dalaman:
Why the excessive obsession with Dawkins ?

KingEbukasBlog:



What's your obsession with Dr. Craig , you seem to mention him every time we argue .

felixomor:
Ravi my man!
Heheheheheh
Some people will not like this.

Ebuka has done it again. Nice one.

KingEbukasBlog:


Thank you my brother .

Behold the leader of the atheist sheeples being humiliated on a live Program . How low can they go before they realize their foolishness ?

dalaman:


You always reference him and parrot his arguments ALWAYS.

KingEbukasBlog:


Thank you my brother .

Behold the leader of the atheist sheeples being humiliated on a live Program . How low can they go before they realize their foolishness ?

dalaman:


The leader of the atheist that you appointed abi?

KingEbukasBlog:



He is a very intelligent man feared by all atheists worldwide including you . I mean , take a look at Christopher Hitchens expression after being brutally pummeled by WLC .


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOJRSmrrM0o



You gotta love this guy !

felixomor:


People like dawkins never knew what hit them, with the rise of intelligent Christian apologists.
The man has faded into oblivion.
Even priests now defeat him in debates.

Because all their empty arguments are recycled and exhausted.

KingEbukasBlog:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bjhfKmRCZw


I've always told atheists that Richard Dawkins' is an incompetent High Priest of the atheist ministry . They wee not hear . See how his dumb argument made him an object of ridicule on a LIVE RADIO Programme .

Enjoy !

spacetacular:



Did I just hear Dawkins say "OH MY GOD? " He is quick to label Christians to be hypocrites simply from his questionnaire yet a simple question he was asked which was much the same as the format of his questionnaires he (Dawkins) could not answer. I guess that also makes him a hypocrite atheist.

I enjoyed the video.

dalaman:


He is a very good debater but he is not an honest debater. He stands for nothing in the real sense. He'll tell you he is defending the God of the bible but when you use the bible against his position or points he will just throw the bible completely under the bus. He has been caught twisting facts, lying about the position of scholars and changing things just to promote his beliefs.

You can search for his debate with Laurence Krauss on YouTube that was held in Australia and see how Krauss blatantly exposed him by showing him telling lies about Krauss and Dawkins.

I give it to him that he's a very good debater but he isn't an honest one at all.

Richirich713:
Lmao

KingEbukasBlog:


You can visit his website @ ReasonableFaith.com . Here he explicitly expounds his arguments for God's existence and a lot of concepts in Christendom . He also explicates the facts which he has been falsely accused of distorting . The atheist world is against him , disparaging and traducing him . We all know why , he is a torn in your flesh !

But you have to admit he destroyed Laurence Krauss too when both of them met .

WLC is a very intelligent man and very knowledgeable . I remember when he was accused of using Alan Guth and Vilenkin's research wrongly and he openly showed the audience the mail that one of them sent to him saying that he is making use of the results of the research in the right manner .

Maybe Laurence Krauss is angry that David Albert ridiculed his "Universe from Nothing" book on a daily newspaper and WLC publicly made fun of the whole thing .

Richirich713:


in that debate Kraus rather desperately used an email he received from Vilenkin, omitted parts of it. Then used that cut up email to argue against craig. Apparently parts of the email were "too technical".

Craig later got hold of the full email, then exposed Kraus , the parts he omitted exposed his misrepresentation of vilenkin, kraus is such a liar.

http://www.reasonablefaith.org/honesty-transparency-full-disclosure-and-bgv-theorem

https://winteryknight.com/2013/09/23/william-lane-craig-posts-full-text-of-vilenkin-e-mail-misrepresnted-by-lawrence-krauss/

hoMegas:
.

Richirich713:


in that debate Kraus rather desperately used an email he received from Vilenkin, omitted parts of it. Then used that cut up email to argue against craig. Apparently parts of the email were "too technical".

Craig later goet hold of the full email, then exposed Kraus , the parts he omitted exposed his misrepresentation of vilenkin, kraus is such a liar.

http://www.reasonablefaith.org/honesty-transparency-full-disclosure-and-bgv-theorem

https://winteryknight.com/2013/09/23/william-lane-craig-posts-full-text-of-vilenkin-e-mail-misrepresnted-by-lawrence-krauss/

KingEbukasBlog:



LMAO !!!! So it was the atheist who was trying to cut corners so that he could win a debate eh ? And it backfired big time !!

Dalaman , come and see your brothers ooo with their barrels of lies and deception . They are the ones actually distorting facts to mislead people .

I tell you bro , if these Christian intellectuals were like Richard Dawkins and other rabid vacuous atheists who are only good at vituperating other people , they would have mocked and ridiculed Krauss big time for his cheap and stupid motive which was to clearly deceive people .

Thank you so much for this bro . God bless you.

KingEbukasBlog:


You can visit his website @ ReasonableFaith.com . Here he explicitly expounds his arguments for God's existence and a lot of concepts in Christendom . He also explicates the facts which he has been falsely accused of distorting . The atheist world is against him , disparaging and traducing him . We all know why , he is a torn in your flesh !

But you have to admit he destroyed Laurence Krauss too when both of them met .

WLC is a very intelligent man and very knowledgeable . I remember when he was accused of using Alan Guth and Vilenkin's research wrongly and he openly showed the audience the mail that one of them sent to him saying that he is making use of the results of the research in the right manner .

Maybe Laurence Krauss is angry that David Albert ridiculed his "Universe from Nothing" book on a daily newspaper and WLC publicly made fun of the whole thing .

dalaman:


This guys clearly doesn't know what is he is talking about. Here is the video. It's hard and embarrassing to watch. Craig was caught lying right on Video.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qb1-F_UEtS4

You can skip it and start watching from the 16 min mark to the 20 min mark and you'll see how he was caught and exposed lying about a yet to be relased documentary which he made 3 diffrent podcast about. Kraus took the pains to show how Craig lied about the yet to be released documentary to his followers. I was talking of A and your man is talking about B.

dalaman:

You guys can lie? I wasn't even referring to this one.

dalaman:

I am referring to this video where Craig was cut red handed telling lies about a yet to be relased documentary starring Kraus and Dawkins. He made 3 podcast about the vidoe that wasn't even relased by them, a vidoe he didn't watch and lied that he did. Lawrence Kraus exposed him and played part of the podcast live in the debate where he lied.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qb1-F_UEtS4

KingEbukasBlog:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bjhfKmRCZw


I've always told atheists that Richard Dawkins' is an incompetent High Priest of the atheist ministry . They wee not hear . See how his dumb argument made him an object of ridicule on a LIVE RADIO Programme .

Enjoy !

KingEbukasBlog:


Are you saying that Lawrence Krauss did not intentionally leave out parts of the mail which was sent by Vilenkin in order to mislead people ? Because there is clear evidence from the sites that Krauss was doing the false accusation and defamation .