Before the CCP under Mao overran China and seized power, the Chinese government was called the Nationalist government of China under the control of Nationalist leader Chiang Kai Shek.

Chiang Kai Shek was once part of the radical Communist Party under Mao but repudiated his beliefs in Communism after a closer look and study of the Communist terroir being unleashed in Russia. Chiang Kai Shek was so anti-Communist that he later became an ardent Christian (the antithesis to Jewish Communism).
The Nationalist Party under Chiang had made so many strides in China and many have praised it for the dramatic changes it was making in the
method of governing the Chinese people, and for the important benefits it was offering them.

One such supporter was Dr. Arthur Young, the financial advisor to the Chinese government from 1929 to 1946. He wrote: “When the Nationalist government took over, they set out on a program of financial rehabilitation. During the period from 1928 to 1937, they succeeded in unifying and stabilizing the currency. They developed quite promptly very large revenues from the customs and internal revenue with the result that the Government had a large degree of financial stability by 1937. ”

In other words, Chaing’s government was benefiting the Chinese people by protecting the value of their money by ending the destructive
influences of inflation. Also, when government functions to protect the rights of the people, and their money is stable, a middle class develops.

Professor John Fairbank, certainly no supporter of Chiang, had to admit in his book The United States and China that: “The National government of China at Nanking in the decade from 1927 to 1937 was the most modem and effective that China had known.”

However, China’s experiment with democracy started to experience exterior problems when Japan attacked Shanghai, China, on August 13,
1937. Suddenly Chiang had a two-front war: on one front he was repelling the Japanese invaders, and on the other his troops were fighting the Chinese Communists.

The attack by Japan caused the most problems, however, as the Japanese rapidly overran the principal cities and destroyed the sources of
revenue. The Chinese government, therefore, was forced to rely on paper money as their main financial resource available for the purpose of fighting the war.

The Chinese government was in need of allies, and they turned to America after Japan attacked at Pearl Harbor. Chiang sent the following
telegram to President Roosevelt on December 8, 1941: “To our new common battle, we offer all we are and all we have to stand with you until the Pacific and the world are freed from the curse of brute force and endless perfidy.”

America, in addition to fighting Japan after Pearl Harbor, was also at war with Italy and Germany and became the ally of Russia, also fighting the Germans in Europe.

America’s solution to the war, especially during the early stages, was what it called Lend Lease: the equipping of the military forces of its allies.
However, America’s priorities seemed a bit out of order, as in some cases it chose to equip its soldiers after its allies. America decided to equip its soldiers in the European theater first; its ally Russia second; General Douglas MacArthur’s military forces in the Pacific theater third, and China last. Aid to Russia’s military forces had higher priority than America’s fighting forces in the Pacific. And Chiang never received more than five percent of America’s war material during the course of the war.

Chiang, desperate for assistance "... arranged for a loan of $250 million in gold from the United States to stabilize his money. The man in charge of delivering the gold to China was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury Harry Dexter White, a Soviet agent (and a member of the CFR.) Over a period of three and a half years, White shipped only $27 million of the $250 million that had been promised Chiang.”

Notice that Mr. White broke the law by not delivering the aid that Congress had voted. But the story does not end there, as: "In 1945, Congress
voted a second loan, this one of $500 million — but not one cent of this ever reached China. Again, Soviet agent Harry Dexter White was the culprit. China’s currency collapsed.”

Even with all of these problems, Chiang continued the fight against both the Communists and the armies of Japan. After the war ended in 1945, Chiang called a National Assembly on November 15, 1946, to approve a permanent constitution, which was approved on December 25, 1946. The plan was for this constitution to go into effect one year later, in 1947.

The new constitution provided for a social insurance system and for government management of the public utilities, but also contained a “Bill of Rights” to guarantee personal liberty and rights for the citizens of China. It also provided for the first nationwide election held in China (there had never been an election in China) on November 21 through 23, 1947.

The constitution also planned the convening of a National Assembly on March 29, 1948, where 1,744 delegates were to select the president and vice president of China.

Chiang repeatedly refused to run for the presidency of China, but the delegates to the Convention elected him for a six-year term by a vote of about seven to one.

But the Communists would not accept the popular mandate of the Convention and they continued their aggressive attack against Chiang’s
newly elected government

But Chiang’s enemy was not the Japanese government, nor even the Communists under the leadership of Chou En Lai and Mao Tse Tung. It
was the American government and Secretary of State George Marshall, a member of the CFR.

Secretary Marshall took measures in 1946 to impose "an embargo on the sale and shipment of arms from the United States ”

Using Marshall’s own boastful language: "As Chief of Staff I armed 39 anti-Communist divisions, now with a stroke of the pen I disarm them.”

Chiang’s elected government was doomed to failure and the Communists under Mao and Chou finally succeeded in forcing Chiang and his
government to leave the mainland of China and to move his armies onto the offshore Chinese islands of Formosa.

The pressure mounted on the American government to recognize the Communists as the legitimate government of China. This pressure was in part assisted by the appearance of twenty- nine books published during the period of 1943 to 1949. John T. Flynn, in his book While You Slept, reviewed these books and classified twenty-two of them as being “pro-Communist” and the other seven as being “anti-Communist.” The twenty-two books were reviewed with what Flynn called “glowing approval” in literary reviews appearing in the New York Times, the Herald Tribune, The Nation, The New Republic, and the Saturday Review of Literature. Nine authors wrote twelve of these books and these same nine authors submitted forty-three reviews. In other words, the same pro-Communist authors were reviewing the pro-Communist books, either neglecting the anti-Communist books or ridiculing them.

The general line of the pro-Communist books was that Chou and Mao were “agrarian reformers” seeking to change the tenure of the land from the large landowners to the poor peasants. For instance, even George Marshall in 1946 said this about the Communism of Mao and his followers: “Don’t be ridiculous. These fellows are just old-fashioned agrarian reformers.”

Chiang and his supporters were now safely ensconced on the islands of Formosa (Taiwan), and it is now possible, with hindsight, to see what type of government Chiang gave the Taiwanese, the people who were on the islands before Chiang and his followers appeared.

Taiwan developed a true agrarian reform where today seventy-five percent of the farm land is owner-cultivated. This reform was achieved
without a bloody revolution.

In addition, Chiang Kai Shek and his successors, have been elected by the people of Formosa, and Mao and his successors on mainland China have never allowed the Chinese the opportunity to freely elect their rulers.

Congressman Eldon Rudd in 1979 issued a message further detailing the differences between the mainland Chinese government of the Communists and the Taiwanese government of Chiang and his successors: “With 270 times the land area and 53 times the population, the Gross National Product of Mainland China is only 10 times the G.N.P. of Taiwan The figures I have dated illustrate beyond contradiction the material abundance created by freedom’s climate. In my view, this is the smallest and least important of the remarkable differences between the People’s Republic of China and the free government of Taiwan. The true difference is spirit — the human condition, the absence of compulsion and regimentation, the presence of individual opportunity.”

What was the cost of the Chinese Revolution spawned by Secretary of State George Marshall, Harry Dexter White, and the Communists Mao Tse Tung and Chou En Lai?

In 1971, the Senate Committee on the Judiciary issued a twenty-eight page document entitled “The Human Cost of Communism in China” that
concluded that Chou and Mao, were "responsible for the deaths of as many as 64 million people.”

In addition to the deaths of as many as 64 million Chinese, the Communist government has other areas of progress to be proud of. Valentin Chu is a professional journalist who was born and raised in China but who escaped from the Communist regime. He wrote a book in 1963 called Ta Ta, Tan Tan, the Inside Story of Communist China. Mr. Chu devotes a chapter to Communist efforts to destroy the family, from which the following was taken:

The family everywhere is man’s source of strength and courage as well as his emotional harbor at times of natural disaster and
personal misfortune. In China it was even more so. It was society itself. The Chinese Communists were acutely aware that their
control of the people could never be effective unless the monolithic family system was destroyed, along with religion and conventional
morals. This they set out to do as soon as they came to power.

Another move of the Chinese Communists to destroy the family was to move the Chinese mothers away from the home and into the fields as farm workers. As the Boston Globe put it on January 31, 1975: “Ninety percent of the women work in factories and on farms and then attend school,” which obviously leaves little time to function as wives, mothers and homemakers.

A related move, according to Chu, was the commune system, which summarily put men, women, children and the aged in segregated labor
camps, destroyed ancestral graves, and reduced marital relations to brief Party-rationed sex-breaks.

But there are some who feel that all of these costs, the sixty-four million dead, the destruction of the family, and the establishment of the commune, was worth the price.

David Rockefeller said this about the cost of the Revolution after his return from a visit to China in 1973:

Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing a more efficient and dedicated administration but also in fostering high morale and community of interest. The social experiment of China under Chairman Mao’s
leadership is one of the most important and successful in human
history.

This statement by Rockefeller was a little more than three years after Chairman Mao urged the “World to defeat U.S.” by appealing to the peoples of the world to: “Unite and defeat the U.S. aggressors and all their running dogs.”

The American policy towards Communist China was now due for a change. It was now time for the American government to recognize the
Communists as the legitimate government of the Chinese people and to break all diplomatic relations with the Taiwanese government of Chiang and his successors. On July 15, 1971, Premier Chou En Lai, on behalf of the People’s Republic of China, according to a press release issued by President Richard Nixon’s staff: “extended an invitation to President Nixon to visit China at an appropriate date before May, 1972. Nixon accepted the invitation with pleasure.”

It was no coincidence that President Nixon accepted that invitation on July 15, 1971, the very day that Radio Peking, China’s official radio station, issued the following statement: "People of the World, unite and defeat the U.S. aggressors and all their running dogs.” 68

The American press and President Nixon refused to acknowledge the hypocrisy of the Chinese government and accepted the invitation the same day they were calling for a world wide revolution against the United States.

Nixon’s support of Red China was strange, indeed. As a Presidential candidate in 1968, Nixon said: "I would not recognize Red China now, and I would not agree to admitting it to the United Nations ” And in his book. Six Crises, he wrote: "admitting Red China to the United Nations
would be a mockery of the provision of the Charter which limits its membership to ‘peace-loving nations.’ And what was most disturbing was that it would give respectability to the Communist regime which would immensely increase its power and prestige in Asia, and probably irreparably weaken the non-Communist governments in that area.”

So President Nixon went to China and opened the doors to the Chinese Communist government of Mao and Chou.

The next step in America’s betrayal of the Chinese people came in 1976 when first Chou En Lai and later Mao Tse Tung passed away. The tributes that flowed from the mouths of the world’s leaders about these two bloody butchers was amazing.

These comments were made about Chou En Lai by the following individuals:

Gerald Ford: “Chou will be long remembered as a remarkable leader.”

Secretary of State Henry Kissinger: “I admired Chou En Lai very much.”

Former President Richard Nixon: “Chou’s legacy will be that he helped end the darkness. Only a handful of men in the 20th century will match Premier Chou’s impact on world history.”

These comments were made about Mao Tse Tung:

Premier Pierre Trudeau of Canada: “The People’s Republic of China stands as a monument to the spirit and political philosophy of Chairman Mao. Canadians recognize the path-breaking spirit of community that, under Chairman Mao’s guidance, had contributed to the modernization of China.”

President Gerald Ford: "Mao was a very remarkable and a very great man.”

how did Britain create Nigeria?

By the December of 1978, the American government recognized the Chinese Communists as the official and legitimate government of China, after fifty-five years of accepting the governments of Sun-Yat-Sen and Chiang Kai Shek as the representatives of the Chinese people.

Others did not approve of the move of the American government. One, a former Chinese citizen, Dr. Chiu-Yuan Hu, told a Congressional Committee in Washington: “To recognize the Chinese Red Regime is to discourage the people in the whole world .... It will make the world know that the great nation of the United States is unworthy to be a friend, that it sometimes betrays its most loyal allies.”

Senator Barry Goldwater was one who felt that the move was improper. He told a news conference: "I have no idea what motivated him other than (that) the Trilateral Commission, composed of bankers in this country and others, want to expand big business. This is a dangerous thing because it puts fear in our allies, especially our small allies, as to how the U.S. will keep its word.” Arizona Daily Star (Tucson), Dec. 17, 1978, p. A-ll.

To American banksters and business men, communist societies are the best investor destinations as the communist society is nothing short of a slave empire with full central authority under the control of a handful of powerful oligarchs. In short, communism that we are all to believe is the arch enemy to capitalism is actually extreme capitalism where all the wealth is controlled and owned by the state and the labor force mere slaves to be used and discarded. This is why Western banksters and businessmen like Rothschild, Jacob Schiff and John D. Rockerfeller all supported, bankrolled the communist take over of Russia in an apparent large scale heist of that vastly rich empire. Not only did they murder the entire Romanov Royal family, stole his vast wealth of cash, gold bullions and jewelry as well as estates and shares in the west but went on to steal all of the resources under the Tsarists realm .

But the final betrayal to the Chinese people occurred on January 1, 1979, when President Jimmy Carter severed diplomatic relations with the only elected government China has ever had, the government on Taiwan, and went so far as to state that the United States position was that: “there is but one China, and Taiwan is part of China.” Arizona Daily Star (Tucson), Dec 16, 1978, p. A-l.

The Nationalist government on Taiwan took the betrayal rather bitterly but stated that they would “neither negotiate with the Chinese Communist regime nor compromise with Communism.”

Both moves caused Senator Barry Goldwater to charge that President Carter's motives were economic, saying that “he did it for the big banks of the world — Chase Manhattan and the French bankers — and for companies like Coca-Cola.”

Ronald Reagan called the break with Taiwan a “betrayal.”

The hypocrisy of the entire China scenario was dramatically illustrated in May, 1979, when the New York Times ran a picture showing Commerce Secretary Juanita Kreps in China touring the Great Wall of China, and she was smiling and apparently enjoying herself. This picture was attached to and just underneath the main article on the same page that headlined: “(Chinese) Poster says political prisoners tortured, starved in Chinese ‘Eden.’ ”

The article doesn’t say whether the smiling Secretary visited any of the “tortured” and “starving” Chinese prisoners, but it is doubted.

The question as to why the visiting American journalists and dignitaries who toured China in the '70’s failed to mention the tortured existence of many of the Chinese people was partially answered by Edward N. Luttwak, associate director of the Washington Center of Foreign Policy Research at John Hopkins University, who also visited Mainland China.

Mr. Luttwak wrote an article for the April, 1977, Reader’s Digest in which he asked a series of questions:

Why have American journalists failed to convey to us such fundamental Chinese realities? After all, the miserable poverty of the country is everywhere in evidence.

Why, moreover, have previous visitors not been revolted by the schoolrooms where children are taught from booklets replete with the brutal images of harsh class-war propaganda?

Why have our "Asia scholars” failed to denounce the militarism of a system where the cheapest suit of clothing for little boys is a mini-uniform complete with rifle?

And above all, how could they have missed the central phenomenon of (Red) Chinese life: its unique, almost pure totalitarianism?

But it was too late. Secretary of State George Marshall, the Institute of Pacific Relations, and modern politicians had betrayed the only elected
government of China and replaced it with the most brutal and bloody government on the face of the earth.

China was now truly Communist.

So what's Nigeria's business in all these?

Or you prefer communism?

AntiBalaka:


spoken like a true village idiot.

Marxism is on the rise aka Zionism and you are asking what concerns niggerians?

All the pandering Joe Xiden is doing towards China and how all western major corporations are in bed with the CCP and their Orwellian state surveillance is lost on you abi? What of Covid?

Take the advice of the poster that asked why you must comment.

I repeat
Do you prefer communism?

Phiniter:
how did Britain create Nigeria?

Britain did not create Nijeriya.

It was your precious Jewish slave masters in London, Bristol, Amsterdam and Liverpool that created a chartered company on the London Exchange known as ''Royal Niger Company''.

theInterpreter:
So what's Nigeria's business in all these?

Or you prefer communism?

Must you comment ?

tollyboy5:

Must you comment ?

must you quote me?

theInterpreter:
So what's Nigeria's business in all these?

Or you prefer communism?

spoken like a true village idiot.

Marxism is on the rise aka Zionism and you are asking what concerns niggerians?

All the pandering Joe Xiden is doing towards China and how all western major corporations are in bed with the CCP and their Orwellian state surveillance is lost on you abi? What of Covid?

Take the advice of the poster that asked why you must comment.

Educative

[s]

theInterpreter:
So what's Nigeria's business in all these?

Or you prefer communism?I repeat
Do you prefer communism?

[/s]

I am not here for your stupidity.

If you can't read and understand the entire post to see how and why US Govts and businessmen have facilitated the setting up of communist regimes and for what purpose especially with the bumbling idiot Joe Biden and his satanic democrat communists in power and how they are doing all to empower China in the wake of the Chinese virus, then pls waka comot for this thread.

Hmmm, learnt something today


Long post though

.

theInterpreter:
must you quote me?

You're a new comer here and you're constituting nuisance

tollyboy5:

You're a new comer here and you're constituting nuisance

lol
Because of my new moniker?

Russia or USSR?
If the person that wrote this can’t diff between USSR and Russia then the person and his news are mad

AntiBalaka, why do you call people stupid or idiot?
It is like jews and America that created AntiBalaka