superior1:

Then either you or the Bible is right

Genesis 3:15
15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

Isaiah 7:14
14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel

Mary was a decendant of David and Christ was concieved without a man's seed (that was the proof of His divinity)

1. Like I said before the woman gets the seed from the man and passes it back to him once the child is ready to be born


2. Isaiah 7:14 never mentions anything about a VIRGIN the hebrew word used here is ALMA roughly transliterated means maiden

your last statement is your personal interpretation about defining divinity, intertestingly it is also the interpretation for the worshippers of Molech Ishtar and Baal (virgin birth.)


What is the proof of your own divinity?

frosbel:

Is it wrong for people to question things they do not understand in the bible ? Or should we just keep quiet and keep marching on with error ?

This is not to challenge Jesus in anyway , he is the Son of GOD , Messiah, Lord and eternal King of the new Kingdom. It is to challenge the lies, deceptions and pretence of the apostate church.

Now , just stay on point and explain the ambiguity of these 2 genealogies and stop trying to stifle debate.

thanks

Well said.