₦airaland Forum

KnownUnknown:
Ahhhh, you are finally looking in the mirror. Lol

So in other words?

No evidence, no experiment. Deistic god does not exist because you don't like it.
Well, I will go to bed now. I'm sure by tommorow, I will still be begging you to demonstrate your conclusion. 😅

Goodnight militant atheist

KnownUnknown:
You are demonstrating it for me and also weeping.

Lol, yeah, same way a winner member will say that I'm an evidence for the existence of yahweh.

Atheism and Theism are the same thing, opposite sides of same kind of reasoning. They become confuse when you tell them to demonstrate their ideologies 😂😂

KnownUnknown:
The “deist god” aka the deadbeat god aka the lazy god aka the indifferent god.

The “deist god” created the universe then went into Witness Protection!

I just felt like I had a debate with a deeper life member 😂

All talks, no action. For more than 11 pages 🤣. Not one demonstration

KnownUnknown:
I don’t know everything but I do know what you wrote is utter bullshit.

of course you don't know everything. Including if a deistic god exist or not.
You don't know it, you are just reaching a blind conclusion.

If we ask you to demonstrate it, you Wil start weeping again 😂😂

KnownUnknown:
You really are a confused agnostic. How does it feel to wrestle against strawmen?

“Atheism is not scientific”. No shit!

In case you don't know, the concept of a deistic god is the ultimate goal shifting in theism. You will never solve the puzzle, the smartest people in history have not, talk less of a lousy atheist like you.

The more you try to solve it, the more complicated it becomes because there's absolutely no property to test hence it so widely open. Even if you find evidence that the singularity created itself, deism will still have where to shift the post. It's why science doesn't even bother solving it.

Stop doing as if you know everything.

KnownUnknown, I'm sure you now realize why science is agnostic.

You can never find evidence against a deistic god, it's impossible. It's why science does even try addressing it.

But lousy atheists like you on nairaland think that you reach a conclusion on such matter even when you don't the properties of the god in question.

I pity you, I swear 😂😂😂

KnownUnknown:
You really are a confused agnostic. How does it feel to wrestle against strawmen?

“Atheism is not scientific”. No shit!

That's a perfect analogy for you.

You cannot dismiss it until you provide evidence against it. Else, say you don't know and shut your stinking mouth up 😂😂

KnownUnknown:
Exactly!! The redshift demonstrated with experiment that your deistic god is bullshit!

If you demonstrate "deistic god does not exist" with an experiment, I will change my mind.

I don't want a crying baby here. If you can't demonstrate it then it's remains a possibility until someone more scientific than you are does it.

I kinda see you like a theist now, its how I feel. That sense of hopelessness from their inability to substantially demonstrate their ideologies with evidence 😂😂

Sorry o

KnownUnknown:
I know because of the redshift. What a coincidence!!

Redshift was demonstrated with an experiment.

It's what I expect you to do. Bring an experiment to disprove a deistic god and stop being a serial loser 😂

KnownUnknown:
Evidence? Look in the mirror. The nonsense you spew is my evidence. Lol

Now you are sounding like theists when they say "God exist because everything exist"

You guys are the same thing. When you get a superior argument, you make shit up.

Laviosier didn't believe the phlogiston hypothesis of fire. He didn't go about fighting people and insulting them like a loser, he got to work and disprove it with evidence by discovering oxygen.

Dude, that's what you should do, stop wailing like a loser 😂

Atheism is not scientific, it's not.

KnownUnknown:
I KNOW gods don’t exist and their descriptions are limited to the vocabulary and intellect of the person making the claim. You are Exhibit A.

If you know, then share your knowledge with evidence.

The same way Edwin Hubble mismissed Albert Einstein with Redshift.

If not, how did you know?

KnownUnknown:
If I wanted science lessons, I know where to go. Your agnosticism has nothing to do with science so I don’t know why you keep talking about science. Your “deistic god” doesn’t have anything to do with science either.

I don’t know much but what I know would be an ocean compared to your puddle.

You will never get a science lesson with the way you reason close-mindedly. Youf kind of reasoning cannot make a good scientist.
Someone who reaches a conclusion before evidence surfaces. Hunour me more 😂

Your kind of reasoning, if applied to science with create multiple bis results.
Where or not you like "a deistic god does not exist" is still a hypothesis. There's no single atom of fact backing this

KnownUnknown:
I don’t need to do a research to dismiss your baseless claim.



Your stupid analogy already fell flat.
FYI

https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Automobiles/Toyota-and-Honda-to-ramp-up-China-plants-to-make-up-lost-output#:~:text=Toyota%2C%20which%20has%20four%20assembly,the%20same%20month%20last%20year.

Japanese auto companies will accelerate production in China from May as the country recovers from the coronavirus pandemic earlier than other parts of the world.




You are really fucking stupid!! Lol
Is a claim about where Toyota is made similar to a claim about a supernatural entity?!

you don't know if a deistic god exis or not. Let it end there and keep your fuccccking mouth shut 😂😂

There's nothing wrong with not knowing and waiting for more knowledge to make an educated conclusion

KnownUnknown:
Wormhole! Mr Science, Wormhole! A warmhole is what’s between your madre’s legs.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole

You are still sounding so naive about science.

You will be shocked everytime. Something that we all think is probable has been repeatedly dismissed. The list is long.

Stop making uneducated conclusions when you don't have enough knowledge. Keep you leaking mouth shut and wait for more knowledge 😂😂

KnownUnknown:
Lmao



The possibility of “wormholes” is a hypothesis is astrophysics. Science doesn’t involve your muddled “I don’t believe it” nonsense so leave wormholes out of the discussion. No one is looking for “evidence for or against it” neither.

you are just loud and you know nothing.
Making a hell of noise.

Steady state theory hugely preached by Albert Einstein was very believable, until Hubble Edwin discovered Redshift in 1912. Everyone was amazed, it was unbelievable until he provided evidence that stars moved accelerated away from us and the steady state theory which Albert Einstein himself was a strong proponent of was dismissed.


You have to be humble, don't think that you know too much. Whenever you don't know, keep your fucccccking mouth shut 😊

KnownUnknown:
Lmao



The possibility of “wormholes” is a hypothesis is astrophysics. Science doesn’t involve your muddled “I don’t believe it” nonsense so leave wormholes out of the discussion. No one is looking for “evidence for or against it” neither.

you don't know anything about science, I can show you many scientific hypothesis that were disproven with evidence against. You are bragging and making noise like an empty barrel 😂

Nothing is certain in science until evidence for or against exist.

Even Albeit Einstein himself got disproven many times with evidence against.

Warmholes might seem probable to a closeminded person like you, but people are working hard to either find evidence for it or against it. It's not certain for either of them

KnownUnknown:
As simple as you?



Horrible analogy aside, the first thing you ask for in that situation is “what is Toyota”? Then you find out where Toyota is manufactured. There is no need to bring you stupid “belief/disbelief” dichotomy into the situation. All you have to do is find out if Toyota has a manufacturing plant in China or not.



I don’t have to agree or disagree with the person. It’s a simple question of research. There is no extraordinary claim being made to dismiss summarily. It’s just a statement about where Toyota is made which could be China or Texas or Japan.



It would be senseless to say “I don't know where Toyota cars are made but I don't believe it's made in China. ”

If I tell you Mercedes is “made” in Alabama you don’t have to belief, disbelief, or disagree with me. All you have to do is look up whether Mercedes makes cars in Alabama or not and then you would know.

So what research have you done to reach a conclusion that a deistic god does not exist.

I can simply browse the internet, look for the headquarters 9f Toyota to disprove that person. If he continues arguing, I could fly him to Japan to see for himself.

But in the topic of deistic god, you have not researched anything. There's no evidence against anywhere, you are making noise and claiming a ridiculous conclusion 🤣🤣

KnownUnknown:
Lol, that’s what you are reduced to? “E pain am”!!

in your little head, you may think that the claim of a deistic god is jot reasonable, but if it's not you would have eaiskt found evidence against it.
The fact that you cannot find evidence against it means that it's still beyond your current understanding.
If we had a method to actually prove that the singularity formed on its own, no one will be talking about a deistic god.

But you don't know, you nothing about it but you are pompous and you feel like you can reach a conclusion from ignorance, I pity you 😂😂😂

You better be humble

KnownUnknown:
That would be you and your “deistic god” that you are looking for “evidence against”. Lol

I will be schooling you bit by bit.

Someone makes a claim that a warmhole exist, it's a claim. Nobody is saying "no I don't believe it" in science. Every astrophysicist is either working to find evidence for it or against it. Until either of it surfaces, it will be stupid to say that you don't believe in warmholes.

KnownUnknown:
Lol, that’s what you are reduced to? “E pain am”!!

Take it easy man, if you don't agree with deists then show me that everything formed on its own. Especially that first singularity.

It's not Hard, you will convert everyone.

KnownUnknown:
That would be you and your “deistic god” that you are looking for “evidence against”. Lol

it's simple my dear friend:

Someone makes a claim that Toyota is made in China, if I don't know about Toyota, I cannot believe or disbelieve it. If you disagree with the person, then you have to find evidence to show the person that Toyota cars are made in Japan.

It will be very unwise to say that you don't know where Toyota cars are made but you don't believe it's made in China. It's a close minded reasoning

KnownUnknown:
The stupid muthafucker read some shit on Quora and decided that the confused agnostic is somehow “enlightened”.

😂😂😂

E pain am 😅

KnownUnknown:
No, it’s a sign of mirth. Ad hominem are often accurate. Are you sure the “average atheist” knows this? You aren’t agnostic about it? Lol

Don't you think that your inability to demonstrate your conclusions with facts and evidence is why you are going crazy? 😂

KnownUnknown:
I know that’s it bullshit. and I’ve concluded that your are stupid.

How did you know?
How?

Do you know what it means to "know" something?

KnownUnknown:
Oh, they will never stop

don't you think that it's a sign of frustration?
Ad hominem is not evidence, at least an average atheist knows this.

KnownUnknown:
Lmao, why would I get mad about that? Are you mad because you can’t provide “evidence against” The Dragon?

You should be mad with yourself, because you don't know anything about a thing but you are reaching a conclusion on it.
That's mad bro 😂

KnownUnknown:
slowpoke. I’m not an atheist or theist and definitely not a confused “agnostic” . I KNOW gods are nonsense.

and the insults keeps coming 🤣🤣🤣

KnownUnknown:
Lol, if that’s what you are waiting for, contact the Scientologists. Become a disciple of Tom Cruise. You will fit in and find all the evidence you want because their religion includes an alien that created humanity. They even have spaceships in their “scripture”. Kill two birds with one stone and find your alien and your god. Lol

You are moronic. Lmao. Gods and aliens!

At the end of the day, you have not been able to provide an evidence against a deistic god and that's kinda getting you mad 😂

KnownUnknown:
I’m laughing and won’t stop insulting you because your beliefs are hilarious.

You seem to be crying because you cannot provide evidence against The Dragon. Forget about your “deistic god” and focus on The Dragon. Lol

lol, I love triggering atheists a lot and see them become frustrated just like theists.
At the end of thr day, they are both opposite sides of same coin of making a conclusion without sufficient knowledge

KnownUnknown:
Lol, your position is stupid and these harsh words are not meant to be “evidence” of anything but abject dismissal of your claim.

You make the extraordinary claim so the ball is in your court regarding the “practical experiment” to show that your “deistic god” is not bullshit.

Where is your “practical experiment” to demonstrate how The Dragon cannot exist? Lmao

Again, insults are not evidence for or against. Stop being triggered.

Same way I am waiting for evidence for or against aliens is exactly how I am waiting for a deistic god.
Since you cannot provide any evidence against it, please stop crying and insulting me.
Insults are not practical demonstration of anything, it's only sign of frustration.

KnownUnknown:
I don’t want you to believe it or disbelieve it. I want you to see that it’s as nonsensical as your “deistic creator”. There is nothing to “believe” or “disbelieve”. I know your deistic creator is bullshit. It’s not a belief. I know for a fact it’s bullshit just like I know for a fact that the one eyed monster under your bed is bullshit. Fiction is fiction whether you call it “deistic creator” or “dragon creator”

Harsh words are not evidence against a deistic creator.
You won't change my mind if you cannot demonstrate with practical experiment how a deistic god cannot exist

KnownUnknown:
It doesn’t give evidence for or against a creator because it’s just nonsense I made up, which is akin to the other nonsense you call god. There is nothing different from the claims I make and any other claim about a creator because they are all fabrications. Also, the notion of “creator” is also baseless nonsense and that was already shown when queried about your so called “creator”.

The crux of agnosticism is that whatever extraordinary claim you can’t provide evidence for or against is “unknowable”, therefore you should be agnostic about the Dragon just like you are agnostic about whatever you mean by the “deistic god”.

I do understand you have critical thinking and comprehension problems.

How does your own version of a creator provide me with an evidence for or against a creator?

You don't get it at all.

There's no evidence for or against a deistic creator. It's why I don't believe or disbelieve, it doesn't matter if this deistic creator is your dragon, my alien or a leprechaun.
If you want me to believe it, bring evidence. if you don't believe it bring an evidence against it.