₦airaland Forum

amber_ella:
Not all women. You just need to get out more.

I have been out more than the word itself.
It's all the same thing. . . . .
Some women feign to have more pride than normal but then once sex enters the equation, it bores down to the same thang!

amber_ella:
All women??

, or just the golddiggers you choose to date?

All women!!!!!
Gold-diggers normally ask how and when to be treated ROYAL!!!!
In the wooing stage, these women still pretend that they are up for splitting the bill.

Look at it this way, when two women go out to dinner, they usually split the bill.
The same thing happens when a woman goes out with a man who's just a "friend" -- each pays an equal share.

But the second that sex enters the equation, the woman expects to be paid for.
This is nothing less than whitewashed prostitution.  
 
I've heard many women say:"I've got what you want and you're going to have to pay for it."
Such arrogance just reduces dating to a LovePeddler-john relationship.

jennykadry:
where u there when he called?nope ,so(amara) kanus wife is innocent until proven guilty

I don't have to be there to know how things work. I am a geezer from the concrete streets.

back to square 1,i still borrow your language,innocent until proven guilty,that is what u say isnt it?so let us believe d guys story until he opens up and tell us if he really wants to use and dump her,but until then innocent until proven guilty

Noted!!!!

sistawoman:
I was not talking about the men but the women. Not only are they chickenheads but they are hoes, if you will spread your legs for money then call it what it is.

Whores!!!!!  You have just raised an interesting point there.
Technically, u are saying all women are whores.

The road that leads into any relationship starts from a guy meeting a woman. . . . . . .Taking her out on dates, buying gifts to impress, taking her out for lunch n sometimes dinner and finally getting her laid. I agree it is not directly straight cash-sex but then the end justifies the means.

vicade:
and what is the extra benefit of an eighteen years old dating or getting married to a 24 years old and not a 29 years old?
what ever happened to Love knows no bound afterall it is not illegal though it can be argued that it is immoral but that is only relative compared to our sisters in the north.

24 is a tad closer to 18 than 29 is. . . . .
Blimey. . . . what kind of peops are y'all? Would u let your daughter at 18 date a man of 29?
The probability of him seeking her knickers is 95%

By the way,amarachi,,kanus wife is one hell of a fine babe and i think there is a thread about investment on ladies or something like that, that is one nice investment from kanu-financially or otherwise. when kanu is 40 years old, amarachi will just be warming up

Interesting!!!!

jennykadry:
story xerxes ,who told u kanu's wife married d guy because of money huh?i borrow your words,innocent until proven guilty

Why would any 18 yr-old chic marry a man of 40 if not for money.
Besides, was it not an arranged marriage? kanu called his people in Owerri that he needed a decent virgin and they arranged it.
What else could be involved in that? Love?

anywayz that is by d way,d poster wants to marry her its not as if he just wants to suck d orange and throw away d peel,he wants to keep it forever and as for me i don't see anycrime in it,as long as the babe is matured enough to handel it,for christsake age has got nothing to do with maturity,i was once in this kind of situation so im talking out of experience 18 is not too young for a 29 yr old guy

And what makes u think the poster wants to marry her.
What if he wants to take an advantage of a young, naive woman?
Good parents will be wary of this kind of association. . . . . .Poster is a predator, he should find someone older than 21.

jennykadry:
40 yr old xerxes then i will support the girls mother but 29 is still young and good for d 18 yr old girl

11 yeas difference between the couple?? ??
The geezer is old enough to be her dad. . . .
If i were the gurl's mother, i would shoot ur ass with a 12-guage shotgun.
18 year-old woman should date guys btw 20-23(max).

vicade:
Kanu married that pretty 18 years old girl so you never know

Kanu is a pedophile and that marriage is also motivated by Kanu's finances.
Will that same gurl marry a 40-year-old carpentar around the corner?

sistawoman:
I hope noone gets mad at me but that is exactly what we call chickenheads over here in the states.

Chickenheads?
Men don't mind to be called anything as long as they reach their CANAAN!!!!

dre101:
I'm 29yrs old, in love with an 18-yr old girl. I really want to marry her because I know she loves me more dearly, but her mother is really on her neck, she doesn't want our union, but whenever she sees me, she pretends to like me. But my baby is always complaining about her. Please what should I do?

29 Dating 18 year-old??
Blimey. . . . . this is not right!!!!

sistawoman:
I notice that Nigerian men tend to throw their money at women first w/o first determining if they deserve it.

This is because Nigerian women don't regard Nigerian men who cannot splash some cheddarz in the chasing stage.
Money makes their world go round so a guy who wants to SCORE knows he must throw some cheese around.

VIVA RONALDO!!!!!!!!!

The best player on the planet has just announced his presence in Euro2008.
He had a hand in all the goals and he struck a sweet one that made Cech look like a kindergarten goalie.
Way to go Portugal. . . . . Y'all are thru to the Q-finals.

Bravo Ronaldo!!!! You are simply the best.

amber_ella:
Maybe you should stop trying to buy their love and they'll stop breaking your heart?

Nobody's holding a gun to your head. If you don't want to buy your girlfriend a present, then don't.

I am not talking about me. . . . I was speaking generally about MEN/WOMEN.
Woman would break ma heart? How?
Me heart is not even commited in the 1st place so how does it get smashed?
U gotta be kidding me!!!

amber_ella:


lol - sounds like you're wasting your money! I'd switch to a more conservative portfolio, my friend.

It's not about me. . . . . .It's about these serpents(girls).
Guys spend and spend and spend and these tricks still break men's fragile hearts.

amber_ella:
Thus the reason it's an invesment for men. You buy her a few presents while you're dating, and once you're married, you get a lifetime of free labor.

I am having a laugh.
What's the probability that i would marry the gurl i am currently dating?
Blimey. . . . What kinda high-risk investment is that?

amber_ella:
@xerxes

I don't think you understood my point.

I'm not interested in discussing the gender wage gap.

What I said is that equality does not exist as long as men expect their wives to feed them.

Really?
We are talking single males n females. . . . .
My girlfriend does not stay with me as we speak. . . . . so how is she feeding me?
Yet, i have to buy her presents on Val's day, Birthdays, Anniversary, Christmas, New Year and sometimes Mother's day.

eldee:
Never even thought of that part of it before
Seriously, I won't mind that kind of enjoyment.
You even forgot the unexpected presents, think of the presents you'll get just because the weather was good

That k'inda enjoyment is Heaven or Hell or Prison.
Beware of serpents!!!!!

bgees:
Fabregas is good,if not better than xavi (now).
But i think cesc does'nt show that 'arsenal confidence and spirit' when he plays for spain.
But u just can justify his exclusion because recently xavi has been playing xceptionally well.
But think about it, how many midfield 'generals' have fallen to francesc fabregas. The zidans.pirlos,makelele,viera,scholes,mascheranos and even gerrard.

You forgot to mention Anderson?
A brazilian kid who has never failed to put Cesc Fabregas in his pocket everytime they faced each other.

amber_ella:
Ha, it's funny you should mention it because I work on pay equity and the gender wage gap for the government.

But anyway, I'm not saying that equality shouldn't exist.  I'm saying that it doesn't exist in most homes.
Until you men are doing laundry and dishes and changing diapers just as much as your wives, you have no right to whine and complain when you pay for our dates!

Where a wage gap does exist can easily be accounted for by: job experience (according to The Journal of Labor Economics , full-time employed women have 20% less job experience than men); larger numbers of men in their 50s and 60s are earning bigger salaries based on time and experience;

Female job choices (women often seek out jobs with less income potential such as teaching or retail, or are less dangerous than certain higher-paid male-dominated occupations, such as firefighting and construction);

Longer male hours at work (men work 90% of overtime hours); the large percentage of female part-time workers which distort the statistics; and the time women take off from work for child-rearing (an option not normally afforded to men).

Even if it were true that women earn 25% less than men, women still should be picking up 75% of their half of the dating expenses. Equal rights means equal rights.

amber_ella:
@xerxes

There is no equality. Yes, us women earn paychecks just like you men. But then we have to come home and do a second full-time job - taking care of husbands and children.

Equality? What a joke.

I conclude that dating is an investment for the MEN and us women are getting screwed.

No equality?
The feminist movement would have u flogged for saying this on a public forum.
Where were u when they were fighting for the rights of women and the gender wage gap?

buzyDiva:
@ Xerxes,

u'll be very surprised.

Come and ask my boyfriend . . he will tell u
am not saying that men should foot the whole bill and all that and blah blah blah
but alot of u guys need to take note behind your heads that "not all girls are after u for money" . . some of u sef don't have kobo.

That is not the point!!!

The point is women cook up loads of excuses like men earn more than the women for the same job, it costs more to be a woman, if u don't pay for me u are cheap, it's just nice and expected and whoever asks for the date should pay.

Sure it's nice -- I'd like someone to give me door-to-door chauffeur service, bring me presents, and pay for my dinner and entertainment, all for the possibility of sex, but with no obligation whatsoever. Let's be honest; if MEN did this, we'd be in jail for fraud.

buzyDiva:
Xerxes . . I will divorce u o?
u sound stingy

I am not stingy but women can't have it both ways.
Equal rights come with a price because true equality means equality across the board, not just equality until the check comes.
The real gender gap is that women with good jobs and equal incomes are still insisting that men finance their social lives. . . .
It's so unfair.

I'd say that's a double standard; a very self-serving double standard.
Why should men foot the bill for dinner, entertainment and weekend getaways, while women happily bank their paychecks?
In an age of equality, shouldn't the focus of dating be on partnership and sharing, instead of women still expecting to be taken care of financially?
P.S. You cannot divorce me.

buzyDiva:
Spot on . . .Very well said!!

then again . . i keep saying this. . "ME, I am very allergic to poverty" I look very good and it takes money to maintain my beauty.!!!!!

Boyfriends are investment to women because of various ways men have been scammed to believe women should be treated like princesses.
Scams like if a man is a gentleman, he'll pay for me.

Acting as a woman's version of a "gentleman" is an excellent example of how men are brainwashed by women to fulfill their self-serving interests.

Mothers train their sons to buy into this scam at an early age, teaching them to treat women like goddesses and to pay for female company without question.
No man should allow himself to become a doormat for female whims, and no man should have to pay for a woman earning as much as he is.

Razorr:
@Xerxes

Yea sweety, but the difference between Ronnie and Kaka & Cesc is that Ronnie is head over heels in love with Madrid. Plonker's been having wet dreams on life with the Galacticos and has come out to clearly state that he'd love to leave.

If it's that simple. . . . .Let him pack his bags after Euro2008 and walk straight to the Bernabeu!!!!!
This is Europe and i am sure Ronaldo has freedom of movement, innit?

@ Razorr,

If they can cough out £75 million and above, Ferguson should flog him and get Messi and Huntelaar.
However, i think Man Utd want to rub Real Madrid's nose in the dust like Milan did last season when Madrid chased Kaka.
£56 million was tabled for Kaka but Milan told Real Madrid to self-service off!!!!
Real Madrid don't always get their man like they want people to believe. . . . They failed to land Kaka and Fabregas last season.

Razorr:
@Xerxes

He's a cheat! That ain't no secret! Even the lad in question knows it.

I am sure Roman would love such cheats in his club.
If a cheat can score 42 goals in a season, he is a priceless cheat.
Permit me if i may ask, who spends £75 million on a cheat??

What do you mean by that, last time I checked, he was Brazilian?

Ooooops, ma bad. Anutha typo.
Was meant to say Brazilian. . . . .He speaks Portugese and he should be able to keep Carvalho, Ferreira and Bosingwa happy at Chelsea.

Razorr:
I've got two serious problems with that statement. Firstly, Carvalho ain't no cheat. Torres said so! And secondly, There's a name conspicuously missing from your list. Oilsheen ring a bell?

You are not serious.
How does a cheat score 42 goals in a season as a WINGER??

More Q's for ya!

1. Who's been your favourite player in the tourney so far?

2. If you were Roman Abramovich, who'd you give the Chelsea job to? I'd personally go for Marco Van Basten, but what do ya think? (No sentiments please).

My favourite player has been Van Brockhorst. That dude is the shiznit!!!

Chelsea's job should go to Scolari. He is a Portugeezer, he can continue where Avram Grant stopped!!!

Razorr:
Whew! Thank goodness!!! Ma respect for you has done doubled!

I am chuffed to bits. Thank Ya.

1. If Spain were to meet Holland today, who'd win in your opinion? And if Portugal were to bump into the same dutch, who'd win?

Spain and Holland? That would be explosive but u have to tip the Dutch team. Loads of match-winners and dodgy goal scorers in their team.
Portugal Vs Holland? Portugal have loads of divers in their squad too. They would cheat to earn penalties n freekicks and prolly win.
Deco, Carvalho, Nuno Gomez and Nani are born-cheats!!!

2. With the quality you've seen so far in all the teams, do you see Germany as capable of winning this tournament?

The Germans are efficient just like Chelsea but teams with creativity like Holland, Portugal and Spain will hurt their rigid defence all day!!
I am not convinced yet about the Nazis.

3. I know UEFA has said that Ruud's goal was onside based on the FIFA rule that says a man is still in play after crossing the line until the ref acknowledges him as out of play. But do you agree with the referees' panel? Was Ruud's goal onside or off?

Ruud was offside. He always make a mockery of the offside rule. . . . . He is a bloody opportunist!!!
The snag is Panucci kept Ruud onside. . . . . . .If the offside rule that kept Ruud onside was not in place, it means Carvalho and Terry can run off the pitch as soon as they see Rooney clear on goal to keep him OFFSIDE.

TOH:
can one be malnourished and overweight at the same time?

Malnourish simply mean physically weak due to unhealthy food.
So u can be malnourished by eating junk foods and adding unwanted flabs of flesh.

Razorr:
Ok. Fair enough. But why was he taken off at the 53rd minute? His partnership with Villa seemed great, so what did Aragones see that we missed?

Prolly because Torres was tired.  He was doing all the hardwork and Mr Villa was just doing the cleaning up.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmm Same player that was giving you guys blueballs just a few days back.

Blueballs? Nope.
Of course, he is better than Saha but if i am were to choose between him and Hunter. . . . . Hunter everyday of the week.!!!

Another question - I know your obvious answer to this question would be Van Der Sar, so I'd rule him out.
Who has been the best keeper in the tournament so far. (No sentiments please.)

Petr Cech!!!!
Van Der Sar didn't have a lot to do. . . . .The Azzuris were shyte!!!

Razorr:
@Xerxes

Naaaaaaaaaa There actually is a school of thought that thinks Grant has got quite sexy eyes. It's just his teeth and entire mouth region that have spoilt what would have made him a terrific looking bloke. SAF on the other hand is blood ugly. He's got blood nearly gushing out of his face for feck's sake. That his pink face and red nose.

I disagree with u Razorr. SAF is 66 and Grant is 53(Big difference).
Can u imagine Avram Grant at 66? I doubt he would be able to turn his neck.
Besides he looks over-weight and mal-nourished.

Two more questions for you.

1. Villa aside, who was the second best man on the pitch for Spain last night.

2. After watching Karim Benzema play for France on Monday, are you still as obsessed with signing him as you initially were?

Fernando Torres was the best player on the pitch yesterday. His forward bursts and positioning was a thorn in the flesh of the Russians.
He was explosive and selfless. . . . . . The 1st goal he set up for David Villa epitomises vision, awareness and stealth.

Karim Benzema is a waste-pipe. I have always known he is talented but whether he would grow up and become a big match player remains a mystery.
If i were to choose between Huntelaar and Benzema, Hunter will be ma preferred out n out striker.
Benzema has just reduced his price tag from £30 million to £15 milla. Anutha shambolic performance like that would reduce him to £7.5 million.
Who knows? Lyon might flog him for £3 milla by the end of Euro2008.

Razorr:
@Xerxes

I got involved in an argument with a colleague this morning and I need your opinion ASAP.
Question is who's sexier, Avram Grant or SAF?

Please be objective in your reply. No sentiments.

Come on. . . . . . . SAF is far far bonz by 5 astronomical miles.
I was told parents in England always keep their kids away from the TV when Chelsea is playing.
Kids always tell their teachers in school that the face of Avram Grant terrifies em in their sleep.
Grant's head reminds me of ET!

rikkyjen:
What i think? The bitching Ronaldo should be offloaded ASAP

Ronaldo will stay till 2010.
I cannot see him leaving while Fergie and CQ are still in Man Utd.