Atheism is Inherently Evil , Very Evil

1. No Good , No Evil : Atheism is responsible for the most evil and nefarious acts in the world . Atheists believe that since there is no God , there is no right and wrong .

Even Richard Dawkins has openly stated that in an atheist's world which does not involve God , there can't be good and evil , He said :

"So, in a world without God, there can be “… no evil and no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.”

2. Subjective Morality is Dangerous Atheists subscribe to a dangerous type of morality , the subjective morality . With subjective morality , atheist mass murderers justified their wicked acts against humanity . Any wicked act can be justified because morality is viewed from a personal perspective . It is arbitrary most times .



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxiAikEk2vU&t=133s




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qiw8GB3cZ5M



3. Inherently Evil Ideologies Inherently evil ideologies were founded by atheists due to their unbelief in the existence of God . Here are 4 common ideologies invented by atheists :

A Nihilism : This sees life as having no meaning , without purpose . It views the world as irrational and absurd . Atheists subscribe to this worldview. Nihilists who are atheists are responsible for the disruption of social order , iconoclasm etc . Nihilists are liable to commit suicide . They also have a strong impulsion to destroy and rebel against authority

A Communism : Communists governments hated people who believed in God . They tortured , persecuted and destroyed the lives of mostly Christians .

C Marxism : The founder , Karl Marx believes that before any revolution occurs there must be bloodshed .

D Juche Ideology The Juche Ideology was developed by the North Koreans and has been used against people who believe in the existence of God . Due to this Ideology founded based on the belief there is no God , people who believe in God has been subjected to abhorrent torture and horrible deaths . According to various media reports , there are death camps scattered accross North Korea where despicable acts are being committed against mostly Christians .

You can visit this site to see the abominable acts atheists do to Christians due to their belief in God : http://www.northkoreanchristians.com/

Bigotry ! Bigotry !! Bigotry !!! Atheism begat Bigotry !

Atheists are very bigoted . They are intolerant of your beliefs . They have been asked to mock and ridicule people who believe in God .

Here is Richard Dawkins calling on atheists to mock and ridicule people who believe in God



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51rR4aC9aMg




This is a blatant display of bigotry . Why are these people filled with so much hatred and anger ?

Atheism begat malevolence , Atheists gloat over misfortunes of people who believe in God

Here is a thread showing atheists worldwide calling for the massacre of people who believe in God

https://www.nairaland.com/3176513/atheist-murderers-past-present-murderous


Have you wondered why atheists never congratulate your on your testimonies ? They always criticize your testimonies about God's goodness in your life. And anytime anyone who believes in God shares his grief about his misfortunes , atheists come in their numbers to mock and ridicule you and the unfortunate predicament you are facing . This is because of their unbelief in the existence of God . They believe life is meaningless and purposeless that's why they celebrate when you are miserable because they don't want you to be happy .

Please beware of this evil and false belief called atheism ! It is dangerous ! It can destroy you !

Beware !

Evil atheism .

Atheism is Dogmatic ! And Atheists are not people who are open-minded


Let us now look at the standard dogmatic atheist statements earlier presented in this essay and see how each is flawed and unscientific.

A There is no scientific evidence for a Creator.

B Science proves there is no Creator.

C All things have naturalistic explanations.

THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE FOR A CREATOR is a scientifically inept statement. Science assumes all things have naturalistic explanations in accord with Occam’s Razor. Claims that science has found no evidence for a Creator implies that scientists are engaged in research to prove or disprove a Creator. Dogmatic atheists peddling this slogan open themselves up to a simple question that exposes their ignorance and presumptions: What scientific research going on now is specifically looking for evidence of a Creator? (The answer is none.)

SCIENCE PROVES THERE IS NO CREATOR is not only scientifically inept but stupid. Since science is not attempting to prove or disprove a Creator and there is no scientific research being done based on such a hypothesis, then science is proving nothing that justifies such an outlandish statement. It is no surprise that the proponents of this particular slogan become extremely defensive when asked to share this “proof” that there is no Creator. Dogmatic atheists repeatedly fall back to claiming, like the cynics they are, that they have no Burden of Proof although they claimed they have proof. The irony here is that if they had such proof, then it would be easy to prove it, so why the defensive emotional anger? The answer is self-evident, the dogmatic atheist was called on his bluff, and like a poor card player cannot maintain his cool. The intellectual hypocrisy to claim on one hand that science proves something and to become defensive and not explain how science proves it is the product of an immature and emotional mind, and such people are the ones who give science a bad name in many circles. While the dogmatic theist will hide his own ignorance and intolerance behind largely misrepresented scripture, the same holds true for the dogmatic atheist who hides behind misrepresented science. Although the dogmatic atheist will claim they have no Burden of Proof because negatives cannot be proven, the opposite is true. An affirmative statement that something can be proven not to exist is workable. The statement that science proves there is no Creator can be demonstrated if the Creator is defined in a falsifiable way and the definition shown to be fundamentally flawed. This paper will now put forward just such a definition and an examination of the definition in light of modern scientific findings. If science proves the definition flawed, then that definition is invalid.

Definition: The Creator is defined as the creator of the physical universe and the originator of biological life.

Such a definition avoids the abstractions so common in theological definitions. The above definition contains two parts and both can prove a Creator does not exist if scientific naturalistic explanations can be produced. Remember one works within the definition.

If natural forces triggered the Big Bang, then that part of the definition of the Creator being the creator of the physical universe would be refuted. Unfortunately for the dogmatic atheist, no such explanation or demonstration exists; the present Big Bang Theory, although helpful, is not the final word. What happened before the Big Bang is based solely on speculation, and it is this unknown region leading up to the Big Bang that is open to speculation -- it is here that there is room for the intervention of a Creator.

There are many unanswered, and possibly unanswerable, questions concerning the Big Bang, here are a few:

a) What conditions existed before the Big Bang?

b) Where did the energy and matter that existed before the Big Bang come from?

c) What triggered the Big Bang?

d) How and why did the universe expand?

The Big Bang was a singularity, where the laws of nature do not exist; as such, there is no naturalistic explanation and that leaves room for a Creator.

If the self-replicating molecule can be produced which triggered life and natural selection, then the second part of the definition of the Creator being the originator of life would be refuted.

Although one hears that one cannot prove a negative, the fact remains that negatives can be proven by invalidating evidence. All that is needed is a hypothesis, model, theory, or a mere statement to be invalidated. Invalidating evidence is evidence that contradicts a hypothesis, model, theory, or statement. This can be cleared up with an example: if someone claimed there was a graveyard under his new lawn, then this claim can be either validated or invalidated by digging up the lawn. Finding nothing would be invalidating evidence. Depending on how one defines a Creator, there is no invalidating evidence against the possibility of such an entity.

ALL THINGS HAVE NATURALISTIC EXPLANATIONS is an equally inept statement. There is far more unknown than known about nature as any scientist will state for the record. There are plenty of things without explanations. For example, the origin of the Big Bang and the origin of life are rooted in speculation. How does a Big Bang happen? How did life begin? What was the first self-replicating molecule? What was it composed of? These are just a few of the legion of unanswered questions in science and to claim that all things have naturalistic explanations is to expose one’s scientific ignorance.

Carl Sagan wrote the following concerning the question of atheism, God, and science:

An [dogmatic] atheist is someone who is certain that God does not exist, someone who has compelling evidence against the existence of God. I know of no such compelling evidence. Because God can be relegated to remote times and places and to ultimate causes, we would have to know a great deal more about the universe than we do now to be sure that no such God exists…."

http://www.deism.com/dogmaticatheism.htm

Atheism is a false belief ! Logic and reason has destroyed atheism !


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CulBuMCLg0&t=32s



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPCzEP0oD7I&t=36s


Evolution does not disprove God ... NOTHING DOES !!!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOJRSmrrM0o

Post 3

This thread is still inchoate . Poor Network

Please bear with me

How can one person kill millions of people? You can't do that throughout your life time.
Those men didn't do the killings themselves. There are men that did it, and majority are theist!

Killing is bad whether done by theist or atheist.

All terrorist are theists. Theism is evil

All slave traders are theist cos their so called holy book supports slavery

The greatest form of fraud and extortion is done by theists through collection of tithes. Theists are fraudsters!

Atheism and Hatred
5 and 6

Theist follow the steps of their teachers who are gay and paedophiles. Therefore all theist are sodomy and paedophiles

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_bishops

chemystery:
Theist follow the steps of their teachers who are gay and paedophiles. Therefore all theist are sodomy and paedophiles

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_bishops

Try to address the topic of the thread.

felixomor:


Try to address the topic of the thread.

Lol . He understands that addressing the thread means agreeing atheism is a false belief , evil and dogmatic . . Look at him throwing red herrings upandan . Trying to distract us .

Say no to theism. Say no to an evil god that kills his own creation
Their evil god was the first in history to solely carry out mass murder.

But they prefer to look the other way and shove that under the carpet. Wicked god shepherding wicked and biased set of fraudsters

KingEbukaNaija:


Lol . He understands that addressing the thread means agreeing atheism is a false belief , evil and dogmatic . . Look at him throwing red herrings upandan . Trying to distract us .

Exactly
maybe he has conceded that there is no viable counter argument.

chemystery:
Say no to theism. Say no to an evil god that kills his own creation
Their evil god was the first in history to solely carry out mass murder.

But they prefer to look the other way and shove that under the carpet. Wicked god shepherding wicked and biased set of fraudsters

The view that god/gods is/are evil is dystheism NOT Theism .

Please carry your ignorance commot from here .

Derogatory words is not my thing but I needed it just on this thread to create similar fallacy like the op, who should have been busy looking for his lost god or at least prove it's existence than creating fallacious threads

KingEbukaNaija:



The view that god/gods is/are evil is dystheism NOT Theism .

Please carry your ignorance commot from here .

similarly, the view that atheism is evil is called fallacy of composition NOT atheism

KingEbukaNaija:



The view that god/gods is/are evil is dystheism NOT Theism .

Please carry your ignorance commot from here .

this statement is like saying the view that god is three-in-one is Trinity NOT theism.

Your badmouthing is not new to me na. You self you know. And when you start such, I know what it implies.

Christians and theists have killed over 2 billion people


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXUxMng7Mbk

felixomor:


Try to address the topic of the thread.

topic fully addressed but not to a layman's understanding

chemystery:
topic fully addressed but not to a layman's understanding

addressed with what?
Argumentum ad hominems?

felixomor:


addressed with what?
Argumentum ad hominems?

yeah, that was intentional. An argumentum ad hominem sometimes should be addressed with same. Though not my thing

chemystery:
yeah, that was intentional. An argumentum ad hominem sometimes should be addressed with same. Though not my thing

Actually
You are the only one using ad hominems on this thread.
An opening argument is not ad hominem

felixomor:

Actually
You are the only one using ad hominems on this thread.
An opening argument is not ad hominem

People are likely to see only what they want to see.

I raise an argument, he used ad hominem.

If I start by saying all robbers are criminals that is not ad hominem. But when a robber replies saying i'm ignorant, then that's ad hominem. That is a perfect example of what happens here. But since you have chosen what to see and what not, you won't see the truth.

Una nor dey tire sha

chemystery:
People are likely to see only what they want to see.

I raise an argument, he used ad hominem.

If I start by saying all robbers are criminals that is not ad hominem. But when a robber replies saying i'm ignorant, then that's ad hominem. That is a perfect example of what happens here. But since you have chosen what to see and what not, you won't see the truth.

Truth ke,
I hear you

There are good atheists and there are bad atheists.

jonbellion:
Una nor dey tire sha

As in... Repeating the same thing over and over again. Ebuka is scared of atheists, even YAHWEH is scared.