An Islamic State militant carried out a public "execution" of his mother because she asked him to leave the group, activists say.

Ali Saqr, 21, killed his mother, Lena al-Qasem, 45, outside the post office in Raqqa, Syria, eyewitnesses said.

Raqqa has served as IS' de facto capital since the group captured the city in August 2013.

IS does not tolerate any dissent and imposes brutal punishments, often carried out in public.

The UK-based monitoring group, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) and the activist group Raqqa is Being Slaughtered Silently reported the incident.

Lena al-Qasem had reportedly told her son that the US-led military alliance fighting IS would "wipe out" the group, and tried to convince him to leave the city with her.

Her son is then said to have informed the group of her comment, and they ordered her killed.

Ali Saqr is reported to have shot her outside the post office where she worked, in front of hundreds of people.

IS, a jihadist group which follows its own extreme version of Sunni Islam, took over large parts of Iraq and Syria in 2014.

Since then the group has killed more than 2,000 people for reasons including homosexuality, and for the alleged practice of magic and apostasy, according to the SOHR.

Annunaki:
Only a religion started by satan himself can inspire people to such evil atrocities.

Do you really mean that? So if i show you similar instances in 21st century Christianity. will you still say the same?

johnydon22:

Do you really mean that? So if i show you similar instances in 21st century Christianity. will you still say the same?

Annunaki:


It will be completely impossible for you to show such behaviour is based on the teachings of christ(true Christianity) even if you can come up with a 'similar' instance. On the contrary we know what mohamed preached and practised so we know what motivates his followers to behave that way.

johnydon22:

Let us be fair..

The basis of the deductions on your criticism of Islam is based on their religious book which is the Quran.

So can we also base the criticism of Christianity based on its on book which is the Bible without cherry picking or denying any part of the book to shield ourselves from it's inconsistencies?

The comparison here is not about the Character Jesus of the gospels and Muhammed.

But of two ideas or religions in relation to their Holy books (which in entirety is regarded by these two bodies as the "Word of their various God(s)"..

So should i go on?

Annunaki:


That's the big mistake you are making, Christianity is bbased strictly on the teachings of christ and his apostles as recorded in the new testament. The old testament is a different religion(Judaism) so I will not accept it in criticising christianity. Let me remind you that the bible was not canonised till the fourth century AD and if the catholic church had decided then to exclude the old testament from our canon of scriptures, we will still have christianity today.

So what you are saying in essence is that you are fully divorcing anything that has to deal with the Old testament..

Good.. I am familiar with that tactics of divorcing the Old testament once it is being used for criticism at the same time employing it when it suites you.. It's called Cherry Picking

I will remind you these exact words of yours anytime i see you quoting the Old testament for any reason what so ever.

Since you have decided to divorce the Old testament (which by the way also is regarded the words of Yahweh) i hope you refrain from using it ever again.

Because if you do, you still then affirms the fact that the old testament being part of the Christian canon (bible) also is also a part of Christian fundamentals.

Annunaki:


That's the big mistake you are making, Christianity is bbased strictly on the teachings of christ and his apostles as recorded in the new testament. The old testament is a different religion(Judaism) so I will not accept it in criticising christianity. Let me remind you that the bible was not canonised till the fourth century AD and if the catholic church had decided then to exclude the old testament from our canon of scriptures, we will still have christianity today.

johnydon22:

So what you are saying in essence is that you are fully divorcing anything that has to deal with the Old testament..

Good.. I am familiar with that tactics of divorcing the Old testament once it is being used for criticism at the same time employing it when it suites you.. It's called Cherry Picking

I will remind you these exact words of yours anytime i see you quoting the Old testament for any reason what so ever.

Since you have decided to divorce the Old testament (which by the way also is regarded the words of Yahweh) i hope you refrain from using it ever again.

Because if you do, you still then affirms the fact that the old testament being part of the Christian canon (bible) also is also a part of Christian fundamentals.

urahara:


But u don't realise the old Testament is Judaism when your pastor is collecting tithe and offering from you

Annunaki:


I don't cherry pick, it's very clear from several scriptures in the new testament that the old has been done away with and we are now under a new covenant. Unlike most believers I am very clear about my beliefs and my christianity is based strictly on the teachings of christ and not the bible as a whole.

johnydon22:

So what you are saying in essence is that you are fully divorcing anything that has to deal with the Old testament..

Good.. I am familiar with that tactics of divorcing the Old testament once it is being used for criticism at the same time employing it when it suites you.. It's called Cherry Picking

I will remind you these exact words of yours anytime i see you quoting the Old testament for any reason what so ever.

Since you have decided to divorce the Old testament (which by the way also is regarded the words of Yahweh) i hope you refrain from using it ever again.

Because if you do, you still then affirms the fact that the old testament being part of the Christian canon (bible) also is also a part of Christian fundamentals.

johnydon22:

I am sure you have heard of that statement "What ever you say will be used against you in the court of law" This exactly will be the situation when i remind this to you

glossy6:


The old testament is part of the bible but those practices that are at variance with the Love preached by Christ & the apostles are not tolerated by Christians.

Mosaic law says "an eye for an eye", while Christ preached forgiveness. That is what we stand by.

Annunaki:


Bring it on, as I said earlier I am very clear of my beliefs.

Alright Bro Since you asserted above that any religion with such tendency is from satan

Annunaki:
Only a religion started by satan himself can inspire people to such evil atrocities.

johnydon22:
Islam is 50% of what is wrong with this planet.. Imagine some idiot killing his mother because he thinks he is fighting for a God he has never even seen before..

Just imagine how humans supposedly intelligent species are being turned into literal mor0ns by 1book with primitive theme.

tartar9:

so Islam says;you shall kill your mother

johnydon22:

So what you are saying in essence is that you are fully divorcing anything that has to deal with the Old testament..

Good.. I am familiar with that tactics of divorcing the Old testament once it is being used for criticism at the same time employing it when it suites you.. It's called Cherry Picking

I will remind you these exact words of yours anytime i see you quoting the Old testament for any reason what so ever.

Since you have decided to divorce the Old testament (which by the way also is regarded the words of Yahweh) i hope you refrain from using it ever again.

Because if you do, you still then affirms the fact that the old testament being part of the Christian canon (bible) also is also a part of Christian fundamentals.

Annunaki:


That's the big mistake you are making, Christianity is bbased strictly on the teachings of christ and his apostles as recorded in the new testament. The old testament is a different religion(Judaism) so I will not accept it in criticising christianity. Let me remind you that the bible was not canonised till the fourth century AD and if the catholic church had decided then to exclude the old testament from our canon of scriptures, we will still have christianity today.