yungsmart:
Aswear Xiaomi fvck up Big time. SD 439 this is a complete downgrade.

ZesusHVWritter:

Are you complaining about the chipset due to its figure count or you have done a comparison between it and the previous 632 found on the redmi 7?

yungsmart:


Lol I know it is not about numbers even adreno 530 is better than adreno 610. But go check the comparison with 632 at kimovil.com

ZesusHVWritter:

I don't need to check. I know, it's why I asked if you knew, if you have checked the comparison not only on that site you just quoted but on other site. Then I ask, what are you complaining about? Other than 632 is bigger than 439 in terms of figure?

yungsmart:
Aswear Xiaomi fvck up Big time. SD 439 this is a complete downgrade.

Ayebaeapretai:
Haq Haq Haq Sd 439

yungsmart:
Aswear Xiaomi fvck up Big time. SD 439 this is a complete downgrade.

drjprince:
as if tecno and infinix can use this on their flagship self,this phone still stand its ground with tecno flagship

Obaiyski:

I think They only want Redmi8 to compete in prize with phones on the same segment like Hot8 with P22 chip, that's the reason they reduce the chip and now added few features that are not in Redmi 7

yungsmart:

Bigger than in figure lol. Now I know you don't know. 632 scored 119000 points in antutu compared to 439 85000 points. It is not just bigger it is better

ZesusHVWritter:

Okay let me do the usual.
The sd439 is less energy consuming because it was manufactured on 12nm semiconductor why the 632 is produced on 14mn.

The sd439 has a better architecture of big little chip arrangement with 4x1.95 and 4x1.45 cores alignment, this helps the chipset to designate proper work load according to demand. Tasks like calling, Facebooking and other less intensive tasks are executed and maintained by the 4x1.45 cores which reduces memory and energy consumption.

The sd632 has a more parallel core arrangement. With 4x1.8 and 4x1.8 cores, these core segmentation means the chipset is less memory and energy efficient, but can perform even the less demanding of tasks with high cores which enables the cores score those high ratings you found on antutu and other ratings.
But in everyday use, the 439 will do much better all round when compared to the 632.

I can go on, but when discussing about lowend devices the major focus is on battery and memory. And the sd 439 does it better than 632 or any chip from snapdragon lower than the sd636.

Like I initially stated, what worries you is the difference in figure and you confirmed it by quoting the the antutu score of both chipset then stopped there, forgetting every other aspects that makes up a good chipset.
Xiaomi is a global company, with a lot of things to consider before launching a device. The redmi 8 is coming to triple the performance of the redmi 7 by taking everything to a better level.
What am actually waiting before I give the redmi 8 my complete support is the camera shoot out test against midrange devices powered by the sd655 and above.
But so far, I am not disappointed yet.
In fact, I will recommend the redmi 8 and note 8 to anyone, but I wouldn't recommend the note 8 pro to anyone because I personally don't see any edge mtk has over a snapdragon chypset in terms of performance and battery management.

ZesusHVWritter:

Okay let me do the usual.
The sd439 is less energy consuming because it was manufactured on 12nm semiconductor why the 632 is produced on 14mn.

The sd439 has a better architecture of big little chip arrangement with 4x1.95 and 4x1.45 cores alignment, this helps the chipset to designate proper work load according to demand. Tasks like calling, Facebooking and other less intensive tasks are executed and maintained by the 4x1.45 cores which reduces memory and energy consumption.

The sd632 has a more parallel core arrangement. With 4x1.8 and 4x1.8 cores, these core segmentation means the chipset is less memory and energy efficient, but can perform even the less demanding of tasks with high cores which enables the cores score those high ratings you found on antutu and other ratings.
But in everyday use, the 439 will do much better all round when compared to the 632.

I can go on, but when discussing about lowend devices the major focus is on battery and memory. And the sd 439 does it better than 632 or any chip from snapdragon lower than the sd636.

Like I initially stated, what worries you is the difference in figure and you confirmed it by quoting the the antutu score of both chipset then stopped there, forgetting every other aspects that makes up a good chipset.
Xiaomi is a global company, with a lot of things to consider before launching a device. The redmi 8 is coming to triple the performance of the redmi 7 by taking everything to a better level.
What am actually waiting before I give the redmi 8 my complete support is the camera shoot out test against midrange devices powered by the sd655 and above.
But so far, I am not disappointed yet.
In fact, I will recommend the redmi 8 and note 8 to anyone, but I wouldn't recommend the note 8 pro to anyone because I personally don't see any edge mtk has over a snapdragon chipset in terms of performance and battery management.

yungsmart:



I get you it is coming with Sony imx 362 . Now you are so engaging and comfortable to converse with unlike one dilapidated brained brined itzneowizy

yungsmart:



I get you it is coming with Sony imx 362 . Now you are so engaging and comfortable to converse with unlike me that has a dilapidated brained brined

yungsmart:
Aswear Xiaomi fvck up Big time. SD 439 this is a complete downgrade.

CharlesJok3r:

I read the Redmi 8 3/32gb will be selling for $100 if that is true then this is a very good bargain.
I don't think MI fvcked up considering the price they will be selling this Redmi 8. Plus the Redmi 8 is equipped with USB type C, 18W charging, 5000mAh battery...

CPU & GPU on Redmi 7 is better but Redmi 7 is more expensive

https://versus.com/en/qualcomm-snapdragon-439-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-632

Itzneowizy:

Ayebaeapretai:
Zero 6 has SD 636 so what are you saying ?

Olanivalue:
baba rubbish is rubbish why will I use my money to buy rotten � tomato. Abeg no give speech here..

yungsmart:


Antutu scores merges everything together That doesn't stop it from being a downgrade. Because you just focused on the CPU neglecting the GPU which will be unable to play heavy games

ZesusHVWritter:

Indulge me. What gpu is the 439 using and what gpu is the 632 using and how do they differ in performance?
Just to be exact. Have you seen a detailed gaming video review of a device housing the sd439 vs a device being powered by 632?.

So you know, the 439 or 632 are not made for midrange or high-midrange devices expecting either of these chipsets to do well while playing heavy games means you have misplaced priorities when considering a device that is powered by these chipsets.
There is a reason why lowend devices are powered by these chipsets and not midrange devices.

yungsmart:


You still don't get my point, you know what I give up

Adioss