Just consider our ability to SEE AND HEAR; there is no way for natural science to completely account for these two features without being get stuck along the way. We are told that the light and sound signals which enter our sensory systems were firstly converted into electrical impulse signals . These electrical impulse signals were then conveyed to the brain through the nerves. Even if we assume a costly assumption that the nerves were able to convey all the necessary details and the brain was able to reconvert those electrical impulse signals back to the original visual and sound perceptions, there is still need for the "actual seer" and the "actual hearer" to see and hear these FAKE PERCEPTIONS formed in the Brain. Yet there is no way to account for this "actual seer and hearer" (which the theists depicted as soul or spirit) in a purely atheistic and material world. Furthermore, consider our ability to talk and speak in a coherent manner:1.How are we able to select an appropriate word at a particular point in time from vast number of words stored in our brain during speech production? 2.How does the brain even managed to store and retrieve those words? 3.How does the the vocal apparatus ( which consist of the tongue,lips, teeth etc) managed to be informed within the shortest period of time regarding the words selected by the brain? 4.How did vocal apparatus managed to coordinate its activities to ensure the correct pronunciation of those words? 5.How and why did present human species manage to have over 6000 languages given that a child always speak the same language he heard from his parents or relatives? A child grown in the midst of the parents has never been observed to speak a completely new language. Even if we suppose that new vocabularies were able to evolve due to change in culture, the basic syntax of a language should not be evolving 6.Are we to suppose that the first man and first woman on earth spoke thousands of languages during their life time? 7.How are we able to switch voluntarily from one language to another during speech production? 8.How are we able to pause voluntarily during speech production? 9.How are we able to change the tone of our voice voluntarily during speech production? 10.How are we able to increase or decrease voluntarily the loudness of our voice during speech production?All these events are nothing but miracles. Any NATURAL PROCESS can only be based on CHANCE or follow some SET OF NATURAL LAWS. Therefore, if all activities going on in our brain is ultimately determined by natural process, THE ONLY INSTRUMENT PRESENT IN ATHEISTIC WORLD,then the process of our speech production will be based purely on CHANCE or based on some SET OF NATURAL LAWS. Under this condition, it is either our speech is full of NON COHERENT AND NONSENSICAL words(if it is based on chance) or full of REPEATED AND HOMOGENEOUS set of words(if it is based on some set of natural laws); in other words, our speech can never be DIVERSE, COHERENT AND MEANINGFUL if its production is ultimately determined by natural process, the only instrument present in Atheistic world. Therefore, Atheism can never account for our ability to see,our ability to hear and our ability to speak in a diverse and yet coherent manner.