am confused if it is a sin or not to eat meat of animal whose blood was nt made to flow out when it was killed. i understand we are no more under d boundage of law as dis is era of grace where what goes into our body doesnt make us unclean but what comes out of our mind and body. but can we say it doesnt matter to eat such meat since christ also confirmed it dt he didnt come to scrap d law. pls i need ur contribution.

Hmmmmm

dhope:
am confused if it is a sin or not to eat meat of animal whose blood was nt made to flow out when it was killed. i understand we are no more under d boundage of law as dis is era of grace where what goes into our body doesnt make us unclean but what comes out of our mind and body. but can we say it doesnt matter to eat such meat since christ also confirmed it dt he didnt come to scrap d law. pls i need ur contribution.

This is a very sensitive one. It all depends but I believe it's "unfair" to feast on an animal whose blood was not made to flow. The implication of this is that you either strangled such animal, poisoned such animal or that you decided to feast on the creature after it had long died. The initial two is totally uncool and cruel. For a sensitive person like me, I'd not eat such because the death was not borne from the conventional way, which is by knife. The last is totally worse, eating an already dead animal is dangerous to one's health and considered a great risk as the "eater" may not ascertain the cause of the creature's death.

why dont you check your church doctrine and go with whatever it says.

thanks y'all for ur contribution. May God help all of us