solomto: We are still going to beat u again. Up united

Bimfo:
Dint get Wat u are Saying... U r Just Jumping From Pillar to Post With a Poor Control of English...

Dotman01: Chelsea is better than even Man United at
the moment,
that's why sucking haters are buying
officials. Let them know that we are the team
who can beat even Barcelona with
10 men. We fight till our last breath, and win
with Pride.
We are the pride of london and the
European Champions.

jude33084: I tried to replay the chelsea ManU game on my bb but it rejected it, now I know that I have a smartphone

ayee001: Now Chelsea wants to fight dirty.

smileyprin: if u had good control of english u'll have used your instinct to try and understand the message no matter how poor the grammer was. Leavin d topic and dwelling on pples grammer is pure childish smfh...I'm out,see u after wednesdays game.

ubong560: Man-U cannot boldly claimed they won dat match, if they do, den they are nothing dan bloody fvucken liars. Aside d inconsequential controversies brought in by d referees, i can assure u dat chelsea would av beaten man-u 4-2 QED. Even at dat, didn't u c chelsea stil dominating d match. Dat's Man-U 4 u. Earlier in d season, dat's exactly how they robbed liverpool to 2-1 winning. I hate d FVUCKEN club called MAN-U.

stagger:

No mind them. That 2-1 victory at Old Trafford with 2 matches to go eventually decided the title in Chelsea's favour in the 2009/2010 season. It was good for them while it lasted. Now they got hit hard. You need to see the noise Chelsea fans made in my area. Come see their faces when the heat was on.

Man U for life!

Bimfo:
How Would I understand What I cant Read... Yea, Wednesday's game.

nerodenero: I like your comment and it was well said.Dont forget the best team dont win at times. Such was the case of Barca Vs Chelsea and the show of shame put up by the ref in d game yesterday

smileyprin: D ref got it wrong in some instances but pple goin on abt united been unable to defeat cheski are plain dillusioned,if only they cn remembr champions league wen we beat them home nd away...though on present form they're a better team but who scored first.....so the result could ve gone either way.

elampiro:

3rd April 2010. Drogba was at least 5 yard offside when Kalou passed the ball to him, yet the referee and linesman allowed it. Chelsea went 2-0 up at 78 minute. Ferguson brought on Nani [s]who immediately changed the game tearing Chelsea from the left wing. Man U pulled one back to become 1-2.

Macheida got a last minute equalizer, but it was disallowed when referee judged it was a hand control, but replay showed he controlled with his chest.[/s]

Chelsea won 2-1 at Old Trafford to go 1 point on top of Man U with three matches to go. At the end, Chelsea won with one point.

Man U took it in good faith.

dabossman:

Most sensible post here. Some folks seem to forget that United scored two quick, clean goals before Chelsea fought back to level scores. Sure, the ref messed things up after that, but why blame United for that? Referees will always goof, and no Chelsea fan here can say they've never won a game through controversial decisions. Last season against Wigan and this season against Reading are clear examples. Even at 11-a-side the game could have gone either way. That Chelsea had more possession doesn't mean they would have won. Chelsea fans should know that. I believe they played Barcelona last season. Did Barca pressure translate to victory? Come on.

Dotman01: that game was one of d biggest in europe last weekend, it was nt only watched in europe but all over the world. Some ppl far away kept vigil for it. Its an advert for the epl. Just like the last day game of last season btw man city and qpr. A big game of that magnitude shouldnt have been marred by the 'mistake' of one guy.

Onyeasi: I'm a die hard Man u fans.. To be frankly, the ref got it all wrong. The first red card is approved with the rules guiding football. But the second yellow card which resulted to a red card (shakes my head). The English football is turning to another thing entirely.. Racial abuse here and there. What a ref will racially abuse players, callin Juan Mata a Spainard twit, only Mikel knows what he call him.. Happy with the win though..

dabossman:

Yep, but heck it happens! England lost to Germany at the last World Cup because a clear goal was not counted. Even though Germany went on to win by 4 clear goals, that singular mistake still marred the game. It happened to Arsenal against Barca in the EPL a couple of seasons ago. It's all part of the game, sad as it may be.

Dotman01: Number of penalties Howard Webb has
awarded Manu: 9 in 32 games. No. of
penalties Webb has awarded
Arsenal,Chelsea and Pool: Only 10 in
100 games.

Dotman01: Chelsea is better than even Man United at
the moment,
that's why sucking haters are buying
officials. Let them know that we are the team
who can beat even Barcelona with
10 men. We fight till our last breath, and win
with Pride.
We are the pride of london and the
European Champions.

bxg: Chelsea were not particularly hard done by
In recent times, a lot of hot air has been emitted regarding Manchester United's supposed preferential treatment from referees. Some lunatics genuinely believe there is an official conspiracy involving Sir Alex Ferguson, the FA, the CIA and Nasa. Their attitude will not have been changed by events at Stamford Bridge, yet the fuss over Sunday's game is misplaced, a convenient narrative that doesn't stand up to the most basic scrutiny. Fernando Torres should have been sent off long before his dubious second yellow card. Chelsea were not unlucky to be down to nine men; they were lucky not to be down to eight, because Mikel John Obi should have received a second yellow card for fouling Antonio Valencia. Chelsea were the better team at 2-2, but they were about to go 3-2 down when Branislav Ivanovic committed the foul for which he was correctly sent off.
And while Javier Hernández's winner was offside, United would probably have won the game anyway. Hernández's goal does not significantly impact on the balance sheet of refereeing mistakes in matches between United and Chelsea at Stamford Bridge. Since their previous league win at Stamford Bridge in April 2002 United have suffered a series of shocking decisions, most notably in 2002-03, 2007-08, 2009-10 and 2010-11. Two of those almost cost them the league; a couple of mistakes from Martin Atkinson in 2009-10 probably did cost them the title. They were due a decision at Stamford Bridge. They are due a few more before things can be said to have evened themselves out.

elampiro:

3rd April 2010. Drogba was at least 5 yard offside when Kalou passed the ball to him, yet the referee and linesman allowed it. Chelsea went 2-0 up at 78 minute. Ferguson brought on Nani who immediately changed the game tearing Chelsea from the left wing. Man U pulled one back to become 1-2.

Macheida got a last minute equalizer, but it was disallowed when referee judged it was a hand control, but replay showed he controlled with his chest.

Chelsea won 2-1 at Old Trafford to go 1 point on top of Man U with three matches to go. At the end, Chelsea won with one point.

Man U took it in good faith.

ubong560: @stagger, why shld i b chatting wit a dumb lik u? Even ur name implies dat, 4 gud 3days now, u havent eaten and u ar staggering 4 survival. Wen last did u sip garri esp. now dat's as costly as it is talkless of coming 2 bargain 4 man u. Find ur level abeg!