Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,150,853 members, 7,810,281 topics. Date: Saturday, 27 April 2024 at 05:05 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Health / Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? (14327 Views)
JOHESU And APHA Directive To All Members In States And LG Health Institutions To / Fear Of Ebola: Villagers Flee From The Sight Of Red Cross And Western Doctors / How Do Doctors Calculate Medical Bills? (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) ... (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by wengerjay(m): 5:50pm On May 03, 2013 |
Lawlessness in the nation,imagine a Lab scientist collecting a sample for high vaginal swab(HVS),a procedure meant to be done by the Doctors only.O ga o |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by JoannaSedley(f): 5:57pm On May 03, 2013 |
^^ so delusional. Only for doctors indeed. Please stop parading ignorance. |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by pathology(m): 7:54pm On May 03, 2013 |
@ wenger, i dont think you know what u re saying or thinking, it is high vaginal swab,is dokita trained to collect the sample, lets know the part of your trainig that says so,.jack of all trade master of none. |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by Nobody: 9:36pm On May 03, 2013 |
New Drug Approval Process FDA Approvals It takes on average 12 years and over US$350 million to get a new drug from the laboratory onto the pharmacy shelf. Once a company develops a drug, it undergoes around three and a half years of laboratory testing, before an application is made to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to begin testing the drug in humans. Only one in 1000 of the compounds that enter laboratory testing will ever make it to human testing. If the FDA gives the green light, the "investigative" drug will then enter three phases of clinical trials: Phase 1 uses 20-80 healthy volunteers to establish a drug's safety and profile. (about 1 year) Phase 2 employs 100-300 patient volunteers to assess the drug's effectiveness. (about 2 years) Phase 3 involves 1000-3000 patients in clinics and hospitals who are monitored carefully to determine effectiveness and identify adverse reactions. (about 3 years) The company then submits an application (usually about 100,000 pages) to the FDA for approval, a process that can take up to two and a half years. After final approval, the drug becomes available for physicians to prescribe. At this stage, the drug company will continue to report cases of adverse reactions and other clinical data to the FDA. The research-based pharmaceutical industry currently invests some US$ 12.6 billion a year in new drug development. Historically, the drug development figure doubles every five years. www.drugs.com/fda-approval-process.html that is no way pharmacists would develop or sell drugs without input of physcians and pathologists. that is the headache of phatmacists now. |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by Nobody: 9:41pm On May 03, 2013 |
A laboratory director is a member of a laboratory staff who is responsible for overseeing operations at the laboratory and any related facilities. People in this position tend to have a great deal of training and experience, especially if they are supervising labs which engage in complex tasks, brand new research, or work with dangerous substances. A well-qualified laboratory director can usually find work anywhere, and employment prospects in this field are quite good in many regions of the world. To become a laboratory director, a candidate must usually be a medical doctor or hold a PhD, depending on the type of lab. In addition to fulfilling these educational requirements, laboratory directors also need to have practical lab experience, with labs usually preferring at least three years of experience. Many laboratory directors are drawn from the existing staff of a lab when a previous laboratory director steps down, as high-ranking staff members have experience and familiarity with the lab. The laboratory director is responsible for overseeing staffing in the laboratory, hiring appropriate people to fill positions, conducting regular performance reviews, scheduling lab staffers, and confirming that staff members are fully qualified and competent. Depending on the nature of the work the lab does, the laboratory director may also need to run background checks on staff members to conform with government standards which are designed to keep labs safe and secure. Laboratory directors also oversee budgeting and research initiatives in a lab. While they may encourage people in the lab to seek grants and assistance and to develop research projects, they must also balance the needs of the lab itself, which can require judicious scheduling of equipment and personnel. Laboratory directors also set policies in the lab, make sure that staff members are informed of lab policies, and confirm that policies are being followed. The clinical laboratory director also deals with issues such as patient confidentiality, ethics in clinical trials , and meeting the needs of people who require the services of the lab. Lab directors are also concerned with quality control in the lab, security of the lab facilities, and keeping the lab current with industry and government standards. Failure to follow government mandates may cause a lab to be downgraded, which will mean that it will not be able to handle as many materials. m.wisegeek.com/what-does-a-laboratory-director-do.htm some stupid fellow would say doctors have no role to play in laboratory. |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by azaros: 10:14pm On May 03, 2013 |
Its unfortunate dat tday wit d lots of advancement in health some bdy can stil proudly hold him/her self out before d public to say he/she is more important in a team of professionals as it affect healthcare delivery. As a matter of fact d patient whom is focal point of every staff of healthcare delivery center come to d hosp. for d services renderd in d hospital. And d services needed by any patient dat requires health care comes frm diferent professionals not just one profession. Interms of team leader in service delivery dis depends on d patients problem, if related to physiotherapy=physiotherapist, drug relat=Pharmacist, etc it should b noted dat cross carpetin and jack of all trade principle by any profession connot joblessnes nd i believe if we borrow from d developed world present practice of healthcare all profession in healthcare wil b overwhelmed wit responsibilities and fufilment. For d headship of health care facilities any person with sound managerial skill and profile should serve d purpose. |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by Nobody: 10:59pm On May 03, 2013 |
azaros: Its unfortunate dat tday wit d lots of advancement in health some bdy can stil proudly hold him/her self out before d public to say he/she is more important in a team of professionals as it affect healthcare delivery. As a matter of fact d patient whom is focal point of every staff of healthcare delivery center come to d hosp. for d services renderd in d hospital. And d services needed by any patient dat requires health care comes frm diferent professionals not just one profession. Interms of team leader in service delivery dis depends on d patients problem, if related to physiotherapy=physiotherapist, drug relat=Pharmacist, etc it should b noted dat cross carpetin and jack of all trade principle by any profession connot joblessnes nd i believe if we borrow from d developed world present practice of healthcare all profession in healthcare wil b overwhelmed wit responsibilities and fufilment. For d headship of health care facilities any person with sound managerial skill and profile should serve d purpose.if that is ur position health facilities should be classified: nurses hospital,doctors hospital,physiotherapy hospital, pharmacist hospital,laboratory scientists hospital. intertedepence should be stopped. all professional should be allowed to anything they like to patient there would be strong legal system that would protect patients. let malpractice be handled by lawyers. let see who will survive doctors or allied health professionals. behold medical specialities. The following chart lists the approved specialty and subspecialty certificates in which the ABMS Member Boards can offer certification. General Certificate(s) Subspecialty Certificates American Board of Allergy and Immunology Allergy and Immunology No Subspecialties American Board of Anesthesiology Anesthesiology Critical Care Medicine Hospice and Palliative Medicine Pain Medicine Pediatric Anesthesiology 1 Sleep Medicine American Board of Colon and Rectal Surgery Colon and Rectal Surgery No Subspecialties American Board of Dermatology Dermatology Dermatopathology Pediatric Dermatology American Board of Emergency Medicine Emergency Medicine Emergency Medical Services2 Hospice and Palliative Medicine Internal Medicine-Critical Care Medicine Medical Toxicology Pediatric Emergency Medicine Sports Medicine Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine American Board of Family Medicine Family Medicine Adolescent Medicine Geriatric Medicine Hospice and Palliative Medicine Sleep Medicine Sports Medicine American Board of Internal Medicine Internal Medicine Adolescent Medicine Adult Congenital Heart Disease3 Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology Cardiovascular Disease Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Critical Care Medicine Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Gastroenterology Geriatric Medicine Hematology Hospice and Palliative Medicine Infectious Disease Interventional Cardiology Medical Oncology Nephrology Pulmonary Disease Rheumatology Sleep Medicine Sports Medicine Transplant Hepatology American Board of Medical Genetics Clinical Biochemical Genetics* Clinical Cytogenetics* Clinical Genetics (MD)* Clinical Molecular Genetics* Medical Biochemical Genetics Molecular Genetic Pathology American Board of Neurological Surgery Neurological Surgery No Subspecialties American Board of Nuclear Medicine Nuclear Medicine No Subspecialties American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology Obstetrics and Gynecology Critical Care Medicine Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery1 Gynecologic Oncology Hospice and Palliative Medicine Maternal and Fetal Medicine Reproductive Endocrinology/Infertility American Board of Ophthalmology Ophthalmology No Subspecialties American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Orthopaedic Surgery Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Surgery of the Hand American Board of Otolaryngology Otolaryngology Neurotology Pediatric Otolaryngology Plastic Surgery Within the Head and Neck Sleep Medicine American Board of Pathology Pathology-Anatomic/Pathology- Clinical* Pathology - Anatomic* Pathology - Clinical* Blood Banking/Transfusion Medicine Clinical Informatics1 Cytopathology Dermatopathology Neuropathology Pathology - Chemical Pathology - Forensic Pathology - Hematology Pathology - Medical Microbiology Pathology - Molecular Genetic Pathology - Pediatric American Board of Pediatrics Pediatrics Adolescent Medicine Child Abuse Pediatrics Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics Hospice and Palliative Medicine Medical Toxicology Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Neurodevelopmental Disabilities Pediatric Cardiology Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Pediatric Emergency Medicine Pediatric Endocrinology Pediatric Gastroenterology Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Pediatric Infectious Diseases Pediatric Nephrology Pediatric Pulmonology Pediatric Rheumatology Pediatric Transplant Hepatology Sleep Medicine Sports Medicine American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Brain Injury Medicine 4 Hospice and Palliative Medicine Neuromuscular Medicine Pain Medicine Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine Spinal Cord Injury Medicine Sports Medicine American Board of Plastic Surgery Plastic Surgery Plastic Surgery Within the Head and Neck Surgery of the Hand American Board of Preventive Medicine Aerospace Medicine* Occupational Medicine* Public Health and General Preventive Medicine* Clinical Informatics1 Medical Toxicology Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology Psychiatry* Neurology* Neurology with Special Qualification in Child Neurology* Addiction Psychiatry Brain Injury Medicine 4 Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Clinical Neurophysiology Epilepsy2 Forensic Psychiatry Geriatric Psychiatry Hospice and Palliative Medicine Neurodevelopmental Disabilities Neuromuscular Medicine Pain Medicine Psychosomatic Medicine Sleep Medicine Vascular Neurology American Board of Radiology Diagnostic Radiology* Interventional Radiology and Diagnostic Radiology* 3 Radiation Oncology* Medical Physics* Hospice and Palliative Medicine Neuroradiology Nuclear Radiology Pediatric Radiology Vascular and Interventional Radiology American Board of Surgery Surgery* Vascular Surgery* Complex General Surgical Oncology4 Hospice and Palliative Medicine Pediatric Surgery Surgery of the Hand Surgical Critical Care American Board of Thoracic Surgery Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery Congenital Cardiac Surgery American Board of Urology Urology Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery1 Pediatric Urology *Specific disciplines within the specialty where certification is offered |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by JoannaSedley(f): 9:19am On May 04, 2013 |
^^ you're proliferating this thread with junks. Please lay down your arguments without refering to irrelevancies, cos it's making this thread boring. The important of doctors in the management of patients cannot be over-emphasised, what about management of paper work concerning other professionals in the system;you study that in school too? Somethings doesn't add up here? |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by Nobody: 9:19am On May 04, 2013 |
mintyx:When i told the insulin stuff to the other docs in d morning, they all laughed and said , thats how nurses do', so does that mean all my fellows dont present demselves well too. Wat r u evn talkin abt? U think i hav time for nurses? Mtchew This is the reason their rantings are not granted at the higher bodies. They shd relax,let me get to that top first. Mere looking @ me wl make them know the kind of complaints to be be laid, to head institutions wl be d last of them! Onyebuchi chukwu has their damn time The ppl i like their attitude to an extent are the med lab scientists. They are graceful in my sight. |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by Nobody: 9:20am On May 04, 2013 |
mintyx:When i told the insulin stuff to the other docs in d morning, they all laughed and said , thats how nurses do', so does that mean all my fellows dont present demselves well too. Wat r u evn talkin abt? U think i hav time for nurses? Mtchew This is the reason their rantings are not granted at the higher bodies. They shd relax,let me get to that top first. Mere looking @ me wl make them know the kind of complaints to be be laid, to head institutions wl be d last of them! Onyebuchi chukwu has their damn time The ppl i like their attitude to an extent are the med lab scientists. They are graceful in my sight. |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by JoannaSedley(f): 10:13am On May 04, 2013 |
^^ well, with the comment and attitude, ignorantly you just gave one of the major reasons why doctors shouldn't head any health institutions. |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by azaros: 10:23am On May 04, 2013 |
Its only an individual wit gud administrative track recorded dat is needed to head any institution. D gtn askd is as gud as saying only political science professionals b allowed into politics or b elected as d president. So headship of health institutions should b open to all dat has d merit |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by frednestyahoo: 12:19pm On May 04, 2013 |
dmalam:its like u dnt have knowledge of coronary heart disease or coarctation of aorta,so in that case u should go bck to skol. The consultant was treating symptom and ignoring the root. |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by ziga: 12:27pm On May 04, 2013 |
frednest@yahoo.: Please, stop exposing your ignorance!!! Stop it!!! |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by Nobody: 5:28pm On May 04, 2013 |
frednest@yahoo.:what is link between coarctation of aorta and coronary heart disease? hyperlipidaemia? mr man u need brain transplant. |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by Nobody: 5:30pm On May 04, 2013 |
azaros: Its only an individual wit gud administrative track recorded dat is needed to head any institution. D gtn askd is as gud as saying only political science professionals b allowed into politics or b elected as d president. So headship of health institutions should b open to all dat has d meritministerial appointment can be opened to all sorts of people with administerial skills. but cmd should still be reserved for doctors. |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by Nobody: 6:05pm On May 04, 2013 |
www.voxeu.org/article/should-physicians-manage-hospitals from the link above physcians manage hospitals better than non-physcians. |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by Nobody: 6:19pm On May 04, 2013 |
Physician as Hospital Chief Executive Officer Robert E. Falcone, MD Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus Bhagwan Satiani , MD, MBA Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, bhagwan.satiani@osumc.edu Abstract The vast majority of hospitals in the United States today are led by nonphysicians. This is in sharp contrast to the turn of the 20th century, when over a third of the hospitals in the United States were physician led. As the pendulum swings back from lay leader to clinician leader, there is a strong and appropriate opportunity for physicians to reinsert themselves into a leadership role. In fact, the time has perhaps never been more appropriate than today. In a health care system that is complex, troubled, and challenging, the physician CEO brings a unique set of skills to the business of medicine. The successful physician leader, however, must understand the business of medicine as well as or better than he or she understands the practice of medicine. Training, developing, and equipping our future physician leaders with the necessary skill sets will be one of medicines' many challenges as it expands into the 21st century. ves.sagepub.com/content/42/1/88.short even in developed countries physcians would soon chase administators out of hospital management. |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by Nobody: 6:23pm On May 04, 2013 |
frednest@yahoo.: i stil dey laf.....half baked!!! cntinue exposin ursef.... hypertension na symptom ko? and the root of hypertension na CHD/ hyperlipidaemia ko? u sabi dr wrk wella.... so wen u c prson wt hypertension u go fst do lipid profile, if hyperlipidaemia dey, u go treat hyperlipidaemia fst since its d root of d "symptom" (hypertension) abi?? Joker, u r funny!!!! u fit kill ur uncle wt dis ignorant practice oooo 1 Like |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by Nobody: 9:06pm On May 04, 2013 |
Laalamed:Dont mind him, there is no connection. He just talked trash which is a reason non doctors shdnt head d health institution Coarctation is a congenital hrt dx, has nothing to do wth hyperlipidemia. |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by frednestyahoo: 9:08pm On May 04, 2013 |
a.) THE ROOT CAUSES OF DISHARMONY AMONGST HEALTH WORKERS AND AMONGST PROFESSIONAL GROUPS IN THE HEALTH SECTOR IN NIGERIA. Appointment of Minister for Health as the birthright of doctors in Nigeria. Deficiencies of Decree 10 of 1985 now cap 436 LFN 2004. Discriminatory salaries and wages in the Health Sector Illegal and unlawful strike action by doctors. Imbalances in the directorate structure of the Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH). Unprofessional and hostile disposition of doctors to the team approach The poor implementation of the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS). Unlawful appointments in regulatory agencies of government Non adherence to the rules setting up the Drug Revolving Fund (DRF). Poor implementation of interventionist health agencies. A) APPOINTMENT OF MINISTER FOR HEALTH AS THE BIRTHRIGHT OF DOCTORS IN NIGERIA. At the height of the last ministerial nomination and screening, the Nigeria Medical Association (NMA) had taken a parochial and insulting position that one of its own must be appointed at the helm of the Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH) because according to it, this was a global practice. The NMA went further to threaten the then Acting President that it would ground the health sector if its position was not adhered to. This arrogant stance has polarized the health sector which has culminated in the formation of the Assembly of Healthcare Professional Associations and Unions and the setting up of this committee. Section 147(1) & (2) of the 1999 constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is very clear as to how Ministers are appointed. Section 42 (1) a & b also compels a right to freedom from discrimination on the basis of Community, Ethnic Group, Place of Origin, Sex, Religion, Political Opinion etc. It is important to state that the headship of the Health Sector is not vested in medical doctors contrary to the claims of the NMA. The Situation in other Countries In the United States of America (USA), Kathleen Sebelius was sworn in as the 21st Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services (equivalent to our own Minister of Health) on April 28th, 2009. She is a former Governor of Kansas State, holds a Bachelor Decree of Arts and Masters in Public Administration. Donna Shalala and Tommy Thompson were health ministers in Bill Clinton’s and G.W. Bush’s administrations respectively. They are neither medical doctors nor healthcare professionals. In the United Kingdom (U.K), the immediate past Secretary of Health was Rt. Honourable Andy Burnham who holds a Master of Arts (MA) Decree in English Language. In Japan Akira Nagatsuma who was appointed in 2009 as Minister of Health, is not a Medical Doctor. In India the Minister of Health, Mr. Ghulan Azad is not a medical doctor, he holds a M.Sc. Decree in Zoology. These are countries Nigerians are travelling to, in large numbers, for medical attention while the Nigerian healthcare service has been ranked 192 out of 198 countries by the World Health Organization under the leadership of Medical doctors. In Africa, Botswana has been rated by the World Health Organization as having the best national healthcare service. The current Minister of Health in Botswana is an Accountant, and he took over from Mrs. Motsumi, a Nurse, who was Health Minister from 2003-2009. Earlier on, Mrs. Phumaphi, a Nurse, was the Minister of Health from 1989-2002. It is noteworthy that since her independence in 1966, no medical doctor has been appointed Health Minister in Botswana. In Nigeria, the tenure of many non-Medical Doctors at the helm of Federal Ministry of Health witnessed stability and harmony as epitomized by the leadership of late Aminu Kano, Admiral Patrick Koshoni, Admiral Jubril Ayinla, Prince Julius Adelusi-Adeluyi, Prof A. B. C. Nwosu and lately Prof Eyitayo Lambo. Perhaps it is appropriate to also remind this committee that Doctors have, at different times, led other Ministries that are not related to Health. Prof. Jubril Aminu was at different times Education and Petroleum Minister only recently incumbent Ondo State, Governor Dr. Segun Mimiko was Housing Minister in the Obasanjo Government. In these capacities these eminent Doctors enjoyed the support of other core professionals in these different non-health Ministries. In the immediate past dispensation, the two Ministers in charge of the Federal Ministry of Health were medical doctors in a multidisciplinary set up such as Health, the first in the History of this Nation and yet there was no threat from the other stakeholders in the Health Sector. The general perception on why doctors want to continue to be Minister of Health is to maintain the hegemony of an unjust entry level in the civil service and discriminatory salary scales which they always get when doctors are Ministers of Health |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by mintyx(m): 9:28pm On May 04, 2013 |
Laalamed: Physician as Hospital Chief Hey at least you said something that made sense here that in developed countries, non physicians head the health sector and thier health sector is the best! Compare it with Nigeria that its health sector has been held hostage by doctors. The consequence is that in terms of healthcare services, we are ranked 192 out of 198 countries by the World Health Organization. Dont blame it on poor funding like the current minister keep using as an excuse, it is just a case of a square peg in a round hole! |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by JoannaSedley(f): 9:41pm On May 04, 2013 |
Hian!!!!!! |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by frednestyahoo: 9:44pm On May 04, 2013 |
dmalam:you dnt know wat u talkin about,if only u know u wil understand better why statins have to come in. I leave u to wallow up in ur ignorance |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by Nobody: 10:50pm On May 04, 2013 |
frednest@yahoo.: i stil dey laf....let me corrct u ko 1.Hypertension is not a symtom. 2.U dnt hv to do a lipid profile bfr u commence treatmnt of establishd hypertension. 3.Lipid profile is nt an investigation to diagnose hypertension. Its gud u do it!!! 3 u can put in statin if thr is hyperlipidemia but it is nt a substitute fr antihypertensivs. |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by frednestyahoo: 7:35am On May 05, 2013 |
dmalam:of course its symptomless but in a case were by the symptom of its complications(atherosclerosis)arises. Atleast u and I know that some cases of hypertension may be cured by eradicating the cause. Mind u,it was never said dat statin took d place of antihypertensiv |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by Nobody: 9:47am On May 05, 2013 |
frednest@yahoo.:oga, treating hyperlipidaemia wl nt cure hypertension n vice versa... so u sayin dt hyperlipidaemia is the root of hypertension is totally nt true, and a dr who commenced antihypertensiv on a patient witout doin a lipid profile is nt killing d patient, tho doin it may be of hlp.. not ol hypertensiv patient hv hyperlipidaemia... thy cm togeda wt dm/impaired blood glucose under metabolic syndrome.. Pls doin a lipid profile is a bit xpensiv, u do it wen thr r indication (risk factors).... I repeat ,u can not use it to diagnose hypertension; and u can not use it to determine wen to start treatng hypertension.... |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by ziga: 6:24pm On May 05, 2013 |
dmalam: U no suppose dey give the ignorant lab scientist free lessons. If him wan become doctor, make he go medical school. I swear little knowledge is worse than no knowledge. That is the problem with us Nigerians. Too many cooks. Abeg, make nurse stick to him job, make pharmacist stick to him job. Same goes for Doctors, Dentists, Med lab scientist etc. And the doctor coordinates all of the care. He has the widest perspective and is the head of the team. |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by Nobody: 7:36pm On May 05, 2013 |
frednest@yahoo.: this post stil dey mek me laf....lol, LAB SCIENTIST its nt difficlt becmn a dr, its jst 6yrs+ .....u can do it, yes u can!!! Whr & wen did drs ask LAB SCIENTIST to teach em lab test. u can only demontrate sm test to undergraduate "drs", Thr r cnsltnts in ol d labs dt teach residents.... Histopath(whr u mek d slides for d drs to read em n mek diagnoses), Chempath( whr u run d samples fr d drs thr to interpret), Haematology/immunology, and same fr microbiology...... how do u mek diagnoses fr drs.?... except if u r doin it @ d PHC to hlp d CHEWS. jst bcs u use arrows to indicate increase or decrease of a particular variable (LDL) does nt in anyway equate u to a dr... Stop deceivn ursef n stop deceivn ppl..ka ji ko? |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by Samdurance(m): 9:54pm On May 05, 2013 |
dmalam: Who are the Doctors that read slides? MBBS is not and can never be a Consultant. No MBBS graduate can read a slide so dont equate urself to that. U are still growing up thats why U have this Pride. Those that have attain heights has no Ego. Boys and Girls U need to grow up. Medicine is not a one-man show. |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by Samdurance(m): 10:06pm On May 05, 2013 |
Laalamed: Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. So thats ur prayers. I just know wat is wrong wit U. You are scared and wishing they never exist. My advice for U is go and develop ur career and forget about pressure of the unknown. U will only get frustrated. I cant argue or exchange words wit U cos its not worth it. I have never had problems wit Doctors I work wit because we learn from each other and anyone coming wit Pride I shelve. So just do ur best and leave the rest. And stop wishing wishes that is irrelevant. Whether U like it or not the Medical Lab Scientist are there to handle the same machines U are talking about.lol |
Re: Should Non-doctors Head health Institutions? by Nobody: 10:47pm On May 05, 2013 |
Samdurance:I pity u, whr is d pride? i tokd abt drs generaly not only d mbbs holders ,btw mbbs is wht u can neva hv, sorry lab attendant, u nid mor thn lab wrk to achieve it..Its a statemnt of fact... thy r drs doin residency in ol d lab fields ( thy read slides), its obvios u dnt hv a degree, this thread is fr d intellctuals..jst go n cntinue cleanng d lab instrumnts. |
(1) (2) (3) ... (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (Reply)
COVID-19 Update For September 29 2020 In Nigeria -(3,815 Tested)) / Risk Factors Associated With Sudden Cardiac Arrest.. / Lagos Discharges 67 Coronavirus Patients Today
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 104 |