US Election 2016 has suddenly become a theme of "Trump vs. Clinton" and its effect has spiralled round the globe with diverging expectations and conclusions from various countries and continents.

Israel, for instance, is curious to know the agenda of the next America's President especially due to that fact that Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu didn't enjoy a lofty relationship with America over the last eight years of President Barack Obama's Administration.

For India and Pakistan, "US Election 2016 Updates" have been the most heartily-watched TV Series particularly in New Delhi and Islamabad. This is most expected as the hostilities between the two nuclear-armed neighbours are becoming more volatile with each passing day. While Donald Trump considers the relations between both countries as a "very, very hot tinderbox", Hillary Clinton is more concerned about Pakistan running full speed to develop tactical nuclear weapons in their continuing hostility with India.

In China, Donald Trump is seen as an unreliable lunatic, while Hillary Clinton is believed to be a liar that can't even be trusted. As a matter of fact, China considers Mr Trump as a resurrection of the duo of Mussolini and Hitler as both came to power through elections. For Mrs Clinton, China sees her hectoring on human rights and anti-China policies.

In Europe, the entire EU member countries except for one seem to have cynically signalled their desire for a win for Hillary Clinton. Only Hungary's right-wing populist Viktor Orban endorsed Donald Trump. Most main opposition parties in Europe also support Mrs Clinton because her presidency is expected to continue the trans-Atlantic relationship enjoyed to a certain degree. European governments have paid close attention to Trump's campaigns but still considers him as "the unknown" since a Trump presidency, with its domestic, nationalist priorities, could further damage an already wounded European Union.

Lastly, in motherland, Africa, America has never been a laughing stock because a nation that project itself as the self-appointed police officer of world democracy appears to be hovering remarkably close to electing a leader who does not seem to be much of an advocate. This mockery is actually directed at Donald Trump whose presidency is viewed to be an authoritarian leadership bent on protectionism and isolationism with little sympathy for those who are different to him or who are not American. But Hillary Clinton, being a First Lady and a former US Secretary of State who left a big "Clinton footprint" over many parts of Africa, especially South Africa seem to enjoy more patronage from African countries though with some doubt as more was expected from the Obama administration.

Who can be trusted between Trump and Clinton?

Source: http://www.ygist.com/2016/11/trump-vs-clinton-europe-israel-china-india-africa-divided.html

Totally wrong analysis,Clinton is in a position of anything but Clinton,the majority of African elite do not like Clinton you think you would plot the killing of gadahi and be liked in Africa that is the joke,only those who sick migration like Clinton. if there where to be a vote in Africa the margin would be 3;1 in favor of trump

yGist:
US Election 2016 has suddenly become a theme of "Trump vs. Clinton" and its effect has spiralled round the globe with diverging expectations and conclusions from various countries and continents.

Israel, for instance, is curious to know the agenda of the next America's President especially due to that fact that Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu didn't enjoy a lofty relationship with America over the last eight years of President Barack Obama's Administration.

For India and Pakistan, "US Election 2016 Updates" have been the most heartily-watched TV Series particularly in New Delhi and Islamabad. This is most expected as the hostilities between the two nuclear-armed neighbours are becoming more volatile with each passing day. While Donald Trump considers the relations between both countries as a "very, very hot tinderbox", Hillary Clinton is more concerned about Pakistan running full speed to develop tactical nuclear weapons in their continuing hostility with India.

In China, Donald Trump is seen as an unreliable lunatic, while Hillary Clinton is believed to be a liar that can't even be trusted. As a matter of fact, China considers Mr Trump as a resurrection of the duo of Mussolini and Hitler as both came to power through elections. For Mrs Clinton, China sees her hectoring on human rights and anti-China policies.

In Europe, the entire EU member countries except for one seem to have cynically signalled their desire for a win for Hillary Clinton. Only Hungary's right-wing populist Viktor Orban endorsed Donald Trump. Most main opposition parties in Europe also support Mrs Clinton because her presidency is expected to continue the trans-Atlantic relationship enjoyed to a certain degree. European governments have paid close attention to Trump's campaigns but still considers him as "the unknown" since a Trump presidency, with its domestic, nationalist priorities, could further damage an already wounded European Union.

Lastly, in motherland, Africa, America has never been a laughing stock because a nation that project itself as the self-appointed police officer of world democracy appears to be hovering remarkably close to electing a leader who does not seem to be much of an advocate. This mockery is actually directed at Donald Trump whose presidency is viewed to be an authoritarian leadership bent on protectionism and isolationism with little sympathy for those who are different to him or who are not American. But Hillary Clinton, being a First Lady and a former US Secretary of State who left a big "Clinton footprint" over many parts of Africa, especially South Africa seem to enjoy more patronage from African countries though with some doubt as more was expected from the Obama administration.

Who can be trusted between Trump and Clinton?

Source: http://www.ygist.com/2016/11/trump-vs-clinton-europe-israel-china-india-africa-divided.html

yGist:


Lastly, in motherland, Africa, America has never been a laughing stock because a nation that project itself as the self-appointed police officer of world democracy appears to be hovering remarkably close to electing a leader who does not seem to be much of an advocate. This mockery is actually directed at Donald Trump
Source: http://www.ygist.com/2016/11/trump-vs-clinton-europe-israel-china-india-africa-divided.html

Big time lies. Who wrote this? one of the liberals from the Clinton Establishment with the help from CNN and BBC. Keep in mind Africans are tired fed up with the Democrats backing radical Islam's globalist agenda. Not only that We still remember Bill Clinton sending Milosevic to jail in the Netherlands and pushing o Muslims in the Balkans.If Clinton is elected, the first thing her administration will do will be to destroy Africa by stirring a war in Nigeria and creating a flood of 100 million refugees from that country.

panafrican:

Big time lies. Who wrote this? one of the liberals from the Clinton Establishment with the help from CNN and BBC. Keep in mind Africans are tired fed up with the Democrats backing radical Islam's globalist agenda. Not only that We still remember Bill Clinton sending Milosevic to jail in the Netherlands and pushing o Muslims in the Balkans.If Clinton is elected, the first thing her administration will do will be to destroy Africa by stirring a war in Nigeria and creating a flood of 100 million refugees from that country.

Your opinion is well noted but don't forget what Soyinka said few days ago. It went viral so you must have noticed it and that is just one among many.

Personally, I don't want Hillary Clinton neither am I clamouring for Trump but I think both local and [most] foreign media favours her.