Scientist mathematically proves that black holes do not exist and the Big Bang Theory is wrong -

Read full report from UK Dailymail [ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2769156/Black-holes-NOT-exist-Big-Bang-Theory-wrong-claims-scientist-maths-prove-it.html]

When a huge star many times the mass of the sun comes to the end of its life it collapses in on itself and forms a singularity - creating a black hole where gravity is so strong that not even light itself can escape.
At least, that’s what we thought.A scientist has sensationally said that it is impossible for black holes to exist - and she even has mathematical proof to back up her claims.If true, her research could force physicists to scrap their theories of how the universe began.

The research was conducted by Professor Laura Mersini-Houghton from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the College of Arts and Scientists.

Before the black hole can form, she said, the dying star swells and explodes.The singularity as predicted never forms, and neither does the event horizon - the boundary of the black hole where not even light can escape.Professor Mersini-Houghton said :

"I’m still not over the shock .We’ve been studying this problem for a more than 50 years and this solution gives us a lot to think about."

Experimental evidence may one day provide physical proof as to whether or not black holes exist in the universe. She claims that as a star dies, it releases a type of radiation known as Hawking radiation - predicted by Professor Stephen Hawking.However in this process, Professor Mersini-Houghton believes the star also sheds mass, so much so that it no longer has the density to become a black hole.


But for now, Mersini-Houghton says the mathematics are conclusive. What’s more, the research could apparently even call into question the veracity of the Big Bang theory. Most physicists think the universe originated from a singularity that began expanding with the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago.

If it is impossible for singularities to exist, however, as partially predicted by Professor Mersini-Houghton, then that theory would also be brought into question.

One of the reasons black holes are so bizarre is that they pit two fundamental theories of the universe against each other.

Namely, Einstein’s theory of gravity predicts the formation of black holes. But a fundamental law of quantum theory states that no information from the universe can ever disappear.

Efforts to combine these two theories proved problematic, and has become known as the black hole information paradox - how can matter permanently disappear in a black hole as predicted?

Professor Mersini-Houghton’s new theory does manage to mathematically combine the two fundamental theories, but with unwanted effects for people expecting black holes to exist.

‘Physicists have been trying to merge these two theories - Einstein’s theory of gravity and quantum mechanics - for decades, but this scenario brings these two theories together, into harmony,’ said Professor Mersini-Houghton.

‘And that’s a big deal.’

More Here : http://www.kingebuka.com/2014/09/scientitst-mathematically-proves-that.html

Science sef

Our own sun is also a star when it dies what becomes of our earth?

Jameselias: Our own sun is also a star when it dies what becomes of our earth?

It has at the very least three billion years of useful life left after which it would expand into a red giant and consume the inner solar system before turning into a red dwarf. But that is still a very long time from now.

dorox:
It has at the very least three billion years of useful life left after which it would expand into a red giant and consume the inner solar system before turning into a red dwarf. But that is still a very long time from now.

it will expand into a red gaint and consume the inner solar system our's inclusive abi?peharps that's what the ancient pple referred to as the end of the world. Which was latter incoporated in to religeous writings Just asking?

Jameselias: it will expand into a red gaint and consume the inner solar system our's inclusive abi?peharps that's what the ancient pple referred to as the end of the world. Which was latter incoporated in to religeous writings Just asking?

Trust me, at the current rate we are polluting the planet we would have long made it uninhabitable and gone into extinction as a result before that time comes.

dorox:
Trust me, at the current rate we are polluting the planet we would have long made it uninhabitable and gone into extinction as a result before that time comes.

u may be right about going into extinction. But that is scary... Don't u think? Could that be said to be the same with the misunderstud end of the wold dogma as purpoted in reiigious writtings reconcile scientic view on earth exictintion and that of religious view on end of the world pls.?