sagieramos:


There is a big difference between "replacing a generator part from another generator" and "developing an actual generator from the scratch"

Fact: Do you know humans have not been able to design a new type of protein (except the ones already available in nature) talk more reviving more complicated damage DNA which is the source of life?

LegendHero:


An artificial heart is a device that replaces the heart. Artificial hearts are typically used to bridge the time to heart transplantation, or to permanently replace the heart in case heart transplantation is impossible.

The first artificial heart to be successfully implanted in a human was the Jarvik-7 in 1982, designed by a team including Willem Johan Kolff and Robert Jarvik.

Is this not synthetic enough? Guy science is way above limitation, that it hasn't happened now does not mean it's impossible.

Attached is the image below!

sagieramos:
Have they figure out the process of reviving damaged DNA behind cells and organs formation that was caused by Adam?
If they haven't, God's kingdom is our only hope for everlasting life

LegendHero:


My question to you is that because it has not been created yet, can we conclude it is not possible?

naijaguy123456:
It’s very very possible. Who would have thought we will have driverless cars, apple phone etc now including airplanes .

keenn:



What if someone said, a time would come when we will hold a metal and communicate with each other and even see ourselves on that metal dispute disranches away.

What if someone said a metal will be carrying people around in the air.

Or man will go to moon and come back.

Never say nevery, science is still in it rudimentary stage.

Felixamos:


Guy after this post if you argue again, I won't reply you..
The link below is the steps of inserting an artificial heart
https://syncardia.com/clinicians/home/

Now follow that link and tell me the part where the heart was removed and replaced with a device.. Also take your time to read what a heart is made up of.. And also tell me if you see any part the scientist claim the heart can give back life to a person..

kevoh:
From comments on this thread, it's quite obvious many religious Nigerians think science is the enemy, to the extent of rubbishing scientific breakthroughs that have helped humanity. I wish these fellas can be teleported to the stone age era to better appreciate life without the fruits of modern day science.

jasontrigga:



Damaged DNA can regenerate

sagieramos:


Well, the evidence from creations is just too glaring that only the creator can be responsible for our perfection or living forever. The Bible has attested to this truth.

“He will actually swallow up death forever, and the Lord Jehovah will certainly wipe the tears from all faces.”—Isa. 25:8.

popsy2:


All I can say is that this is a fraud.

LegendHero:


Well we have different religion in the world. Why should we limit our thinking to the tenets of the bible alone?

Did the bible also talk about heart transplant, planes, ships, submarines, kidney transplant, etc.

Because the Bible did not mention it does not mean it's impossible!

Felixamos:


Your comment is contentless and very myopic.. You that appreciate science can not differentiate between technology and human breath.. You are claiming posh.. Mtchewwwwwwwwww...

dotlanre:

Its no fraud. If you know what the whites are doing about AI in there deep underground labs,seriously its no joke.
Try and watch this;ALCHEMY:THE RISE OF THE BEAST.

LegendHero:


@ your bolded words, I never think I said a synthetic heart can bring the dead back to life. Don't twist my words. What I said is that in the future that might be possible because presently they are able to use a synthetic heart to sustain life.

Your link is saying something else from a different context, You are digressing and saying something that is not of interest in this argument.


"First clinical implantation of a total artificial heart
On 4 April 1969, Domingo Liotta and Denton A. Cooley replaced a dying man's heart with a mechanical heart inside the chest at The Texas Heart Institute in Houston as a bridge for a transplant. The man woke up and began to recover. After 64 hours, the pneumatic-powered artificial heart was removed and replaced by a donor heart. However thirty-two hours after transplantation, the man died of what was later proved to be an acute pulmonary infection, extended to both lungs, caused by fungi, most likely caused by an immunosuppressive drug complication.

The original prototype of Liotta-Cooley artificial heart used in this historic operation is prominently displayed in the Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of American History "Treasures of American History" exhibit in Washington, D.C."

Mind you, the artificial heart is always created from silicone!

Colorado1:
Mad ohhhh
Na dis one gan gan dem dey call 'MISSION IMPOSSIBLE' ...na wetin God use take pass man be dis. That's why God is the ALMIGHTY and he didn't give scientists power for dis one. E don tey wey dem dey preserve people sef, but d sad truth is these peeps are going to be preserved for life..but can't be brought back to life.

Felixamos:
I can bet my life that no matter how science improves, it can never and would never bring back the dead.. There are things that can only be done by God and bringing back the dead is one of them.. Even Satan sef no fit..

There's a limit to everything and there's a limit science can never cross..

Don't be surprised when this useless Nigeria govt would come out tomorrow and say "the ministry of science would be investing in brain freeze soon"...

kevoh:

One of the cavemen that should be teleported to stone age era spotted!

kevoh:
From comments on this thread, it's quite obvious many religious Nigerians think science is the enemy, to the extent of rubbishing scientific breakthroughs that have helped humanity. I wish these fellas can be teleported to the stone age era to better appreciate life without the fruits of modern day science.

Felixamos:


I may not agree with @legendhero on his opinions but I can say for sure that he's an intelligent guy with the way he portrays his argument and that's why I'm still on this topic with him.. But you, I would never argue you.

kellystone87:


How much are these chairs

Felixamos:



Btw what is the topic of this thread?

kevoh:
From comments on this thread, it's quite obvious many religious Nigerians think science is the enemy, to the extent of rubbishing scientific breakthroughs that have helped humanity. I wish these fellas can be teleported to the stone age era to better appreciate life without the fruits of modern day science.

LegendHero:


Brother I said "If the function of the heart can be duplicated by human" in the below screenshot.

The scientist was able to duplicate the function of the heart using a synthetic material from the example I indicated in my earlier posts. However, the heart alone is not what guarantees life because there is actually a lot of process that can lead to death itself.

If we continue arguing, we will just be going around in circles coz I will still stand on my own ideology that "Science can actually raise the dead or sustain life to mitigate death due to biological occurrence that in the coming years, whether a thousand or million years, I don't know".

kimlee3:


They keep trashing science, but can't even leave a day without it. Science will continue to have breakthroughs and improve human life. The word "IMPOSSIBLE" is just a mind state

Felixamos:


And I still stand on my opinion that, science has improved and would keep on improving but it can never replicate life(as in breath)...
#peace..

Blindersoff:


I updated my post so read the last parts.

You are actually speaking in my favour. Man is not a robot despite coming preprogrammed for certain functions. Man is actually a living, emotional being with sensory perception. A robot is not.

So only robots require such newer versions because they do not learn on the go and only give out what has been put in them.

God is above man and thus man is above robots

LegendHero:


If we are to go by the holy books alone without science coming in to help save humanity, we would all have perished.

Without science, the humans would have long been extinct.

Felixamos:


And I still stand on my opinion that, science has improved and would keep on improving but it can never replicate life(as in breath)...
#peace..

Blindersoff:

Stop trying to say what has not been said here. Nobody is saying science is the enemy on the contrary the science brainwashed ilk here think Religion is the enemy.

Blindersoff:


I actually believe science is complimentary and could not have existed without nature first being there. To me Science is a parasite which only exists because nature exists. Nature gave science life as it were.

Blindersoff:


Anything science does is simply it utlilizing nature to our advantage [s]and for this i give it a C but to God he gets an A+ for deliberately giving science the tools with which to exist.[/s]