₦airaland Forum

LordReed:
Which Oxford Dictionary did you check?

LordReed, at the end of this your back and forth, all of them means someone who doesn't believe in God in this context.

Stop grabbing the straw and give us evidence 😂

walefresh3:
Place in southeatern region has dis look

Ogun state water side and abeokuta...

Ogun state is far developing...

Ogun waterside is a village.
That's ijebu east local government.
It's a village and does not have this facility. This is from Lekki

walefresh3:
shut up that ogun state... Waterside... Even though if it is LEKKI does LEKKI look like alaigbo ?

Is LEKKI not Yoruba land ?

what's superb about those Abeokuta pictures you have been posting? 😂

maticar:
One of them above said it's because there is no sea shore
😂 😂 😂

I saw it, it was so funny

LordReed:
For the 3rd time I didn't tell you that the diagram represents your position. You can stop knocking your head against it now. LoLz.

for the umpteenth time, you are saying rubbish. Lol 😂

Your diagram is a fallacy. It's not true just because LordReed thinks it's true.

I'm so shocked that I have been engaging someone who even doesn't know the difference between belief and disbelief 🤣

LordReed:
No it doesn't.

Really, let's check Oxford dictionary.

Atheism is a joke 😂

So according to LordReed, if you are not believing something, then it's not same as lacking belief in it.

LordReed:
LWKMD! Let's see your other semantic gymnastic feat of contorting lack of belief into disbelief.

The same person that says "I don't believe" is not the same as "I neither believe nor disbelieve" wants to equate lack of belief with disbelieve. Chai! English don suffer. Bwahahahahahahahahahaha!

Here goes the cherrypicking again.

The person that says he neither beliefs nor disbelief is not represented in that diagram. That diagram is a fallacy of false dichotomy

LordReed:
LWKMD! Let's see your other semantic gymnastic feat of contorting lack of belief into disbelief.

The same person that says "I don't believe" is not the same as "I neither believe nor disbelieve" wants to equate lack of belief with disbelieve. Chai! English don suffer. Bwahahahahahahahahahaha!

So in your book:

Lack of belief does not mean "disbelief"?

Let's know where your problem lies 😂

LordReed:
Show me where on the picture it says disbelieve. The one in denial here is you. You are looking at A and calling it Z. LMFAO!

Dude I never said you are part of the picture, I used it to illustrate my point of view. So that's why you are knocking your head on it because you think I am saying you have to choose one of them? Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! LWKMD!

You are running from pillar to post

Ulunne777:
@Workch,It is time the new Ngwa road road from Asa to OUK bridge be cleared and slabs used to cover it .I could never understand leaving drainages open.
The sight I met the other day made me almost vomit.The drainages are filled with waste and so when the rain falls,the water remains on either side of the roads .It is Avery unpleasant sight.
The govt must meet with mkt union leaders to find a solution to this.
That beautiful road should not look the way I saw it.

you close drainages, you need to do it in every part of the city else you will have issues in future removing clogged diets from it.

It's a big process

Jubilee road, almost complete

LordReed:
Where on the picture does it say disbelieve?

How is 4 choices a dichotomy? And does it say these are the only choices in the whole universe? LoLz.

Atheism is disbelieve in god.
Bring the picture again.

Are you just living in denial?

This is the picture you posted.
Right side theism, which means believing in God.
Left side, atheism, which means disbelieving God.


The picture is compelling one to either believe or not believe. Which is flawed. I'm not part of anything in that picture and you need to reset your brain to know that people like us exist

LordReed:
LMAO! There are 4 segments in my picture so tell me again how it is a dichotomy. Bwahahahaha!

it's two, look it.

The four choices are either to believe or disbelieve.

Why can't you see it? 😂

LordReed:
Educate me. LoLz.

You have two choices. Either you eat an apple every day, or you get sick and need to see the doctor. Of course, this isn't actually true. These are not the only two options you have, but such is the fallacy of the false dichotomy.

Your picture is giving me two choices, it's either I believe or not. Of course this is wrong, I can decide not to believe or disbelieve.

You can go back and look at the piture again.

LordReed:
How are 4 sections a dichotomy? LMFAO!

do even know what a false dichotomy is?

😂😂😂

Looks better 40 years ago. It means that place is not progressing.

You can see it from the decay in infrastructure and serenity

LordReed:
To show you how simple it is and how you keep fucking up something so simple. Even now you cannot show where I said I disbelieve not even in that simple picture but you keep saying I disbelieve. You are so obstinately wrong it is sad. LoLz.

the picture is a false dichotomy. It's no that straight forward

LordReed:
Point out in the picture where it says disbelieve.

I put to you that you are confused, LordReed.

You really do not know that you think. The last time we had this conversation, you agreed that you were an igtheist and not I'm seeing agnostic atheist.

What's actually your position? 🤣

LordReed:
Point out in the picture where it says disbelieve.

lol 🤣

So why are you talking about pictures that you showed me?

LordReed:
Yes very easy, I even showed you a picture but you kept getting it wrong.

You showed me a picture to disbelieve just like theists show me the bible to believe 😅😅

LordReed:
And if you think anything I said is equivalent to Pascal's wager then you definitely need tweaks to your reasoning.

It's equivalent.

The is a house, inside of this house is the believe, outside of it is disbelieve, there are places that cannot be regard as inside of the house like within the wall, in the roof (technically), an ant some within the spaces of the roof is roofing sheet is neithet inside or outside.

Lumping all parts of the house as inside of the house is a false dichotomy and it's flawed

It's 18 pages, atheists still cannot demonstrate anything 🤣🤣🤣

LordReed:
I sure can, I just don't think you are willing to figure it out.

I have dude, there's no point going back and forth.
You are an agnostic atheist, it's easy to understand what that means and to know that it's different from pure agnosticism.

LordReed:
If you think Pascal's wager is valid then you have crippled yourself intellectually.

Really, you think I think that Pascal's wager is valid?

Is that what you could comprehend from that?

Damn 😂😂

LordReed:
This is the same you who cannot quote where I said I disbelieve. Bwahahahahaha!

And just like I predicted banging his head on atheist. LMFAO!

I don't need to quote, you an agnostic atheist.

You can figure it out yourself 😂

LordReed:
Now put it together, is the rat outside or inside the house? The rat is not outside or inside the house. It's just a nonsensical semantic dribble.

This is a Pascal's wager, if we follow your logic.

Pascal's wager lumps all religion together. He argued that it's better to believe in God because you will have nothing to lose if God does not exist.

Pascal's argument is a typical example of a false dichotomy and its as flawed as your argument because he refused to see the other options. You cannot lump all the house together just the way pascal lumped all religions together.

You will be reaching a very illogical conclusion of you do that, you will never see the true picture.

LordReed:
Maybe because you can't understand English when I say I am an AGNOSTIC atheist who holds the exact same position as you. I know you are going to bang your head on the atheist part and ignore the agnostic part while accusing me of cherry picking. Bwahahahahaha!

Also maybe you can't understand simple English to know that an agnostic atheist is different from an agnostic.

The difference is that, both do not claim to know if a god exist or not, but agnostic atheists go further to take a position by disbelieving it. Agnostic do not disbelieve or believe it either.

I have tried explaining this to you and even a primary two student would have gotten it. 😂😂😂

LordReed:
LoLz! As superior as a rat running inside walls. Bwahahahahaha!

Yes, atleast we have evidence of rats living inside a wall, there's no evidence for atheism 🤣🤣🤣

Lol 😅😅😅😅

LordReed:
I asked you asimple question: what am I supposed to prove if my position and yours are exactly the same. You still can't answer it because that will also show you are on a pointless semantic ramble.

If you are an atheist, our position is not the same.

Why is that hard for you to grasp?

LordReed:
LoLz. You that can't admit simple glaring mistakes? Bwahahahahaha!

another whataboutism fallacy 😂

Atheists eat fallacies like food just like theists when they meet a superior argument.

LordReed:
LoLz! Who came to open thread about atheists? Bwahahahahaha!

Bros, atheism is not scientific.
Science works with evidence and not with disbelieve like atheism does.

It's simple, and I have proven that. No atheist has provided any evidence and we are in the 17th page of this thread 😂

LordReed:
There is no dichotomy false or otherwise, you simply playing a nonsensical semantic game.

It's false dichotomy.

You are only working with two option of either believe or disbelieve.
You are incapable of comprehending the fact that some people called agnostics don't fall into these two categories.

You have to reset your brain to admit it 😂