Ajixegun:
My question goes to evolutionists and atheists since they don't believe in divine creation. Thus, between bird and egg which one evolves first?
I am proudly scientist

Ajixegun:
My question goes to evolutionists and atheists since they don't believe in divine creation. Thus, between bird and egg which one evolves first?
I am proudly scientist

AccidentalGenius:
The egg evolves before the bird because the egg is the begining and the bird is the result of the development of the egg. All changes occur in the process of development of the egg from the beginning to its end. Adapting to the new environment it finds itself in. Thus, the egg is the beginning and the end and the bird is the result of this begining and end. I hope you understand.

AccidentalGenius:
The egg evolves before the bird because the egg is the begining and the bird is the result of the development of the egg. All changes occur in the process of development of the egg from the beginning to its end. Adapting to the new environment it finds itself in. Thus, the egg is the beginning and the end and the bird is the result of this begining and end. I hope you understand.

naijadeyhia:



U do realise that for an egg to even exist there has to have been some form of male and female involvement and fertilisation without which such an egg would be sterile much like our poultry eggs today.

So how come the egg was fertile and formed life within if it was first?

Ajixegun:


What produces the egg, if it evolves first?

Ajixegun:
@accidentalgenius you failed to asked, if we cleared all the birds will there be any egg?

AccidentalGenius:
ofcourse there won't be! Like i said earlier, the birds depend on their own procreation for survival. Without an egg, a bird will not exist. The egg is the first to evolve in every generation of a bird because it adapts to the new conditions it finds itself in during development. Each egg represents a new generation. Making the egg the first. A bird cannot just exist out of nothingness

Ajixegun:


Since a bird cannot just exist out of nothingness, egg exists out of what?

AccidentalGenius:
ofcourse there won't be! Like i said earlier, the birds depend on their own procreation for survival. Without an egg, a bird will not exist. The egg is the first to evolve in every generation of a bird because it adapts to the new conditions it finds itself in during development. Each egg represents a new generation. Making the egg the first. A bird cannot just exist out of nothingness

naijadeyhia:


You need to think deep first before just answering bro.

Eggs serve to incubate and protect a growing bird from dangers in nature. For what you are speculating to happen the way you assume then a live chicken ought to have first evolved and over time realising the dangers its exposed to would evolve a shell like casing during growth to protect it while it matures enough.

So for you to say an egg came first is wrong. Even as it is in humans so it is in eggs...they have some sort of unbilical cord attached which they feed from while within the egg as their food source is already within the egg while they grow. Plus the chicken in the egg is first a white goo and need the egg to keep this goo together. How did this goo know how to transform itself from just liquid goo to a life form which would be that particular specie all the time.

Its most unlikely that a chain of random occurrences would evolvs or mutate into a chicken which would grow into a female and another random occurrence which would grow another into male and they would mate and such a mating would yield anything if they were not of the same specie. For example you cannot cross an ostrich with a chicken or a dove with a parrot.

All these are statistically impossible. Mathematicians say the evolutionary theory is an impossible occurrence based on statistics.

AgentOfAllah:


You either didn't read the question, or you're ignorant about evolution. The question asks which came first between birds and eggs. Birds are a particular, but not a discrete point on the evolutionary continuum of life. Birds have predecessors (called dinosaurs). These predecessors were oviparous, meaning they laid eggs.

This suggests that the fundamental structure of eggs predates the evolution of dinosaurs into the birds of today. Logically, therefore, the egg came before the bird.


Do you know the difference between a statistical impossibility and a statistical improbability? Please, furnish us with the peer reviewed articles of these Mathematicians who say evolution is an impossibility.

Joshuabase:
Enlighten yourselves

http://blogs.lt.vt.edu/chickens/2013/05/01/evolutionary-history-of-the-chicken-pigeon-and-other-birds/

http://www.iflscience.com/plants-and-animals/what-came-first-chicken-or-egg/

raphieMontella:
lol...the egg came first....
Open ur minds..think straight...use ur fones ...do ur research...easy as ABC...
The op tot this wud be a way to favour his so called biblical creation of life..bt lol...
Those arguing wit naijadeyhia...once his mind is fixed it is fixed...a piece of advise...
There a lotta more tinz to do...

naijadeyhia:



The egg came first because science based on imagination and assumptions said so....how convenient for science....Hurrah for science.

raphieMontella:

and the egg came first based on creationism?...whats that based on?...emperical evidence?...
I dnt even knw ur stand yet? Religionist? Atheist? Or jst dere?...
Cs i believe ive given u what a probable assumption and an impropable one is befre...

naijadeyhia:



I am glad I am a mystery to you. Keep researching.

naijadeyhia:



I think you are the one with zero evolution knowledge.

If Dinosaurs were oviparous according to science of course because for u guys science is always right even when they did not witness the dinosaur age and have no internal organ specimen or reproductive specimen but just bone samples. So with bone samples they were able to conclude that dinosaurs were oviparous? Interesting. .....

U do realise that in an egg there are over 5 billion different cells and DNA profiling that work together to gradually replicate an already existing Blueprint of what the fully form chick should look like and when there is an error in this DNA sequence it would result in a mutation and that mutation is regarded as an error and disadvantageous so this rules out the law of natural selection.

Evolution is seen as a statistical impossibility based on its own summation, DNA sequence and its process. I already gave a break down of this on another thread. The chances of evolution occuring acording to statistics is 1 in a billion billion trillion. Which in one word translates to it being impossible.

Sorry but you are so wrong

dolphinheart:
I'm a layman and will appreciate if I'm being corrected without derogatory speech.

which came first, chicken or the egg
pls is the chicken egg not a chicken, even though it's not fully formed?
due Im of the view that the DNA of the egg and the chicken are the same.

Some say eggs came first, please where did the egg of the chicken come from if not from chicken

okay some say it's from dinsoars, are those dinosaurs that later became chicken not chicken, though bigger in size and in different forms?

This brings the question , which came first, the dinosaurs that layed the egg or the egg that became dinosaurs.