5minsmadness:
It was the potential for backseat sex that disgusted him, not the kiss between two men.

And so he told the gay couple off — just as he has scolded many customers before them, for smooching in sight of his rearview mirror.

“People try to have sex in my cab all the time. I tell anyone who is in my cab acting like that, and if they act like that I tell them to stop, and most times people co-operate and they even make fun over it,” the cabbie told the Sun.

“I’m not against people who practice gay sex or who are homosexual, because I’m not a homophobic person — I just ask them not to. There is copy of the video in my car and if you go back a week or two, you’ll come across a man and woman who I told, please don’t do it.”

That’s the other side of the story, according to a man who may be the most despised cab driver in Calgary right now, for allegedly insulting and threatening to eject a gay couple who kissed in his backseat, after being picked up at the Stampede grounds.

If his passengers are correct, it’s hard to feel sorry for the cabbie, now suspended from work until early August and maybe out of a job for good.

But what if he was right? What if the cab company was a bit quick in thier judgement?

He claims the apparent homophobia was a misunderstanding, and he wants a chance to consult with a lawyer and then prove his innocence before an upcoming Livery Transport Services hearing.

“Two guys come into my cab and they’re making out and so I tell them please stop until I get you to where you are going. People have started out like that, and they end up undressing themselves, until they are naked and about to have sex, and so I have to stop this kind of thing before it gets to that,” he said.

“I only told them to stop until I get them to where they are going.”

http://www.google.com.ng/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCQQqQIwAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.calgarysun.com%2F2015%2F07%2F07%2Fcalgary-cab-driver-suspended-for-alleged-homophobia-speaks-out-on-why-he-told-two-men-to-stop-kissing-in-his-taxi&ei=7ZWfVZyLE5Dd7QarpqWACA&usg=AFQjCNFpGMJokrxmrkW8SsZ17InIV_-vBw&bvm=bv.96952980,d.ZGU

My brother this is what we have been shouting about for ages. These homosexuals will never be content with just being tolerated. They want to dominate every discuss. They want to throw their despicable lifestyle in front of our faces to clearly disgust us.
They are making a mockery of their creature and laughing derisively at how they managed to fool many people into backing them.
Already paedophiles in the US are demanding for rights and using exactly the same tactics employed by homosexuals to propagate their lifestyle. They now wants to be addressed as 'minor attracted' not paedophiles anymore. They are now claiming that it is a sexual orientation.
And very soon the gullible Americans will be manipulated to back them in the name of equality.
As for adult incestous couples, they won't have much problem at all getting what they want.

That is what support for homosexuals will bring in the long run. If it were a normal couple that were making out in the taxi and were cautioned to take it home, all these nonsense will not have happened.
Nigerians look and learn.

coogar:


only gays would watch 2 girls make out. the nude bodies of the girls is what interest the guys not the act itself. what possibly excitement can i get from 2 chics rubbing pubes together? it's extremely repulsive to me.

you're one of the different ones then.

But don't be like you don't know some straight guys like it.

I hear you.

I even have a secret wife too.

dinachi:

Homosexuality is an abomination!
But I have noticed that women in general seem to have carefree attitude about it than guys. They are the proffesional fence sitters.
There are by far more lesbians than homosexual men. The reason is because of single sex schools where the senior female students lure the younger one in through promises of no pregnancy, little or no chance of STIs and some financial gratification. The result is that almost 90% of all girls that attended single sex schools have been involved in one lesbian act or the other. That is why most women especially the young ones like cococandy and co have a favorable opinion for homosexuals.

dinachi:

I have been suspecting you for while now since you claimed in another thread that you have witnessed more homosexual sex in Nigeria than the US.
I just hope you did not indulge in them.

No need for suspicion anymore.
Now you have your fact.

cococandy:
you're one of the different ones then.

But don't be like you don't know some straight guys like it.

they like it just to see mammary glands & bushy pubes!

coogar:


they like it just to see mammary glands & bushy pubes!

Whatever their reasons, it does seem very hypocritical

cococandy:


Whatever their reasons, it does seem very hypocritical

hypocritical to be excited by the bodies of the opposite sex?

cococandy:


No need for suspicion anymore.
Now you have your fact.

Which fact?
Is this a clear admission that you cococandy Nwa mama used to suck the beaver?

cococandy:


Whatever their reasons, it does seem very hypocritical

Hypocritical or not, does it make it right?

cococandy are you for or against lesbianism?
No sarcasm pls.

5minsmadness:


Hypocritical or not, does it make it right?

cococandy are you for or against lesbianism?
No sarcasm pls.

Hating one and tolerating the other is wrong that's what I'm trying to say.

As per whether I'm for gay marriage or not, I'd say let other people have the same rights as you.
Simple as that.

coogar:


hypocritical to be excited by the bodies of the opposite sex?

look atew

What happened to their morality.?
Aren't those lesbians having homosexual sex?

cococandy:


Hating one and tolerating the other is wrong that's what I'm trying to say.

As per whether I'm for gay marriage or not, I'd say let other people have the same rights as you.
Simple as that.

I'm sorry but you havent said anything here.

Do you support gay marriage or dont you?

lmao

5minsmadness:


I'm sorry but you havent said anything here.

Do you support gay marriage or dont you?

I do 5mins.

That's what letting other people have the same right to be married as I do means.

cococandy:


I do 5mins.

That's what letting other people have the same right to be married as I do means.

Finally.

So, are you a christian?

5minsmadness:

Finally.

So, are you a christian?

Good question. I was expecting it.

Yes I am a Christian.

Should the rules of the world be made according to my beliefs?

If you're asking me whether I consider a homosexual Christain as a sinner, then the answer is yes. The person clearly knows his or bible is against.

That doesn't mean because I'm a Christian I should be oblivious to the fact that their are people who don't share my beliefs.

Saying they should be denied their right to be married because my bible that they don't believe in says so, would be the height of narcissism for me.

cococandy:


Good question. I was expecting it.

Yes I am a Christian.
[s]
Should the rules of the world be made according to my beliefs?

If you're asking me whether I consider a homosexual Christain as a sinner, then the answer is yes. The person clearly knows his or bible is against.

That doesn't mean because I'm a Christian I should be oblivious to the fact that their are people who don't share my beliefs.

Saying they should be denied their right to be married because my bible that they don't believe in says so, would be the height of narcissism for me[/s].

You are a christian. Got it.

Under which guidance should your moral compass lie?

5minsmadness:


You are a christian. Got it.

Under which guidance should your moral compass lie?

That's the point.

My morality should not be the standard for others.
It is based on my Christain morality that I would say yes a gay Christain is commiting a sin.

Taking it beyond that to actively campaign against gay folks being together means I also consider people of other religions who try to force their morality on me as doing the right thing.

The the phrase "the other person" mean nothing to you? Because you're a Christian?

I would have taken my eyes off and make that money. Go home and wash the making out off your car or best take the car to Coolio car wash for special cleansing.
No need being moral preacher. Imagine his current status and his families are asking for money, school fees, food, bills....it just doesn't worth it.
Making out as in kissing made our brother upset. I doubt the guys could make love in the back of a small taxi cab.

salsera:

Very nauseating hearing kissing noises for over 5mins, consider others.

Oh please
Chances are you watch porn, but even if you don't, you most likely watch movies where they kiss...
what's the difference?

freecocoa:
I wonder why any sane person would be making out in a cab to start with.

what's the big deal?
It's a kiss

cococandy:


That's the point.

My morality should not be the standard for others.
It is based on my Christain morality that I would say yes a gay Christain is commiting a sin.

Taking it beyond that to actively campaign against gay folks being together means I also consider people of other religions who try to force their morality on me as doing the right thing.

The the phrase "the other person" mean nothing to you? Because you're a Christian?

You are not answering the question. But I get where u r going from your lengthy explanations.

Sorry to say you are not a christian, maybe born one. You are a PACIFIST. And it is not a good word in this context. A christain stands up for her values and defends them. If not her value has no substance and makes no impact. The other religions you are talking about are standing for something and are already forcing their opinions on you albeit subtly. You are content with just not airing your opinion at all or taking a stand in any matter that concerns public opinion so as not to be seen as demanding. The truth is that in this scenario your silence means consent. And the day these 'equal rights' people vote for change your vote will count for them cos you probably won't vote at all

And the day these 'equal rights' people force you to accept their ideologies and force you to teach it to your children (even though its against your beliefs) you won't have a choice then cos it would have been passed into law and then you might be the one fighting for 'equal rights'. Its already happening if only you can open your eyes to look around you.

This is not about fanaticism or conspiracy theories, this is about morality and the right to be able to decipher right from wrong and choose what is right without being penalised by the law for it.

It's so funny how OP is preaching morals and bible ethics to someone else when he was on another thread prooving, "men are polygamous in nature" whereas bible is against all forms of fornication, adultery, lust et al.
He goes mute and less vocal on any thread about likelihood of men cheating in marriage instead of condemning it outrightly.
Talk about height of hypocrisy.
I am not surprised because Jesus said, that even prostitutes(sinners) will make heaven before "we" hypocrites.

@Topic, they crossed their boundary. *Iyama*

Really? You 5min. Want to teach me about being a true Christiain? I've heard it.

It is funny you remember your Christain faith when it is stuff that you don't like.
But when it is something unfair and unjust to other people but is comfortable for you,your Christianity flies out the window.

Your kind are the funniest of christains.

I repeat, if fighting and actively campaigning for other people's right to be denied because it doesn't suit your faith is true Christianity to you, count me out.
I do know that true Muslims and true whatever-other religions if they had their way would want a person like me to be banned from certain things because it is unholy in their books. And they'd be right too if we all listened to you.

So Let's all fight each other in this zoo called the earth and try to make our way the superior way. And in the process kill each other because we are too dumb to understand that 7billion people cannot be the same.

Trueness of anything in its purest form must mean eliminate anyone of a different orientation.

Well Except you plan a genocide of the magnitude of the holocaust on homosexual people all over the world so that they will all be wiped out and no traces of them left, there's no way your kids won't learn about. Accept that now and have peace.

Not everyone who learned about it turned gay. If your kids are born into this world, they must know homosexual beings exist. It exists hence they MUST learn about it. I have accepted that they have a social right to be married like me. And my kids will learn to accept that too.

They will know to keep their judgment to themselves.

5minsmadness:


You are not answering the question. But I get where u r going from your lengthy explanations.

Sorry to say you are not a christian, maybe born one. You are a PACIFIST. And it is not a good word in this context. A christain stands up for her values and defends them. If not her value has no substance and makes no impact. The other religions you are talking about are standing for something and are already forcing their opinions on you albeit subtly. You are content with just not airing your opinion at all or taking a stand in any matter that concerns public opinion so as not to be seen as demanding. The truth is that in this scenario your silence means consent. And the day these 'equal rights' people vote for change your vote will count for them cos you probably won't vote at all

And the day these 'equal rights' people force you to accept their ideologies and force you to teach it to your children (even though its against your beliefs) you won't have a choice then cos it would have been passed into law and then you might be the one fighting for 'equal rights'. Its already happening if only you can open your eyes to look around you.

This is not about fanaticism or conspiracy theories, this is about morality and the right to be able to decipher right from wrong and choose what is right without being penalised by the law for it.

cococandy:


I do 5mins.

That's what letting other people have the same right to be married as I do means.

Coco! Coco!! Coco!!!

I'd like to be a fly on the wall in your philosophy class Na liberal arts college? Although I guess in the US they all are now !

Let's take it as read to start, that a right to marry exists - homosexuals have never been denied the right to marry. We first have to ask what marriage is - it's "the lifelong union of a man and a woman"

It's a sexually differentiated union, not one based on "orientation" (if we actually agree that orientation is a thing - and homosexuality is not an identity, more a lifestyle, no matter how strongly one is inclined towards it).

So the requisites for marriage have always been male and female and not contravening any of the particulars, consent, mental competence,not too closely related, majority age etc.

In order for two people of the same sex to marry, we have to re-define marriage or create a new right based on different criteria. Nobody has a right to demand that their relationship be termed marriage - just because they desire it - or redefine marriage.

So homosexuals have all the rights you have - what they are after is a new one or too re-define an existing one into meaninglessness so they can participate.

Afterall, if two "straight" men applied for a marriage license, why would they be denied? It was never about orientation, it was about sexual differentiation, not about anumus towards gays, about the outcome of the conjugal relationship between "straights" - said thing gays reject and cannot accomplish.

Feel free to raise this philosophically in class before you reply !


TV

cococandy:
Really? You 5min. Want to teach me about being a true Christiain? I've heard it.

It is funny you remember your Christain faith when it is stuff that you don't like.
But when it is something unfair and unjust to other people but is comfortable for you,your Christianity flies out the window.

Oh?
Examples pls.

Though its interesting you think yourself so morally high above me that I can't teach you a thing or two about the faith. But anyway.

I repeat, if fighting and actively campaigning for other people's right to be denied because it doesn't suit your faith is true Christianity to you, count me out.
I do know that true Muslims and true whatever-other religions if they had their way would want a person like me to be banned from certain things because it is unholy in their books. And they'd be right too if we all listened to you.

My dear the only reason you are not being banned right now by such people is because of those who fought for their christian rights before you. You will agree with me that if you go to Saudi Arabia now or Pakistan that those your rights you so freely talk about WILL be thrown out the window. That's because they have exercised their rights according to their faith and what they want in their country. And if you don't do the same in yours one day you will see yourself being forced to do what you won't normally do. "America the land of the free" is gradually turning into "America the land of the homosexuals and if you dare exercise your right to not like it you will lose your job and be suspended or jailed".

So Let's all fight each other in this zoo called the earth and try to make our way the superior way. And in the process kill each other because we are too dumb to understand that 7billion people cannot be the same.

Trueness of anything in its purest form must mean eliminate anyone of a different orientation.

Well Except you plan a genocide of the magnitude of the holocaust on homosexual people all over the world so that they will all be wiped out and no traces of them left, there's no way your kids won't learn about. Accept that now and have peace.

Melodrama except for bolded.
Kids were learning about homosexuality pretty well already thank you very much. They knew it as an abberation. They knew bout male and female and the copulation of both naturally giving birth to a baby.
In psychiatry class(yes, psychiatry) is where they would have learnt of homosexuality first. As an aberration. And even there it wasn't stigmatised against but seen as what you know it is even though you don't want to admit it, an illness. A man wasnt made to fvck another man. Simple. And none of them turned into automatic homosexuals either.

Not everyone who learned about it turned gay. If your kids are born into this world, they must know homosexual beings exist. It exists hence they MUST learn about it. I have accepted that they have a social right to be married like me. And my kids will learn to accept that too.

Eh ya. Happy for your kids Ma'm.
I know you won't have any problem with your teachers encouraging your male child to proclaim love for another male. For your Sam to come home one day at the age of 14 to excitedly tell you he got his first kiss from Bob his best friend. I know you won't mind the fact that you can't tell him this is wrong or against your chirsitian beliefs because not only would you have no moral standing to tell him not to, but if you do social security will take your son from you cos you are a bad influence on him by not tolerating his gay tendencies.

By then you would have lost your right to teach him your faith. But that's OK. Live and let live. Or is it really?

They will know to keep their judgment to themselves.

Yeah I've heard this a lot too.
The bible said "Judge not that ye may not be judged". It didn't say you should keep quiet when you see something morally wrong being perpetrated .

Mahatma Ghandi said "Evil thrives when good men (and women) do nothing.

Dhalsim said "when good men(and women) say nothing in the face of evil, the act of silence becomes evil in itself.

Seen

5minsmadness:

Oh?
Examples pls.

Though its interesting you think yourself so morally high above me that I can't teach you a thing or two about the faith. But anyway.



My dear the only reason you are not being banned right now by such people is because of those who fought for their christian rights before you. You will agree with me that if you go to Saudi Arabia now or Pakistan that those your rights you so freely talk about WILL be thrown out the window. That's because they have exercised their rights according to their faith and what they want in their country. And if you don't do the same in yours one day you will see yourself being forced to do what you won't normally do. "America the land of the free" is gradually turning into "America the land of the homosexuals and if you dare exercise your right to not like it you will lose your job and be suspended or jailed".


Melodrama except for bolded.
Kids were learning about homosexuality pretty well already thank you very much. They knew it as an abberation. They knew bout male and female and the copulation of both naturally giving birth to a baby.
In psychiatry class(yes, psychiatry) is where they would have learnt of homosexuality first. As an aberration. And even there it wasn't stigmatised against but seen as what you know it is even though you don't want to admit it, an illness. A man wasnt made to fvck another man. Simple. And none of them turned into automatic homosexuals either.


Eh ya. Happy for your kids Ma'm.
I know you won't have any problem with your teachers encouraging your male child to proclaim love for another male. For your Sam to come home one day at the age of 14 to excitedly tell you he got his first kiss from Bob his best friend. I know you won't mind the fact that you can't tell him this is wrong or against your chirsitian beliefs because not only would you have no moral standing to tell him not to, but if you do social security will take your son from you cos you are a bad influence on him by not tolerating his gay tendencies.

By then you would have lost your right to teach him your faith. But that's OK. Live and let live. Or is it really?



Yeah I've heard this a lot too.
The bible said "Judge not that ye may not be judged". It didn't say you should keep quiet when you see something morally wrong being perpetrated .

Mahatma Ghandi said "Evil thrives when good men (and women) do nothing.

Dhalsim said "when good men(and women) say nothing in the face of evil, the act of silence becomes evil in itself.

Seen

TV01:

Coco! Coco!! Coco!!!

I'd like to be a fly on the wall in your philosophy class Na liberal arts college? Although I guess in the US they all are now !

Let's take it as read to start, that a right to marry exists - homosexuals have never been denied the right to marry. We first have to ask what marriage is - it's "the lifelong union of a man and a woman"

It's a sexually differentiated union, not one based on "orientation" (if we actually agree that orientation is a thing - and homosexuality is not an identity, more a lifestyle, no matter how strongly one is inclined towards it).

So the requisites for marriage have always been male and female and not contravening any of the particulars, consent, mental competence,not too closely related, majority age etc.

In order for two people of the same sex to marry, we have to re-define marriage or create a new right based on different criteria. Nobody has a right to demand that their relationship be termed marriage - just because they desire it - or redefine marriage.

So homosexuals have all the rights you have - what they are after is a new one or too re-define an existing one into meaninglessness so they can participate.

Afterall, if two "straight" men applied for a marriage license, why would they be denied? It was never about orientation, it was about sexual differentiation, not about anumus towards gays, about the outcome of the conjugal relationship between "straights" - said thing gays reject and cannot accomplish.

Feel free to raise this philosophically in class before you reply !


TV

Double post.
[size=5pt]Cococandy I think you should read the novel series Left Behind (if you haven't read it already.) It's not like all those boring Christian novels and its very insightful. [/size]

cococandy:
Seen

Noted.

Court is now in recess while the opposition reconvenes with her homo client and re-strategises.











Na joke o

dinachi:

Homosexuality is an abomination!
But I have noticed that women in general seem to have carefree attitude about it than guys. They are the proffesional fence sitters.
There are by far more lesbians than homosexual men. The reason is because of single sex schools where the senior female students lure the younger one in through promises of no pregnancy, little or no chance of STIs and some financial gratification. The result is that almost 90% of all girls that attended single sex schools have been involved in one lesbian act or the other. That is why most women especially the young ones like cococandy and co have a favorable opinion for homosexuals.

I would really love to know where you get your stats from? I guess same thing can be said about 90% of males like you who attended single sex schools have been involved in one gay act or the other as a result because of the guilt and the actual fact that they prefer men then women, that's why they are always angry and pretend that they hate gays?

TV01:

Coco! Coco!! Coco!!!

I'd like to be a fly on the wall in your philosophy class Na liberal arts college? Although I guess in the US they all are now !

Let's take it as read to start, that a right to marry exists - homosexuals have never been denied the right to marry. We first have to ask what marriage is - it's "the lifelong union of a man and a woman"

It's a sexually differentiated union, not one based on "orientation" (if we actually agree that orientation is a thing - and homosexuality is not an identity, more a lifestyle, no matter how strongly one is inclined towards it).

So the requisites for marriage have always been male and female and not contravening any of the particulars, consent, mental competence,not too closely related, majority age etc.

In order for two people of the same sex to marry, we have to re-define marriage or create a new right based on different criteria. Nobody has a right to demand that their relationship be termed marriage - just because they desire it - or redefine marriage.

So homosexuals have all the rights you have - what they are after is a new one or too re-define an existing one into meaninglessness so they can participate.

Afterall, if two "straight" men applied for a marriage license, why would they be denied? It was never about orientation, it was about sexual differentiation, not about anumus towards gays, about the outcome of the conjugal relationship between "straights" - said thing gays reject and cannot accomplish.

Feel free to raise this philosophically in class before you reply !


TV

Bros TV, seen my mail yet? Nothing especially urgent though.