Hello everyone, Atheist, Agnostic, Deist, Secular Humanist and other like minds.
I have been wondering if circumcision of the male child is a necessity,lets say if I have one today. Given that I don't subscribe to Religion any longer.


Your inputs are needed: hopefulandlord johnydon22 cloudgoddess seun Pastafarian hahn
adepeter26 hopefulLandlord

darkhorizon, I'm still undecided when it comes to circumcision, Catfishbilly what's your opinion?

Adepeter26 the "carpenter" , what's your opinion?

Well I was circumcised, I have seen an uncircumcised member and I will tell you that; I am sure glad I was circumcised.

From a medical point of view, circumcision is purely for cosmetic purposes.
However research has shown that circumcised males are less likely to contract some sexually transmitted diseases, particularly HIV.
Phimosis and Paraphimosis (a surgical emergency) are also associated with intact foreskin.
Hygiene with intact foreskin too is also a hassle.
So, my professional opinion? Snip it

CatfishBilly:
From a medical point of view, circumcision is purely for cosmetic purposes.
However research has shown that circumcised males are less likely to contract some sexually transmitted diseases, particularly HIV.
Phimosis and Paraphimosis (a surgical emergency) are also associated with intact foreskin.
Hygiene with intact foreskin too is also a hassle.
So, my professional opinion? Snip it

However,we should not also turn a blind eye to the benefits of been uncircumcised.

The fact that the foreskin has more nerve endings than the remaining peni$ is a reason we have to consider.

That means we circumcised dudes are getting less Pleasure and Orgasm from sex.

darkhorizon:


However,we should not also turn a blind eye to the benefits of been uncircumcised.

The fact that the foreskin has more nerve endings than the remaining peni$ is a reason we have to consider.

That means we circumcised dudes are getting less Pleasure and Orgasm from sex.

That is subjective, there's no way to quantify how pleasurable a sexual experience is when comparing circumcised and uncircumcised men.
Last I checked, circumcised males have no problems achieving orgasms.

CatfishBilly:

That is subjective, there's no way to quantify how pleasurable a sexual experience is when comparing circumcised and uncircumcised men.
Last I checked, circumcised males have no problems achieving orgasms.

Yeah I get your point,but removing the foreskin of the Peni$ has been likened to removing the clitoris from the V@gina.

And I am not saying circumcised males have problems achieving orgasms,all am saying is that the foreskin would lead to multiple Orgasms.

darkhorizon:


Yeah I get your point,but removing the foreskin of the Peni$ has been likened to removing the clitoris from the V@gina.

And I am not saying circumcised males have problems achieving orgasms,all am saying is that the foreskin would lead to multiple Orgasms.

Multiple orgasms? That's debatable. I get your point though.
Foreskin can't be compared to the clitoris though. A better comparison is clitoris and penissss.
They both develop from the genital tubercle. Hormones now decide if it will be a penissss or clitoris.