Vicotex's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Vicotex's Profile › Vicotex's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 (of 95 pages)
 Foreign Affairs › Re: When Will The Russians’ Aggressive Regime Collapse Under The Western Sanctions? by Vicotex(op): 7:06pm On Mar 13, 2022 |
joyandfaith:35% of the so called Ukrainian defeated to Nazi, and some where even held as prisoners. Brah take it slowly with your lies 2 Likes |
| Foreign Affairs › Re: Russians To NATO: We Are Going To Target The Weapon Shipments To Ukraine by Vicotex(m): 7:05pm On Mar 13, 2022 |
Kelvin3476:What loss? 1 million dead Russia dead armies? Good luck with such lie |
| Foreign Affairs › Re: You’ll Be Captured, Killed – US Warns Citizens Against Joining Ukraine by Vicotex(m): 10:04am On Mar 13, 2022 |
Hahahahaha. Fat motherfvcker always making threats, come Ukraine come fight, dem dey fear 1 Like |
| Foreign Affairs › Re: Ukraine: Russia To Create A Pseudo Independence Referendum In Kherson by Vicotex(m): 10:01am On Mar 13, 2022 |
joyandfaith:Hahahahahaha, who was the leader of USSR during the time of russifacaton? I guess it was Josef Stanlin, whom himself isn't Russia, he's from current day Georgia |
| Foreign Affairs › Re: Ukraine: Russia To Create A Pseudo Independence Referendum In Kherson by Vicotex(m): 9:59am On Mar 13, 2022 |
[s] joyandfaith:[/s] Historian can you please list the nations invaded by USSR? Automatically USSR = Russia 1 Like |
| Foreign Affairs › When Will The Russians’ Aggressive Regime Collapse Under The Western Sanctions? by Vicotex(op): 9:57am On Mar 13, 2022 |
The Nazis invaded Russia in 1941, killed one out of seven Russian adults, and even though Russia was ruled by Josef Stalin (from current day Georgia) , who was pretty good at killing Russians himself, the Russians still defeated the Nazis and captured Berlin in 1945. Considering that Russians have gone through this experience, then the collapse of the Soviet Union in the 1990s, the Chechen civil war and near-bankruptcy and wholesale robbery of their economy and state assets by foreign and domestic oligarchs before Putin came to power, do you really think that Western sanctions are going to bother them? I don’t think so. If anything, they are likely to rally behind Putin, even if they quietly disagree with his Ukraine policy. Sanctions never cause a society to break up; they always make the people rally tighter behind the current leadership. It has been true in Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, North Korea and now Russia. Western policymakers are so dumb that they have turned to Venezuela and Iran, countries sanctioned by the West, to buy oil to make up for the loss of Russian oil! Have you heard of anything so stupid? The west just never learns… 10 Likes |
| Foreign Affairs › Re: Ukraine: Russia To Create A Pseudo Independence Referendum In Kherson by Vicotex(m): 8:34am On Mar 13, 2022 |
joyandfaith:Hahahahaha ignorance is bliss. France and US did thier thing in Libya because of oil and money. Know this and know peace. Ask the baltics what? Russia empire never invaded the baltics, Poland invaded Moscow and the Russia faught back and took their lands, ussr gave the baltics their freedom, thier first Republic, made them a sovereign Republic within the ussr, they should be grateful. The Balkans have no issue with Russia, I heard you calling the Romanians, they have no issue with them and they never got invaded 1 Like |
| Foreign Affairs › Re: Russians To NATO: We Are Going To Target The Weapon Shipments To Ukraine by Vicotex(m): 8:20am On Mar 13, 2022 |
Dalil8:No mind them, Ukraine military is stronger than most eu countries within the Nato umbrella. Wetin Russia don achieve for this war within 17 days , e take the combined Nato forces a month plus to achieve the same thing for Iraq, same with Kosovo war 6 Likes |
| Foreign Affairs › Re: UKRAINE: Experts Fear Anti-plane Missiles Could End Up In Wrong Hands by Vicotex(m): 8:05am On Mar 13, 2022 |
sanpipita:If they are not fighting under Russia military why are they being deployed in Ukraine? Sense no common reach your side, I swear 1 Like |
| Foreign Affairs › Re: Ukraine: Russia To Create A Pseudo Independence Referendum In Kherson by Vicotex(m): 8:03am On Mar 13, 2022 |
joyandfaith:You should ask the west how many times they've sanctioned or questioned the invasion of Libya by France and US, Nato and Co in the yugoslav war, Iraq first and second invasion, Yemen war etc. I can hi on if you want me. How many times you hear your fucking CNN and and BBC condemn such attacks? Instead you go see stupid headlines like " Librating the democratic people of Libya from the the grip of a dictator", now the so called dictator has been killed by the west, how good is the democratic people of Libya now after the west liberated them? You always call Russia the aggressor, how many nations have they invaded or removed a head of state? If you provoke the bear, you get biten real hard. Ask Georgia, Ukraine will testify 2 Likes 1 Share |
| Foreign Affairs › Re: Russian Footholds In Mideast, Africa Raise Threat To NATO by Vicotex(m): 8:21pm On Mar 12, 2022 |
blaquebelle:Has backed Egypt |
| Foreign Affairs › Re: Ukraine: Russia To Create A Pseudo Independence Referendum In Kherson by Vicotex(m): 8:16pm On Mar 12, 2022 |
joyandfaith:But when west dey remove head of countries and invade other nations, e no be provocation abi? I guess dem dey bring democracy |
| Foreign Affairs › Re: UKRAINE: Experts Fear Anti-plane Missiles Could End Up In Wrong Hands by Vicotex(m): 8:14pm On Mar 12, 2022 |
sanpipita:See your ignorance just dey smell. Russia has many republics within itself. Chenchenya just another Republic within Russia just like the Tuvas, Kazahs, Tatars etc. No dey watch CNN and BBC again you no go hear. Russia is entitled to bring any army from which ever Republic within Russia they chooses 2 Likes |
| Foreign Affairs › Re: UN Balsts Meta For Allowing Hate Speech Against Russians by Vicotex(m): 8:04pm On Mar 12, 2022 |
Double standard No worry Ukraine is going down for good. RUSSIA, SAVIOR OF THE FREE WORLD 4 Likes |
| Foreign Affairs › Re: Russia, Blocked From The Global Internet by Vicotex(m): 8:21am On Mar 11, 2022 |
9182736455O1999:You don't know anything concerning the art of war. Abeg no quote me again. I be think say na better person dey reason with me |
| Foreign Affairs › Re: Russia, Blocked From The Global Internet by Vicotex(m): 6:24am On Mar 11, 2022 |
9182736455O1999:Brother man them no surrender, they were captured. Being captured and surrendering are 2 different things entirely. Na only God know where you dey get your news from. No governments official don step down, they're strongly with Putin |
| Foreign Affairs › Re: Russia, Blocked From The Global Internet by Vicotex(m): 4:25pm On Mar 10, 2022 |
9182736455O1999:Brother there will be no coup in Russia, Russia no be Africa. Their government officials and military fully back Putin. US are the aggressors brah. Know this and know peace |
| Foreign Affairs › Re: Clash Between Poland And US Over Mig-29s Reveals Tensions In Escalating War by Vicotex(m): 1:34pm On Mar 09, 2022 |
Poland don finally decide to use thier senses. Dem no want make wetin happen centuries ago replay again 1 Like |
| Travel › Re: This Is Obinofia Ndiuno, Enugu State Tourist Haven by Vicotex(m): 7:09am On Mar 09, 2022 |
Igbomaka 10 Likes 1 Share |
| Foreign Affairs › Re: UN Refrains From Calling Ukraine Conflict ‘war’ Or ‘invasion’ – Media by Vicotex(m): 9:19pm On Mar 08, 2022 |
Hahahahahaha, them for choose side na |
| Programming › Re: What's The Best Laptop For Coding by Vicotex(m): 4:17pm On Mar 08, 2022 |
Any laptop can code. But if you're working a huge project then you'll need a PC with lot of core counts and simultaneous multi threading capability. And don't forget to look a laptop with good keyboards. So I'll recommend you to get dell G15 AMD ryzen 7 model or lenovo thinkpad x carbon with either amd ryzen or Intel processor 4 Likes |
| Gaming › Re: EA To Remove All Russian Clubs & The National Team From FIFA 22 by Vicotex(m): 4:10pm On Mar 08, 2022 |
Sanctions no dey win war. E dey solidify the citizens of that country with thier ruler 4 Likes 1 Share |
| Car Talk › Re: Ogun State: This Is How Much I Bought Petrol For Today. by Vicotex(m): 4:09pm On Mar 08, 2022 |
Sai baba don finally put all of them wey vote am put for power for one chance 2 Likes 1 Share |
| Car Talk › Re: Ogun State: This Is How Much I Bought Petrol For Today. by Vicotex(m): 4:09pm On Mar 08, 2022 |
Omihanifa:Na wa for you o, you no see say the price na Kingsway 1 Like 4 Shares |
| European Football (EPL, UEFA, La Liga) › Re: Scotland's World Cup Play-off Against Ukraine Postponed by Vicotex(m): 3:55pm On Mar 08, 2022 |
Fifa for dash them free 3 points as support for the war. Nonsense people 4 Likes |
| Foreign Affairs › Re: Russia has Become The World's Most Sanctioned Country by Vicotex(m): 9:42am On Mar 08, 2022 |
Normally Russia is self sufficient and those sanctions won't harm them in a long run because they'll find a way to tackle it 1 Like |
| Foreign Affairs › Re: Finland To Purchase Israeli Air Defense Systems Due To Russian Threat by Vicotex(m): 5:30pm On Mar 06, 2022 |
ObamaMessi:Shift make i sit down jor. One chance my ass. Russia has the best air defence in the world |
| Foreign Affairs › Re: Are The People On Nairaland Supporting Russia Invasion Of Ukraine Real Or Bots ? by Vicotex(m): 3:37pm On Mar 06, 2022 |
Rubbiish:To answer that you'll have to look at the bigger picture. Forget about toppling dictators (for that reason alone the king of Saudi Arabia would have been the nr. 1 target), forget about 'bringing democracy' (North Korea would have had priority over the relatively moderate government of Syria), forget about noble motives (after Iraq the US army should have had some embarassment about 0,5 million children being killed and should have grown much more restraint in repeating the military meddling in other countries , but there's not even an apology there), forget about Assad being evil (as long as the US can do business there's no problem with alleged evilness, remember again Saudi Arabia). Before Isis was created in Syria there were no US troops there. They were pushed out of Iraq and one should think that if the purpose was to destroy Isis the US would have teamed up with the Syrian army. Which they didn't. In time there was even a new narrative: “Assad must go”. This narrative came in very comfortable with the revolt that already was at hand in Syria (mostly created by the likes of the Muslim Brotherhood and other fanatics) and so in the first 1,5 year we saw this strange situation that Assad on one side was fighting the so-called 'moderate rebels' and Al Qaeda offsprings and the US supposedly fighting the Islamic Caliphate. In time it became clear that the SAA was losing the fight while Isis was growing despite the US fighting them (yes, start to wonder why the most powerful and potent army in the world couldn't at least contain a bunch of extremists). When after 1,5 year Russia entered the field it became painfully clear that with a limited but well organized army group the extreme islamists could be defeated. It makes one think: the Russian army isn't really more advanced than the US army, yet the Russians made a difference while the Americans did not. Only after the Russians interfered the US began to make real progress. So it's safe to think the US only made a show before the Russians came in (there's more than one complaint of pilots who had to drop their bombs in the empty desert) and after it they had to change strategy to safe face (the Russians booked results, so it couldn't be that they did not). The battlefield had changed and they had to adapt. In time we learned that the US supported so-called 'moderate rebels', gave them money, information and weapons. When the Russians asked to designate the real opposition in order to separate them from the extremists the US couldn't answer this simple question. Very strange indeed because you should expect the Americans were well aware where the Al Qaeda-affiliates were located (remember 911? Maybe state enemy nr. 1?), but they were so fuzzy about that that the Russians ultimately cut the Gordian Knot: those who are fighting the legitimate government are terrorists and those who are willing to talk are opposition. This is a brief oversight of the situation, but it should make clear that the US isn't there because of human rights, fighting terrorists or other noble motives. It's really there to stimulate chaos, rather than restoring order. So … why would one want to create chaos? There must be some reason for creating chaos, because it's a costly business in which millions of dollars are spent, if not more. To solve that riddle you can look back and forward. If you look forward the intended endresult of chaos is dividing the country, giving the Kurds the illusion of creating their own state, giving the sunni-extremists the illusion of a pure islamic state and maybe with some luck some other territories will arise because of the tribes. You'll end up with a powerless Syria which in the first place will not pose a threat anymore to Israel (remember Assad is the last Arab leader who at least plainly supports the Palestinians). Secondly, the Golan issue will no longer exist (and it's not just strategic territory: there's an enormous reserve of oil under the Golan Heights). Thirdly, Iran can forget about a pipeline to Europe. Fourth, Qatar can realize their dreamed pipeline, along with the Saudi's (a pipeline Assad is opposed to). And fifth: American business can benefit because when the US army wins in the end they have gained a lot of influence and thus a lot to say how things will be done. So looking forward you see interests. Not for the benefit of the Syrian people of course, but those who are interested in this scenario are all lined up with each other (Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Israel). Because of ideological visions the US is allied with Israel, because of economic interests the US is allied with the Saudi's and Qatar. As long as their interests come together they will team up (for the time being religious motives seem to have been set aside, but one wonders for how long?). So far for looking forward. So there's interests involved, business interests, business on a big scale scale but still business. Quite simple once you see it. For the moment it overcomes ideologic and/or religious factors. Among the many, many victims are also those islamic extremists who are really convinced they're fighting for their vision on Islam (no matter how despicable it may seem in our eyes), but are subsidized by those parties mentioned above and thus are just puppets in a greater game. They're being used, once the goal is reached the subsidies will dry up and they'll be left with nothing. Now we're going to look back for an even bigger picture. Why had Gadhafi to be removed? Once he shook off his terrorist image he was kind of a 'good friend' with the West for a long time. Was it that he suppressed his people? Unlike the US president he could drive around in his capital in an open car, probably some bodyguards in the neighbourhood, but still, it wasn't that hard to point a gun at him if you really wanted to. Yet he could feel safe in those years, apparently, and maybe that had something to do with the work he had done for Lybia (look it up, in his last years it was the most prosperous country of Africa). Yet he had to be dethroned, here in the West the narrative was about those Arab Springs but guess what: after he was murdered Lybia jumped into a civil war and one side consists of … yep, Al Qaeda, Muslim Brotherhood and the likes. You wonder where they get their money from to be so busy in multiple countries. But oh, money, did I say that Gadhafi did have plans to abandon the dollar and introduce an African currency? That wasn't very nice of him because since the 70's oil is traded worldwide in dollars and the dollar happens to be the US currency, which means that all transactions go through American banking systems. Which means in turn that America controls the transactions, has thus influence on the transactions and even earns some money on top of it and can calculate interest on top of that). So if Gadhafi's introduction of an independent African system would succeed that would have been bad for the US banking and corporate business. If you fantasize about it: his Lybian model could have eventually freed more African countries from their debt to the West and could have made them independent. You can have similar thoughts on Saddam Hussein: he had plans to trade his oil in Euro's, thus bypassing the dollar. All those dollars are regulated by the central banks, which are connected to a handfull of families like the Rothchilds (yep, one has to mention them at least once). Now Lybia didn't have such a central bank, but shortly after the murder of Gaddafi, well, Lybia has one now. Iraq didn't have such a ‘Rothchild’ central bank (the name Rothchild stands in fact for a cluster of families, they're just the ones in the frontrow). And guess what: Syria's central bank isn't controlled by foreigners either (as in Iran, as in North Korea, they are just a few countries left without such a bank; begin to see a pattern?). Now I don't know how they do it but this cluster of families gives tremendous loans to governments thus making them dependent and in cases these loans aren't being payed off because it takes all the effort to pay the interest alone. So in the end of the game it's not about oil or even money but the dependency of whole countries on this cluster of families, who can therefore influence the politics of a government and thus control the country. In short, it's about this kind of power. We ordinary people care about money, those kind of people look behind it. So back to Syria, what the heck is the US army doing there? The boots on the ground will tell you a very idealistic story, I've read a story of an US soldier in Iraq that was very rational narrated, even with the chaos over there and the 0,5 million dead children and the creation of Isis it was still a ‘good invasion' in her eyes (yep, a woman, if you please). Never heard that it had to be Iraq because it was 'low hanging fruit' (the other options being Iran and North Korea). Never thinking about the fact that boots on the ground have to be inspired to do the dirty work so they have to be fed with a good & bad story, something that hits them in their ethics. I mean, how many German soldiers would have fought so hard for their Reich if they would have known that it was Hitler's sole purpose to get to the oilfields in the Caucasus. The boots on the ground were fed with the lie that the commies were pure evil and threatened their Lebensraum. But far away from the mud and the cold and the bullets Hitler desperately needed resources. And here comes the third layer: in order to get resources and fabricate and keep your industries working you need … money. In those times the cluster around the Rothchilds already had a firm grip on European countries and that's one of the threads you need to understand why the Nazi regime hated the Jews so much. Anyway, Hitler needed money too and a large part he took from the Jews. I guess he didn't have a central bank. So here are your layers. On the ground we see ordinary people with their honest beliefs, ethics, biases, ignorance, love for the country you're born in etc. No matter if you're educated, there's always an emotional weak spot that can be manipulated; that's where the information stream comes in, but since it's directed it's really propaganda. Onesided, distorted or flawed facts, lack of historical context etc. People begin to see an enemy, receive a gun and enter the battlefield in full conviction that their war is a just war. Just as they want it to see on the next level, the politicians use your emotional state to satisfy their own needs, whether it be gold in Africa or that Chinese-controlled oil refinery in Raqqa, Syria. What? The Chinese in Syria? Yup, just like the Russians had their companies in Iraq some years ago but they were wiped out of that country. Don't know if the Chinese are still there but it was quite convenient that Isis made Raqqa the capital of their caliphate. So you can safely conclude in the top layer of all this it wasn't about the WMD (didn't exist), Al Qaeda in the middle east (not in Iraq as long as Saddam ruled), not about oil (there was no problem as long as Saddam traded in dollars), not about dictators (just read about Syria being the only secular country left in the region), but all about the monetary system and having corporate dominance. It's ultimately Assad's fault to have an independent course and not willing to bow to the capitalistic hegemonic tendencies of the West, the US and behind that system the thrills and whims and purposes of those who control the money system. All Western countries have considerable debts and just think about it on your own level: if you're in debt because of a simple mortgage, who's really the boss? The bank or you? 1 Like |
| Foreign Affairs › Re: Are The People On Nairaland Supporting Russia Invasion Of Ukraine Real Or Bots ? by Vicotex(m): 1:36pm On Mar 06, 2022 |
Rubbiish:American caused it Mr man. Shebi as Russia don come to thier aid America don hide thier head for Syria. 1 Like |
| Foreign Affairs › Re: Are The People On Nairaland Supporting Russia Invasion Of Ukraine Real Or Bots ? by Vicotex(m): 6:03am On Mar 06, 2022 |
Rubbiish:Yes they did 1 Like |
| Foreign Affairs › Re: Are The People On Nairaland Supporting Russia Invasion Of Ukraine Real Or Bots ? by Vicotex(m): 8:05am On Mar 05, 2022 |
Wisfem:Exactly, but they won't report the truth 2 Likes |
| Foreign Affairs › Re: Are The People On Nairaland Supporting Russia Invasion Of Ukraine Real Or Bots ? by Vicotex(m): 12:27am On Mar 05, 2022 |
GeneralPula:You're a fucking liar. California and Texas are Mexicans territories 4 Likes |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 (of 95 pages)