and helicopters.
The government that says it has no money for capital projects released 98% of the budget needed for the president to travel and gallivant.
In 2017, the budget for presidency was about N7bn. In 2025, it was over N25bn with about 98% release. In the 2026 budget, it is estimated at over N200bn.
For the airforce, less than 17% of thier operational budget was released. Similar situation across all security arms.
So, it is not about capacity, it is about what those in government consider priority. Though there's no need for argument on this but for clarity compare the budget of the Texas you mentioned with that of Nigeria. Check whether Nigeria has financial capacity to employ police personnel for the populace based on the recommendations of UN. This is where structural deficiency have to be corrected. For example, how many of Nigeria past president and governor have ever accounted for security vote. Will allow such abnormality if your region is solely responsible for the security in your region? A country where saboteur and fanatics have compromised the Nigeria security system and are part of the people that get employed into the force, or are you going to sack officers who are sympathetic to the these terrorist based on religion or ethnic ground. How I wish many of you can genuinely analyze the deep rotten foundation of this false unity to see how practically impossible for a president to eradicate the insecurity without tamper with the Nigeria constitution |
Politics › Re: Can Any President Stop Insecurity In Nigeria? What Will You Do? by Ttalk: 8:25pm On May 29 |
1vandragon: While the causes of insecurity in Nigeria is a hydea-headed monster, the first step to stopping large scale terror acts is to ensure the perpetrators are swiftly apprehended or confined.
For example, where the terrorists are holding the kids in Ogbomoso should have been surrounded by now, with lights and constant sounds.
Thier lines of communication to the outside world cut off leaving them with only one government negotiator.
While negotiating with them, the security forces should plan an attack.
Now, the chances of losing a number of hostages will always be there, but if kidnappers are quickly traced and confined on 2-3 occasions, in time, they will understand that there is no escape.
Then security forces have to be audited... personnel, weapons and equipments... how are they utilised and deployed?
Set up a special reaction force that deals with hostage taking.
Improve the standards of security recruitment and personnel. There are too many 'criminals' in the security forces.
Give states greater control on security matters but with strong oversight from regional heads pending full devolution to LG policing (not just state policing)
Each state should have at least 6 drones (3 per zone). Hotspots should have more with 24 hours surveillance and tracking abilities.
Get at least 20 helicopter troop carriers to quickly move special forces to intercept and confine terrorists.
Tackle the flamboyant lifestyle of government officials and criminals. Flaunting ill-gotten wealth leads people to do anything for money.
Make kidnappings and terror attacks as unprofitable as possible by ensuring the perpetrators cannot get away with it and are apprehended or confined within hours of any attack, not days... hours...
There is a lot to be done, but these are a few first steps.
Then the government can now look into the issues of grazing, religion etc. But Government must show it has the ability to stop threats at once and bargain from a position of strength. That is why the Nigeria security architecture have to be completely overhaul before any meaningful achievement can be recorded. The present command channel doesn't support swift response and it takes hours of bureaucratic nonsense before order can be given even when incidents are reported swiftly. Nigeria is a vast rural communities that these wicked people take advantage of the vast landscape. We equally do not have enough capacity for the kind of scenario you painted. However, Nigerians will no longer tolerate or take excuses from the government. No one force them into power, they chose to voluntarily and must solve the security challenges |
Politics › Re: Can Any President Stop Insecurity In Nigeria? What Will You Do? by Ttalk: 6:19pm On May 29*. Modified: 6:52pm On May 29 |
No single individual can stop the insecurity in Nigeria.
Nigeria president doesnt have the power to unilaterally stop the insecurity until Nigerians solve the structural deficiency that makes insecurity to fester.
For Nigeria to solve the insecurity plaguing this nation, a constitutional amendment is required to create a state or regional police that will be equiped like the federal securities to combat these terrorist fire for fire.
Regional autonomy or state autonomy is required in the area of security and armying the personnel with sophisticated weapons.
Every state will have to adopt ranching enforce the ban on open grazing.
The Nigeria Constitution will have to insert secession clause and give every region right to secede if a region feels the union agreement is breached.
Sharia law will have to be removed in Nigeria constitution and all Sharia court abolished.
Unfortunately decentralizing Nigeria security architecture required the state and federal lawmaker agreement but many are paying lip services to t.
In the main time, the president can only use its Federal power which is has not been effective in Nigeria
The president can only call for national conference and report implemented within 1 year |
Politics › Re: Help Me Add To The List Of People That Obidients Have Insulted by Ttalk: 5:10pm On May 29 |
There's no one in the country apart from Peter Obi that is free from Obidients insult. Obidient are ready to disown their parent and curse them if they they have different opinion from them.
Every Nigerian is a potential candidate of insult to the Obidients, they are just lurking in the corner to hear different view that doesn't gel with their Obi becoming president |
Politics › Re: What Will Be The Fate Of Igbo People In 2027 by Ttalk: 12:29pm On May 29 |
|
Politics › Re: What Will Be The Fate Of Igbo People In 2027 by Ttalk: 11:39am On May 29 |
DatNiggaDaz:

To be honest, what will be your faith ? What will be the faith of your kith and kin in Oyo, Kwara, Ondo, Osun, Ekiti?
Don't worry about people who already know what they should worry about. Worry about yours and your kind
See this face below Go back to school and stop messing around on social media. It's funny to see online bully who doesn't know the difference between FATE and FAITH. |
Politics › Re: Daddy Adeboye Gave The Order — Member Cries After Alleged RCCG Protest Cancelled by Ttalk: 11:44pm On May 28 |
princepee: but the same Grandpa don go on protest during Jonathan regime so what changed Childish |
Politics › Re: Another Perspective On The Nigerian Civil War by Ttalk: 11:33pm On May 28 |
Lifestone: Ask Nnamdi Azikwe why he insisted that Nigeria should be one without secession clause as advocated by Chief Awolowo That's not necessary right now, what are the Southerners doing to put a stop to the killing going on presently? |
Politics › Re: Another Perspective On The Nigerian Civil War by Ttalk: 11:27pm On May 28*. Modified: 11:42pm On May 28 |
lawani: Another perspective on the Nigerian civil war
Someone on social media, a lady, pointed out that the No Victor no vanquished posture of the federal government after the Biafran surrender should have meant that Biafra would be allowed to secede if they want.
This actually is true because Nigeria was not created by force. It started as a voluntary union and if some stake holders back then did not want the union, then it would not have been formed. It was formed because people back then were enthusiastic about the union. Sir Macaulay the acknowledged founder of Nigerian nationalism once made a statement to the effect that as his moustache can not be separated from him, so will Northern and Southern Nigeria remain inseparable. He had plans and a vision for a big nation because of the advantages.
However the North was the first to threaten a breakup during negotiations prior to independence. Sir Ahmadu Bello publicly exclaimed that the mistake of 1914 has come to light referring to the amalgamation of the Northern and Southern protectorates of 1914. Dr Azikiwe calmed him by saying we should forget our differences. The Northern delegates during negotiations said they will only agree to join the union if they get the PM position as well as half the federal seats and the westerners and Easterners agreed. This was a mistake especially for the western region because the budget of the western region was up to three times or thereabouts of the combination of the budgets of the East and the North as at 1960. The western state's budget was 55 million pounds, East 12 million pounds and the North 7 million pounds in 1960.
The union started having problems immediately. The leadership of the West was in opposition while the East and North's leadership were ruling. By 1963, the leadership of the West that were the opposition were in prison for treasonable felony purportedly aided by Kwame Nkrumah's Ghana.
There was a coup in 1966 led by Easterners and political leaders were massacred by young soldiers. A military head of state of Eastern origin became the head of state after the coup failed and as a result of what many call his own technical coup. There was then a counter coup led by Northerners after six months in which the head of state and the western governor were assassinated. The war cry then was Araba by the Northern soldiers which means separation especially after many Igbos had been massacred in the North by Northern mobs responding to the massacre of their leaders during the first coup. The Northerners that led the second coup were originally no longer interested in one Nigeria even as there were no Igbos in the North again. That was the second attempt to break up the country. However on reflection and on consultation with politicians and diplomats and after a short power vacuum, the most senior military man, General Ogundipe a Yoruba and westerner took up appointment in the Nigerian embassy in the UK and allowed the next person in rank that was trusted by the coup plotters in person of Lt Col Gowon who was chief of Army staff to resume as head of state.
The second coup was not successful in the East and Colonel Ojukwu the governor of the East understandably declared that he will not go anywhere where there are Northern soldiers for any kind of meeting. Aburi, Ghana was therefore agreed upon by Lagos and Enugu as a neutral venue for a meeting.
At Aburi, both parties signed an agreement on several things including that no major decision will be taken without all governors agreeing.
However the FG later decided to create new states and the East did not agree for any new state to be created out of the East while those that asked for those states in the East agreed. There was actually an armed struggle for one of such states before the military head of state General Ironsi was assassinated during the second coup
The East then declared independence from Nigeria in order to preserve the integrity of it's territory. The new state was called Biafra. Some indigenes of the states created out of Biafra served in the Biafran forces while others joined the federal forces.
After almost three years of struggle and after Biafra opened a new war front that drew into the war the western and Midwestern regions of Nigeria leading to an amphibious landing of the Nigerian army at Calabar and after a blockade that led to hundreds of thousands of death, the Biafran forces were forced to surrender.
The FG proclaimed a policy of No Victor No vanquished. Going back to the comment of the lady I read on social media awhile back, the true no Victor no vanquished posture should mean that after the Biafran surrender, the whole of Eastern Nigeria would then be free. Biafra can remain but without forcing any land to be part of it. No matter any clause that is in any constitution, the fact is that the North could have seceded in 1959 as well as in 1967 or 1966 because Nigeria was formed voluntarily even with enthusiasm and it was never meant to be what it has become today. I quite agree with you and want to emphasis that the Southern leaders both from the Eastern region and the Western region were complacent and very parochial in their position, there wa no justification at all to have allowed the north to be joined to the South, there was no basis for it that it will benefit the future southerners. Fast forward to 1979 constitution that was crafted to favour the north and later fused into the 1999 constitution that has been the albatross of the crises bedeviling the country today, The question is what were the Southern leaders thinking that made them agree to a worthless document that only favour one section of the country. It is on this premises that one should conclude that the Southern leaders only acted to suit their parochial and persona interest at the expense of the Southern populace. Presently, the same selfishness is driving the Southern leaders and their lackey followers who abandon the pressing danger the South face in the hand of the Fulani that are killing, maiming and taking the land of the indigenous people of the country. For how long will the South continue to look helplessly when it is glaring that the agenda is to subjugate the South and overun them? What stops the Southern leaders from taken a decisive decision over the killing and kidnapping of their people by declaring to go their way if the killins is not stopped? What future is the present Southern leaders building for their generation unborn? Like past leaders, like the current ones, the Southern leaders have failed if they can't agree to put a permanent stop to the insecurity in Nigeria. Yes, I blame the South for enduring abnormality when it is clear that it will only get worse. |
Politics › Re: They Attack Tinubu For Insecurity But Refuse To Join Army And Police by Ttalk: 9:30pm On May 28 |
Kemetian: How come Obidients always attack Tinubu for insecurity yet virtually none of them wants to join the security forces?
Who are you expecting to protect you?
I read recently that in army recruitment drives to beef up security forces, those from the SE had by far the smallest number volunteers to join the army and police.
An absolutely negligible number of volunteers, to the point of embarrassment.
One would have thought that, as the most vociferously opposed to insecurity, that they would be First in Line to volunteer their service to the nation, but the reverse is the case
So I ask once again.
Who are you demanding should protect you?
How can the people loudest in shouting "insecurity" be the least willing to join the security forces?
Or am I missing something? 🫡🫡 This your complain no follow. Choosing a profession or career is by choice, you can't force Obidients to join NA, Nigerians including Obidients are in war front all over the world, tell the government to make Army attractive so Nigerians can join. You can as well get the form as empowerment package for your village people. All of you should stop politicizing insecurity |
Politics › Re: Egypt Now Exports Electricity To Europe - Peter Obi (video) by Ttalk: 8:43pm On May 28 |
Kukutente23: Let us even leave the lie of Tinubu selling the land to Dangote apart How is selling the land to Dangote an achievement Must you people become dull just because you want to support another human The narrative you guys were spinning initially was that the land was given to Dangote for free until he came out and debunked it now it's Tinubu sold the land to him You guys need to stop disgracing yourselves with this zombic mentality You are not informed. It's not the sale of the land that matter but creating a FTZ that attracts Dangote to site his refinery in Lagos. That's a policy that Obi can never dream of |
Politics › Re: Egypt Now Exports Electricity To Europe - Peter Obi (video) by Ttalk: 8:39pm On May 28 |
Penguin2: Is this how much you people have accepted Tinubu’s uselessness that you are now pushing the only thing he promised during campaign to state governors? Don't quote me if you won't address the lies of your master you are propagating here. How many MW of electricity has been exported to Europe so far? |
Politics › Re: Daddy Adeboye Gave The Order — Member Cries After Alleged RCCG Protest Cancelled by Ttalk: 8:24pm On May 28 |
Ofunaofu: Pa Adeboye received a call from the presidency and cancelled the planned protest against insecurity and hardship.
Chai… we no longer have men of God who speak truth to power. An adult who is waiting for a grandpa to lead a protest for him na suegbe. Make shame dey catch una small small |
Politics › Re: Tinubu’s Downfall Began The Day Reno Pitched Tent With Him by Ttalk: 8:17pm On May 28 |
Validated: Everyone Reno supports loses. He supported GEJ, and he lost. He moved to Atiku, twice Atiku lost. Now Tinubu received him into his fold and failure stares him nakedly. Look into the mirror. 2015 una support Jonathan, o lu le 2019 una support Atiku o lu le 2023 una support Obi O lulee Any party una support must fail. Just as the way una kill APGA, PDP, LP, ADC and now NDC Una support Saraki, Dino, El- Rufail and they were all visited withback luck. The year una start to support Buhahi as best President was the year he died. Simon Ekpa and MNK are langushing in jail because of the badluck support he received from that side. Tueh |
Politics › Re: Obi Will Solve Nigeria’s Security Challenge, Says Reps Aspirant, Ugochukwu Okoji by Ttalk: 6:32pm On May 28 |
franchasng: Buhari brought those foreign Fulani mercenaries into Nigeria to fight for APC should Jonathan win or refuse to hand over power.
Unfortunately for them, Goodluck threw in the towel without putting up any fight, so they became carried away with excitement and abandoned those foreign Fulani militants they brought in.
Those Foreign Fulani militants kept threatening them to settle them so they can go back they ignored them, so they started cattle rustling and from there, Hausa communities formed vigilant groups that were attacking the Fulani militants rustling their cows and robbing them off their belongings, this angered the Fulanis and they took up arms fully and became full militant groups now terrorizing every part of Nigeria they go to.
It's foreign Fulanis that they brought in for 2015 election that are terrorizing Nigeria and they have increased in their numbers due to APC lukewarm attitude towards wiping them out from Nigeria. You are naive. Insecurity didn't start in 2015. Stop typing long kindergarten poem thinking you are making point |