AlBaqir:
^ First, what do expect from an Ash'ari Sunni-Sufi and a Wahabi-Salafi other than clash of ideas?!

Second, its high time for Sheik Habib to always support his submissions with references. Many a times his submissions are genuine but he doesn't site reference(s). And Sheik should stop his arrogance. He sees himself as an authority but he is not. That is the downfall of Shaytan. I urge you to go and watch Dr. Alaro vs Sheik Habib on itan Yoruba Quran.

Third, Fatai Sarumi is a maniac with a methodology to deliberately twist other Alfa's submission. This is the exact methodology he used for Jabata. He and Jabata have became menace to Ilorin society now. Their case is nearly physical now.
.............

Now, to the main issue (the video).

1. Minutes 13:35 - 14:00, Sarumi says:

"Gbogbo Alfa esin, lati ojo ti anabi, salallahu alayhi wa Salam, ti kuro laye, ti Imam Bukhari tide leyin igba naa, gbogbo al-Ummah lopa nupo pe haaa kosi tira hadith to to ti Imam Bukhari..."

* If I am to use Sarumi's quoting out of context methodology, the bold statement is fallacy and heresy. What is the distance between the time of the demise of the Prophet and the lifetime of Bukhari? Centuries apart. So, how dare he making such statement? That is àsodùn! However the underlined statement corrected his initial fallacy (the bold statement). But trust Sarumi, he will only quote/play the bold if it is other Alfa that made such statement.

2. Minutes 17:31 - 17:58, sheik Habib submits:

"Taa batowo bo oro sahih Bukhari, (Bukhari fun rare) taaba towo bo, a bèrè siiri, a bèrè siiri aaye. Imam Bukhari si ni yii afoju sini, kotunrina..."

Here no doubt, Sheik Habib's emphasis is on the "sahih" of Imam Bukhari (that it is not 100% authentic) not on Bukhari as a person. Sheik's reference to Bukhari being blind is to explore that Bukhari was not the compiler of the "Sahih". Its like saying how can a blind man compiled a book?

As expected, Sarumi says Sheik Habib was talking about the person of Bukhari. He never make any reference to the book. Here are his statements:
"Se awa naa tiri gbo bayii? Oniwipe al-Imam Bukhari, ta wan bani ka wan towo bo Iran re, awon o ma ri aaye . O wa ni Imam Bukhari afoju sini. Otumo pe lodo ti e, ìjé afoju aaye ni"

Then, Sarumi quoted Imam Ibn Kathir to prove that Imam Bukhari only had eye problem during his childhood but was cured due to the dreams of his mother whereby Nabi Ibrahim visited her and give glad tidings.

* That is just a story. What is Ibn Kathir's chain of transmitter (sanad) from himself to Imam Bukhari's mother (about 300 years apart) to confirm the authenticity of that dream report? Sarumi ran away from that and weirdly says "gbogbo Alfa loma wi pe tira 'Al-bidaya wa Nihaya' Imam Ibn Kathir, ko si iro ni be".


Lastly, Sheik Habib says:

Minutes 22:05 - 22:47
"Bukhari òun gann, sogbo larubawa ni? Imam Bukhari o gbo larubawa. Sebi omo Russia ni, omo Bukhara ni. Larubawa re o duro daada...ko gbo daada bi ka sope o wa 'mut'kinun, bi lugah'. La!.

# Unfortunately, Sarumi was not able to convincingly defend this point. Rather he was just quoting "praises" of Ulamas for Imam Bukhari.

# Then he (Sarumi) talks about Books written by Imam Bukhari. Sarumi read the names of those books in Arabic but he NEVER established that those books were written by Imam Bukhari in Arabic.

# Then Sarumi tried his utmost to defend Najd not being the central Saudi and his cursed Sheik Ibn Abdulwahab not one of the qarn shaitan. Though I expect a fight back but its a loss cause.

* Have you seen a video titled "Where is Najd?" part 1&2. Its a lecture in two parts by unknown yellow beard young scholar. He did a fantastic job

Empiree:


Subhannallah!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ng-a6sNKA90&ebc=ANyPxKr2onnnxyttOuIlk5MbBmEAC66I3a05c4kFeP0G4bIbpiRpEt-CneJ_FVZEyUiD2wREiGXC

lanrexlan:
Who knows this man? This is sheikh Habebullah Al Ilory, the first child of Sheikh Adam Abdullah Al Ilory(RTA) and the rector of Markaz Arabic school In Agege. Empiree, do you remembered that I told you that I read a disturbing article about this man few years back? Unfortunately I lost my history and a lot of things was lost in the process .

Recently, during Ramadan I was watching this man lecture on MiTv and I was so eager to hear him because I never listened to him before. Then, he said something disturbing again, he said Eesa(as) is dead and he is never coming back. He further said all those hadiths that said he's coming is daeef. He said if he comes back, the Ahadith says he will kill pigs and break cross, he replied and said 'Anabi Eesa yoo Wa di alapata abi?' meaning 'Prophet Eesa will now turn to a butcher abi?' . I found this disturbing for a man like him to say that.

So I was very curious about what sheikh Adam Abdullah Al Ilory (RTA) say about the descent of Eesa. Since I think he should be following the footsteps of his father, will he contradicts him? So I went to one of ustahds and enquired about the view of baba Adam concerning the issue. He said baba wrote in one of his books that Eesa is coming. To be cocksure, when I arrived home from school for Eid I asked my cousin about this man and Baba's view on Eesa descent again, he replied in affirmative that baba also agreed that Eesa is coming back. I got this pics from my cousin.


My headache is that, there were hundreds of people who were listening to him that day.He is a popular sheikh in Lagos. What is Markaz turning to? This is not what the great man sheikh Adam Abdullah Al Ilory laboured for.

Empiree:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJ03F2OIZfM

AlBaqir:


This Aniyikaye guffed and fumbled. This kind of legal handling should be done to Jabata and his thugs.