[b] Australia will come to America's aid if North Korea launches attack against US
Prime Minsiter Malcolm Turnbull made the sensational statement on Friday
'If there is an attack on Australia or the US, each of us will come to the other's aid'
'In terms of defence we are joined at the hip,' Mr Turnbull said on Friday morning


Australia will come to America's aid if North Korea launches an attack against the US, Malcolm Turnbull has confirmed.

The prime minister discussed the unfolding situation with US Vice President Mike Pence on Thursday night.

'We have an ANZUS agreement and if there is an attack on Australia or the United States then each of us will come to the other's aid,' Mr Turnbull told 3AW radio on Friday.

'In terms of defence we are joined at the hip.'

Asked about Tony Abbott's call for Australia to urgently consider a missile defence system, Mr Turnbull said the country is constantly reviewing its position.

He said the advice from Defence is there is a no benefit to deploying a US-style 'Terminal High Altitude Area Defence' (THAD) system.

'The reason for that is that THAD's designed to provide protection for relatively small areas against short-to-intermediate range missiles,' he said.
The Vice President again told the prime minister that the US sees the way to resolve the situation as being through economic sanctions, despite Donald Trump threats of 'fire and fury'.

'That is the preferred way to deal with it but of course if North Korea decides to carry out some of its violent threats then obviously terrible consequences will follow,' Mr Turnbull said.

Labor leader Bill Shorten believes nations need to concentrate on encouraging Pyongyang to de-escalate tensions.

'The big concern is actually not the United States, it's the bellicose and provocative actions of the North Korean dictatorship,' he told reporters in Canberra.

Mr Shorten insists the government and opposition share the same concerns about North Korean leader Kim Jong-un's pursuit of nuclear missiles.

'Australians should be reassured that on this matter of North Korea and our national security, the politics of Labor and Liberal are working absolutely together,' he said.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4780340/Turnbull-says-Australia-fight-against-North-Korea.html[/b]

Australian Prime minister, turnbull.

NorthKorea self

When USA and the Allied forces invade North Korea.... it would be a story of... There was a country.
That was how Japan decided to try shit against USA,and till today,that area is still producing mutants... Lol

eezeribe:
When USA and the Allied forces invade North Korea.... it would be a story of... There was a country.
That was how Japan decided to try shit against USA,and till today,that area is still producing mutants... Lol

.


How can you invade more than 1m+ troops?

Do you think NK is a child play?

Invading NK is a suicidal mission.

NK is well armed to the teeth.

You just want Kim Jong Un to commit " Holocaust " again.


USA knows the implication of invading NK.

Australia can't stand NK for war without US support but NK can stand US(without allies).


With all that is happening, NK is ready for war that is why is a warmonger nation.

War is NK hobby.

EdoBoy90:
.


How can you invade more than 1m+ troops?

Do you think NK is a child play?

Invading NK is a suicidal mission.

NK is well armed to the teeth.

You just want Kim Jong Un to commit " Holocaust " again.


USA knows the implication of invading NK.

Australia can't stand NK for war without US support but NK can stand US(without allies).


With all that is happening, NK is ready for war that is why is a warmonger nation.

War is NK hobby.

USA does not need to battle every single of their 1m+ soldiers to win the war. They don't even need nukes. No matter how big an anaconda is, once the head is chopped off, the body is useless and US have that might.
Eliminating the dictator will make the others/most fall in line. I'm sure many North-Koreans are tired of living a subdued life under a ruthless tyrant already, hence the frequent but risky defection to the South. When you have weary, hungry and subjugated citizenry, doomsday is imminent.

JaffyJoe:


USA does not need to battle every single of their 1m+ soldiers to win the war. They don't even need nukes. No matter how big an anaconda is, once the head is chopped off, the body is useless and US have that might.
Eliminating the dictator will make the others/most fall in line. I'm sure many North-Koreans are tired of living a subdued life under a ruthless tyrant already, hence the frequent but risky defection to the South. When you have weary, hungry and subjugated citizenry, doomsday is imminent.

Like US and all her allies has been successful in Syria abi?
Funny you, US can only bully countries that has no ability to strike back,Its Simple.
Even McCain who be war supporter that removed of Saddam and Qaddafi, changed mouth about NK.
Have you even witnessed a Civil unrest before?
You think 1M armed force is a joke?US will just drop bombs and NK will be sleep abi?
SK and Japanese are within reach of NK nuke strike and thats the same reason US is still afraid to attack Iran.
In your mind Russia and China will watch while US invade her Borders right?
Russia is opening back her base in CUBA and US is already running to CUBA.
NK will never attack US, its simple.
US attack on NK will trigger the war of our time.
WW1 was trigger just by a mistake.
WW2 was almost the same.

I feel you man but let's be real population don't count. As with all wars, kill the king, control his army. Britain defeated the ruling Muslim house in India prior to the partioning and went on to control that vast landmass and its nearly a billion population for many centuries until independence in 1947 and nothing happened.

Kim is a small fry who can be taken out without firing a single shot and nothing will happen. US is just hoping they (NK) strikes first. You think China or Russia gives a hoot if he's eliminated? Everybody in the world knows the North Korean problem is a situation that need curbing but many don't want to directly get their hands dirty and complicitly end up on the wrong side of history.

NK isn't worth a military confrontation between Russia-USA-China. The economic stakes are just far too high. What was the ultimate aim in Iraq or Libya? The answer is simply regime change next to oil and this was achieved but what do i know tho

EdoBoy90:
.


How can you invade more than 1m+ troops?

Do you think NK is a child play?

Invading NK is a suicidal mission.

NK is well armed to the teeth.

You just want Kim Jong Un to commit " Holocaust " again.


USA knows the implication of invading NK.

Australia can't stand NK for war without US support but NK can stand US(without allies).


With all that is happening, NK is ready for war that is why is a warmonger nation.

War is NK hobby.

north korea can stand US?
Lolzz. Are you related to Basketmouth?

seunny4lif:


Like US and all her allies has been successful in Syria abi?
Funny you, US can only bully countries that has no ability to strike back,Its Simple.
Even McCain who be war supporter that removed of Saddam and Qaddafi, changed mouth about NK.
Have you even witnessed a Civil unrest before?
You think 1M armed force is a joke?US will just drop bombs and NK will be sleep abi?
SK and Japanese are within reach of NK nuke strike and thats the same reason US is still afraid to attack Iran.
In your mind Russia and China will watch while US invade her Borders right?
Russia is opening back her base in CUBA and US is already running to CUBA.
NK will never attack US, its simple.
US attack on NK will trigger the war of our time.
WW1 was trigger just by a mistake.
WW2 was almost the same.

tell him abeg. he has been brainwashed

Mazeltovscotty:

north korea can stand US?
Lolzz. Are you related to Basketmouth?

.


Yes ooo. Did US win 1950-1953 Korean war ?

If there is an outbreak of war in the Korean peninsula, South Korea will record the highest casualties. Seoul houses more 10 million people and NK missile range are pointed to Seoul, 4000 rounds.

You are not pitying south Korea at all. South Koreans are very wise, they know a war with NK versus US will end up at Seoul turning to ash.

That was South Korean President said " they don't want war at the Korean peninsula ."

US knows Kim is not truthworthy. He can't put his nuclear nukes at the negotiating table.


Kim will not submit. An attack to Kim and his people is a nuclear war.

EdoBoy90:
.


Yes ooo. Did US win 1950-1953 Korean war ?

If there is an outbreak of war in the Korean peninsula, South Korea will record the highest casualties. Seoul houses more 10 million people and NK missile range are pointed to Seoul, 4000 rounds.

You are not pitying south Korea at all. South Koreans are very wise, they know a war with NK versus US will end up at Seoul turning to ash.

That was South Korean President said " they don't want war at the Korean peninsula ."

US knows Kim is not truthworthy. He can't put his nuclear nukes at the negotiating table.


Kim will not submit. An attack to Kim and his people is a nuclear war.

NO!! Kim does not need to submit or surrender. After all, Assad is still on seat enjoying Russian support while other countries are architecturing his country with all sort of missiles while millions of people are fleeing day and night. The population of people in a local government in Bayelsa state is more than the entire number of people in syria including those who are still trying to flee.
So I pray Kim doesn't surrender while the super powers (US Russia china Germany Britain e.t.c) turn his country to a nuclear test field.
As for Japan and South korea. For how long or how many minutes will it take Kim to destroy these countries before the swift and heavy response from US?

JaffyJoe:
I feel you man but let's be real population don't count. As with all wars, kill the king, control his army. Britain defeated the ruling Muslim house in India prior to the partioning and went on to control that vast landmass and its nearly a billion population for many centuries until independence in 1947 and nothing happened.

Kim is a small fry who can be taken out without firing a single shot and nothing will happen. US is just hoping they (NK) strikes first. You think China or Russia gives a hoot if he's eliminated? Everybody in the world knows the North Korean problem is a situation that need curbing but many don't want to directly get their hands dirty and complicitly end up on the wrong side of history.

NK isn't worth a military confrontation between Russia-USA-China. The economic stakes are just far too high. What was the ultimate aim in Iraq or Libya? The answer is simply regime change next to oil and this was achieved but what do i know tho

problem is u guys dont get it any unrest in NK will destabilize china russia and many parts of asia 25 fucking million refugees na beans?? look at what refugee crisis from syria is doing to europe..china will NEVER allow that shit to happen in its backyard..considering the part china plays in world enconomy..and secondly a divided korean pennisula is what both china and russia wants...china and russia dont will not allow that because a united korean pennisula is a threat to china and its eastern european neigbor russia look at how close NK is to china ..then if Nk and Sk unite being an ally of america is assured u think china will allow a powerful united north and south korea who are american ally so close to them NO even if something is to be done on Nk issue it is China that will do it and china will make sure it installs a puppet that is also anti american

Mazeltovscotty:

NO!! Kim does not need to submit or surrender. After all, Assad is still on seat enjoying Russian support while other countries are architecturing his country with all sort of missiles while millions of people are fleeing day and night. The population of people in a local government in Bayelsa state is more than the entire number of people in syria including those who are still trying to flee.
So I pray Kim doesn't surrender while the super powers (US Russia china Germany Britain e.t.c) turn his country to a nuclear test field.
As for Japan and South korea. For how long or how many minutes will it take Kim to destroy these countries before the swift and heavy response from US?

u guys talk like ignorant folks as if america is located in mars or is untouchable?? do you knw that Nk has nuclear missiles with america in range?? we are not yet talking of Sk and Japan at their back yard... America will respond yes but one sure thing is that NK will nuke it and her allies first a nuked america Sk and japan and a nuked Nk who has more to lose? people think this north korea matter is beans but ask americans its asian allies and Trump they will tell you its a hard nut to crack its a fly on the balls any mistake they will be bleeped up

chukagates:
u guys talk like ignorant folks as if america is located in mars or is untouchable?? do you knw that Nk has nuclear missiles with america in range?? we are not yet talking of Sk and Japan at their back yard... America will respond yes but one sure thing is that NK will nuke it and her allies first a nuked america Sk and japan and a nuked Nk who has more to lose? people think this north korea matter is beans but ask americans its asian allies and Trump they will tell you its a hard nut to crack its a fly on the balls any mistake they will be bleeped up

you tried but still ended up talking like a post-war era boy.

The salient points in my comment are: and these are the points you should attack.
Why do you want to nuke a country you won't live to celebrate?

And talking about missiles range and payloads delivery, for how long will Nk be able hold off US?