rationalmind:

Yea. I agree with you creationism can be observed.

Its been observed how God made adam from clay, we see many more people made from clay these days.

And I thought its common knowledge scientists often disagree on what exactly is the scientific method.

OLAADEGBU:

I didn't observe when God made Adam but I do observe the evidence of design. A painting is the evidence of a painter, a building is the evidence of a builder, Creation is the evidence of the Creator.

Genesis chapters 1-11 gives us an account of historical events about the ultimate cause of the universe and how life originated - questions you atheists haven't got a clue about. Through the application of science we can safely confirm that God's account of creation is true. For instance, God informs us in the account of Genesis chapter 1 that fish, birds plants, animals and every living organism were created after their own kind, And that is exactly what we observe. Dogs only produce dogs, cats only produce cats etc. We can also confirm many other aspects of the Scripture's history in other areas of science such as astronomy and geology.

OLAADEGBU:

Someone Said: "Creationism is anti-science."

Creationism can be observed. Genesis says every animal has male and female and brings forth after its own kind (see Genesis 1). Faith isn’t necessary when it comes to what the Bible says about these things, because this is observable in the existing creation and in the fossil record. Darwinian evolution isn't scientific because it doesn't pass the scientific method. If you don’t believe it watch www.evolutionvsGod.com and listen to evolutionary scientists admit it.

rationalmind:

Creation is the evidence of a creator. Which creator? Yahweh, Allah, Fsm? Which one?

Like I once told you and I'm saying again, the unexplained doesn't mean the inexplicable. Until you fully grasp the implication of that statement, you might not be making much sense when you talk.

macof: Pls mods this should be in front page.
It's very important

OLAADEGBU:

I didn't observe when God made Adam but I do observe the evidence of design. A painting is the evidence of a painter, a building is the evidence of a builder, Creation is the evidence of the Creator.

Genesis chapters 1-11 gives us an account of historical events about the ultimate cause of the universe and how life originated - questions you atheists haven't got a clue about. Through the application of science we can safely confirm that God's the Jews account of creation is true. For instance, GodThe Jews informs us in the account of Genesis chapter 1 that fish, birds plants, animals and every living organism were created after their own kind, And that is exactly what we observe. Dogs only produce dogs, cats only produce cats etc. We can also confirm many other aspects of the Scripture's history in other areas of science such as astronomy and geology.

ifeness:

I will post my nude pics if it ever reaches front page.

macof:

God never gave any account. HUMANS did.

the jews have theirs, the greeks have theirs, the yoruba have theirs, and all people have their own philosophy

OLAADEGBU:

I produced my evidence and you can only dispute it with concrete evidence not with emotional outbursts that doesn't change anything.

macof:

if u believe the jews and I as a yoruba believe the yorubas, You cant impose ur myth as universal

OLAADEGBU:

Science and prophecy supports and confirms my "myth" as being true and certain, can the same be said about yours?

macof:

Actually Yes .
And i thought u disregard Science wats ur business wit scientific theories and findings when u only pick wat complements the Jews

OLAADEGBU:

True science only confirms what the Bible asserts. "Evolution" is disproved by science and that is why it remains as a "theory" and not a scientific law.

OLAADEGBU:

True science only confirms what the Bible asserts. "Evolution" is disproved by science and that is why it remains as a "theory" and not a scientific law.

Logicboy03:


The first sentence almost killed me. An overdose of crap

rationalmind:

A theory in scientific terms is a statement that is generally accepted to be true.

plaetton:

Yeah , like when science confirms that once upon a time, snakes and donkeys had speech capabilities, then that's when science lives up to it's true name and true calling.

Logicboy03:

The first sentence almost killed me. An overdose of crap

OLAADEGBU:

"The theory of evolution" is not a scientific theory as you can see in the video clip I posted earlier, how your apostle Stephen Hawkins was unable to say when it can be observed.

rationalmind:

A theory in scientific terms is a statement that is generally accepted to be true.

plaetton:

Yeah , like when science confirms that once upon a time, snakes and donkeys had speech capabilities, then that's when science lives up to it's true name and true calling.

OLAADEGBU:

"Evolution" is not a theory in "scientific terms" and cannot therefore be accepted as true.

OLAADEGBU:

Someone Said: "Do you believe in talking snakes?"

Parrots talk. Dogs tell humans when there's danger. They also "talk" with other dogs. Dolphins communicate with each other. So do whales. Elephant's converse with each other, and a cat will tell you when he's hungry. Believers in evolution mock the thought of a snake that can communicate, but they believe the ridiculous notion that they themselves are talking primates.

Are you a cousin to Bananas? -> www.EvolutionVsGod.com

Logicboy03:

I think that olaadegbu was not taught science as a kid

Logicboy03:

How old are you?

Is your problem a case of immaturity or poverty?

Even Joshthefirst is at least approachable on this issue

rationalmind:

Lol, there are many christians here who are just a slightly more intelligent version of onyfrank.

If stephen hawkins can't answer a particular question, the theory of evolution ceases to be scientific....

This is what happens when one believes skydaddy made adam from clay

OLAADEGBU:

If you were that intelligent you would have realised that it was Richard Dawkins that couldn't answer that question and not Stephen Hawkins. The videoclip below shows science professors and science majors students who couldn't answer the intelligent questions posed to them.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0u3-2CGOMQ

olaadegbu: "The theory of evolution" is not a scientific theory
as you can see in the video clip I posted earlier,
how your apostle Stephen Hawkins was unable to
say when it can be observed.

Logicboy03:

How old are you?

Is your problem a case of immaturity or poverty?

Even Joshthefirst is at least approachable on this issue

rationalmind:

As in, this guy worse pass. He makes Josh look like a genius.

Logicboy03:

You can kill someone with your irrational claims. Snakes can't talk....they don't have the organs necessary for speech. Parrots can speak but they can only repear

OLAADEGBU:

You may mock the thought of a snake that can communicate, but is it not irrational, illogical and unscientific if you believe the ridiculous notion that you are talking primates?

OLAADEGBU:

Someone Said: "Creationism is anti-science."

Creationism can be observed. Genesis says every animal has male and female and brings forth after its own kind (see Genesis 1). Faith isn’t necessary when it comes to what the Bible says about these things, because this is observable in the existing creation and in the fossil record. Darwinian evolution isn't scientific because it doesn't pass the scientific method. If you don’t believe it watch www.evolutionvsGod.com and listen to evolutionary scientists admit it.

OLAADEGBU:



It is open secret that the only tactics you use when you've run out of bullets is to start using ad hominems, ridicule and equivocations. You've got no evidence to back up your claims.