₦airaland Forum

LordReed:
You asked me my stance on god and I told you it is exactly the same as yours so what am I supposed to be proving or bringing evidence for?

So why are then questioning me if you are an agnostic?

LordReed:
Point out where I said I know that a god does not exist.

So why do you disbelieve the existence of a god?

Trustedpronet:
How many building come dey for the abia

you think say Abia na small place?

Funny atheists, 15 pages on back and forth.

Even theists that are reading this thread will be laughing at you guys. 😂

After all said and done, their school of thought is still based on crass ignorance. No evidence to justify anything, just like theism

LordReed:
This what you said: if you don't believe it bring an evidence against it. So what evidence do you have against deism to not believe it?

I'm confused, I don't know anything. I have not taken a position yet.

That's why I'm asking atheists who have taken a position to substantiate it but they are on the defensive 😂.

I am not claiming to know anything. I don't know if a god exist or not. There's nothing lkk evidence for "I don't know"

I'm proving to you that atheists also can not substitiate their position with evidence. Thru position is based on ignorance, just like theists 😂

LordReed:
Well Workch says you need to bring evidence against what you don't believe.

Do you know that you re committing a whataboutism fallacy.
Atheist are equally as illogical as theists, in the face of superior argument, you resort to fallacies 😂😂

Whether or not he doesn't provide evidence, it still doesn't mean that a god doesn't exist. Stop the red herring.
If you don't believe in God, then you have to bring evidence for it else your disbelief is an ad ignoratiam.

As far as I'm concerned, I don't know anything 😂😂

LordReed:
Did I say differently? If you don't believe what evidence do have against it with respect to what you said: “if you don't believe it bring an evidence against it. ”

But I don't disbelieve as well.
I don't know anything. It is you that claim to know. I not claiming to have any knowledge, you re the one claiming to have knowledge.

If you say god does not exist, how did you know?

LordReed:
This what you said: if you don't believe it bring an evidence against it. So what evidence do you have against deism to not believe it?

I don't disbelieve or believe it.

Why is it hard to understand?

triplechoice:
I don't blame you.

This forum is faceless . So you can insult. But I tell you, it's not what you think. You might be surprised.

I have strong reasons to believe my house was burgled by a thief, but not certain who exactly is the thief, and that's because no evidence to confirm.

If I have no evidence it's wrong to accuse and arrest anyone as being responsible, but people do that all the time.

This is the main thing I want go get across ,and not the fact of it being burgled.

You didn't read very well before barking.

I told you already, stop with this nonsense to score cheap points in order to give yourself airs.

You are have been the only one trying to misinrepresent me here, but you will continue to fail .

Stop replying tk him.
You won't regret it.

He has psychological problems. Respond to saner people

LordReed:
According to you, you need to give evidence against the deistic god before you can say you don't believe it. Where is this evidence?

According to me, I ask atheists for evidence against a deistic god, but I ask deists evidence for it. Because I don't know.

It's both of you guys who make up your mind without actual knowledge. At the end if the day, both deists and atheists always do not provide evidence

jaephoenix:
But you and your agnostic gang were quick to dismiss my claims of existence of the dragon. You didn't do any research whatsoever. Not even a question about its properties or attributes. You dumped all of it into the trash can. I feel hurt

Where did i dismiss it?

Where? Show me?

Why should I dismiss it?

If you like make plenty shit up, why should I bother about dismissing it?

LordReed:
According to your own standard here where is your evidence against a deistic god for you not to believe it?

I don't know.

Where's your evidence to dismiss it?

LordReed:
Why can't you be gracious about a simple spelling correction? Would it kill you to acknowledge you spelt it wrong?

Don't mind me jare, I ways type fast hence numerous typos.

How does that change the fact that you cannot dismissa deistic god?

jaephoenix:
Lemme rephrase….
Someone makes a claim that a warmhole Dragon exist, it's a claim. Nobody is saying "no I don't believe it" in science. Every astrophysicist human is either working to find evidence for it or against it. Until either of it surfaces, it will be stupid to say that you don't believe in warmholes Dragon(s).

Does this sound familiar?

NB: This your warmhole thingy is getting me all hornyyy. I wonder why

So they are saying that they know right that warmholes exist?

Evidence is knowledge, if there's no evidence then no knowledge.
They don't have to say it that they don't know, whether or not they say it l, if evidence for or against warmholes don't exist, they don't know it.

Atheism is odd, it's like theism

jaephoenix:
But your fellow agnostics say my precious Dragon is bullshit and a 'non-starter'. But I'm dead sure its swirling on your head right now

Well, I don't know.

D

KnownUnknown:
I’ll be your editor to improve your reasoning.

I love messing with atheists, same way I mess with theists.

Same vibe, same results 🤣😔😔

KnownUnknown:
Ahhhh, you are finally looking in the mirror. Lol

So in other words?

No evidence, no experiment. Deistic god does not exist because you don't like it.
Well, I will go to bed now. I'm sure by tommorow, I will still be begging you to demonstrate your conclusion. 😅

Goodnight militant atheist

KnownUnknown:
You are demonstrating it for me and also weeping.

Lol, yeah, same way a winner member will say that I'm an evidence for the existence of yahweh.

Atheism and Theism are the same thing, opposite sides of same kind of reasoning. They become confuse when you tell them to demonstrate their ideologies 😂😂

KnownUnknown:
The “deist god” aka the deadbeat god aka the lazy god aka the indifferent god.

The “deist god” created the universe then went into Witness Protection!

I just felt like I had a debate with a deeper life member 😂

All talks, no action. For more than 11 pages 🤣. Not one demonstration

KnownUnknown:
I don’t know everything but I do know what you wrote is utter bullshit.

of course you don't know everything. Including if a deistic god exist or not.
You don't know it, you are just reaching a blind conclusion.

If we ask you to demonstrate it, you Wil start weeping again 😂😂

KnownUnknown:
You really are a confused agnostic. How does it feel to wrestle against strawmen?

“Atheism is not scientific”. No shit!

In case you don't know, the concept of a deistic god is the ultimate goal shifting in theism. You will never solve the puzzle, the smartest people in history have not, talk less of a lousy atheist like you.

The more you try to solve it, the more complicated it becomes because there's absolutely no property to test hence it so widely open. Even if you find evidence that the singularity created itself, deism will still have where to shift the post. It's why science doesn't even bother solving it.

Stop doing as if you know everything.

KnownUnknown, I'm sure you now realize why science is agnostic.

You can never find evidence against a deistic god, it's impossible. It's why science does even try addressing it.

But lousy atheists like you on nairaland think that you reach a conclusion on such matter even when you don't the properties of the god in question.

I pity you, I swear 😂😂😂

KnownUnknown:
You really are a confused agnostic. How does it feel to wrestle against strawmen?

“Atheism is not scientific”. No shit!

That's a perfect analogy for you.

You cannot dismiss it until you provide evidence against it. Else, say you don't know and shut your stinking mouth up 😂😂

KnownUnknown:
Exactly!! The redshift demonstrated with experiment that your deistic god is bullshit!

If you demonstrate "deistic god does not exist" with an experiment, I will change my mind.

I don't want a crying baby here. If you can't demonstrate it then it's remains a possibility until someone more scientific than you are does it.

I kinda see you like a theist now, its how I feel. That sense of hopelessness from their inability to substantially demonstrate their ideologies with evidence 😂😂

Sorry o

KnownUnknown:
I know because of the redshift. What a coincidence!!

Redshift was demonstrated with an experiment.

It's what I expect you to do. Bring an experiment to disprove a deistic god and stop being a serial loser 😂

KnownUnknown:
Evidence? Look in the mirror. The nonsense you spew is my evidence. Lol

Now you are sounding like theists when they say "God exist because everything exist"

You guys are the same thing. When you get a superior argument, you make shit up.

Laviosier didn't believe the phlogiston hypothesis of fire. He didn't go about fighting people and insulting them like a loser, he got to work and disprove it with evidence by discovering oxygen.

Dude, that's what you should do, stop wailing like a loser 😂

Atheism is not scientific, it's not.

KnownUnknown:
I KNOW gods don’t exist and their descriptions are limited to the vocabulary and intellect of the person making the claim. You are Exhibit A.

If you know, then share your knowledge with evidence.

The same way Edwin Hubble mismissed Albert Einstein with Redshift.

If not, how did you know?

KnownUnknown:
If I wanted science lessons, I know where to go. Your agnosticism has nothing to do with science so I don’t know why you keep talking about science. Your “deistic god” doesn’t have anything to do with science either.

I don’t know much but what I know would be an ocean compared to your puddle.

You will never get a science lesson with the way you reason close-mindedly. Youf kind of reasoning cannot make a good scientist.
Someone who reaches a conclusion before evidence surfaces. Hunour me more 😂

Your kind of reasoning, if applied to science with create multiple bis results.
Where or not you like "a deistic god does not exist" is still a hypothesis. There's no single atom of fact backing this

KnownUnknown:
I don’t need to do a research to dismiss your baseless claim.



Your stupid analogy already fell flat.
FYI

https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Automobiles/Toyota-and-Honda-to-ramp-up-China-plants-to-make-up-lost-output#:~:text=Toyota%2C%20which%20has%20four%20assembly,the%20same%20month%20last%20year.

Japanese auto companies will accelerate production in China from May as the country recovers from the coronavirus pandemic earlier than other parts of the world.




You are really fucking stupid!! Lol
Is a claim about where Toyota is made similar to a claim about a supernatural entity?!

you don't know if a deistic god exis or not. Let it end there and keep your fuccccking mouth shut 😂😂

There's nothing wrong with not knowing and waiting for more knowledge to make an educated conclusion

KnownUnknown:
Wormhole! Mr Science, Wormhole! A warmhole is what’s between your madre’s legs.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole

You are still sounding so naive about science.

You will be shocked everytime. Something that we all think is probable has been repeatedly dismissed. The list is long.

Stop making uneducated conclusions when you don't have enough knowledge. Keep you leaking mouth shut and wait for more knowledge 😂😂

KnownUnknown:
Lmao



The possibility of “wormholes” is a hypothesis is astrophysics. Science doesn’t involve your muddled “I don’t believe it” nonsense so leave wormholes out of the discussion. No one is looking for “evidence for or against it” neither.

you are just loud and you know nothing.
Making a hell of noise.

Steady state theory hugely preached by Albert Einstein was very believable, until Hubble Edwin discovered Redshift in 1912. Everyone was amazed, it was unbelievable until he provided evidence that stars moved accelerated away from us and the steady state theory which Albert Einstein himself was a strong proponent of was dismissed.


You have to be humble, don't think that you know too much. Whenever you don't know, keep your fucccccking mouth shut 😊

KnownUnknown:
Lmao



The possibility of “wormholes” is a hypothesis is astrophysics. Science doesn’t involve your muddled “I don’t believe it” nonsense so leave wormholes out of the discussion. No one is looking for “evidence for or against it” neither.

you don't know anything about science, I can show you many scientific hypothesis that were disproven with evidence against. You are bragging and making noise like an empty barrel 😂

Nothing is certain in science until evidence for or against exist.

Even Albeit Einstein himself got disproven many times with evidence against.

Warmholes might seem probable to a closeminded person like you, but people are working hard to either find evidence for it or against it. It's not certain for either of them