₦airaland Forum

KoiceReloaded:
The irony of you is you're the conspiracy theorist. You believe in something that you cannot prove just because America said so. Until there is a successful mission to moon that will prove this, every other theory saying otherwise is nothing more than a conspiracy theory. Don't be a sheeple.

There has already been successful missions to the moon, if you come out to say it was a lie you are the one that needs to provide proof.

KoiceReloaded:
You made inquiries... Lolz. This guy is a joker. What's next? You will probably tell us that you have met Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin.

When you have nothing meaningful to say you start trolling with memes. You should hide under your scrotum in shame and stop deluding yourself into thinking you are intelligent. You are just another regular Joe fortunate enough to have access to the internet.

pryme:
Ever heard of CGI?

I just gave you a scientific explanation and you choose to refute it with CGI? You think with all the knowledge these guys had, it didn't occur to them not make the flag wave during pre production?

KoiceReloaded:
An isreali spacecraft on a mission to moon that would have dispelled the uncertainties once and for all, crashed landed recently.

So...

Bro, unless you can somehow show me an American flag hanging on a pole stuck on the moon, there is nothing else to say on the subject. Have a nice day or evening.

You keep spinning conspiracy theory and you expect me to take you serious?

Did you also know that Japan sent a probe which captured some surface of the moon? Some of the images returned matches the ones captured by the Apollo 15.

JAXA and plenty of other independent institutions outside of NASA, as well as amateur astronomers from around the world, have reported sightings of the remnants and signs of the past Apollo missions.

pryme:
Are you sure about this?
Did you read up what I wrote?
NASA said they can no longer land on the moon cos they lost the technology.

You should read to understand, don't read for argument sake.

Can you provide the source for this?

KoiceReloaded:
I find it funny that a random guy will wake up one day, and suddenly believe wholeheartedly that a moon landing not even involving his country took place, not even in his timeline, but before he was even born, when far more learned people, among then Russians, have doubts that it ever took place. Just saying.

I wonder if you were conceived by natural means or the product of some outlawed lab experiment.

So because it didn't involve my country I have no right to have interest in it? You think I just woke up and decided the moon landing was real? So you have been missing the point in my posts where I made it known that I did my inquiries before coming to these conclusion.

About the Russians thing, where did you pull out your census from?

KoiceReloaded:
Yeah, run away. It's obvious you don't have an answer for this one. The Russians you claim to have accepted the moon landed is a fallacy as I have shown you.

I was going to let you get away with your insult and have a nice day but now you've changed my mind.

I'm coming for you bubby.

Beorn:
You're getting my point wrong. I said from the beginning that I don't know whether the narration of moon landing is wrong or not, it's not a subject that interests me. However, there have been several debates about its authenticity. That's what I've been trying to point out.

Who's right between those who believed the story, or those who don't believe the story, that I don't know.

My aim is to let the doubters know that their doubt is wrong. You have to stand somewhere, there is no middle ground on this matter.

KoiceReloaded:
Again, you talked as if you're there. Lemme ask you, were you there?

I'm not saying it didn't happen, neither am I saying it happened. The point I'm trying to make is that there seems to be more evidence that discredit it, than the one that collaborate it, period.

Every evidence you read are nothing but conspiracy theories. I have told you to do an actual research on the matter, only then would you realize what's up.

And stop coming at me with the were you there line.

That line is for dumb egocentric people who are too stubborn to accept the truth.

Beorn:
I don't need your detailed expose, just trying to let you know that a lot of people have debated on the authenticity of story. That's all. What you choose to belive or not believe, is none of my business.

How many of these moon landing is a hoax specialists are actual experts on the matter?

KoiceReloaded:
Obviously, you don't know what you're saying, and it's hilarious because 76% of Russians don't believe that Americans landed on the moon..

The head of Russia’s national space agency jokingly proposed a mission to the moon to verify if America really landed on the moon. Now, it might be a joke, but it gives us a peek into the minds of Russians as pertain the moon landing.

[s]So, for a nobody to come out and claim that America landed on the moon without any definitive proof - when majority of Russians are still in doubt - can only be summed up as delusional. [/s]

Have a nice day.

KoiceReloaded:
You talk as if you're there, and yet you don't have the slightest clue. There's a video of this thing floating around on the internet. A flag is swaying in space. A _fucking space! There is no amount of inertia that can make a flag sway in an airless void! Kapish?

The flags weren't waving!

If you actually look at the footage shot on the moon instead of reading idiotic conspiracy sites, you can clearly see that the flags only ever move for one of three reasons:

An astronaut touched the flag or the pole holding it up.

An astronaut passed by it, and his electrostatic charge caused it to move.

The LEM ascent stage was taking off, and the rocket exhaust moved it.

pryme:
And how is it that they can land on the moon with analogue technology, but cant land on the moon with the most advance technology of the modern day? think about it.
how in God's name do you wipe out the technology you spent Billions of dollars on just like that?
we are talking America here that wont stop once they succeed at something. How come they stopped going to the moon?

If there is a time to go to the moon now is the time, with the global warming and shiiit, but no for some reason the team that worked on the first trip to the moon had amnesia over night so they could not passed down the blue print, or maybe they did but fire and brimestone melted iron safes they put the document and burnt it to ashes.

You should know the main stream media is controlled, they will only tell you what they want you to hear, all i say is you should think about it from a logical point of view.

You are the one who is seeing it from a non-logical point of view.

What can you point out from the actual moon landing to convince yourself that it was faked?

After the first landing there were other landings, there have been probes to Mars and discovery and study of black holes etcetera. NASA has done away with the moon obsession and now focused on deep space study. Like I told the other guy, stop drowning yourself in conspiracy theories okay?

Beorn:
Xxix, I don't know if America's narration of landing on the moon is truth or not, but it's ignorance on your part if you don't know by now that there have been several debates doubting its authenticity.

[s]Even Iker Casillas brought up the issue about 2 years ago[/s].

You made me laugh so hard with that Iker Casillas line

For that your reward is that I won't give you a detailed expose.

KoiceReloaded:
To add to what I said earlier; in the first video of the "moon landing", the American flag wasn't limp as onewould expect of an object in an airless place, instead, it was moving in a motion reminiscent of a breeze blown flag. How can you explain that?

Don't ask questions, okay? Accept everything their media feeds you like a good little sheeple, why don't you. Mtchew.

Don't get yourself high on conspiracy theories okay?

It's really really simple, each flag had a horizontal rod at the top of the flag and when astronauts bumped it, without any air to damp out the motion and with the extra inertia of the steel supporting rod involved, it continued swaying for a very long time.

KoiceReloaded:
Dude, think with the brain your mama gave you, and stop bowing to your emotions. I know you're one of those that swallow everything the western media feeds you, but every now and then, try to think, okay?

I do think with my brain and I am writing from a logical and reasonable point of view not emotional.

I don't swallow everything the western media or any other media for that matter feeds me.

From an academic stand point, I have done my questioning and research and have come to a resounding conclusion that the moon landing did happen. And it's because of this acquired knowledge that I tend to loose my calm and sound emotional when someone obviously ignorant tries to claim otherwise.

THERE has been no definitive proof that America went to the moon. A lot of people are questioning it right now. We are in the 21st century, and no country apart from America has gone to moon since. Why? It's simple, the technology hasn't been perfected. Yet, somehow, even before IBM invented a computer chip, America went to the moon? How? Think about it. It's hard to believe is all I'm saying.

No definitive prove you say? Please what would you consider a definitive prove? The Soviet Union who at the time were the opposition of the space war never called out the US for faking the moon landing. This was a country who painstakingly followed every aspect of it, don't you think if they had found even the thinnest discrepancy that wouldn't have made it public to tarnish the image of the US? Yet they accepted the moon landing and the defeat that came with it.

As for computers, you expect NASA to wait for IBM to invent chips? You obviously don't know any detail concerning Apollo.

If you are interested to know how. Do some research.

The only way we can truly know that America landed on the Moon is if another country go there and see the American flag. Until then, it will serve you well to claw out of America's ass and think like someone with a brain.

Even America has stopped sending men to the moon, there are more interesting places in space to be explored.

KoiceReloaded:
It's probably staged. I think America got insecure about the Soviet surpassing them in technology, so they elaborately staged a moon landing to level the playing field. I could be wrong though, but it's definitely a possibility.

You like to pride yourself with being enlightened yet you spew this shit?! I won't be surprised if you think the Earth is flat.

Can you detail the possibility of faking the moon landing? How come after all these years no one among the scientists and astronauts has come forward to debunk the moon landing. How is it possible that the USA could be able to keep thousands of mouths shut?!

I saw this movie this morning the silence of the lambs

I rate it 8/10 although the movie failed to horrify me, it delivered on everything else. If you are looking for a good classic horror/mystery movie to pass time with please do check it out.

mekaprime:
This people will just be doing Apollo 11/moon landing documentary every year, abeg, dem no day tire. I just keep wondering if the Moon landing in 1969 was real or just a hoax.

The moon landing was real. Don't join the morons discrediting the hard work thousands of men and women put into making it happen.

Seun:
Thanks. Corrected. What’s the name of the Interviewer? Her name is as relevant to my point as Natalie’s name.

You ever read a story or watched a play which the Narrator is always referred to as the Narrator? His name is never revealed, he is just there to help the audience or the reader connect the plot and nobody cares to learn anything about him.

Same can be applied to the interviewer.

arantess:
Theres this news about them directing a star wars movie next year or so, who know how the movie go be

They might wind up actually doing a pretty decent job, who knows?

bond77:
It's normal to get pissed off when they turn your favorite character to sh1t. I don't blame the character I blame the writers....

My point: D&.D are hell bent in scattering our head and manipulating our minds. don't you see the way they talk and behave during the show interviews? those guys look like psychos.. don't waste your time trying to defend any character o.

in other news I heard they (D&.D)wrote and directed the last episode. aswear some people will definitely run mad when the show ends.

Especially that one called Dan Weiss, see the way they coldly explain the shit they make happen on TV. While Dan appears quite more confident David benioff always has his head on this shoulders and trying not to look directly at the camera. These guys are something else!

Seun:
You must have missed this post:

I liked her acting in Episode 5 too. It was effective. I wish her character ended up as the empowering hero that most of us, including Emilia, wanted her to be.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vxh4hnFKaHs
Interviewer: Have you shot your final scenes yet and are you happy with how things ended?
Emilia Clarke: ...
Missandei Actress: Yes.
Interviewer: She didn’t say ‘yes’.
Emilia Clarke: Best season ever!

I know she wasn't that much of a main cast but she deserves better!

Her name is Nathalie Emmanuel

Buharifanatic:
when they call her names

My body use to do me like those hyenas in lion king


Say that name again

DAENERYS STORM BORN!!!

Don't worry those Goosebumps will disappear in about 30 minutes

DavidEsq:
I do. But I never knew UC browser could be used on a PC

Uc browser has a PC version. It is known.

Have you tried what I told you? Did it work?

The only thing the show runners have succeeded in doing this season is divide the fandom.

The whole mad queen sequence was cheap and forced down our throats, nobody should act like that given the circumstances! They just did this to tear her down and have a good reason to get rid of her next episode.

Talk about character assassination, that's what they did to almost all the main characters, but the way they handled Dany's was just pure bullshit!

Everyone knows she can be filled with rage and go to drastic measures and make irrational decisions at times, but have her commit such atrocities? There must be better reasons to make her burn down the city than that.

And this is what the show runners had to say about that:

“I don’t think she decided ahead of time that she was going to do what she did. And then she sees the red keep yada yada yada and decides to make this personal.”

What kind of silly excuse was that

The show runners are just hunting for shock value now and they got it. Because most people are just shocked at how low the show has descended.

No matter what they do, they can't stop me from loving my queen!

May your days be long DAENARYS STORM BORN and may your reign be filled with people with both balls and brains.

DavidEsq:
Bros, rather for it to download, it plays. It doesn't download. It plays instead.

If you are on PC or using uc browser right click on the link that plays the video, you'll see save link or something similar; click it and the video would download.

If you are on phone and chrome, when the video starts playing; at the right bottom of the screen you will see three vertical dots. Click it and you will see the download option

Hope you understand this.

I will blame Jon for this. Dany clearly wanted the d!ck! The dumb fvck refused to give her the d!ck; so she went berserk and unfurled one thousand years of targaryen madness on king's landing and burnt it to it's core!!!

This is clear definition of thanking things personal.

echibuogwu:
lol bro u don’t get my point. I don’t need to watch that clip because We Nigerians we really listen to reply, From my precious post u will see that I agreed with the fact that Jaime saved lives by stopping the man from burning down the city, what I’m trying to let u know is that Jaime could have stopped the mad king even without killing him, the mad king was already doomed and he knows it. Jaime shouldn’t have been the one to deliver that blow considering his status, Ned knows it, Robert knows and everyone in kings landing knows it. The mad king deserves to die but not by Jaime’s sword. I know you are going to say the people in kings landing are unaware that he saved them but they are aware of the madness of the king and they know how cruel he was and that he deserved to die but still they still mocked Jaime for killing him cos they know he shouldn’t have been the one to kill him.

Here is an excerpt from the book;

“It fell to me to hold the Red Keep, but I knew we were lost. I sent to Aerys asking his
leave to make terms. My man came back with a royal command. ‘Bring me your father’s
head, if you are no traitor.’ Aerys would have no yielding. Lord Rossart was with him, my messenger said. I knew what that meant.
“When I came on Rossart, he was dressed as a common man-at-arms, hurrying to a
postern gate. I slew him first. Then I slew Aerys, before he could find someone else to
carry his message to the pyromancers. Days later, I hunted down the others and slew them
as well. Belis offered me gold, and Garigus wept for mercy. Well, a sword’s more merciful
than fire, but I don’t think Garigus much appreciated the kindness I showed him.”

From Jaime's perspective, the only way to truly stop the mad king was to kill him. Merely killing the pyromancer was just postponing the action; the mad king would have simply had someone else to carry out his order. For the problem to go away completely, the mad king had to go. It was nothing personal, it was simply duty.

Tho I agree he could have held the mad king captive till the rebels got there, but the king's guard are sworn to protect the king's secret. Killing the mad king was also to cover up his intention of roasting his own citizens. Jaime was just saving lives and doing his sworn duty at the same time.