pansophist:
My rule is simple, and it is that I won't hit you first, but I promise, I will hit you last.

Only a child will hit me and I will overlook it, not an adult that understands the concept of consequence, responsibility, and civility. Questions like this give unscrupulous women the effrontery to assault men, with the belief that it is only men that should uphold the integrity of being non-violent, but not them.

Biglittlelois:



So many potential domestic violent men here,

If you were saying this instead of typing, spittle would have filled everywhere, no be fight calm down

Do you want to compare the level of strength used by a female to a male? If a lady hits a guy first, he must have said terrible things to her, and she reacted with her hands, a reflex action, you hitting her afterwards is deliberate, which is wrong, and the level of hurt or pains she'd feel from your hit cannot be compared to hers, and yours can lead to intense bleeding or other physical bodily harm,

You guys should be sensible and logical in reasoning just cos you want to prove a baseless point to the female gender, totally uncalled for.

Biglittlelois:



So many potential domestic violent men here,

If you were saying this instead of typing, spittle would have filled everywhere, no be fight calm down

Do you want to compare the level of strength used by a female to a male? If a lady hits a guy first, he must have said terrible things to her, and she reacted with her hands, a reflex action, you hitting her afterwards is deliberate, which is wrong, and the level of hurt or pains she'd feel from your hit cannot be compared to hers, and yours can lead to intense bleeding or other physical bodily harm,

You guys should be sensible and logical in reasoning just cos you want to prove a baseless point to the female gender, totally uncalled for.

pansophist:


The quality of your brain is really low, to put it mildly, and your response is an evidence to that effect. Even more shameful you've assumed yourself as being logical. You, logical. Lol

So if you're justifying violence against men because "he did something to warrant it", will you also justify it if its between women ? If your answer is yes, why should violence be the answer?, if it's no, then why is it acceptable if the victim is a man ?

angelfallz:
A potential domestic violent woman spotted.

You want to assault men without consequences right?

I know some men that are willing to be assaulted and they wouldn't assault you back, these are their monikers
stanliwise
olisaEze
angelfrost

You can assault them all you want, they won't hit back.
Your type of men.

stanliwise:

Stop looking for attention

pansophist:


The quality of your brain is really low, to put it mildly, and your response is an evidence to that effect. Even more shameful you've assumed yourself as being logical. You, logical. Lol

So if you're justifying violence against men because "he did something to warrant it", will you also justify it if its between women ? If your answer is yes, why should violence be the answer?, if it's no, then why is it acceptable if the victim is a man ?

angelfallz:
A potential domestic violent woman spotted.

You want to assault men without consequences right?

I know some men that are willing to be assaulted and they wouldn't assault you back, these are their monikers
stanliwise
olisaEze
angelfrost

You can assault them all you want, they won't hit back.
Your type of men.

Biglittlelois:


Did you read my second paragragh at all? You cannot compare a reflex action to a deliberate attack, you cannot equate the force of a female hand to that of a male,

But since you want to keep hitting females because they hit first, like a child, as you don't even live in Nigeria where most mistake of men get away with domestic violence, pls do so or continue wherever you are, till she bleeds, get injured, or dies, when you're jailed, maybe you'll get sense by then.

pansophist:


Yea, I read all your response including second paragraph, but I choosed to ask you those questions (that you didn't even answer) because answering them will reveal the errors in your comment.

Again, you're implying that women are only violent to men only because men have done something to deserve it, this is pure nonsense. Women can be violent because some humans are violent, its not a male thing. A good example of female violence to men is Johnny Depp and Amber Heard.  I won't go into the details of that, but the whole world know she was violent and harmed him even if he did nothing. He never touched her.

If a woman knows that she is weaker than a man, then the smart thing is to not attack a man. It is very common in Lagos for some women to slap bus cknductirs with the belief that he won't retaliate. Is this what you encourage ? stop playing the ostrich.

angelfallz:


Nah I'm not. I'm just calling your attention to a suitable woman for your principles.

And also to expose you to how women twist such principles.

Shey you read what she wrote? How she defended women assaulting men because the man must have said terrible things to the woman.

Do you want to compare the level of strength used by a female to a male? If a lady hits a guy first, he must have said terrible things to her, and she reacted with her hands, a reflex action,

you hitting her afterwards is deliberate, which is wrong, and the level of hurt or pains she'd feel from your hit cannot be compared to hers, and yours can lead to

You guys should be sensible and logical in reasoning just cos you want to prove a baseless point to the female gender, totally uncalled for.

ShaqFu:

Ha! I'm sure most feminist won't reason along this line. In their demented thought process, a man should hold back and let a woman physically assault him, why? Because he's a man. Imagine such narrow minded way of reasoning.

pansophist:


The quality of your brain is really low, to put it mildly, and your response is an evidence to that effect. Even more shameful you've assumed yourself as being logical. You, logical. Lol

So if you're justifying violence against men because "he did something to warrant it", will you also justify it if its between women ? If your answer is yes, why should violence be the answer?, if it's no, then why is it acceptable if the victim is a man ?

pansophist:


Yea, I read all your responses including the second paragraph, but I chose to ask you those questions (that you didn't even answer) because answering them will reveal the errors in your comment.

Again, you're implying that women are only violent to men only because men have done something to deserve it, this is pure nonsense. Women can be violent because some humans are violent, it's not a male thing. A good example of female violence to men is Johnny Depp and Amber Heard.  I won't go into the details of that, but the whole world knows she was violent and harmed him even if he did nothing. He never touched her.

If a woman knows that she is weaker than a man, then the smart thing is to not attack a man. It is very common in Lagos for some women to slap bus conductors with the belief that they won't retaliate. Is this what you encourage? stop playing the ostrich.

OlayemiAshraf:
Yes the question remained the same ""should a man physically assault a woman that assaulted him ..( I'll really like to know everyone opinions about this article.......

Lalasticlala Mynd44

richeeyo:
No never, a lady once slapped me in school in front of everyone, due to some class arguments and I kept cool, packed her things from the floor, the next week, we were having sex

Evergreen2x:
Your stupidity is legendary

Regex:


This is a big trap. She would jump.

Biglittlelois:



You are not getting what I'm saying/typing,

If a woman hits you, simply give her a stern warning then walk away, there are many men roting in jail today because they choose to be the boss by hitting back, don't even compare it with women cos it is very few, and those women in jail used harmful objects, not their hands, there are many men in jail for just using their hands on a woman, not to talk of harmful objects, that is why I say you do not have to retaliate, simply walk away to avoid "had I know", hitting back to prove a baseless point is stupidity, it can put you in trouble.

richeeyo:
No never, a lady once slapped me in school in front of everyone, due to some class arguments and I kept cool, packed her things from the floor, the next week, we were having sex

cococandy:
Just so you people know, a woman can kill a man. So, if you’re in danger, please don’t let the notion that one should never lay hands on a woman lead to your death.
As long as your response is commensurate with the level of violence dished to you, nobody can reasonably fault your actions.

I mean if someone slaps you and you pummel them to shreds, it’s not commensurate. However if someone is holding actively brandishing a knife about to stab you and you shoot them, you’re well within reasonable measures of self defense.

Somethings are just common sense.

angelfallz:
A potential domestic violent woman spotted.

You want to assault men without consequences right?

I know some men that are willing to be assaulted and they wouldn't assault you back, these are their monikers
stanliwise
olisaEze
angelfrost

You can assault them all you want, they won't hit back.
Your type of men.

Do you want to compare the level of strength used by a female to a male? And the level of hurt or pains she'd feel from your hit cannot be compared to hers, and yours can lead to intense bleeding or other physical bodily harm, or death

I mean if someone slaps you and you pummel them to shreds, it’s not commensurate.

angelfallz:
If a female has the strength to assault a male she should have the strength to receive assault from the male.

cococandy:
Just so you people know, a woman can kill a man. So, if you’re in danger, please don’t let the notion that one should never lay hands on a woman lead to your death.
As long as your response is commensurate with the level of violence dished to you, nobody can reasonably fault your actions.

I mean if someone slaps you and you pummel them to shreds, it’s not commensurate. However if someone is holding actively brandishing a knife about to stab you and you shoot them, you’re well within reasonable measures of self defense.

Somethings are just common sense.

Biglittlelois:


@Pansophist, what is the difference between what I said above, and what coco said below?

olisaEze:


It appears ure going thru a really rough patch, and have concluded that all ur problems are caused by the other gender. If I was the type, I would pray for u. But alas, I can only buy u some bottles of origin to calm ur angry soul. Take heart eh.