Prettygirl200: Sorry for the breakfast madam op. What I will advice u is this, do not give the whole of your heart to a Nigerian guy, bc they will break it and shatter it to pieces if u must date den don't make any sacrifices or give the whole of u. That's my one cent.
the irony of all this is. She will heal and eventually move on from all this. She'll meet someone who'll treat her even better than her ex but she may end up calling it quits with this person in a worse way than this. it goes around
TenQ: I can never forget my 200L years ago. I was almost reciting the Shahada! My first English Qur'an was the Glorious Qur'an by Marmaduke Pickthall. I was following Ahmed Deedat like a fly will follow a rotten corpse.
Everything came to a stop because I WAS READING the Qur'an. I saw so may irreconcilables! Unlike you Muslims who should not question the Qur'an, I asked questions and the answers fell flat. So many things were wrong and didn't add up.
The final blow was wrecked when I started reading the hadiths in the state library. I'm sure Arabian night stories could have done better.
So bro! I've come a long way with Islam, the only difference is that unlike you, I just don't memorise, I ask questions!
On my phone, I have at least five or six Qur'an Apps. The more you seek the truth, the farther it will lead you away from Islam.
Sorry bro to disappoint you!
You seem to have a knack for getting wrong information. Get someone to lend you a copy of the Holy Qur'an. Hard copy oo..
Uthman destroyed every variant Qur'an and preserved and circulated only the one from the Quraysh dialect. Where are the several Dialects of the Qur'an from?
This narrative was used to defend why there exist only one Arabic Quran in the world. Any answer?
I'm sure you're getting all these theories from your YouTube links. I'd advice you find something someone to lend you a copy of the Quran. Try not to download it online because you'd probably just end up getting a doctored. Just like the fabricated YouTube links you have been posting
TenQ: Lame excuses as I ALSO gave you at least TWO website links to read. But no! You've sealed up your mind against knowledge of the truth.
At least Muslims are agreeing that there are other Qurans BUT they are only DIALECTS!
If these are Dialects, then the narrative of perfectly preserved Quran down to the letter is deflated!
You've not answered this question o:
If Uthman destroyed ALL the variants of the Qur'an and circulated ONLY the Hafs version of the Qur'an, Where are these other Qurans coming from? 1. Did Uthman fail in his mission? 2. Did Uthman preserve the other 7 or 10 dialects? 2. Did the Hadiths lie about Uthman?
I stopped taking you seriously the minute you started posting excerpts from YouTube . The summary of all this is they're all written in Arabic. This can be likened some words in English where (Deceive/Decieve) both mean thesame thing but different spellings.
These Qurans are in use in Sudan, Morocco, Syria, are different. Most of North African Muslims use the Warsh Qur'an instead of the Hafs Qur'an.
If Uthman destroyed all the other variants of the Qur'an except the Hafs, were are all these "different recitations" coming from? by now ALL alternate dialects should not exist or did Uthman preserve all the 30 plus Qur'ans?
Just ask questions: you will find the truth
These are all assertions you deduced from YouTube links of some of the people trying to screw with your mind. The Qur'an is one and the message is thesame. Anyone can fabricate pretty much anything and post them online I'd assume you know this already.
Kobojunkie: 1. Wrong! I call them groups because they call themselves groups.
2. The standard wasn't set by me so I am not the one who decides who is better than whom. Jesus Christ, is the standard Himself, and He declared since over 2000 years ago that those who refuse to obey Him, but follow their own laws and ideas, don't belong to Him. It is that simple.
The conflict you imagine here was not created in the minds of men but by Jesus Christ Himself, so only the confusion you imagine are of men were also created by Jesus Christ in order to eliminate those who do not conform to His Truth and way.
3. The book does not preach anything to you - it is not a holy book. Jesus Christ is not limited by the book or any book.
In a nutshell. You're saying Jesus would be okay his teachings and everything being altered by man like it's happening now? Changing the message to suit whatever narrative you deem fit? Lol
TenQ: That is exactly why I asked you to do your own research after watching each of the videos.
1. If by what Muslims say about when Mohammed is recieving recitations from Jubril, it is impossible that seven different dialects would be dictated by Mohammed for his followers to memorize.
2. The narrative of the "perfectly preserved Qur'an down to the dots" is punchored by the existences of these other Arabic Qurans.
3. Your sheikhs and imams seem to know about these but it baffles me that they sold a wrong narrative to Muslims until the bubble began to burst.
Ask questions and Study: you shall surely find ANSWERS that leads to the TRUTH!
you bore me. These fabricated books like you mentioned earlier are only meant to leave you wallowing in confusion like it's doing now. There are millions of opinions on YouTube and everyone is entitled to one.
TenQ: That is exactly why I asked you to do your own research after watching each of the videos.
1. If by what Muslims say about when Mohammed is recieving recitations from Jubril, it is impossible that seven different dialects would be dictated by Mohammed for his followers to memorize.
2. The narrative of the "perfectly preserved Qur'an down to the dots" is punchored by the existences of these other Arabic Qurans.
3. Your sheikhs and imams seem to know about these but it baffles me that they sold a wrong narrative to Muslims until the bubble began to burst.
Ask questions and Study: you shall surely find ANSWERS that leads to the TRUTH!
Kobojunkie: But what you say you are afraid of has been happening for over 1500 years in that same islam, so ?
So we should keep at it until everything loses its meaning and everything it represents because it has been happening for 1500 years? Life's really simple we just intend on making it complicated for ourselves.
Kobojunkie: 1. I have to confess that I am having a seriously hard time understanding you still.
2. What do you mean when you say they give different narratives to the same book?
3. What you call Christianity is instead a Constitution, a Law consisting of about 100 Laws, imagine a contract agreement, given to individuals (not groups) for living in the Kingdom of God with restriction that no one can add, change or remove commandments from this Law. So when you have groups that use the Christian Logo but adopt additional rules/commandments for themselves, it is just another group not really interested in what Jesus Christ has to offer and that is fine by Jesus Christ.
So, no, what you describe with Islam is nothing at all like what Christianity is about. The Law is meant to filter out those who do not confirm, not include at any cost.
You call them groups because you do not stand for or do not approve of the message they are trying to pass. It still doesn't make you any better than they're are; their message might even be more correct than yours. This right here creates the conflict I mentioned earlier.
And what if the message is contrary to what the book actually preaches? Would Jesus still be fine by it?
You can then search by yourself as you shouldn't believe them. Ask questions from your Sheikhs and make sure they make sense to you.
The Qur'an is said to be revealed in 7 different styles or dialects. If this is true, how did the other 25 codex come up. Are they fabrications?
Which of the 30 plus Qur'an is the words of Allah?
I'm not even aware of these fabrications as you call them but if they do exist. They are fabrications. The Arabic alphabets are thesame, the way the Qur'an is recited is thesame everywhere in the world. Which brings me to why we shouldnt have multiple versions of a particular thing because it brings up the question of which is the authentic and which is not
Kobojunkie: So you are insinuating that part of the reason for wanting to maintain it all in one language in Islam also has to do with competition- not wishing to be sidelined by other books out there of the same name?
The purpose of keeping it that way is so the message doesn't get altered in any way.
Kobojunkie: You are still not making any sense in this. From the beginning,
From its very beginning, the belief has been plagued with errors and you have been trying to control the problem by restricting it to just the one language. Yet the problem continues. How exactly does doing the same thing that you have been doing for over a 1000 years, with continued failure by the way, sound like the meaningful thing to continue with ? Everyone can write their own copies of the Bible if they wish to this since God never told people they had to believe in a book in order to believe in Him.
errors or whatever you have of it is your opinion and yours alone to hold. It doesn't make it true nor does it change the way I see things. Having too many sides to a particular thing is only going to eventually ruin that thing. I'd give you a simple instance where we have different creeds like the Sunni, Shia, izala and other types of Muslims with each having certain things differentiating it from the other. All of these never existed during the time of the prophet. It was introduced by people and they're the same people giving different narratives to thesame book.
It's the same thing as in Christianity. I've seen some Christians who see garment wearing Christians as fetish.
Kobojunkie: But isn't that pretty much what continues to Islam to this day? This destruction not coming from the outside but from right within Islam itself?
What does it mean for a version to be better than another's?
There's no one better than the other. It's a competitive world and it won't be long until certain churches start recommending certain versions of the Bible for it's members, that's if it's not already happening. Thereby sidelining the other books, which further brings in more division.
Firstly, I don't even know who or what's Yasir Qudais. Secondly. There is only one Qur'an which was revealed to Prophet Muhammad S.A.W. The message ,recitations, the contents is forever unchanging. It is read/recited in thesame way everywhere in the world. Not where you have different people using different versions of thesame book with different meanings. I'm having that funny feeling,, it's like I should make my own copy of the Bible what do you think?
Kobojunkie: 1.. If it's not wrong and it isn't right, doesn't that mean it is of no consequence to do it then and hence should be an issue of concern at all?
2. Coining up new words? So you think languages are born from the coining up of new words to suit different narratives? Is this a joke or something?
Complicate what for whom? So the man whose name is Jesus has his life complicated after finding out that the same name can be said in other languages as Jesu, Yesu, Ieosus, Yeshua ?
There's also the chances of people of other faiths or beliefs who'd stop at nothing to destroy what a different faith stands for. Coming up with their own versions of the books and changing the contents to suit their narrative. And note, it doesn't make your version any better than theirs, since everyone can come up with their own versions and they'd still be recognized.
Kobojunkie: Yet the belief is plagued with exactly that, no different from any other religion out there. And you know why? There is no such thing as a perfect book written by the hands of humans and in human language.
This is true. And that is why we must try to not alter these messages as humans because it starts to lose it's meaning. Imagine if everyone were to write their own copies of the Bible today, with each opinion varying from the other.
Kobojunkie: So why is that WRONG or a Terrible thing where Islam is concerned?
It's not wrong. It doesn't make it right either. Coining up new words to suit whatever narrative you want to give certain things is only going to complicate things where thesame word would mean different things to different people. Which brings us to why we should stick with the language it was originally revealed in.