Thunder fire you!

Kingsley10000:
You ara biased....Tottenham player committed a pk,they didn't give it(he held a mancity tight till he fell down)

most man city's attack and counter has been halt by the center referee.

the last Jesus goal should have counted,the ball didn't touch any man city player,it was even the Tottenham player that committed the hand ball




TRUST ME VAR IS SPOILING FOOTBALL.
THIS CAN'T HAPPEN IN SOUTH AMERICAN AND AFRICAN LEAGUE

M not biased.
Read what I said earlier.
I said honestly that it should be a penalty and no doubt about it.
But I never saw city attack being halted by the ref. As for this point u brought out? I disagree.
If u r talking about VAR decision so far, what about wolves and Leicester game. Wolves coach was busy saying at press that they scored a clear goal buh VAR ruled it off.
The thing is that once VAR doesn't favour u, u will complain and if it favours u u will smile. I think Leicester westham and Tottenham are the lucky ones.
Let every club be ready this season for VAR shit. M a man utd fan. Any day I suffer it, I will endure.
Gary Neville himself said that more shocking drama will happen this season.

uunwanaobong3:
HONESTLY, LET THE TRUTH BE TOLD, I AM BEGINING TO GET CONVINCE THAT VAR WAS SOLELY CREATED TO STOP MANCITY FROM WINNING PRIMEIR LEAGUE AND CHAMPIONS LEAGUE and also help liverpool to win primier league.
Last year, VAR allows lorente hand ball goal to stand but disallow city marginal offside goal at injury time.
Liverpool won super cup because VAR could not over rule liverpool keeper whose both legs were off the line during penalty shøötout.
VAR deny jesus goal last week stating that sterling was a millimeter offside despite replay showing that both players were on the same line.
Now today VAR deny mancity a clear and open penalty when lamela wraps his hand around rodri neck and pull him down during corner kick. But VAR was quick to disallow mancity goal despite reply showing that the ball slightly brush of laporte hand as both laporte and totenham defender arm were wrap against each other unknowingly... Believe me this var is a witch hunt to deny city their trophies... So far two mancity goals has been cancel

For u to say that sterling was millimeter offside doesn't make sense. ThankGod u add offside after tying that millimeter. That's why VAR was implemented. U are talking as if didn't watch past tournaments where this kind of offsides has been ruled out. For VAR to zoom in for u to see is just to prove to u what they found out. That means they are transparent.
As for challenge on laporte, its controversial.
Honestly if it looks like a penalty. Buh it may have been reviewed. And if they observed it to be penalty they would have called the attention of the referee. Its a controversial scene for me.
Buh for that of jesus goal, its not a goal. That hand ball deflected/changed the direction of the ball and that's y jesus got the ball and scored. U cant allow that goal na. Had it been it scrapped the hand and it didn't deflect the ball it would have been a goal. The deflection was much. Me personally thought it was headed in wrong direction.
As for implementing VAR to hunt city?
Its a lie. It city and guardiola that first protested for it. They are the only club out of big 6 that called for it. and its now affecting them.

Pls that llorente goal is not hand ball oo. Make una talk true. They did the replay several times. Even before the ref went to review it. They showed the reply several times, me personally didn't see any hand ball and the ref took his time and watched it.

uunwanaobong3:
HONESTLY, LET THE TRUTH BE TOLD, I AM BEGINING TO GET CONVINCE THAT VAR WAS SOLELY CREATED TO STOP MANCITY FROM WINNING PRIMEIR LEAGUE AND CHAMPIONS LEAGUE and also help liverpool to win primier league.
Last year, VAR allows lorente hand ball goal to stand but disallow city marginal offside goal at injury time.
Liverpool won super cup because VAR could not over rule liverpool keeper whose both legs were off the line during penalty shøötout.
VAR deny jesus goal last week stating that sterling was a millimeter offside despite replay showing that both players were on the same line.
Now today VAR deny mancity a clear and open penalty when lamela wraps his hand around rodri neck and pull him down during corner kick. But VAR was quick to disallow mancity goal despite reply showing that the ball slightly brush of laporte hand as both laporte and totenham defender arm were wrap against each other unknowingly... Believe me this var is a witch hunt to deny city their trophies... So far two mancity goals has been cancel

Oga u r not getting it. Last two season guardiola protested strongly for VAR in premier league. When they started it newly in FA cup then, guardiola praised it while some coaches didn't like it. So they did open floor opinion based on clubs that wants it @ epl towards the end of last two season. Many big clubs like man utd, Chelsea, Tottenham, huddersfield, even arsenal I think and some other clubs didn't support the use of VAR. So pep came to press conference and was complaining about big clubs that doesn't need it and was aiming dig @ man utd and other big clubs because he wants it. and that was why they didn't implement the VAR last season via clubs voting. Buh due to errors like Charlie Austin goal that was ruled out last season and of wic Austin came to the press and was fuming about his clear goal denied and there was alot of mistakes in the match so they held meeting and confirmed the use of VAR this season. Buh before then, champs league don dey use m. And pochettino is strongly against it. Buh the VAR now favoured him in that champs league game against against city and the thing name came back to haunt guardiola.
Its not a conspiracy against the citizens but it was guardiola that spoke strongly for it and the thing is haunting him and favouring most clubs that never wanted it. (Like man utd wey no want m, the thing favored them against psg)

U can make research about what I have said. I giving u the concrete information

Paul Parker thinks Jose Mourinho will put his career in jeopardy if he doesn't change his ways, after he criticised new manager Ole Gunnar Solskjaer.

I don't want to read anything Jose Mourinho has said - he spends his life looking so mournful all the time, and it sums him up.
He's probably never going to be a 'nice guy' like Ole Gunnar Solskjaer is, but some people in football are too scared to talk about him for fear of the consequences.
Mourinho never smiled, which doesn't make any sense. He should have been happy - he was in a job that he'd always wanted, one of the most prestigious jobs in the world at one of the biggest clubs. He was acting like he was at Carlisle United, not Manchester United.

MOURINHO IS WRONG ABOUT SOLSKJAER.

Things might have tailed off for United under Solskjaer, but Mourinho doesn't get it. When you come in as an interim manager, your job is to fill a role. You have to pacify players and you don't do that by going in and shouting at everyone. You calm things down at the club and then start to earn the respect of the players.
To be fair, Mourinho might have a point about some of the players, but it doesn't mean he was right to carry on as he did. They might have been difficult to work with. Some of them were stale, some of them were bad apples, and some of them weren't good enough to challenge at the top, but Solskjaer didn't ruin the atmosphere at the club, instead he gave them hope. Look at the game against Paris Saint-Germain, they could never have done that under Mourinho. You have to work with what you've got, whether you think there should be improvements or not.

MOURINHO'S FAILURE WAS NOBODY'S FAULT BUT HIS OWN.

He's gone against the normal etiquette to single out his replacement for criticism. It doesn't do him any good, and it makes him look bitter. He was the one to blow his golden opportunity - it's not anybody else's fault.
He didn't buy well, and he bought Alexis Sanchez, which was a disaster for the club's finances and the team. He was fitting a square peg into a round hole, and it was totally unnecessary. Nobody made him do that.
The problem with Mourinho was that he wanted to be a manager, which misses out at least half of the responsibility of the job, which was to be a coach. He surely could have got more out of
Chris Smalling and Phil Jones by praising them and coaching them rather than making them feel unwelcome.

MOURINHO LEARNED NOTHING FROM FERGUSON AND ROBSON.

He'd worked under one of the great man managers, Bobby Robson, but it seemed he learned nothing from him. When Bobby saw weakness, he managed it and mitigated it, he didn't scream and shout.
The very best managers plan for a year ahead, they don't burn all their bridges in anticipation of problems. I knew at Manchester United that I was being eased out, but Alex Ferguson handled it brilliantly.
I was aware that other players were being brought in, but it wasn't leaked to the press that I probably didn't have a future anymore. I wasn't publicly undermined, and so I respected Ferguson. I still see him now, and while I still consider him the boss, I can also consider him a friend too - I spoke to him just the other week at the LMA awards.
I was asked to play in the Champions League games despite needing surgery, but because I was treated with respect, I was willing to play through the pain for him. When I knew I was leaving, I didn't down tools either - I gave everything for my teammates and my future. Will Mourinho ever be able to get the same thing from one of his players?

Because people want to watch United, win or lose, they will always be in the papers. But when things are going badly, Mourinho's antics just make things worse. He could have taken the heat off the players, but instead there were leaks to the press.
The only hope for him now is that he learns. He looks at the mistakes he's made and he changes for the better. It's said the only job left that he wants is to manage his own country, Portugal. He has to realise then that he's not just managing players. He has to be kind to the canteen staff, and those who are there to help him. He can't just bring in new players when he loses his way with his first choices - he'd actually have to become a coach, and a more pragmatic one too. He could even try smiling.

https://www.eurosport.co.uk/football/premier-league/2018-2019/_sto7274738/story.shtml

Parker: Mournful Mourinho has to change after criticising Solskjaer.

Paul Parker thinks Jose Mourinho will put his career in jeopardy if he doesn't change his ways, after he criticised new manager Ole Gunnar Solskjaer.

I don't want to read anything Jose Mourinho has said - he spends his life looking so mournful all the time, and it sums him up.
He's probably never going to be a 'nice guy' like Ole Gunnar Solskjaer is, but some people in football are too scared to talk about him for fear of the consequences.
Mourinho never smiled, which doesn't make any sense. He should have been happy - he was in a job that he'd always wanted, one of the most prestigious jobs in the world at one of the biggest clubs. He was acting like he was at Carlisle United, not Manchester United.

MOURINHO'S FAILURE WAS NOBODY'S FAULT BUT HIS OWN.

He's gone against the normal etiquette to single out his replacement for criticism. It doesn't do him any good, and it makes him look bitter. He was the one to blow his golden opportunity - it's not anybody else's fault.
He didn't buy well, and he bought Alexis Sanchez, which was a disaster for the club's finances and the team. He was fitting a square peg into a round hole, and it was totally unnecessary. Nobody made him do that.
The problem with Mourinho was that he wanted to be a manager, which misses out at least half of the responsibility of the job, which was to be a coach. He surely could have got more out of
Chris Smalling and Phil Jones by praising them and coaching them rather than making them feel unwelcome.

MOURINHO LEARNED NOTHING FROM FERGUSON AND ROBSON.

He'd worked under one of the great man managers, Bobby Robson, but it seemed he learned nothing from him. When Bobby saw weakness, he managed it and mitigated it, he didn't scream and shout.
The very best managers plan for a year ahead, they don't burn all their bridges in anticipation of problems. I knew at Manchester United that I was being eased out, but Alex Ferguson handled it brilliantly.
I was aware that other players were being brought in, but it wasn't leaked to the press that I probably didn't have a future anymore. I wasn't publicly undermined, and so I respected Ferguson. I still see him now, and while I still consider him the boss, I can also consider him a friend too - I spoke to him just the other week at the LMA awards.
I was asked to play in the Champions League games despite needing surgery, but because I was treated with respect, I was willing to play through the pain for him. When I knew I was leaving, I didn't down tools either - I gave everything for my teammates and my future. Will Mourinho ever be able to get the same thing from one of his players?

Because people want to watch United, win or lose, they will always be in the papers. But when things are going badly, Mourinho's antics just make things worse. He could have taken the heat off the players, but instead there were leaks to the press.
The only hope for him now is that he learns. He looks at the mistakes he's made and he changes for the better. It's said the only job left that he wants is to manage his own country, Portugal. He has to realise then that he's not just managing players. He has to be kind to the canteen staff, and those who are there to help him. He can't just bring in new players when he loses his way with his first choices - he'd actually have to become a coach, and a more pragmatic one too. He could even try smiling.

pointblank247:
No no Bros. You may not get those songs from the net. Go to upper idea and ask of where you can get those old igbo classics

pls what is upper idea?

Pls frnds I need link on where to download "ihe emebiwo" album by bro okwey. And "ga na ulo nso" music by ezeji Luke.
Who knows should help me pls. I need it.

PSTEMMA1960:
where is the word "pope" mentioned in the bible? Peter was an apostle not a pope........and as for the image do catholics not bow down b4 an image during station of the cross......why bow down in the first place when u don't want to worship it?......God strictly warn the Israelite not to make an image in the first place.....

that u bow to an image doesn't mean u worship it. There r pipo like Koreans Japan igbo that bow to their elders y greeting and yorubas that prostrate. Will u say now that they worship the person. And I know that u too do the same. If u wanna shake someone superior or an elite, u lower down ur heard slightly. Does that mean u worship the person?

OpenYourEyes1:


You ask them to repent. but the pope seems to be encouraging it.
He seems to be encouraging atheism too in that statement.

see. The pope is nt supporting the act. He's jst encouraging others not to segregate them. And not condemn them.
U Pentecost that's talking what abt adventist church that support abortion with some flimsy excuse. Y don't u guys criticize the church. Y must it be catholic?. Who knows what the doctrine of ur church looks like.

jesusjnr2:
I have always been of the belief even while as a church goer that there was something fundamentally wrong with the catholic church, especially with respect to an idol they worship that has been fashioned in the guise and image of Mary the mother of Jesus, for it just didn't make common sense then how people could be so blind not to see the blatant error in that.

So of course that position strengthened when I repented and grew in the knowledge of the things of God, as I saw the catholic Pope that the world regard as the world leader of the church, as being an absolute appointment of men and none of God, for it was obvious no one would attain that position and yet condone such extent of idolatry in the catholic church among other things.

For despite that they claim Apostle Peter to be the first bishop of the Catholic church, from the available evidence of him provided in the Bible, it is obvious that the Peter we all know in the Bible who was himself a disciple of Jesus, that Mary the mother of Jesus a times had to pass through first to get to Jesus during the course of His ministry on Earth, would now ridiculously start praying to that same mother of Jesus to pray to Jesus and encouraging people to do same, and not completely denounce it.

For even if it be true that Peter was ever the bishop of the catholic church, then going by his records in the bible, it would be that they the catholic church and their leaders these days especially the Pope have significantly derailed from the way that the catholic church was then whike Peter was the leader of it.

So for a Pope who endorses the idolatry in the respect the worship of Mary's image, it not surprising to have this extent of trash emanate from mouth of such a leader:

'Giving more importance to the adjective [gay] rather than the noun [man], this is not good. We are all human beings and have dignity. It does not matter who you are, or how you live your life – you do not lose your dignity.There are people that prefer to select or discard people because of the adjective. These people don’t have a human heart. For those of you who are believers, pray for me. For those of you who do not believe, could you wish me a good journey, so I do not let anyone down."

Now he called it a mere adjective to be gay, hence endorsing a lifestyle which is not just living a sinful but an abominable one even by the law of Moses standards.

Secondly he denounced those who were didn't condone the abomination of homosexuality as not having a human heart.

Now that's the Pope the leader of the catholic church, but this is Jesus the Master, Lord and founder of the true church saying not even to an homosexual, but an adulterous woman caught in the act of adultery which in itself is a much lesser sin than homosexualism:

John 8:10-11 (KJV)
10 When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee?"

11 She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more."

Now even though He didn't condemn her, He denounced the sinful(adulterous) lifestyle, for regardless of the fact that He didn't condemn her, it was important for her to know that the sinful lifestyle she lived was wrong!

So that she needed to desist from it otherwise even though He had spared her, that the lifestyle of sin would eventually lead her into condemnation.

And that was what someone observed by the world as the world leader of the church would call an adjective, to confirm the truth that he was not chosen by God, and is not of God and hence doesn't represent the views, judgment or Word of God, but that of men.

So I have done my job to put the position of the Jesus on the matter side by side with that of the catholic Pope, so it up to men to chose who their master is and whose example they would follow, if Master Jesus or the blind guide catholic Pope!

From ur title. Catholic church have never endorse gay sex. Say the truth sir. Buh we don't condemn them buh we still pray for them and accommodate them (I mean u don't crucify them because nobody is perfect). Catholic never support gay. U personally know that.

jesusjnr2:
I have always been of the belief even while as a church goer that there was something fundamentally wrong with the catholic church, especially with respect to an idol they worship that has been fashioned in the guise and image of Mary the mother of Jesus, for it just didn't make common sense then how people could be so blind not to see the blatant error in that.

So of course that position strengthened when I repented and grew in the knowledge of the things of God, as I saw the catholic Pope that the world regard as the world leader of the church, as being an absolute appointment of men and none of God, for it was obvious no one would attain that position and yet condone such extent of idolatry in the catholic church among other things.

For despite that they claim Apostle Peter to be the first bishop of the Catholic church, from the available evidence of him provided in the Bible, it is obvious that the Peter we all know in the Bible who was himself a disciple of Jesus, that Mary the mother of Jesus a times had to pass through first to get to Jesus during the course of His ministry on Earth, would now ridiculously start praying to that same mother of Jesus to pray to Jesus and encouraging people to do same, and not completely denounce it.

For even if it be true that Peter was ever the bishop of the catholic church, then going by his records in the bible, it would be that they the catholic church and their leaders these days especially the Pope have significantly derailed from the way that the catholic church was then whike Peter was the leader of it.

So for a Pope who endorses the idolatry in the respect the worship of Mary's image, it not surprising to have this extent of trash emanate from mouth of such a leader:

'Giving more importance to the adjective [gay] rather than the noun [man], this is not good. We are all human beings and have dignity. It does not matter who you are, or how you live your life – you do not lose your dignity.There are people that prefer to select or discard people because of the adjective. These people don’t have a human heart. For those of you who are believers, pray for me. For those of you who do not believe, could you wish me a good journey, so I do not let anyone down."

Now he called it a mere adjective to be gay, hence endorsing a lifestyle which is not just living a sinful but an abominable one even by the law of Moses standards.

Secondly he denounced those who were didn't condone the abomination of homosexuality as not having a human heart.

Now that's the Pope the leader of the catholic church, but this is Jesus the Master, Lord and founder of the true church saying not even to an homosexual, but an adulterous woman caught in the act of adultery which in itself is a much lesser sin than homosexualism:

John 8:10-11 (KJV)
10 When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee?"

11 She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more."

Now even though He didn't condemn her, He denounced the sinful(adulterous) lifestyle, for regardless of the fact that He didn't condemn her, it was important for her to know that the sinful lifestyle she lived was wrong!

So that she needed to desist from it otherwise even though He had spared her, that the lifestyle of sin would eventually lead her into condemnation.

And that was what someone observed by the world as the world leader of the church would call an adjective, to confirm the truth that he was not chosen by God, and is not of God and hence doesn't represent the views, judgment or Word of God, but that of men.

So I have done my job to put the position of the Jesus on the matter side by side with that of the catholic Pope, so it up to men to chose who their master is and whose example they would follow, if Master Jesus or the blind guide catholic Pope!

Trash!!!
Dont say what u dont know. We don't worship images. If u wanna know y we use image u can google it. It will give u every fact u need.
Catholic is the oldest institution. Pipo r opening churches here and there. So if u pipo for instance succeed in pulling Catholic down by painting them black (wic can't work shaa). Then tell me that church that is acknowledged or instituted by Jesus. Is it winners or redeemers or assemblies, deeper life and the rest. Pls point out the one that is the true church then so that we will all know.
I remembered what Jesus said to peter before he ascended. He instructed them to be careful that many will come to claim to com in my name. And that's exactly what's happening. Pentecostals opening churches here and there.
Take it or leave it, peter is the first pope. Go and google the list of popes the catholic church hav had till pope Francis. It will bring it out for u.
I jst dey laugh all this churches that existed yesterday that is opening mouth. I know that u pipo need members that's it.

lawman88:


Sorry to say, but you are a complete fool. Too many useless people like you are the reasons why people don't engage in charity work.

Somebody saved lives of 4 kids and their parents and you are saying it shouldn't be? So it's pictures of a naked woman or cleavage baring that littered Nairaland that you called news? This is the greatest of all news.

Just a reminder: You are still a useless broke ass fool

seconded!!!

Sandycee:
He has been liberating a lot of people from poverty. Mbaka is a very good man but I don't like his involvement in politics

I love everything he does via politics matter. Keep it up padre.

Haters arrived so soon.

CodeTemplar:
There is nothing hateful in my initial comment. I made that comment for those who may want to make a God out of Mbaka erroneously or put their faith in Mbaka instead of God. The only hatred here is the one you seem to have for me.

its a lie oga. Y were u defending urself by making reference to the bible. Or is it becos I countered ur point?. U never addressed what u meant. U wanted to criticize the man. Its simple. Admit u joined them

CodeTemplar:
I thought there is a part of the bible that says "and God wroth many miracles through the hands of Paul" or something close to that.

. Go and read acts 28:8-10 to know if its pauls name or Gods name them use. Learn abeg

CodeTemplar:
I thought there is a part of the bible that says "and God wroth many miracles through the hands of Paul" or something close to that.

. Go and read acts 28:8-10 to know if its pauls name or Gods name them use. It doe

CodeTemplar:
I thought there is a part of the bible that says "and God wroth many miracles through the hands of Paul" or something close to that.

go and read acts of the apostles 5:15-16. I tell me if they said peters shadow or Gods shadow. For christ sake who doesn't know that God heals through man. No dey hate for just no reason. Fr. Mbaka never knew this miracle happened. They were the one that came to him to give thanks to God.

CodeTemplar:
God healed a blind man through the hands of Father Mbaka and not Father Mbaka healed a blind man.

jealousy and heavy heart go kill u. Who doesn't know its God that did the job?. Idiots. In the act of the apostle when peter, Paul and others were doing miracle. Wasn't it the name peter or paul that they used in each accounts of miracles performed. Does it mean its nt God that did the job?. Hatred go kill u there. Anumanu. Na this reason y ur private intentions hav nt been granted.

mosho2good:
In Africa,immediately you fix bulbs for your neighbors, BOOM! They Will start telling everyone that you're an electrician & you can fix Transformer

lollll. Na so I help one lady install xender for her phone on several occasions and she tell me say I suppose go read computer science. Lollll.

Truefaith:


Do we have an example of it in the Bible?


Did any of the Apostles ever presumed to offer, again, the Lord Jesus Christ in a sacrifice, bloodied or not?


The mass, like almost all the idolatrous practices introduced into Roman Catholicism, is from the occult.


You can't get an example of it in the Christian Bible.


If, therefore, it cannot be found in the Christian Bible, where did the popes and the Roman Catholic fathers derive the power to formulate such teachings from?


The true faith of the Lord Jesus Christ cannot be improved upon in any way by any human or human organization.


They can only presume to be able to corrupt it.




"..it is appointed unto men, once to die, after this, the judgment"


IT IS TIME FOR ALL WHO FEAR GOD TO CHECK THEIR BELIEFS WITH THE CONTENTS OF THE BIBLE


https://www.thetruechristianfaith.com/2016/09/23/are-you-a-catholic/

cry cry baby

Buh make I ask oo. All this rigging stories of this and that coming from pdp. Pls eeh does it mean that pdp didn't rig or try to rig in any of the polling units in all the states?.

Hofbrauhaus:
Atiku continue, Nigerians are behind you..

jst say that u r solidly behind him and not Nigerians.

asawanathegreat:
he is telling him the truth.

pls I don't understand what u r trying to say.

Gandollar:
I didn't expressly say I was sure. I said dig deep. Dig deep I said. And why do you think if you dig deep enough you won't unearth any dirt on him? Is he a saint? Nigga is almost 40yrs old and you think he has not ejaculated before?

Don't be stupid puleeese! He's either fvcking the Reverend sisters, fellow clergyman, masturbating sore with pornographic materials or abusing minors sexually!

Dig deep I said! Every man has his own skeletons.

so hav now become a judge. Saying what u don't know. And false accusation for that matter because of hatred? I pray that God and man will still judge u this same way.

All this things r coming up simply because he didn't say what the people wants to hear.
To serve God closely is truly nt easy.
Na so this same human beings spoke lies and false accusations against christ to the extend of let the blood be upon us and on our children. And it seems u look like one of the Jews. Don't invite course to ur future because of social media.

Gandollar:
Then why was he castigating Obi for been stingy because Obi didn't donate to his church?

@asawanathegreat

why did peter obi come up to the alter when he has nothing to offer?
@ gandollar

Loll And u think u r making sense with what u hav written. Keep on crying
So which church did heaven approve let me start going there immediately.

Vincentude04@gmail.com. I hav download the app.