It's grand error, to think that there exist, an entity called atheist.

An Atheist, is a debater, a conversationist, and a "discussionist". Beyond what he/she says, after participation in the subject matter of "claims of existence of Gods", an atheist ceases to exist.

As long as the subject matter isn't CLAIMS of existence of Gods, atheists don't exist.

Essentially, atheism has no conceptual, ideological or philosophical pinnings. Therefore, it presents no basis for qualification.

No one takes title of "an Awitch", on the basis of rejecting claims of existence of witches.

Whatever you call my response, to any of your unfounded claims, is your own creation, and certainly not mine.

@Akintom,

Brilliant!!! One of the reasons why it sounds so imbecilic, is the fact that if you ask different religious retards for the definition of the word "god", they will all come up with different replies!!! They don't even know what a god is!!! How can a Hindu describe god as a rat, then another describe him as a mosquito, then another say that god is a stream, and yet have the guts to call me "atheist", for not believing in something that has diffferent meanings to different brands of lunatics practicing different brands of lunacy?!!!


“...if you ask me whether or not I'm an atheist, I wouldn't even answer. I would first want an explanation of what it is that I'm supposed not to believe in, and I've never seen an explanation.” ---Professor Noam Chimsky