[size=18pt]STOP!!!!!

Dont come in here saying this is CRAZY TALK!

Remember what they taught you in higher learning; critical thinking and looking at two sides of a story is GOOD REASONING[/size]


Top level military men in the Nigerian army who spoke to us , and another top Nigerian blogger/activist on condition of full anonymity, have further validated shocking reports recently revealed by the Voice of America, VoA, about organized, top command sabotage in the ranks of the army, with army operated ambush and assassination squads.

The military men told us candidly, “there is no more Boko Haram, Boko Haram is gone, it is military task force dong the killings now.”

In total 1 710 people were killed in attacks by “unknown” military uniform wearing assassins and incendiarists across Nigeria last week alone.

Apparently troubled by the spate of events in the northeast and around the nation, the soldiers decided to come out and talk to those they could trust; saying that within the ranks, people were afraid of speaking as this could be their end.

The soldiers further described the event the VoA had publicized, stating that another soldier in the ambush who got wounded said the Colonel in charge of the unit left these set of soldiers, taking away all sophisticated fighting equipment and leaving them at the mercy of the better equipped ambushing army unit with only Ak47’s and one or two rounds.

The soldiers described frustration among military men taking part in the battle in the northeast, saying many were abandoning the army because they realize their aim of being soldiers has been undermined and the top military generals who benefit financially from equipment purchase and mobilization funding, and may be involved in a possible plot to depopulate

http://gistbaby.com/2014/news/boko-haram-doesnt-exist-nigerian-soldiers-are-behind-killings/

We know that the US government has a long history of planning and staging fake terror incidents to galvanize public opinion, curtail civil liberties, launch pre-planned wars, pursue a "strategy of tension," and gain other strategic objectives. Anyone who doubts this should simply feed the terms "Operation Northwoods" and "Operation Gladio" into a search engine.


Professor Fetzer and other researchers argue that the Boston bombing videos prove that some of the worst "injuries" were Hollywood-style fakes. He says that one of the alleged victims, Nick Vogt, actually lost his legs in Afghanistan, not in the Boston bombing. In his article "Some 'hard lessons' from the Boston Bombing" Fetzer reproduces photographs purporting to show Vogt being prepared with fake wound prosthetics in the aftermath of the bombing. The photos and video of Vogt and another man who supposedly lost his leg, Jeff Bauman, raise serious questions about how people can lose legs from blunt force trauma yet suffer minimal loss of blood. Bauman was placed upright in a wheelchair - hardly the recommended treatment for someone who has just lost a leg - and taken away looking fully alert and in no apparent pain.
Other governments do the same thing. Israel, with its Lavon Affair, USS Liberty massacre, Achille Lauro false flag, and many similar incidents, may be the world's false-flag champion.http://presstv.com/detail/2014/05/14/362619/is-boko-haram-a-psyop/

Are elements of the Nigerian government, perhaps with foreign help, staging or assisting "Boku Haram" attacks? Could this be just the latest example of a worldwide trend: The creation and deployment of brutal Takfiri militant groups to smear Islam in service to Zionism and imperialism?

[img]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tI7AUmGlEZI[/img]


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6uZ4QjLgls

The problem with you self proclaimed intellectuals sha. #sighs
this isn't just crazy talk,you are definitely crazy.

The problem with you self proclaimed intellectuals sha. #sighs
this isn't just crazy talk,you are definitely crazy.

Did you say we should not call this a crazy talk? Then what is it?
How can you post here without justifying it. You based your arguments on speculation and I disagree with that