Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,150,778 members, 7,810,028 topics. Date: Friday, 26 April 2024 at 07:00 PM

A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts - Foreign Affairs (2) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts (6452 Views)

US Congresswoman, Katie Hill Seen In Nude Photos Showing Nazi Tattoo / Meet Corporal Wojtek A Polish Soldier In WW2 / Thousands Evacuated In Hong Kong After Unexploded WW2 Bomb Was Found(Pics) (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by Defaramade(m): 6:31pm On Jan 25, 2017
Rossikki:
Donald Trump is the new Hitler. He is using the very same tactics Hitler used to gain popularity - scapegoating minorities, expressing a wish to make the country great "again", and vowing to deal with foreign enemies by war. Like Hitler, he will garner millions of supporters, many of whom will perish in the flames of his madness and megalomania.
Hmmn, I hope we don't get to that level because war is hell and world war 3 would be extremely brutal in an unprecedented way.

1 Like

Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by donestk(m): 6:37pm On Jan 25, 2017
World War III will defy conventional methods of engagement.

Frontlines may be non existent.

Just like the battle of kurst (largest tank battle in history) ww3 will be more of air and naval superiority.


Defaramade:
Hmmn, I hope we don't get to that level because war is hell and world war 3 would be extremely brutal in an unprecedented way.

2 Likes

Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by Defaramade(m): 6:43pm On Jan 25, 2017
donestk:
World War III will defy conventional methods of engagement.

Frontlines may be non existent.

Just like the battle of kurst (largest tank battle in history) ww3 will be more of air and naval superiority.


Right on point Sir
Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by Rossikki: 6:55pm On Jan 25, 2017
I read somewhere that Trump keeps a copy of Mein Kampf by his bedside. You know he is German by ancestry. His real name is Donald Johann Drumpf. Count the letters...
Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by Rossikki: 7:02pm On Jan 25, 2017
donestk:
World War III will defy conventional methods of engagement.

Frontlines may be non existent.

Just like the battle of kurst (largest tank battle in history) ww3 will be more of air and naval superiority.


WW2 lasted 6 years. I doubt WW3 will last even 6 days. Nuclear war can end it all in a matter of hours in fact. If not minutes.
Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by panafrican(m): 4:45am On Jan 26, 2017
Talk also about Otto Skorzeny.
Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by panafrican(m): 12:34am On Feb 02, 2017
Why didn' t Hitler invade the UK and why did the German army let the British escape at Dunkirk in 1940?
Any idea?
Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by donestk(m): 1:40pm On Mar 05, 2017
Detailed account of the battle of the bulge


https://www.chess.com/clubs/forum/view/battle-of-the-bulge
Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by bigrovar(m): 7:19pm On Mar 05, 2017
panafrican:
Why didn' t Hitler invade the UK and why did the German army let the British escape at Dunkirk in 1940?
Any idea?

The german were more concerned about the eastern front in ww2 than UK which was of little strategic value. The idea was to contain the brits (most considered them too down to pose a serious threat - huge mistake) The eastern front is where the juice is. It is where Hitler hoped to create Lebensraum.. Living space for the german race. Unlike other European powers the germans have a very small land mass and very few colonies. Hilter note that to be respected as a world power you need huge land mass. If there is anything Russia has in abundance.. It is land. German were suppose to stroll into the mostly under developed mostly peasant country with little industrial capabilities and a largely under equipped army.. It was suppose to be easy pickings.

1 Like 1 Share

Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by bigrovar(m): 7:20pm On Mar 05, 2017
As much as people love to go on and on about ww2. ww1 was the real deal. Made ww2 look like childs play. WW1 also had the biggest effect on geo politics.

1 Like

Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by donestk(m): 10:39pm On Mar 05, 2017
Insightful

bigrovar:


The german were more concerned about the eastern front in ww2 than UK which was of little strategic value. The idea was to contain the brits (most considered them too down to pose a serious threat - huge mistake) The eastern front is where the juice is. It is where Hitler hoped to create Lebensraum.. Living space for the german race. Unlike other European powers the germans have a very small land mass and very few colonies. Hilter note that to be respected as a world power you need huge land mass. If there is anything Russia has in abundance.. It is land. German were suppose to stroll into the mostly under developed mostly peasant country with little industrial capabilities and a largely under equipped army.. It was suppose to be easy pickings.
Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by bigrovar(m): 12:01am On Mar 06, 2017
donestk:
Insightful


Yes o.. western writers would have us believe that WW2 was about western Europe when in fact the campaign in the east made the western campaign look like a mere street brawl. The type of savage fighting and battle of attrition that took place in places like Stalingrad, Leningrad, Rzhev (Known as the meat grinder) was a complete far cry than the almost gentleman campaign in Europe. Some of German most battle hardened men fought in the east. The guys who fought at Normandy, and led the Ardenne offensive were relatively green and inexperience compared to the guys tired down in the east.

3 Likes

Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by donestk(m): 3:09pm On Mar 06, 2017
But the east is too damn far

bigrovar:


Yes o.. western writers would have us believe that WW2 was about western Europe when in fact the campaign in the east made the western campaign look like a mere street brawl. The type of savage fighting and battle of attrition that took place in places like Stalingrad, Leningrad, Rzhev (Known as the meat grinder) was a complete far cry than the almost gentleman campaign in Europe. Some of German most battle hardened men fought in the east. The guys who fought at Normandy, and led the Ardenne offensive were relatively green and inexperience compared to the guys tired down in the east.
Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by Defaramade(m): 7:40pm On Mar 06, 2017
donestk:
But the east is too damn far

Germany was victorious against the western European powers (except Britain) but Hitler made the same mistake that Napoleon Bonaparte made almost a century before him; invading Russia grin
Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by donestk(m): 10:55pm On Mar 06, 2017
Oh it was Napoleon Bonaparte that led a powerful French invasion force in the 1800s but was stalled by the Soviet harsh winters...... History always repeat itself


Defaramade:
Germany was victorious against the western European powers (except Britain) but Hitler made the same mistake that Napoleon Bonaparte made almost a century before him; invading Russia grin
Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by Defaramade(m): 4:19am On Mar 07, 2017
donestk:
Oh it was Napoleon Bonaparte that led a powerful French invasion force in the 1980s but was stalled by the Soviet harsh winters...... History always repeat itself


Exactly cheesy
Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by bigrovar(m): 7:37am On Mar 07, 2017
The general misconception is that Germans lost to the Russian winter. i.e Russian winter played the biggest role in the Germans losing out to Russia. This is not true. Yes the Russia winter played a role but the biggest reason why Germany lost to Russia was due to Hitler's sense of invisibility, isanity and extreme arrogance. Germans went into Russia believing they were in for a swift victory the likes experienced in Western Europe. They considered the Russian to be of a lesser class of people who would surrender in droves under the Blitzkrieg. They expected to to be home by Christmas (a 6 months campaign)

This arrogance made the Germans commit the following tactical error:

Started the campaign without preparing for the Russian winter: The men had no winter clothing, their hardware had no provision for coping with the russian winter.

They completely under estimated the fanatical defends of the mother russia by the Russians who in many instances fought to the last man.. This type of resistance was alien to the Germans who were used to mass surrender once a you outflank and surround an army.. it is suppose to just give up and surrender. The Russians choose not to play to that script and instead fought with the skin of their teeth even when all hope seems lost. Germans often find themselves surrounding and then having to take out the Russians from every inch of land leading to very high attrition from the former.

No room for reserve, Arrogance allowed the Germans to throw in all they had.. because they were assured of victory, they made no room for reserve. Stalin on the other hand used his reserve very well. Unleashing them on the wary Germans time after time at just the perfect moment.

Badly trained and equipped flanks. The Germans rear guard and flanks were often guarded by poorly trained, ill motivated and equipped Hungarian ally. The Russian on many cases especially in the battle for Stalingrad concentrated their fire power on the German Hungarian flanks.. decimating them with their multi rocket launcher before encircling the 6th army (Germany never recovered from that loss)

Hitler's insanity halted the German advance on Moscow, allowing the Russians enough time to prepare a defence. Many German general would go on to say Moscow was the beginning of the end for the German eastern campaign.

Also Hitler's obsession with Stalingrad, a city with zero strategic value but sucked in lots of men and resources which should have been heading towards the more strategic oil fields of baku.. Hitler insanity was in full display when he ordered the 6th army not to attempt to break out of their encirclement even when the opportunity arose. Promising to supply the troops by air.

Even at the battle of the kursk Hitlers delay and constant postponement allowed the Russians to have time to a well laid out plan.

in all these Winter role was just an enabler for the Russian's

5 Likes 1 Share

Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by donestk(m): 7:57am On Mar 07, 2017
Brilliant analysis......

The fuhrer was just obsessed about Staningrad prolly cos of Stalin. Truly the Soviets are fanatical especially displayed in the Battle of Stalingrad. Do you know that during the Battle of Stalingrad, the life expectancy of a Soviet solider was 24 hours?

bigrovar:
The general misconception is that Germans lost to the Russian winter. i.e Russian winter played the biggest role in the Germans losing out to Russia. This is not true. Yes the Russia winter played a role but the biggest reason why Germany lost to Russia was due to Hitler's sense of invisibility, isanity and extreme arrogance. Germans went into Russia believing they were in for a swift victory the likes experienced in Western Europe. They considered the Russian to be of a lesser class of people who would surrender in droves under the Blitzkrieg. They expected to to be home by Christmas (a 6 months campaign)

This arrogance made the Germans commit the following tactical error:

Started the campaign without preparing for the Russian winter: The men had no winter clothing, their hardware had no provision for coping with the russian winter.

They completely under estimated the fanatical defends of the mother russia by the Russians who in many instances fought to the last man.. This type of resistance was alien to the Germans who were used to mass surrender once a you outflank and surround an army.. it is suppose to just give up and surrender. The Russians choose not to play to that script and instead fought with the skin of their teeth even when all hope seems lost. Germans often find themselves surrounding and then having to take out the Russians from every inch of land leading to very high attrition from the former.

No room for reserve, Arrogance allowed the Germans to throw in all they had.. because they were assured of victory, they made no room for reserve. Stalin on the other hand used his reserve very well. Unleashing them on the wary Germans time after time at just the perfect moment.

Badly trained and equipped flanks. The Germans rear guard and flanks were often guarded by poorly trained, ill motivated and equipped Hungarian ally. The Russian on many cases especially in the battle for Stalingrad concentrated their fire power on the German Hungarian flanks.. decimating them with their multi rocket launcher before encircling the 6th army (Germany never recovered from that loss)

Hitler's insanity halted the German advance on Moscow, allowing the Russians enough time to prepare a defence. Many German general would go on to say Moscow was the beginning of the end for the German eastern campaign.

Also Hitler's obsession with Stalingrad, a city with zero strategic value but sucked in lots of men and resources which should have been heading towards the more strategic oil fields of baku.. Hitler insanity was in full display when he ordered the 6th army not to attempt to break out of their encirclement even when the opportunity arose. Promising to supply the troops by air.

Even at the battle of the kursk Hitlers delay and constant postponement allowed the Russians to have time to a well laid out plan.

in all these Winter role was just an enabler for the Russian's
Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by bigrovar(m): 10:58am On Mar 07, 2017
donestk:
Brilliant analysis......

The fuhrer was just obsessed about Staningrad prolly cos of Stalin. Truly the Soviets are fanatical especially displayed in the Battle of Stalingrad. Do you know that during the Battle of Stalingrad, the life expectancy of a Soviet solider was 24 hours?



They fought with insane unbelievable tenacity.., makes you think for all it's fault communism those know how to mobilise and get the best out of a people. One of the most fascinating tales from Stalingrad is the "Night Witches" The women military aviators of the 588th night bomber regiment. This are volunteer women who flew harassment precision bombing raids against the Germans. They flew mostly old wood planes at night.. An attack technique of the night bombers was to idle the engine near the target and glide to the bomb release point, with only wind noise left to reveal their location. German soldiers likened the sound to broomsticks and named the pilots "Night Witches." this heroics ladies often flew without parachutes.

5 Likes

Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by donestk(m): 11:08am On Mar 07, 2017
Battle of the Bulge

Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by Defaramade(m): 12:25am On Mar 09, 2017
bigrovar:
The general misconception is that Germans lost to the Russian winter. i.e Russian winter played the biggest role in the Germans losing out to Russia. This is not true. Yes the Russia winter played a role but the biggest reason why Germany lost to Russia was due to Hitler's sense of invisibility, isanity and extreme arrogance. Germans went into Russia believing they were in for a swift victory the likes experienced in Western Europe. They considered the Russian to be of a lesser class of people who would surrender in droves under the Blitzkrieg. They expected to to be home by Christmas (a 6 months campaign)

This arrogance made the Germans commit the following tactical error:

Started the campaign without preparing for the Russian winter: The men had no winter clothing, their hardware had no provision for coping with the russian winter.

They completely under estimated the fanatical defends of the mother russia by the Russians who in many instances fought to the last man.. This type of resistance was alien to the Germans who were used to mass surrender once a you outflank and surround an army.. it is suppose to just give up and surrender. The Russians choose not to play to that script and instead fought with the skin of their teeth even when all hope seems lost. Germans often find themselves surrounding and then having to take out the Russians from every inch of land leading to very high attrition from the former.

No room for reserve, Arrogance allowed the Germans to throw in all they had.. because they were assured of victory, they made no room for reserve. Stalin on the other hand used his reserve very well. Unleashing them on the wary Germans time after time at just the perfect moment.

Badly trained and equipped flanks. The Germans rear guard and flanks were often guarded by poorly trained, ill motivated and equipped Hungarian ally. The Russian on many cases especially in the battle for Stalingrad concentrated their fire power on the German Hungarian flanks.. decimating them with their multi rocket launcher before encircling the 6th army (Germany never recovered from that loss)

Hitler's insanity halted the German advance on Moscow, allowing the Russians enough time to prepare a defence. Many German general would go on to say Moscow was the beginning of the end for the German eastern campaign.

Also Hitler's obsession with Stalingrad, a city with zero strategic value but sucked in lots of men and resources which should have been heading towards the more strategic oil fields of baku.. Hitler insanity was in full display when he ordered the 6th army not to attempt to break out of their encirclement even when the opportunity arose. Promising to supply the troops by air.

Even at the battle of the kursk Hitlers delay and constant postponement allowed the Russians to have time to a well laid out plan.

in all these Winter role was just an enabler for the Russian's
Fantastic analysis

2 Likes

Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by panafrican(m): 9:04pm On Mar 12, 2017
Hitler named Man of the Year, Times Magazine Year 1938
Video segment 0:00 -2:32

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MV0TtnwbkpQ

1 Like

Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by Missy89(f): 3:33pm On Mar 13, 2017
donestk:
Is Rommel overhyped?

Despite the fact that he lost North Africa, he's still being celebrated by both countrymen and adversaries. Some authors believe that he's the most overrated commander of World War II.

Share your opinion.


The most over hyped general was Monty
Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by Missy89(f): 3:35pm On Mar 13, 2017
donestk:
Oh it was Napoleon Bonaparte that led a powerful French invasion force in the 1800s but was stalled by the Soviet harsh winters...... History always repeat itself


Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by donestk(m): 6:42pm On Mar 13, 2017
Nope. Erwin Rommel was and still is.

Lady what the hell are you doing in such a thread

Missy89:



The most over hyped general was Monty
Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by donestk(m): 6:44pm On Mar 13, 2017
It's really unfair that thread as this cannot make frontpage embarassed
Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by Missy89(f): 7:27pm On Mar 13, 2017
donestk:
Nope. Erwin Rommel was and still is.

Lady what the hell are you doing in such a thread



And who the hell are you to tell me what thread a can go to is that an argument?

Monty's big failure in market garden alone is enough to put him on the list of overrated generals in ww2. Even when he defeated Rommel in El Alamein, he had overwhelming numbers and tanks.
Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by donestk(m): 7:51pm On Mar 13, 2017
Rommel's initial success got into his head.... I mean the desert fox thingy after he pushed the allies to as far as Egypt with his overwhelming firepower.

Monty carefully studied Rommel's strategy and countered him. Rommel had the respect of everyone cos he was a humane officer....


Missy89:



And who the hell are you to tell me what thread a can go to is that an argument?

Monty's big failure in market garden alone is enough to put him on the list of overrated generals in ww2. Even when he defeated Rommel in El Alamein, he had overwhelming numbers and tanks.

Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by donestk(m): 7:55pm On Mar 13, 2017
Apologies ma'am. I've never met any woman knowledgeable in WW2 history.

Missy89:



And who the hell are you to tell me what thread a can go to is that an argument?


Monty's big failure in market garden alone is enough to put him on the list of overrated generals in ww2. Even when he defeated Rommel in El Alamein, he had overwhelming numbers and tanks.
Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by donestk(m): 7:59pm On Mar 13, 2017

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIZ1h5D_Klg

Here's a video of a detailed account of the battle of the bulge. This campaign was personally conceived by Hitler himself and the United States forces bore the brunt of this offensive.
Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by Missy89(f): 8:13pm On Mar 13, 2017
donestk:
Apologies ma'am. I've never met any woman knowledgeable in WW2 history.



I figured. Interesting thread btw smiley

1 Like

Re: A Thread For Nazi and WW2 History Enthusiasts by GuyFawkes: 8:25pm On Mar 13, 2017
Missy89:



And who the hell are you to tell me what thread a can go to is that an argument?

Monty's big failure in market garden alone is enough to put him on the list of overrated generals in ww2. Even when he defeated Rommel in El Alamein, he had overwhelming numbers and tanks.
I concur Monty was hugely overrated, the Battle of El Alamein was basically won by superiority in numbers of men. Trust the british folks to tout Monty as a great general, he wasn't even made a field marshal. Market garden was catastrophic and made no sense to start with.

(1) (2) (3) (4) (Reply)

I'm African But Find It Difficult To Love Obama / Evidence Of Life On Mars With PIX / Son Of President Of CAR Beats Man And Woman In Russian City Of Kislovodsk. VIDEO

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 70
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.