I am here again people to try to put to rest this issue of evolution and why i believe its all a deliberately woven scientific farce.

I would like to appeal to everyone who would read this and wish to comment to first of al realise that I am not taking the position of creation on this thread but just to debunk evolution. A thread on creation over evolution would be for another day.

So I would like to invite all evolutionists and biologists and theists and Atheists who believe in the theory of evolution to come and prove my assertions wrong. Shall we proceed?

Most of the time, scientists are not liars and are genuinely trying to discover and understand the laws of the universe but whenever scientists are confronted with anything that has to do with God or evolution, then scientists on the whole always lie to us and they are brazen about it.

For example, until 1956, scientists falsely claimed that humans and apes had the same number of chromosomes and therefore humans evolved from apes.

But the fact is, humans actually have 23 pairs of chromosomes while apes have 24 pairs of chromosomes. Apes, gorillas, chimpanzees, orangutans, etc. all have more chromosomes than humans.

During the first half of the 20th century, that fact would have seriously weakened “ape into human evolution theory” because there is no way to explain how apes, with 24 pairs of chromosomes, could have evolved into humans with 23 pairs of chromosomes. We all know that if we lose a pair of chromosomes, we cannot reproduce.

During the first half of the 20th century, there was a ferocious war between evolution theory and creationism and Darwin’s supporters were extremely hard pressed to “find the missing link.” Darwinians could not find the missing link so they simply fabricated one by faking the Piltdown Man skull.

See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_Man

Darwinians also were determined to hide any
evidence that contradicted their beloved evolution theory. That is why atheist scientists simply concocted a lie and told us apes and humans both have 24 pairs of chromosomes. An atheist scientist named Theophilus Painter took the lead and published a paper in 1921 claiming humans have 24 pairs of chromosomes. Other atheist scientists “confirmed” this in other scientific papers. It was not until 1956 that the fraud came to an end because evolution theory had gained enough support to not need to be buttressed by the 24 chromosome lie. The “apes and humans have the same number of chromosome lie” had done its damage to the truth - Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Mao Tse-Tung all pointed to the “24 chromosome lie” as a reason for them to ban the teaching of creationism from German, Russian and Chinese schools.
We bet you did not know that atheists claimed that “apes and humans have the same number of chromosomes.”
Unless you were studying genetics before 1956, you probably never knew that scientists used to claim humans and apes both had 24 pairs of chromosomes so we should offer you some evidence for this. Below is a link to Wikipedia – the link gets you to the Wikipedia biography of Theophilus Painter, the atheist scientist who published a “scientific paper” incorrectly claiming humans have 24 pairs of chromosomes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theophilus_Painter

It is worthy to note that even now, scientists are prevaricating about this matter and they insist they did not lie to us about humans having 24 pairs of chromosomes. Instead they tell us they made an “understandable mistake” and it was very difficult to accurately count all the way up to 24 pairs of chromosomes.

It is absurd for atheists to assert that the counting of just 23 pairs of chromosomes was so difficult that none of them could do it correctly for over 30 years. Guess what? They had no trouble counting the much larger number of chromosomes for other animals, such as dogs who have 39 pairs.

“Ape to human evolution” is impossible - recent DNA tests reveal that ape and human DNA are far too different for humans to have evolved from apes.

“One species into another species evolution” cannot occur in bisexual animals becaue the laws of genetics and embryology preserve each species and prevent any bisexual species from evolving into another.

If you are wondering why you have not read about any of this, it is because a very powerful Darwin Conspiracy, led by atheists, has suppressed the truth about evolution theory and fed us lie after lie after lie for over 100 years.

The Darwin Conspiracy has both faked evidence, suppressed evidence and it currently constantly lies to promote Darwinism.

The Piltdown Man is an example of the power of the Darwin Conspiracy and how insidious the conspiracy has been.

[b]In 1912, Darwin's “ape to human evolution theory” was at its most critical crossroads – Darwnians had to either come up with the “missing link” or evolution theory would become extinct. For decades, critics of “ape to human evolution theory” had pounded it by insisting that unless it comes forward with evidence of the “missing link,” then “ape to human evolution theory” should be put to death.

In the fall of 1912, the Darwin Conspiracy was formed and On December 18, 1912, the Geological Society, with the assistance of co-conspirator British Museum of Natural History, unvieled a faked skull that they claimed was the “missing link.” Their forgery led to headlines all over the world proclaiming “Missing Link Found – Darwin's Theory Proved.”

The faked Piltdown Man saved Darwin's Theory of evolution from being quickly extinct, and for the next forty years, atheists incessantly cited the fake Piltdown Man skull as irrefutable evidence for “ape to human evolution theory.”

Faking evidence is bad enough but the British Museum and other Darwin Conpirators went much further. They not only faked evidence but the British Museum insisted on being “keeper of the Piltdown Man skull” and refused to permit anyone to examine the Piltdown Man skull. In effect, the British Museum said “We have the evidence but we will not allow anyone to examine or verify our evidence and you just have to take our word for it.”

The British Museum claimed they were afraid the Piltdown Skull would be somehow contaminated or harmed if any one examined it. But the real reason no one was allowed to even look at it from a distance is that it was so obvious a fake.

For over three decades, the British Museum arrogantly denied any requests to examine the fake Piltdown Man skull. Most of the scientific community did not object because they were atheists and part of the Darwin Consipiracy

But then, Darwinians ran into a problem that forced the British Museum to change its stance.

By 1949, most Darwinists supported the “Man Came Out of Africa Theory” of human evolution which said that humans evolved from apes in Africa. But this theory was directly contradicted by the Piltdown Man skull because that faked skull would support the theory that humans came from England, or Europe instead of Africa.

In fact, in 1949, the fake Piltdown Man skull stood in the way of “Man Came Out of Africa Theory” and several prominent Darwinists, including Louis Leakey (who discovered “Lucy”) convinced the British Museum to allow them to examine the Piltdown Man skull.

A History Channel documentary revealed that Louis Leakey said that the Piltdown Man skull was so obvious a forgery that he could tell the skull was a fake from over fifteen feet away because the coloring of the jaw and skull were different. This fact proves the British Museum and all of its hierarchy knew it was a fake and also that it was easy for any expert to know the skull was a forgery and that is why the museum refused to allow anyone to examine it.

This is an example of how a very powerful Darwin Conspiracy, led by atheists, fakes evidence, suppresses the truth and spreads lies in order to promote Darwinian evolution theory.

[/b]
NEW SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERIES PROVE DARWIN WAS WRONG


Researchers in genetics and embryology are learning something new every day. The more they learn, the more obvious it becomes that it is impossible for humans to have evolved from apes.


For purposes of clarity and ease of writing, i will use the term "Darwin Busters" to refer to scientific evidence that strongly contradict "ape to human evolution" theory.

Since 2001, many scientists conducting research in genetics and embryology have discovered more than just a few Darwin Busters.

Here are four Darwin Busters:

[b]Darwin Buster One: Darwinians have been dead wrong whenever they have claimed that the "genetic matter of ape and humans is 98% identical." The ape and human chromosomes are remarkably divergent and too different for "ape to human evolution" theory to adequately explain. For example, the human Y chromosome has twice as many genes as the chimpanzee Y chromosome and the chromosome structures are not at all similar.

Darwin Buster Two: There are laws of embryology that directly contradict "ape to human evolution." One reason is that genes work together in teams to form body parts during embryonic development. This makes it impossible to add genes to any genome because there is no way to coordinate any new gene with existing genes. Yet "ape to human evolution" requires apes and humans to be able to add genes - for example, the chimpanzee Y chromosome has 37 genes and the human Y chromosome has at least 78 genes.

Darwin Buster Three: The laws of genetics prevent "ape to human evolution" from ever taking place. One reason is there is no genetic mechanism that creates new genes. But "ape to human evolution" relies on apes and humans having the ability to create new genes with new functions. New genes are required in order to have morphological changes, such as gills into lungs or more efficient brains. So called "gene duplication" is not evidence that organisms can create new genes. Although bacteria can duplicate existing genes by mistake through "gene duplication," this only occurs in single sex bacteria and this is not evidence that apes and humans can create new genes with new functions.

Darwin Buster Four: Darwinians have no explanation for why humans and apes have a different number of chromosomes. Darwinians claim that "chromosome fusion" of two ape chromosomes into a single chromosome resulted in humans having only 23 pairs of chromosomes while apes have 24 pairs. But there is not one example of "chromosome fusion" in mammals. Darwinians claim that 1 in 1000 human babies have a "fused chromosome" but this is an out and out lie. They are actually referring to Robertsonian Translocations, which are "translocations" and not fused chromosomes and does not result in a change in the chromosome number. Besides, scientifically derived facts refute "chromosome fusion" can occur in apes or humans.
[/b]
I have just provided you with a summary of four Darwin Busters. Each one busts and invalidates "ape to human evolution."

But of course almost all atheist scientists refuse to admit any of them because they worship Darwin and standing in support of thid would squash their much loved Evolution theory and pitch them in the camp of an intelligent designer for man.

Also, you probably have not even read any news about any of this because there is a very powerful worldwide atheist Darwin Conspiracy that actively suppresses the truth about evolution and instead spreads lies.

To help you to begin to understand the truth about "ape to human evolution" theory, i prepared the following short summary of the theory, and i provide you with some details about the first Darwin Buster i listed above.


SUMMARY OF "APE TO HUMAN EVOLUTION" THEORY

Darwinians have asserted that humans evolved from the African ape, and they have proposed the following theory as to how "ape to human evolution" is supposed to have occurred:



Ape to Human Evolution Theory In a Nutshell

[b]Darwinians tell us that the biological differences between humans and apes can be entirely accounted for in the differences in their genes (DNA).

They have claimed for decades that the "genetic matter of apes and humans are 98% identical."

They insist that apes evolved into humans because of gradual changes to their genome. The biological instrument for "ape to human evolution" is changes in the genome, especially the genes.

Darwinians further theorize that each such change in the apes' genes was minor but over the course of over six million years, the accumulation of such small changes in the genes of apes resulted in "ape to human evolution."

Darwin's supporters boast that there are "genes that make us human" and that soon they will find and identify all such genes.




In summary - Darwinians claim the ape genome evolved into the human genome through changes in apes' genes and very few changes were necessary because the genetic matter of apes and humans are 98% identical.

But since 2001, scientific researchers in genetics and embryology have discovered proof that virtually every detail of "ape to human evolution" is contradicted by scientific facts.

Below are some of the recent discoveries that prove "ape to human evolution" is impossible.[/b]


APE AND HUMAN CHROMOSOMES ARE NOT 98% IDENTICAL

BUT ARE TOO DIFFERENT FOR EVOLUTION TO EXPLAIN

Scientists in genetics and embryology are learning something new every day.

One of the things we now know is Darwinians were lying to us when they insisted that the genetic matter of apes and humans are 98% identical.

During the last 12 years, there has been a steady flow of scientific discoveries informing us that Chimpanzee and human chromosomes are so remarkably different that it is inconceivable for the ape genome to evolve into the human genome. For example:

[b]In 2010, Nature published a scientific paper entitled "Chimpanzee and human Y chromosomes are remarkably divergent in structure and gene content." (Nature, by the way, is the most respected peer reviewed scientific journal for evolutionary genetics.)

See link http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v463/n7280/full/nature08700.html

The paper was the product of several teams of well-respected geneticists all of whom were fervent supporters of "ape to human evolution."

Nonetheless, they found that:

The human Y chromosome has twice as many genes as the Chimpanzee Y chromosome. Humans have at least 78 genes and Chimpanzees have only 37.

The Y chromosomes of Chimpanzees and humans are radically different in the arrangement of their genes.

Both of these facts make it impossible for apes to have evolved into humans because there are no genetic mechanisms that would account for the vast differences between the ape and human Y chromosomes.


There is no genetic mechanism that could have rearranged the genes in the Chimpanzee Y chromosome to become the human Y chromosome.

The two chromosomes are so different it is like comparing the chromosomes of humans to those of chickens.[/b]


APE TO HUMAN EVOLUTION IS IMPOSSIBLE BECAUSE

APES AND HUMANS CANNOT ADD GENES TO THEIR GENOMES


The human Y chromosome has twice as many genes as the Chimpanzee Y chromosome. Humans have 41 more genes.

This means that in order for the ape Y chromosome to evolve into the human Y chromosome, apes had to add 41 genes. In order for apes to add genes, they would have to have a genetic mechanism to generate new genes and insert them into their chromosomes.

But apes do not have any "gene generating system."

Nor do apes have a "gene insertion system."

This means that "ape to human evolution" theory is missing the genetic mechanisms necessary for evolution to actually take place.

This is ABSOLUTE CONTRADICTING EVIDENCE that proves "ape to human evolution" is impossible,


This right here is science disproving the evolution theory via genetics. This is a very simple submission and open to scrutiny by all evolutionists and biologists here on Nairaland.

Please Note to all: Before you make a comment ensure you must have read the post and viewed the links so your response would be in line with the write up. I do not want diversionary remarks as this is meant to be an intelligent discussion. Thank you.

Cc cloudgoddess, seun and all other evolutionists.

Oga, you are just looking for argument...i would suggest you go to a beer parlour, buy some drinks and then argue to your fill who is better? Messi or Ronaldo...

donnffd:
Oga, you are just looking for argument...i would suggest you go to a beer parlour, buy some drinks and then argue to your fill who is better? Messi or Ronaldo...

If you did not want to read and discuss intelligently why come here? Your comment has been noted though. Thank you

Op I feel your pains. For you to put up that novel up there means you it really pained you. Ndo.

If somebody tells you he/she evolved from ape, congratulate the fellow and keep clear from him since s/he is an animal.

This should suffice, don't be too angry please.

This is quite lengthy. Let me pitch my tent and wait for the experts.

psucc:
Op I feel your pains. For you to put up that novel up there means you it really pained you. Ndo.

If somebody tells you he/she evolved from ape, congratulate the fellow and keep clear from him since s/he is an animal

This should suffice, don't be too angry please.

LOL @ the bolded.

Jesus said " because they thought they could see they became blind" Anyone trying to explain creation through scientific means is fooling around, you can only have ideas through spiritual sanity!

This guy get time.

Darwin's theory is just a drop in the ocean, trying to explain the origin of man.

Other "theories" exist that defies creationism: the origin of the Olmecs, Sumers, annunakis, nefilims

Choose the one that best suits your belief and move on.

This is actually fascinating. The op helped himself when he said he wasn't going to argue for creationism. That allowed me to keep an open mind.

And then he made a nice summary of his points. Plus one.

I think I'll participate. When I'm on a bigger screen, I'll give my reply.

This can actually turn out to be quite interesting.

Teempakguy:
This is actually fascinating. The op helped himself when he said he wasn't going to argue for creationism. That allowed me to keep an open mind.

And then he made a nice summary of his points. Plus one.

I think I'll participate. When I'm on a bigger screen, I'll give my reply.

This can actually turn out to be quite interesting.

Ifa hear? With THAT op?

hahn:


Ifa hear? With THAT op?

i don't know the op.

Wait, is he one of those conspiracy theorists-dawdy kind of person?

Teempakguy:
i don't know the op.

Wait, is he one of those conspiracy theorists-dawdy kind of person?

Oh, that would have been better

Teempakguy:
This is actually fascinating. The op helped himself when he said he wasn't going to argue for creationism. That allowed me to keep an open mind.

And then he made a nice summary of his points. Plus one.

I think I'll participate. When I'm on a bigger screen, I'll give my reply.

This can actually turn out to be quite interesting.

If you are going to contribute later let me give you something to chew on before you do.

DNA difference between man and Ape amounts to 150,000,000 DNA base pairs that are different between them!

The average ape gene has 100,000 base pairs (a base pair is essentially 2 amino acid molecules). How can 100,000 base pairs suddenly materialize inside of an ape's sperm? And even if 100,000 base pairs can materialize out of thin air, how could all the base pairs be perfectly sequenced so that they form a gene that actually helps the ape evolve into a man?

Let me do the math. 100, 000 x 150,000,000 that would be 15,000,000,000,000 (fifteen trillion) base pair differencs

How is it possible that these 15 trillion different base pairs would materialize out of thin air and become new genes when Apes have no Gene Addition machanism and indeed it is impossible to add a Gene to a chromosome.

naijadeyhia:



If you did not want to read and discuss intelligently why come here? Your comment has been noted though. Thank you

How can i discuss intelligently when you know little about evolution and frankly, you dont wanna learn...

If i was to invest time to discussing wit you, it wud only end one way, the way we started, so whats the point?

ValentineMary:
I would not lie that I read all but from the few I read, I was discouraged to proceed because the OP is very ignorant of evolution and he wallows in his ignorance.

OP if u don't understand something, go and read before u say it is nonsense. And BTW humans did not come from ape.

This might just be another attention seeker.

Sorry to disappoint you. I think you need to read up on the origin of the evolution theory and how man was linked to have evolved from Apes.

Are you a scientist? A biologist?

Man is said to have a common ancestor in a single celled organism which over billions of years evolved into man through various other evolutionary processes one of which was from Ape to neanderthal to man.

naijadeyhia:



If you are going to contribute later let me give you something to chew on before you do.

DNA difference between man and Ape amounts to 150,000,000 DNA base pairs that are different between them!

The average ape gene has 100,000 base pairs (a base pair is essentially 2 amino acid molecules). How can 100,000 base pairs suddenly materialize inside of an ape's sperm? And even if 100,000 base pairs can materialize out of thin air, how could all the base pairs be perfectly sequenced so that they form a gene that actually helps the ape evolve into a man?

Let me do the math. 100, 000 x 150,000,000 that would be 15,000,000,000,000 (fifteen trillion) base pair differencs

How is it possible that these 15 trillion different base pairs would materialize out of thin air and become new genes when Apes have no Gene Addition machanism and indeed it is impossible to add a Gene to a chromosome.

wait, what do you think is the relationship between apes such as chimpanzees, and humans?

Very simple question. Please reply so I can proceed.

naijadeyhia:



If you are going to contribute later let me give you something to chew on before you do.

DNA difference between man and Ape amounts to 150,000,000 DNA base pairs that are different between them!

The average ape gene has 100,000 base pairs (a base pair is essentially 2 amino acid molecules). How can 100,000 base pairs suddenly materialize inside of an ape's sperm? And even if 100,000 base pairs can materialize out of thin air, how could all the base pairs be perfectly sequenced so that they form a gene that actually helps the ape evolve into a man?

Let me do the math. 100, 000 x 150,000,000 that would be 15,000,000,000,000 (fifteen trillion) base pair differencs

How is it possible that these 15 trillion different base pairs would materialize out of thin air and become new genes when Apes have no Gene Addition machanism and indeed it is impossible to add a Gene to a chromosome.

You see why i say you dont understand it...

The similarities that is often said we have with the chimp dna is not the entire dna sequences, that is a misconception.

Human and chimp DNA is nearly identical when you compare the bands on chromosomes, the bundles of DNA inside nearly every cell. Which two chromosomes are more alike?

The light and dark bands on chromosomes, reveal similarities and differences among human, chimp and mouse DNA.

Human and chimp X chromosomes both contain about 1,100 different genes, or sets of instructions. Each gene affects a particular trait in the body.

Each human cell contains roughly three billion base pairs, or bits of information. Just 1.2 percent of that equals about 35 million differences. Some of these have a big impact, others don't. And even two identical stretches of DNA can work differently--they can be "turned on" in different amounts, in different places or at different times.

Teempakguy:
wait, what do you think is the relationship between apes such as chimpanzees, and humans?

Very simple question. Please reply so I can proceed.

I see no relationship except on a genetic level which has been discovered not to be a 98% similarity but actually a 95% similarity when comparing their DNA.

Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes while chimpanzees have 24. Evolutionary scientists believe that one of the human chromosomes has been formed through the fusion of two small chromosomes in the chimp instead of an intrinsic difference resulting from a separate creation.

At the end of each chromosome is a string of repeating DNA sequences called a telomere. Chimpanzees and other apes have about 23 kilobases (a kilobase is 1,000 base pairs of DNA) of repeats. Humans are unique among primates with much shorter telomeres only 10 kilobases long.

While 18 pairs of chromosomes are ‘virtually identical’, chromosomes 4, 9 and 12 show evidence of being ‘remodeled.’5 In other words, the genes and markers on these chromosomes are not in the same order in the human and chimpanzee. Instead of ‘being remodeled’ as the evolutionists suggest, these could, logically, also be intrinsic differences because of a separate creation.

The Y chromosome in particular is of a different size and has many markers that do not line up between the human and chimpanzee.

donnffd:


You see why i say you dont understand it...

The similarities that is often said we have with the chimp dna is not the entire dna sequences, that is a misconception.

Human and chimp DNA is nearly identical when you compare the bands on chromosomes, the bundles of DNA inside nearly every cell. Which two chromosomes are more alike?

The light and dark bands on these chromosomes, created by a laboratory dye, reveal similarities and differences among human, chimp and mouse DNA.

Human and chimp X chromosomes both contain about 1,100 different genes, or sets of instructions. Each gene affects a particular trait in the body.

I am talking about Y chromosomes and not X

naijadeyhia:



I am talking about Y chromosomes and not X

Oh so is that suppose to disprove evolution then, the differences in the y chromosome?

According to you, the similarities is 95%, thats still a superb A, so how do you account for all that similarities?

donnffd:


Oh so is that suppose to disprove evolution then, the differences in the y chromosome?

According to you, the similarities is 95%, thats still a superb A, so how do you account for all that similarities?

Did you read the thread and the links I added? I suggest you do so you would answer this particular question yourself because if I answer it you would not believe me.

naijadeyhia:


Did you read the thread and the links I added? I suggest you do so you would answer this particular question yourself because if I answer it you would not believe me.

So whats the point of the discussion you were saying we should have earlier on!

I ask you a question and you want to run away

It wasnt the link i asked for where the 95% of DNA similarities came from, it was you and i am waiting for your answers...

Meanwhile i would just drop this here, the DNA sequences are exactly the way we would expect them to be if evolution was true...the incremental similarities with closer and closer relatives in the family tree

When I got anything to say, I would tender it. Not really a fan of evolution but let's just see how the discussion goes.

donnffd:


So whats the point of the discussion you were saying we should have earlier on!

I ask you a question and you want to run away

It wasnt the link i asked for where the 95% of DNA similarities came from, it was you and i am waiting for your answers...

Meanwhile i would just drop this here, the DNA sequences are exactly the way we would expect them to be if evolution was true...the incremental similarities with closer and closer relatives in the family tree

If you had read the thread you would have seen where I appealed to every interested party or anyone willing to comment ro first of all read the thread and the links so they would be informed enough before asking questions so as not to derail or seem unintelligent. Your questions show you deliberately refused to read the link which I put up there as foundation.

Kindly read it pls.

Surprising post!!! Shocking!!!

A case of fraud by an archeologist................
........Christian Interpretation: "This proves Evolution false!!!"

A thousand cases of fraud in christianity that have not even ended even as at 2016.................................Christian Interpretation: This does not shake my faith!!! It makes it stronger and makes my god even more real!!!

donnffd:


So whats the point of the discussion you were saying we should have earlier on!

I ask you a question and you want to run away

It wasnt the link i asked for where the 95% of DNA similarities came from, it was you and i am waiting for your answers...

Meanwhile i would just drop this here, the DNA sequences are exactly the way we would expect them to be if evolution was true...the incremental similarities with closer and closer relatives in the family tree

If you had read the thread you would have seen a clear biological truth regarding chromosomes in man.

Apes have 24 pairs of Chromosomes and man has 23 pairs and we know that 1 pair of missing chromosomes will make man unable to reproduce. So if Apes had evolved to be Apes with 24 pairs and man has 23 pairs how would man have evolved from Ape if not via reproduction and genetic influence during embroynics? So if the Ape lost a pair of chromosomes so they would evolve ro man with 23 pairs of chromosomes how then was the Ape able to reproduce?

naijadeyhia:


If you had read the thread you would have seen where I appealed to every interested party or anyone willing to comment ro first of all read the thread and the links so they would be informed enough before asking questions so as not to derail or seem unintelligent. Your questions show you deliberately refused to read the link which I put up there as foundation.

Kindly read it pls.

An African apelike species evolved probably around 6 million years ago with two skeletal characteristics that set it apart from modern apes: small canine teeth (the teeth on either side of the four front teeth) compared to the long canines found in almost all other primates, and, most importantly, bipedalism or walking on two legs as the primary mode of locomotion.

The name australopithecine means “southern ape,” in reference to South Africa where the first known fossils were found. Many more australopith fossils have been found in the Great Rift Valley in eastern Africa, in countries including Ethiopia, Tanzania, Kenya, and Chad.

The very early years of the transition from ape to human, from 6 million to 4 million years ago, is poorly documented in the fossil record, but those fossils that have been discovered document the most primitive combinations of ape and human features.

Fossils from different early australopith species that lived between 4 million and 2 million years ago show a variety of adaptations that mark this transition much more clearly. Among the genera that are included in early australopith species are Sahelanthropus, Orrorin, and Aripithecus; a species of the genus Kenyanthropus; and four species of the genus Australopithecus.

Probably the best-known australopith specimen is “Lucy,” the partial skeleton of a female discovered in 1974 in Hadar, Ethiopia. Lucy belongs to a species, Australopithicus afarensis, which thrived in eastern Africa between 3.9 million and 3 million years ago. Scientists have found several hundred A. afarensis fossils in Hadar. Lucy lived 3.2 million years ago.

Another very exciting Africanus afarensis site was discovered in northern Tanzania at Laetoli. In addition to fossilized bones of A. afarensis, researchers in 1978 discovered trails of bipedal human footprints preserved in hardened volcanic ash over 3 million years ago. The footprints provided irrefutable evidence that australopiths regularly walked upright.

By about 2.7 million years ago, so-called robust australopiths (in contrast to the earlier, gracile forms) had evolved, with wide molars and premolars and a facial structure that indicate that these robust australopiths chewed their food, primarily tough, fibrous plants, powerfully and for long periods. Several robust species have been identified, and the last robust australopiths died out about 1.4 million years ago.

The genus Homo first evolved at least 2.3 million to 2.5 million years ago. The most significant difference between members of this genus and australopiths, with which they overlapped, was their significantly larger brains (about 30 percent larger, though still small compared to modern humans).

Scientists divide the evolution of the modern human genus into three rough periods: early, middle, and late. Species of early Homo, among them Homo habilis, resembled australopiths in many distinct ways, but they had smaller teeth and jaws, more modern-looking feet, and hands capable of making tools. They probably lived from between 2.5 or 2.3 million and 1.6 million years ago.

The middle Homo species, including Homo erectus, evolved anatomically to be more similar to modern humans but their brains were relatively small (though bigger than australopiths). They probably overlapped with earlier Homo species, as they developed perhaps between 2 million and 1.8 million years ago. Homo erectus was a very successful species of the middle period; fossils have been found throughout Africa, Europe, and much of Asia, and the species may have survived for more than 1.5 million years.

The final transition, from the middle to late periods, happened about 200,000 years ago. Late Homo species, including Neanderthals and Homo sapiens, evolved large and complex brains, leading eventually to language, and developed culture as an increasingly important aspect of human life.

naijadeyhia:


If you had read the thread you would have seen a clear biological truth regarding chromosomes in man.

Apes have 24 pairs of Chromosomes and man has 23 pairs and we know that 1 pair of missing chromosomes will make man unable to reproduce. So if Apes had evolved to be Apes with 24 pairs and man has 23 pairs how would man have evolved from Ape if not via reproduction and genetic influence during embroynics? So if the Ape lost a pair of chromosomes so they would evolve ro man with 23 pairs of chromosomes how then was the Ape able to reproduce?

WE DID NOT EVOLVE FROM APES............

donnffd:


An African apelike species evolved probably around 6 million years ago with two skeletal characteristics that set it apart from modern apes: small canine teeth (the teeth on either side of the four front teeth) compared to the long canines found in almost all other primates, and, most importantly, bipedalism or walking on two legs as the primary mode of locomotion.

The name australopithecine means “southern ape,” in reference to South Africa where the first known fossils were found. Many more australopith fossils have been found in the Great Rift Valley in eastern Africa, in countries including Ethiopia, Tanzania, Kenya, and Chad.

The very early years of the transition from ape to human, from 6 million to 4 million years ago, is poorly documented in the fossil record, but those fossils that have been discovered document the most primitive combinations of ape and human features.

Fossils from different early australopith species that lived between 4 million and 2 million years ago show a variety of adaptations that mark this transition much more clearly. Among the genera that are included in early australopith species are Sahelanthropus, Orrorin, and Aripithecus; a species of the genus Kenyanthropus; and four species of the genus Australopithecus.

Probably the best-known australopith specimen is “Lucy,” the partial skeleton of a female discovered in 1974 in Hadar, Ethiopia. Lucy belongs to a species, Australopithicus afarensis, which thrived in eastern Africa between 3.9 million and 3 million years ago. Scientists have found several hundred A. afarensis fossils in Hadar. Lucy lived 3.2 million years ago.

Another very exciting Africanus afarensis site was discovered in northern Tanzania at Laetoli. In addition to fossilized bones of A. afarensis, researchers in 1978 discovered trails of bipedal human footprints preserved in hardened volcanic ash over 3 million years ago. The footprints provided irrefutable evidence that australopiths regularly walked upright.

By about 2.7 million years ago, so-called robust australopiths (in contrast to the earlier, gracile forms) had evolved, with wide molars and premolars and a facial structure that indicate that these robust australopiths chewed their food, primarily tough, fibrous plants, powerfully and for long periods. Several robust species have been identified, and the last robust australopiths died out about 1.4 million years ago.

The genus Homo first evolved at least 2.3 million to 2.5 million years ago. The most significant difference between members of this genus and australopiths, with which they overlapped, was their significantly larger brains (about 30 percent larger, though still small compared to modern humans).

Scientists divide the evolution of the modern human genus into three rough periods: early, middle, and late. Species of early Homo, among them Homo habilis, resembled australopiths in many distinct ways, but they had smaller teeth and jaws, more modern-looking feet, and hands capable of making tools. They probably lived from between 2.5 or 2.3 million and 1.6 million years ago.

The middle Homo species, including Homo erectus, evolved anatomically to be more similar to modern humans but their brains were relatively small (though bigger than australopiths). They probably overlapped with earlier Homo species, as they developed perhaps between 2 million and 1.8 million years ago. Homo erectus was a very successful species of the middle period; fossils have been found throughout Africa, Europe, and much of Asia, and the species may have survived for more than 1.5 million years.

The final transition, from the middle to late periods, happened about 200,000 years ago. Late Homo species, including Neanderthals and Homo sapiens, evolved large and complex brains, leading eventually to language, and developed culture as an increasingly important aspect of human life.

Again I suggest you read that thread so you would not keep shooting yourself in the foot. Between the purported Lucy and todays man is a huge gap which Evolutionists attempted to fill using the piltdown man. I gave the link for you to peruse.

I will not force you to read the thread but don't be upset if I do not respond to some of your questions if I find them unintelligent.

naijadeyhia:



Again I suggest you read that thread so you would not keep shooting yourself in the foot. Between the purported Lucy and todays man is a huge gap which Evolutionists attempted to fill using the piltdown man. I gave the link for you to peruse.

I will not force you to read the thread but don't be upset if I do not respond to some of your questions if I find them unintelligent.

Smh...what makes you think i did not read it and ddnt agree with it?,because it was totally false,i knew this was a total waste of time...chaow

donnffd:


Smh...what makes you think i did not read it and ddnt agree with it?,because it was totally false,i knew this was a total waste of time...chaow

Adios!