I am putting forward/proposing a scientific concept, I look forward to +ve criticism:
The theory of singular Universal origin (The Godeic singularity):
Every matter/ and dust from the universe are scattered in space as a result of Pre modal cataclysmic explosion (According to the big bang theory/la place)...this is the originating determinant for this theory. There's a bit of everything in anything. It further buttress Einstein theory of relativity of matter(e=mc2). It suggests that no part of the universal dust is independent. As such matter, atom, element compound as a concept has relative similarity in mechanics and magnetic quantization, there for implies a singular origin inferring that all creation seen and unseen is =1....(read more)
Eja

This your theory, is it a result of experimental research?? because you have just called it a "theory". Do you have proofs? does it answer the questions the big bang model fails to answer?? what are the evidence of this your theory. Elaborate more about it sir.

mrphysics:
This your theory, is it a result of experimental research?? because you have just called it a "theory". Do you have proofs? does it answer the questions the big bang model fails to answer?? what are the evidence of this your theory. Elaborate more about it sir.

I think i've read an article within this premise sometime ago, and the thesis came accompanied with pretty solid points to validate the theory although im not in the position to tell what is right or wrong but this theory seems a tad bit reasonable and not exactly far fetched .

And it should also make sense if you're within the school of thought that all there is chains from the bigbang. But what do i know? lol

Sometimes atsrophysics appear more philosophical than scientific. Good morning.

Following...

kvngtxnde:



I think i've read an article within this premise sometime ago, and the thesis came accompanied with pretty solid points to validate the theory although im not in the position to tell what is right or wrong but this theory seems a tad bit reasonable and not exactly far fetched .

And it should also make sense if you're within the school of thought that all there is chains from the bigbang. But what do i know? lol

Sometimes atsrophysics appear more philosophical than scientific. Good morning.

please I need the link to the thesis. thanks

mrphysics:

please I need the link to the thesis. thanks

Im sorry but i accidentally stumbled on it. i cant remember whatever the blog's address was, I was bored and just surfing through some google searches that led from one link to another and another, you know.

But i'll try and hunt for it again, if i find it, i'll do you the favour.

kvngtxnde:




Im sorry but i accidentally stumbled on it. i cant remember whatever the blog's address was, I was bored and just surfing through some google searches that led from one link to another and another, you know.

But i'll try and hunt for it again, if i find it, i'll do you the favour.

thanks a million

mrphysics:

please I need the link to the thesis. thanks

Let me ask u one thing....is there any material with a known composition different from any other material in the cosmos soup?

koife:

Let me ask u one thing....is there any material with a known composition different from any other material in the cosmos soup?

There should be, but it probably isnt infamous like conventional theories put forward by popular scientists to validate the possibility of this, your, cosmic theme. the godeic singularity that is.

Although i havent read any, or seen any as a matter of fact. But it doesnt make the thought of counter opinions on the topic peripheral.

koife:

Let me ask u one thing....is there any material with a known composition different from any other material in the cosmos soup?

I haven't read or seen such material. if it actually exist, it may put questions on the concept of "homogeneous" nature if the universe.

perhaps they may be a counter opinion and I'm always willing to learn.