Salamu Aleikum and Good day brothers and sisters. I promised I was going to create a thread about today's terrorists also know as Khawaarij. I intentionally created this thread here for healthy interaction because not all are welcome in 'Islam For Muslims'.

Please let's be matured: Jagoon, basilico, jcross19, truthman2012, true2god, malvisguy212, OREMUSSANCTUS, Ifeann, parisbookaddict, etc behave! I won't tolerate nonsense from you guys. A word is enough for the wise.

May God protect us all from their(BokoHaramm, ISIS, etc) menace! Amin!

I Start Insha'Allah

All praise is due to Allāh, the Lord of the Worlds, the Lord of Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and Muḥammad. May the peace and blessings be upon them all. To proceed: The Prophet Muḥammad (PBUH) informed of the imminent and recurring appearance - after his death - of the group known as the Khārijites (extremist renegades). He stated they would abandon the main body of Muslims, depart from Islām, ascribe disbelief to Muslims on account of mere sins (takfīr) and fight against them. Indeed, they appeared as prophesized less than 30 years later and they are the ideological ancestors of the terrorists of al-Qāʿidah and ISIS. (BokoHaramm)

THE KHĀRIJITES AND THEIR DESCRIPTIONS

From the well-known, authentically related statements of the Prophet (PBUH) about this group include his saying, "They depart from the religion (Islām) like an arrow passes through its game" and "Their faith does not pass beyond their throats" and "They recite the Qurʾān but it does not go beyond their collar-bones," indicating ignorance and false scholarship. He further said, "They speak with the best speech of the creation," meaning, beautified, alluring speech and "Your prayer and fasting (meaning, the Prophet's Companions) is nothing compared to theirs (the Khārijites')," meaning they display outward piety, and "(They are) young of age, foolish of mind" and "Their speech is beautiful, alluring yet their actions are evil" and "They call to the Book of Allāh, yet they have nothing to do with it." The Prophet (PBUH) went further and also said "They are the most evil of those killed beneath the canopy of the sky" and "If I was to reach them, I would slaughter them, like the slaughtering of Ād (a destroyed nation of the past)" meaning, every last one of them until none of them remain as explained by the classical Scholar, Ibn Hajar. He also said of them, "They are the Dogs of Hellfire."


MUSLIM RULERS ORDERED TO FIGHT THE KHARIJITES

The Prophet (PBUH) encouraged the Muslim rulers to fight them whenever they appear with their turmoil and bloodshed. He said, "Wherever you meet them, kill them, for there is a reward on the Day of Judgement for whoever kills them." For this reason, the Muslim rulers from the time of the fourth righteous Caliph ʿAlī bin Abī Ṭālib (RadiAllahu Anha), have never ceased to fight against the Khārijites whenever they appeared and put the Muslims to trial. This duty is performed under the supervision of the rulers and is not a task undertaken by the subjects. However, if attacked by the Khārijites, individual subjects may fight in order to protect their lives, property and wealth.


THE ANTI-CHRIST (DAJJĀL) WILL APPEAR AMONG THEIR ARMIES

The Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) also said, "They will not cease to emerge, being cut off each time, until the Anti-Christ (Dajjāl) appears amongst their armies" This indicates that the Khārijites will fight on the side of the Dajjāl against the Muslim rulers and their subjects who will follow Jesus (PBUH) when he returns to complete his mission.


THE DOCTRINES AND DEEDS OF THE KHĀRIJITES ARE NOT ASCRIBED TO ISLĀM

It is clear from these Prophetic texts that the Khārijites, their doctrines and their actions have been judged to be antithetical (mutually incompatible) with Islām. Indeed, it is the view of some of the Muslim scholars past and present that the Khārijites are apostates, disbelievers, who are outside the fold of Islām. This is because the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) stated that they exit from Islām as the arrow passes through its game. The Companion, Abū Umāmah al-Bāhilī (PBUH) said, "The Dogs of the people of Hellfire, they used to be Muslims but turned disbelievers." Also because they made lawful that which is unlawful in the Islāmic Sharīʿah which is the killing of a soul which has been prohibited. They declared this crime to be lawful and ascribed it to Islām, which is considered major disbelief.


MUSLIM SCHOLARS ON THE KHĀRIJITES

Imām al-Ājurrī (d. 360AH) said in his book entitled The Sharīʿah, "It is not permissible for the one who sees the uprising of a Khārijite who has revolted against the leader, whether [the leader] is just or oppressive, so this person has revolted and gathered a group behind him, has pulled out his sword and has made lawful the killing of Muslims, it is not fitting for the one who sees this, that he becomes deceived by this person's recitation of the Qurʾān, the length of his standing in prayer, nor his constant fasting, nor his good and excellent words in knowledge when it is clear to him that this person's way and methodology is that of the Khārijites."

Ibn Ḥazm al-Andalūsī (d. 456AH) said, "And they do not cease to strive in overturning the orderly affairs of the Muslims (to chaos) and splitting the word of the believers. They draw the sword against the people of religion and strive upon the earth as corrupters. As for the Khārijites and Shiʿah, their affair in this regard is more famous than that one should be burdened in mentioning it."

Shaykh al-Islām Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 728AH) said, "And the way of the Muslims has never ceased upon this (methodology) [of fighting the Khārijites], ... the ḥHadīth of Abū Umāmah, collected by at-Tirmidhī and others that they [the Khārijites] are "The most evil of those who are killed under the sky and how excellent is the one killed by them." Meaning that they are more harmful to the Muslims than others, for there are none which are more harmful to the Muslims than them, neither the Jews and nor the Christians. For they strived to kill every Muslim who did not agree with their view, declaring the blood of the Muslims, their wealth, and the slaying of their children to be lawful, while making takfīr of them. And they considered this to be worship, due to their ignorance and their innovation that caused to stray…" Ibn Taymiyyah also said, "Ahl al-Sunnah (orthodox Sunnī Muslims) are agreed that they (the Khārijites) are astray innovators, that it is obligatory to fight them on the authority of authentic texts and that from the most virtuous of the actions of the Chief of the Believers, ʿAlī (PBUH) was fighting against the Khārijites and the Companions concurred (with him) upon fighting them"

ORIGINS OF THE MODERN-DAY KHĀRIJITES

The Khārijites who emerged in various Muslim lands during the late 20th century trace back to the writings and doctrines of Sayyid Qutb, an Egyptian who in his pre-Islāmist days was engrossed in European materialist philosophies (Marxism, Communism) for fifteen years of his life as noted by his biographer Ṣalāh al-Khālidī in the book Sayyid Qūṭb Min al-Mīlād ilā alIstishhād. He was also affiliated with the secular Wafd party for a while. In the early 1940s, he was an editor for the Egyptian Crown, a newsletter mouthpiece for the Freemasonic Grand Lodge in Egypt, in which he would show strong support for US and British forces against Hitler. When he started writing about Islām in the late 1940s Sayyid Quṭb fused his Communist, Socialist past with scant knowledge of Islām, and upon his warped evaluation of early Islāmic history, he negated the Islām of a number of the Prophet's Companions. After he joined the Muslim Brotherhood in 1953 he began developing his extremist doctrines more fully and the wrath of his pen extended beyond the first ruling dynasty in Islām, the Umayyads, to fall upon all contemporary Muslim societies. He explicitly declared all Muslim societies to be apostate societies in which nothing of Islām is to be found. He claimed that they had reverted to pre-Islāmic ignorance (jāhiliyyah). Upon this vile, oppressive judgement, he then penned Leninist style writings which called for worldwide revolutions in all Muslim lands without exception. Comprising hatred against Muslim societies, these writings gave birth to the extremist groups of takfīr (excommunication) which spread to various other Muslim lands over the next few decades. They distorted the concept of Jihād, a just, conventional war to prevent or repel oppression, and other aspects of Islām to justify these extremist doctrines. Then they began to work sedition in the Muslim lands. On the basis of this anti-Islāmic ideology the Khārijites have been involved in assassinations, bombings and slaughtering of innocent men, women and children in the Muslim lands during 70s, 80s and 90s before they exported terrorism to the West. Indeed, the Khārijites have been committing terrorism against Muslim societies for almost 1400 years.


AL-QĀʿIDAH AND ISIS{BOKOHARAMM}

The leaders of al-Qāʿidah and ISIS are followers of the doctrines of Sayyid Quṭb. Recently, factions of Khārijites from other lands entered Syria when a revolution was stirred against the Nusayrī leader, Bashār al-Asad. These extremists were given tactical support by Western powers because toppling Bashār al-Asad is a strategic regional objective. In ʿIrāq, due in part to a vaccuum created by a lax, unmotivated and demoralized army, those previously affiliated with alQāʾidah took control over its northern parts and announced their alleged "Islāmic State." Just as the Prophet Muhammad(PBUH) described them, those who join the alleged "Islāmic Caliphate" and the imposter caliph, Abū Bakr al-Baghdādī, are the young, ignorant and foolish who are led by emotions and lack knowledge of the Islāmic Sharīʿah. It is incorrect to claim that Muslim governments support ISIS, especially those of the Gulf countries because the Khārijites of ISIS consider the rulers of those countries and their subjects who show loyalty to their rulers to be apostates who are considered worse than the nonMuslims and more worthy of killing. It makes no sense for Muslim governments to support these people.


THE BARBARIC ACTIONS OF ISIS, BOKOHARAM

As for the barbaric acts being perpetrated by these people, such as glorifying beheadings through the media then Imām Ibn Shihāb al-Zuhrī (Rahimahullah) (d. 124H) said, "A severed head was never brought to the Prophet (PBUH), not even on the Day of (the Battle of) Badr. A severed head was brought to Abū Bakr (RadiAllahu Anha) who forbade from (this action)." Severing the heads of the enemy in war is not a practice condoned by Islām and was not a practice of the Prophet or his companions. ISIS, all Nusra, {BokoHaramm} and other factions are now fighting each other in parts of Syria and Irāq, an indication of their severe misguidance. This proves they are not motivated by Islām in reality, but by wealth, power and leadership. They recruit the gullible and young only to help fulfil their personal objectives have made Islām a tool towards that end.

Source: Saheeh Bukhari, Tirmidhi, Ibn Maja ah, Minhaj Us Sunnah, Abu Dawüd, Sunan Al Kubra Of Al Bayhaqi, www.islamagainstextremism.com , www.takfiris.com .

jcross19:
What's your problem if you don't want anyone to comment on your thread. Now you have shown from your instinct that terrorism runs in your damn blood.

and "They recite the Qurʾān but it does not go beyond their collar-bones," indicating ignorance and false scholarship.

Demmzy15:

I never said no one should comment, I only said behave maturely. Is it hard to ask?! watch ur words!

jcross19:
the worst you can do is to ban right huh abi please get away.

Demmzy15:
Pained nigga!

onetrack:
It is not for you to declare if someone is Muslim or not. This is forbidden in Islam, and in fact this is what the Kahrijites did. If someone says he is a Muslim, then you should accept it, even if they engage in certain non-Islamic behavior.

However, they are basing their actions on the Quran itself:

[s]Read the whole of the 9th sura, At-Tawbah. This is the second to the last sura in terms of the time it was written. Thus it abrogates other earlier verses that may conflict with it, such as 2:256 "no compulsion in religion". That verse has been abrogated and no longer applies.[/s]

Quran 9:29 "Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled."

If you look at the tafsir (ibn Kathir) you will see that this was a command for Muhammad to go and attack the Byzantine Empire. ISIS holds this verse to be true until the entire world is ruled by the Muslims, because that is what the Quran says. Notice it does not say to kill all non-Muslims, but if they refuse to pay the annual tax, then they can be killed.

Quran 5:32 "Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land - it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one - it is as if he had saved mankind entirely."

There is an error here (god did not tell the Jews this and it appears in no prophecy or holy book, it was written by a rabbi in a commentary),

but the error does not really affect this because the key phrase is 'corruption in the land'. For ISIS this corruption means anyone or any government which opposes sharia law.

In other words, for them, Muslims who oppose strict sharia law are spreading corruption in the land and may be killed.

This is why ISIS and Boko Haram are killing Muslims--they believe they are corrupt, and the Quran justifies their killing. It's unfortunate that the Quran has such a vague expression allowing people to be killed because virtually any behavior can be categorized as 'corruption within the land'.

That's how the jihadis justify their actions. Straight from the Quran. If you have a problem with them, take it up with them. I'm not Muslim (I'm atheist), and I also realize how religions with as much conflicting material as Islam and Christianity can basically be manipulated to say whatever anyone wants it to. So those people who support peace among nations and peoples can call themselves Muslims, and those people who call for jihad are also Muslims.

OREMUSSANCTUS:
I comment ma reserve

Demmzy15:

I didn't make takfir on them alone, the scholars who know more than me did. Contemporary scholars like Sheikh Abdulaziz Ibn Abdullah ibn Baz the former mufti of Saudi Arabia declared them to be Non-Muslims based on the hadith of the Prophet in which he said "they leave the religion just the way an arrow pierces through its game" so they aren't my words rather that of the Prophet and Scholars.


From this comment of yours, it shows you didn't read the article. Everything you're saying here has been explained already!


Lmaooooo! When did you become 'Mufassir' for you to know which verse abrogates the other?! You funny o!



The verse never stated you should blow up the limbs of innocent men, women, and children shopping in markets. It never told you to behead someone on camera shouting Allahu AKBAR. So I don't get your point here!


Lol how many Christians are in Iraq, Syria, Libya, Egypt?! Are these countries not ruled by Muslims?! The case of the Byzantine Empire is a totally different one. You can read this article http://discover-the-truth.com/2014/06/03/examining-quran-929-does-islam-sanction-the-killing-of-christians-and-jews/


@emboldened, I don't need any Jewish book or tanakh to authenticate the Quran for me. So I don't care if it's not found in their book, I know for sure that the Quran came to correct the errors of the older books and therefore perfect!


So ISIS are now credible scholars right?! Please read this article and stop spilling sh't. So because a Muslim Government follows democracy then they're apostates?! You were the same person that said I have no right to declare them Non-Muslims, but you support them declaring us as Non-Muslims. What a double standards!


Please read the article!


These are what the Prophet said about great sins.
Sahih Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 83, Number 10:
"Narrated Anas bin Malik: The Prophet said, "The biggest of Al-Kaba'ir (the great sins) are (1) to join others as partners in worship with Allah, (2) to murder a human being, (3) to be undutiful to one's parents (4) and to make a false statement," or said, "to give a false witness."


So with this post of yours are you justifying their actions when in fact they are totally contradictory to islam?! Because I don't get the point of this your post/comment, everything is clearly explained in the article and you come and say "the jihadist do this, they do that, so the Quran supports them". I seriously don't get your point!

onetrack:


There are many versions of Islam just like Christianity.

The jihadis will simply tell you that you are the one who has gone astray, and they have verses and hadiths that they use to support what they are doing, depending on how you intepret them.

Just like the Sunni/Shia divide, which is quite profound. Your argument is with them not with me as I think all religion is man-made.

onetrack:
When it comes to an issue like this, a decentralized religion like Sunni Islam has difficulty resolving this problem. No one has a recognized authority to declare another person a non-Muslim. This is the same as Christianity, though the Roman Catholic Church does have to authority to declare someone a non-Catholic; not sure about the Shia though I know they have a religious hierarchy. If the Ku Klux Klan calls themselves a Christian organization, there is no real way of telling them they are not, since no one 'controls' Christianity. Same with atheism. Anyone can all themself an atheist.

And given that 99% of humans are going to hell anyway according to Muhammad, why even try to separate the 'true' Muslims from the non-true Muslims?

Demmzy15:

http://islamqa.info/en/85102


99percent?! Bro you're better this now!