Is it easier to hack an iPhone?

When you're buying a handset, it's typical to look at your monitor, size, the number of cameras, processors, RAM, or the battery when you are buying a cell phone. The pages of the operating system are usually clear, loyal to Android, and the followers of the apple company, either by fashion or by tradition. This factor is generally not crucial when determining anything between Android and iOS that can be changed, given the frequent controversies over security and privacy. You can change the iPhone location for hackers.

The United States Government is continuing its struggle this year against strong encryption.
To facilitate access to data from devices, the Executive requires technology companies to include backdoors in smartphones. For users, is that safe? Need those back doors for a terminal to hack? Both answers are bad.

A new study to the public shows that these back doors are also not required by the law enforcement authorities. Allegedly, the US government wants to end cryptography to fight terrorism, but, as it already has tools to bypass the security mole, theorize media like Motherboard that they are actually going to remove these obstacles to mass surveillance of its citizens.


The paper by the United States National Institute of Standards and Technology ( NIST) reveals that the U.S. government has had more success in hacking a mobile iPhone than Android for years. Tools for the use of data extraction, transfer, and analysis devices such as the Cellebrite company have revealed which are more difficult to violate systems and which also look at the 'zero days' (some vulnerabilities not yet publicized) of the governments.

The report states that devices that correspond to those used by the US authorities in the test are not fully capable of extracting large quantities of information from reverse engineering tools. Furthermore, the more recent the software version of the terminal is, the harder it is to decrypt its content.