Earth-shattering news are coming from various websites! The
1500-year-old Bible, which was discovered in Ankara, Turkey’s
capital, in 2000, refutes the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.

Moreover, it says that he was not the son of God but a Prophet,
who didn’t die and ascended into heaven alive.

[img]http://i.onthe.io/vllkyt7d4u5jtb75m.27da4b21.jpg[/img]

The 1500-year-old bible was found in Turkey, in the
Ethnography Museum of Ankara


It also states that it was Judas Iscariot who was actually
crucified and calls Apostle Paul the Impostor. This information
was taken from the gospel of Barnabas, who in this work is
one of the twelve apostles.

There is a theory that the modern Bible was formed out of four
canonical gospels by the Catholic Church during the Council of
Nicea, while the Gospel of Barnabas as well as many others
were ommitted.

The book along with antiquities, illegal excavations, and
explosives were reportedly confiscated from a group of
smugglers in a Mediterranean-area operation. It is written in
the Aramaic laguage with gold letters and onto loosely-tied
leather.

The Bible that contradicts the New Testament teachings of
Christianity is reportedly valued up to 40 million Turkish Liras
(about $28m). While authenticity of the book is still under
question some experts and religious authorities believe that it
is original.


However, some scholars branded the Gospel of Barnabas Bible
a forgery written during the Middle Ages. Meanwhile, the
Vatican has asked Turkish authorities to let them examine the
contents of the book.


https://www.naij.com/737721-1500-year-old-bible-claims-jesus-christ-not-crucified.html

blasphemy...

Jesus Is Lord...

Ancient Bible! I hope its content and message will asked all to have a relationship with God through Christ (whether Christ is the son of God or a Prophet) for soul salvation.

Atleast naij needs the kind of news to gain more audience,

Superb nonsense

boman2014:

While authenticity of the book is still under
question some experts and religious authorities believe that it
is original.

For such experts to believe it's original even while it's authenticity is still under question would be prejudicial, and far more criminal than maintaining the status quo. Meanwhile, why did you call that 'bible'? Why not something else? Yes I know the word 'bible' literally stands for 'the book', yet it has come to refer to a particular set of writings such that no Shakespearean was ever called 'bible'. For me, this whole report sounds like a Muslim mischief formed over many years given the way it parrots Muslim attack against the Christian scriptures (and it comes from a Muslim country any way). I don't mean to discountenance the report totally though. If that becomes the truth, so be it (truth is far more important than anything whatsoever). But it has to be proved beyond doubt. And every attempt to make it true before it's proved so must be discouraged - such as those 'experts' and 'religious authorities' are trying to do. For instance, a reliable radioactive dating has to show that the so called 'bible' predates Islam historically.