Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,153,238 members, 7,818,797 topics. Date: Monday, 06 May 2024 at 04:10 AM

Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. - Education - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Education / Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. (3072 Views)

LASU Vs IBADAN POLY : Nairaland Interschool Debate: WINNER: IBADAN POLY / UNILORIN--FUNAAB: Nairaland Interschool Debate: WINNER: FUNAAB / OAU--ABU ZARIA: Nairaland Interschool Debate: WINNER: OAU (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (Reply) (Go Down)

Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by AbuMikey(m): 10:01pm On Nov 19, 2013
[size=18pt]Nairaland Interschool Debate: Elimination Stage[/size]

Ladies and gentlemen, the educational aficionados, the cerebral analysts and pundits, respected Nairaland intelligentsia and commentariat, observers and watchers all well respected Nigerian students both in Nigeria and Abroad, it's our pleasure to welcome you to the First phase and the Elimination round of the First edition of the NAIRALAND INTERSCHOOL DEBATE between the gladiator of ONDO STATE UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY


And that of UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA,NSUKKA



[size=28pt]OSUSTECH (supporting.) VS UNN (opposing.)[/size]



[size=18pt]Topic: It is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech.
[/size]

www.nairaland.com/attachments/1413619_osutech_jpgc20932bdca7d937e63945e4c43b0b523


CHIEF COORDINATOR
Olawalebabs
Fynestboi
Richiez

COORDINATORS
(mr and miss)
BOAY
ALICIA KEYS
HONEYDEAR
ABU MIKEY
KESSY
MISCALLENOUS
ONWORDI
AGROVICK
WILL007


Cordinators Incharge:
[url=https://www.nairaland.com/abu%20mikey]Abu Mikey[/url] and Honeydear

Judges:
Jaybee
Caracta


Date:
Saturday 30th of November.


Time:
1pm-4pm No African time angry angry grin grin

Venue: Nairaland Education Section





For those who have not been following, you may go through the history here:
NAIRALAND UNDERGRADUATES
PLANNING THREAD

Kindly click on here for other fixtures of this elimination round.
fixtures
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by AbuMikey(m): 10:05pm On Nov 19, 2013
PROCEDURES

12:55 -- Debaters and judges take seats, register presence

1:00 -- Coordinators Boay and agrovick declare the debate open

1:00 - 1:20 -- Debaters post their arguements within 15 minutes, its advisable debaters use less than 750 words to make it easier for the judges to read, there is no harm in having more than 750 words but the arguements must not exceed 850 words

1:20 – 2:20pm - A debater takes on his opponent, attempts to puncture his opponent’s points. This a debater does by quoting, highlighting the area to puncture and countering it i.e regular way to reply on Nairaland. While this is going on the judges can take their time to go through the write ups by the debaters. And also Debaters respond to punctured areas in his earlier arguments. He may buttress further. At this time frame.

2:20 – 2:40pm – Judges post questions to debaters either based on what the debater has posted or just reasonable question within the theme. Judges should be specific as to who they are posting the questions to. E.g “Mr ...., could you expatiate what you meant by so so so? or ...., pls give examples of your claim that xxxx”. This is not compulsory. A judge that doesn’t have question to post to the debaters need not do so.

2:40 – 3:00pm – Debaters respond to questions raised by judges

3:00 – 03:20pm – 2 Questions will be entertained from the audience i.e viewers. This will be based on ‘fastest hand’. The coordinators will announce ‘audience, you may now ask your questions’. After the 2 questions have been posted, any other viewer-post will be hidden.
NOTE: -The judges and audience can throw their questions without quotations but the contestants should answer
with quotations and separated for each questions.

3:20 – 3:30 – Debaters respond to audience questions and concludes their arguments. Debaters who were not asked any questions can still conclude his/her arguments.

3:30 – 3:40 – Judges compile the scores and mail to coordinators: abu*****@gmail.com and,or osasmaureen@gmail.com


3:40 – 4: 00pm Coordinators announce results. Thread thrown open for regular Nairaland discussion.
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by AbuMikey(m): 10:05pm On Nov 19, 2013
JUDGING CRITERIA (5 marks each)
1. Presentation (opening, flow, closing,
response to judges questions,
audience questions and contestants
rebuttals)

2. Logic of arguments

3. Strength of facts, examples, cases.

4. Persuasiveness

5. Demonstration of knowledge and
understanding of the subject
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by AbuMikey(m): 10:06pm On Nov 19, 2013
RULES

1.) Two contestants representing their school in this Interschool Debate Elimination stage will have to confirm their availability for the debate a day before the debate proper. Failure to do so will result in the defaulter been disqualify and the opposing or supporting side that duely declare availabily will automatically be declare as the winner.

2.) The recommended font size is the default size (size 8.) and the colour is GREEN for the supporting side and BLUE for the opposing side. Please note that you are to use the designated colour all through the debate period.

3.) The essay should be min. 750 max. 1000 words .

4.) The use of SMS language and abbreviations are strictly forbidden.

5.) All materials used should be properly referenced at the end of the essay.

6.) All essays, responses and conclusion must be submitted within the stipulated time frame stated in the time schedule as posted by the coordinator
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by AbuMikey(m): 10:07pm On Nov 19, 2013
Please while the debate is going, only the debaters, judges, coordinators, Supermods(if need be) can post. It is only at the audience question window that a viewer can post on this thread. Pls let's comply, default attracts 3 hours ban(duration of the debate).

You can however comment simultaneously at thePlanning thread



Thank you.



Debate starts by 1:00pm on SATURDAY.

Come and witness the mother of all e-debates on the biggest section of the biggest online forum in Africa.
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by Fynestboi: 10:09pm On Nov 19, 2013
Till 30th November stay tune.
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by jaybee3(m): 12:58pm On Nov 30, 2013
Registering my presence and wishing the debaters goodluck with the contest.
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by Caracta(f): 1:02pm On Nov 30, 2013
All the best debaters. cheesy
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by honeydear(f): 1:03pm On Nov 30, 2013
The debate is hereby declared open
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by honeydear(f): 1:07pm On Nov 30, 2013
Debaters you can now post your arguments
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by chynazom(f): 1:09pm On Nov 30, 2013
My esteemed Judges, illustrious coordinators, hardworking moderators, fellow contestants, informed audience, and all other protocols duly observed.
It’s quite delightful being part of this live and online debate, my user name is Chynazom, representing the University of Nigeria and I am speaking against the motion that Government should sometimes restrict freedom of speech.

I’d begin by telling us that freedom is easily defined as the ability to act freely, or a state in which somebody is free to act and live as he/she chooses without being subject to any undue restraints or restriction. (Encarta dictionary, 2009).
Freedom of speech and expression is unarguably one of the fundamental rights of a person and it is closely linked with the freedom of information.

Concepts of freedom of speech can be found in early human rights documents, the ‘Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen’ adopted during the French revolution in 1789 specifically affirmed that freedom of speech is an inalienable right. The Declaration in Article 11 states that: “The free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious rights of man. Every citizen may, accordingly, speak, write and print with freedom, but shall be responsible for such abuses of this freedom as shall be defined by law.” There are other human rights documents that speak volumes on the rights of a person as regard freedom of speech, but let me dwell on the above quoted. Granted, the government has the right to restrict this freedom but the ‘Declaration’ does not forget to remind us that a citizen shall be responsible for abuse of this freedom.

Freedom of speech should not at any time be restricted by the Government because restriction totally defeats the real essence of Democracy. Democracy is characterized by free and equal participation in Government; how can we fully participate in decision making process when we don’t have 100% freedom of speech or when there are limitations to what we can and can’t say? A true Democratic society should have free flow of information at all times, including free and open debates regarding matters of public interest even when this involves criticism of individuals.

Freedom of speech is not only limited to expression alone, but also involves right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas. (According to John Milton’s argument). This implies that if the Government ‘sometimes’ restrict freedom of speech, it also indirectly restricting the freedom to seek and receive information. Before one can have information to dish out, he/she must have sought them out. How is that possible when there are certain restrictions?
Governmental actions to deny differing points of view, even distasteful or
unpopular opinions, rob us of the range of ideas that might serve the interests
of society more effectively. The right to speak freely, without restraint, is essential to a democratic government because it helps us develop better laws and policies through challenge, rebuttal, and debate.
The ability to speak freely allows us to pursue truth, to challenge falsehoods, to correct mistakes—all are necessary for a healthy society.

I’ll not forget that the main argument here is whether to restrict this freedom ‘sometimes’ or not; but have you ever imagined that if some of these restrictions are not contested, we might gradually and unconsciously lose the freedom to express ourselves in some political matters. How is that possible?
Let me quote part of Principle 2 of the Principle of Freedom of Expression and Protection of Reputation (found in Article 19). It says: “Defamation laws cannot be justified if their purpose or effect is to protect individuals against harm to a reputation which they do not have or do not merit, or to protect the ‘reputations’ of entities other than those which have the right to sue and to be sued.
In particular, defamation laws cannot be justified if their purpose or effect is to:
i. prevent legitimate criticism of officials or the exposure of official wrongdoings or corruption.
ii. protect the ‘reputation’ of objects, such as State symbols, flags or national insignia
iii. protect the ‘reputation’ of the State or nation.
iv. enable individuals to sue on behalf of a persons who are deceased
Most times when Defamation laws are abused, the resultant effect cannot be overemphasised. We would have cases of public open debates and legitimate criticism of wrongdoings being prevented. The rest of the scenario can be imagined.

I imagine what life would have been like if there was no freedom of speech at all; we would have been in an age of modern day slavery . Forums like Nairaland where issues concerning the populace are discussed daily wouldn’t have been in existence. I am of the opinion that this freedom we enjoy should be full and complete, not altered at any time. An informed society should be totally knowledgeable, having no constraints on free flow of information. So, audience lets crave for a society where we are all free to express ourselves and free to know things we should know. Thank you!

REFERENCES
Freedom of speech in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech
http://www.justicelearning.org/
Defining Defamation in Article 19 in www.article19.org

10 Likes

Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by Fynestboi: 1:20pm On Nov 30, 2013
Unn second speaker kindly post your argument.
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by honeydear(f): 1:21pm On Nov 30, 2013
UNN second speaker please post your argument
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by Omesbrit(m): 1:28pm On Nov 30, 2013
unn secon speaker.

Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by Omesbrit(m): 1:30pm On Nov 30, 2013
The panel of judges, ever effective coordinators, fellow contestant and my well informed audience. Distinguish Ladies and gentlemen, is a great honour to debate on this online forum “Naira land” My username is omesbrite, representing university of Nigeria nsukka, debating against the topic “it is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech”
To buttress the definition given by my first speaker, freedom of speech is also the political right to communicate one's opinions and ideas using one's body and property to anyone who is willing to receive them. It is sometimes used synonymously with freedom of expression, but includes any act of seeking, receiving and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used.
The right to freedom of expression is recognized as a human right under Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and recognized in international human rights law in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Article 19 of the ICCPR states that "everyone shall have the right to hold opinions “without interference" and everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression.
In a truly democratic society, the importance of freedom of speech cannot be underestimated. It is, in fact, the very cornerstone that holds a democratic society, and makes it truly democratic. In other words, without freedom of speech, there can be no true democracy. This is because the idea of democracy itself is based upon the will of the people, if there is no free speech, then how can the will of the people be known? The truth is that, it cannot be known.
Freedom of speech helps the electorate to make a better choice of whom to for, also it helps the general public to be able to make informed decisions as well as what issues to vote for.
It reduces corruption by making the government transparent and accountable, is also a means by which the public makes their opinion known to the government.
It gives right for fair trial during court cases by creating more access to information,expecially, when it involves political officers, because it does not encourage privacy, and it reveals corruption and deception in the government.
It also create room for self-development during interactions with people, examples are online forum like nairaland,punch online news, where people exchange their views through comments after reading.
Having made the above points, I am of the opinion that government should not resist freedom of speech because is of away avoiding disclosure of information regarding it’s corrupt practices and deception to the public,infact is a way of manipulating public opinion to suit them.
Also, It is an infringement to human right law, which states that “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers “so any restriction alters that law and should not be allowed.
If freedom of speech is restricted sometimes is no longer a democracy. A democracy would not be a democracy without freedom of speech. If it were not for freedom of speech, those things that the government was doing wrong would never be pointed out to be corrected, how then would the government be transparent and accountable, if freedom of speech is restricted? If allowed, it would do the society more harm than good.
I would also like you to know that everyone has a right to speak their mind on things, no matter how controversial or how wrong it may be, they have the right to express themselves just the same, according to the constitution. The main reason government tries to restrict is to control thought of the public more easily. It is not acceptable, and should not be allowed to happen, so I don't think it is ever right for a government to restrict freedom of speech sometimes.
The government should not restrict our freedom of speech sometimes, It is not only when it favours the government that it should be heard, but it is good for the people to know what it is up to and know whether is keeping it’s promises.
If freedom of speech is restricted, many civil right issues would not be discussed, meaning that schools would still be segregated; people of different races would find it difficult to associate. Even interracial marriage would be illegal in many places. For that matter, child marriage, gay marriages would never have being discussed. The United States would not exist as it does today in any way. Feminism would also not have existed as it does now. Women would not have had the right to make changes that made them able to have the same jobs that men do. All these issues would never have being discussed for the fear of unknown, if freedom of speech is restricted.
Lastly, I would want my well informed judges to know that, you can't deal with things you don't know about. And we can only move forward when we know where we are. So don't we want to know where we are? Or don’t we know there is a motive behind every action? The truth is hard to take sometimes. It isn't always convenient. It can be disappointing. But knowing and having information about ourselves and the world we live in is part of our identity as human beings. Our democracy relies on an informed citizenry. Thoughtful, fair, balanced, comprehensive reporting in print and in photos or video may be the best way to know what's going on, the best way to inform ourselves. Information is what keeps us free from tyranny, let us not support the government to restrict our freedom of speech from us, whether sometimes or at all times, thank you.

References
1. Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966, entry into force 23 March
2. the Free Speech Provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights", Ambika Kumar, Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 7, No. 1 (Summer 2006). (subscription required. .
3. Lord Mansfield, The King v. Williams (1774), Lofft. 763.







2 Likes

Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by honeydear(f): 1:36pm On Nov 30, 2013
OSUSTECH your turn....kindly post your argument
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by Fynestboi: 1:41pm On Nov 30, 2013
Osustech you have just 10minutes to post your argument. Time is already far spent.
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by Fynestboi: 1:52pm On Nov 30, 2013
Time up for Osustech.
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by Fynestboi: 1:52pm On Nov 30, 2013
Judges and audience can now ask the debaters questions.
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by Fynestboi: 1:53pm On Nov 30, 2013
Osustech is hereby disqualify... Judges can now ask questions.

Debaters, pls respond to question(s) posted at you as soon as the question is visible.
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by Nobody: 1:59pm On Nov 30, 2013
Miss chynazom, In this jet age, terrorism and civil unrest have been orchestrated via social media, how do you want government apparatus to curb this ugly menace?
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by Fynestboi: 2:00pm On Nov 30, 2013
Debaters, pls respond to question(s) posted at you as soon as the question is visible.
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by jaybee3(m): 2:00pm On Nov 30, 2013
@ chynazom
How do you propose to navigate around the issue of national security if governments were to allow 100% freedom of speech
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by tunex23: 2:04pm On Nov 30, 2013
My question to the UNN crew, we know that freedom of speech is a true democracy, but you also know that this can be abuse by the citizens? What your take on that
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by Fynestboi: 2:05pm On Nov 30, 2013
UNN KINDLY give response to the questions...
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by jaybee3(m): 2:06pm On Nov 30, 2013
@omesbrit

Can you please expatiate how freedom of speech helps electorate make better choices

Can you also give me a specific example of how freedom of speech has inadvertently helped reduce corruption
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by Caracta(f): 2:06pm On Nov 30, 2013
@chynazom
How will you address the gross misuse of the liberty that Freedom of speech brings, with reference to how GEJ is constantly being ridiculed on social media and a forum like Nairaland?

The second debater can also do justice to this question.
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by Davo93(m): 2:15pm On Nov 30, 2013
Good Afternoon ladies and gentlemen,

Eye-opening essays there from both debaters!

My ignorance lies in the later part of the third paragraph of Chynazom's write-up. You seems to agree with the fact that the government has the right to limit the discussed right.

Granted, the government has the right to restrict this freedom but the ‘Declaration’ does not forget to remind us that a citizen shall be responsible for abuse of this freedom.

Later on, you vehemently argue that the government is not supposed in any way to restrict the freedom of speech. My question now is this, what is the essence of you having a cutlass as a man living in a bushy environment and your not able to use it to cut those weeds around you? I mean, does it mean that the right invested in the government to restrict the freedom of expression sometimes amount to a joke?

Remember, the topic says "It is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech"

Thanks.
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by chynazom(f): 2:15pm On Nov 30, 2013
Emzybrown: Miss chynazom, In this jet age, terrorism and civil unrest have been orchestrated via social media, how do you want government apparatus to curb this ugly menace?

In the third paragraph, I mentioned that as much as we have our freedom of speech, we will also be responsible for abuse of this freedom.


So, in my opinion , the Government can curb such menace of by having some sort of social media surveillance agency that can monitor such activity online, this can even help in a way. How? The agency can track and even halt some terrorist activities when they are being incited.

Someone who decides to use the 'freedom' of the internet wrongly should be apprehended.
Re: Nairaland Interschool Debate:: WINNER:::: UNN. by chynazom(f): 2:18pm On Nov 30, 2013
tunex23: My question to the UNN crew, we know that freedom of speech is a true democracy, but you also know that this can be abuse by the citizens? What your take on that

Let's not dwell ONLY on the negative aspect of freedom of speech. It is part of a very positive medium for practice of true democracy when used appropriately.

(1) (2) (3) (Reply)

Turkish Government Scholarships / Federal Medical Centre, Owo 2015/2016 INTERNSHIP APPLICATION FORM / Checkout The Youngest SUG President In Nigeria.

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 58
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.