Meet this piece of human garbage right here:
Robert H. Richards the IV.
His case is one of the worst examples of the biased American justice system.

Richards was convicted of raping his three-year-old daughter....yes you read that right...his own three year old daughter...

Here’s the annoying banger!!!!!

He didn't serve a day in prison for such a crime.
Now, this isn’t a case where he escaped being caught, or managed to pull of a bad ass acquittal. The bastardd pled guilty. Yes. This worm in human skin admitted what he did.

But the equally basttard judge sentenced him to probation and counseling, and paid a $4,000 fine. For raping a a 3 year old.

Now here’s the argument in court...

At sentencing, his lawyer argued that he “wouldn't fare well” in prison. And the judge, pathetically agreed that he should not be in prison. Therefore, sentenced him to eight years probation...

I mean, if there's anything on earth that a person should be in prison for, this pretty much has to be it, right? We have poor people going to prison for years for shoplifting, and this monster gets probation for raping a toddler.

If you guessed that he was from an obscenely wealthy family, congratulations, you have a basic sense of how the country works. “Ghana must go has changed hands” sadly it happens even in the mighty civilized United States


Richards is one of the heirs to the DuPont chemical fortune. The DuPonts are an insanely and dangerously rich. That’s not all, they are a politically connected bunch of bastardss.

They have a long history of covering up what happens within their family. Apparently this dude up there has never worked a day in his life, and probably never faced a real consequence either.

Even when his case got to the police, somehow the press never picked up on the story, and the courts cooperated in quietly taking care of it.


I've long known that justice systems treat the rich and the poor very differently, but usually it's a little more subtle. This is so insanely blatant that it's hard to believe.

There are cases where I can get that it's just a matter of having money to spend on lawyers and investigators and professional witnesses, and of judges and juries being biased toward people who are monied, educated and well-spoken.

I have to assume that, at some point in the process, someone was bribed, or blackmailed, or threatened, or some other improper pressure was brought to bear.

There's simply no excuse for him not being on prison right now....... this is a three year old’s right being violated right in the open.....





There has to be another judgement elsewhere.. cos on this earth..Things no just balance at all. Some people just have all the advantage



Lalasticlala... how far

Shey na you go come the take care of the child while the man is in prison ?

What the man did was wrong but bro,9 months probation is ok.

Abi you wan kee am?

If you wan kee am enter motor go USA go do am yourself and stop disturbing us Abel.

advanceDNA:
Now here’s the argument in court...

At sentencing, his lawyer argued that he “wouldn't fare well” in prison. And the judge, pathetically agreed that he should not be in prison. Therefore, sentenced him to eight years probation...

I mean, if there's anything on earth that a person should be in prison for, this pretty much has to be it, right? We have poor people going to prison for years for shoplifting, and this monster gets probation for raping a toddler.