We have already mentioned in another post how to leverage social media to position your site. At that time we talked about the English site Cmo.com and guide to the panorama of social media that it proposes (Guide to the social media landscape).

We saw in detail how the ten examined social media can help in the positioning of your site, by assigning a score to each of them (good, okay and bad).

The guide Cmo analyzes social media from other points of view of customer communications, brand exposure and traffic to your site.


In this post, taking up the leadership of CMO.com, we examine the usefulness of social media in terms of Web traffic.

Let’s start off by Twitter: The microblogging site gets an average score. The promotion of your site on Twitter to be successful should be, by the CMO, weighted: we must not promote your website too in order not to lose “followers”, but at the same time, we must promote it enough to get the attention the user.

Facebook has an average score: got traffic to your site through social Zuckerberg is discreet thanks to the sharing buttons, but, says the guidance of Cmo, do not expect a large number of unique visitors using Facebook.

Flickr has, however, a bad score: even if they arrive tens of thousands of visits to a picture that links to our URL, the number of clicks that come through the site Flickr are still among the lowest.

Also LinkedIn has a score bad: it is unlikely that social bring significant traffic to the site, but the guide says, you never know which of those few visits, for some it might be a potential customer or a consumer.

YouTube has an average score: traffic got through that social media is discrete. The web traffic, in fact, have the most popular videos, but not the site you want to visit, even if you can add a link in the video description, it will be difficult to have a large number of requests through this instrument.
 
In the sector of social media is also analyzed Digg: The social news CMO.com is defined by the “grandfather of peak traffic,” according to the guide to reach the highest rating (good).
If you are active in the community because of Digg, or if you are in contact with someone who is, you can receive lots of visits to your site. If you want to push the site that it is business, you have to consider the idea of ​​launching a blog with a domain to become a non-commercial “thought leaders” on Digg.
In fact CMO.com has been right: if the contents posted are becoming popular, the traffic visits your site will increase dramatically.

Also StumbleUpon reaches the maximum score: the site allows for a diverse range of people to discover your content and share links with Twitter.

Finally, Yahoo Buzz, Reddit and Delicious achieve all three in an average score. Here’s why: on Yahoo Buzz if you end up in the good graces of the moderators, you can have a chance to reach large numbers of visitors, but, of course, you need a lot of work.

For Reddit, (Which has an average score) if you are well placed in the community, then the results in terms of traffic to the site could be like those that correspond to Digg and Stumble Upon. Reddit, however we must be careful not to push too hard to get votes from friends, because you risk being banned (even if you do not work for nothing in this direction will take you to also end up with a fist-handed).

It remains, finally, Delicious: also the social bookmarks reaches an average score because you have to enter a large number of contents to get a significant number of visitors to its site.
In summary, the sites that reach the maximum score for the traffic you are able to bring to your site, the social news Digg and StumbleUpon.

They reach, however, an average score: Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, YahooBuzz, [/b]Reddit[/b] and Delicious. On these sites you have to struggle to achieve results in terms of web traffic: with due precaution, and with a little ‘time available to work on it, you can also achieve good results.
Among the sites recommended not to use to increase your web traffic we are, finally, Flickr and LinkedIn. Source: How To Increase Your Site Traffic With The Use Of Social Media

Not true about Reddit. My Reddit account had 16k + Karma before I gave up on it (it's still there). My Digg account had things hit the front page pretty much every day before I gave up on that one too, b4 the redesign. Traffic from both of those sources DOES not convert. They come, they look and they vanish...

Dkaz: We have already mentioned in another post how to leverage social media to position your site. At that time we talked about the English site Cmo.com and guide to the panorama of social media that it proposes (Guide to the social media landscape).

We saw in detail how the ten examined social media can help in the positioning of your site, by assigning a score to each of them (good, okay and bad).

The guide Cmo analyzes social media from other points of view of customer communications, brand exposure and traffic to your site.


In this post, taking up the leadership of CMO.com, we examine the usefulness of social media in terms of Web traffic.

Let’s start off by Twitter: The microblogging site gets an average score. The promotion of your site on Twitter to be successful should be, by the CMO, weighted: we must not promote your website too in order not to lose “followers”, but at the same time, we must promote it enough to get the attention the user.

Facebook has an average score: got traffic to your site through social Zuckerberg is discreet thanks to the sharing buttons, but, says the guidance of Cmo, do not expect a large number of unique visitors using Facebook.

Flickr has, however, a bad score: even if they arrive tens of thousands of visits to a picture that links to our URL, the number of clicks that come through the site Flickr are still among the lowest.

Also LinkedIn has a score bad: it is unlikely that social bring significant traffic to the site, but the guide says, you never know which of those few visits, for some it might be a potential customer or a consumer.

YouTube has an average score: traffic got through that social media is discrete. The web traffic, in fact, have the most popular videos, but not the site you want to visit, even if you can add a link in the video description, it will be difficult to have a large number of requests through this instrument.
 
In the sector of social media is also analyzed Digg: The social news CMO.com is defined by the “grandfather of peak traffic,” according to the guide to reach the highest rating (good).
If you are active in the community because of Digg, or if you are in contact with someone who is, you can receive lots of visits to your site. If you want to push the site that it is business, you have to consider the idea of ​​launching a blog with a domain to become a non-commercial “thought leaders” on Digg.
In fact CMO.com has been right: if the contents posted are becoming popular, the traffic visits your site will increase dramatically.

Also StumbleUpon reaches the maximum score: the site allows for a diverse range of people to discover your content and share links with Twitter.

Finally, Yahoo Buzz, Reddit and Delicious achieve all three in an average score. Here’s why: on Yahoo Buzz if you end up in the good graces of the moderators, you can have a chance to reach large numbers of visitors, but, of course, you need a lot of work.

For Reddit, (Which has an average score) if you are well placed in the community, then the results in terms of traffic to the site could be like those that correspond to Digg and Stumble Upon. Reddit, however we must be careful not to push too hard to get votes from friends, because you risk being banned (even if you do not work for nothing in this direction will take you to also end up with a fist-handed).

It remains, finally, Delicious: also the social bookmarks reaches an average score because you have to enter a large number of contents to get a significant number of visitors to its site.
In summary, the sites that reach the maximum score for the traffic you are able to bring to your site, the social news Digg and StumbleUpon.

They reach, however, an average score: Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, YahooBuzz, [/b]Reddit[/b] and Delicious. On these sites you have to struggle to achieve results in terms of web traffic: with due precaution, and with a little ‘time available to work on it, you can also achieve good results.
Among the sites recommended not to use to increase your web traffic we are, finally, Flickr and LinkedIn. Source: How To Increase Your Site Traffic With The Use Of Social Media

Nice guide to increase traffic for our website. For my website traffic, I choose SEO technique. SEO is the best one to increase traffic for any kind of website. It gives high quality traffic for our website. And, I got SEO service from TuckTail.com here they provide Search engine visibility service which bring traffic to my website. Here they provide you One-click submission of your site in many search engines like Google, Yahoo!, Bing, and AOL etc... and they also provide Powerful reports that show you how to move your website up in search results.