₦airaland Forum

RuuDie:
Santiago Ascacibar looks a star in the making...

Diademk07:
Greedy ugly mofo!

kokaneprodigy:
What useless methods? U mean the one that almost relegated Chelsea? Somebody is already fidgeting and finding an escape route even b4 the fixture.
Oh I remember, Leicester got him fired the last time they met.
Permit me to welcome u to MOU.

GloryIsaac:
This una formation arguement dey funny shaa ... make i no just put mouth...

Guys, today na d-day oo, come vote Vizkiz for Mr Nairaland...
Format is I vote Vizkiz Cc NLJega

SIRcumalot:
Tomorrow's game na must win for us,and we've to win scoring 4 to 5 goals.
We cant go into it just thinking na ordinary shield.

Diademk07:
I don't get this again!

You first stated that if the second striker turns into a AM, it's no longer a diamond! But now it's not that?.

Diademk07:
You stated that there's nothing like a striker!
Anyway, the 442 tactic had 2 DM as well as a second striker!
the most important thing is 2 DM were flat as the downward tip .

Diademk07:
Can you make a diamond midfield without its SS/CAM?

Diademk07:
That was my first thought and majority of the Bandwagon's thought as well until it was proven that the tip (SS or CAM) is important too!

Diademk07:
The second striker no be striker?
Furthermore, can someone tell me if a false 9 striker such as Suarez, Messi et al wouldn't be equivalent to a second striker in that formation?

Diademk07:
That said!

A diamond in a 4-1-4-1 still exist!

..........The XX players in front of the DM........


X Player on the far right............X players on the far left


.........the Striker.........



The diamond!

SIRcumalot:
mehn,i think say na only me. ask my main man weedtaker,he know how he dey be.

SailorXY:
http://www.squawka.com/news/twitter-reacts-to-wayne-rooneys-performance-against-galatasaray/736336

@elampiro
You can see that it's not like people on NL 'hate' him but the truth is never hidden.

Someone even said he'd be lucky to start in his own testimonia l!!

SailorXY:
Sales in Just One Week

We now know the main reason behind Manchester United‘s decision to bring Zlatan Ibrahimovic to Old Trafford – in fact there are about seventy six million reasons.

United are known to have the savviest and most profitable marketing team in world football, with the money men hired by the Glazer family unlikely to miss a trick that could earn them a few quid.

So, when Jose Mourinho opted to sign Zlatan Ibrahimovic on a free transfer, the Red Devils hierarchy would’ve been all too happy to finance the Swede’s big wages, because they knew exactly how much they’d make back from shirt sales and advertising revenue.

But even the most optimistic employee inside United accounting department probably wouldn’t imagine the club would rake in an astonishing £76 MILLION from fans buying the red home shirt with ‘9 Ibrahimovic’ on the back in just the matter of one week.
And if the sales continue, Zlatan could end up financing the world record transfer deal for Paul Pogba all on his own.

To put the figure into perspective, Leicester City’s entire title-winning squad cost just £54 million in total. Incredible, eh?

What do you make of the numbers? Are United putting money before the team?

http://talkingbaws.com/2016/07/zlatans-manchester-united-shirt-makes-76-million-in-sales-in-just-one-week/?

Dadehmola:
I reiterate - 94m buy-out clause for a proven,in-form, world-class striker isn't too much

I definitely have my reservations as regard the payment of almost 100m for a 29year old but I cannot fault that figure if quoted as his buy out clause.

With the 94m being quoted as buy-out clause, it wouldn't be outta place to put his "bidding value" at about 45-55m which for me, isn't too much.

Juve's decision to trigger the clause should be the crux of the matter, not the actual clause itself.

(please pay attention to the emboldened).

Dadehmola:
90m as higuain's Buyout clause isn't too much...considering his reputation and form
Juve's decision to pay that amount is another issue entirely.