Lol I think u’re the one that is not current here. India and China has a never ending feud, India is a friendly nation to Russia and the U.S.
India is in the quad group with the US while it purchases weapons from Russia also. But the US wants India to be fully loyal cos when China will start, Russia will not be there to save them, cos Russia has more to gain from China than India.
Who better to trust to defend you from your powerful next door neighbor than a more powerful & closer neighbor??
India needs Russia to protect itself from China and Pakistan. And India knows Russia is a reliable defense partner.
It's just laughable and it shows those who have no clue about the military and warfare. Logistics problem is part and parcel of warfare and no military can avoid it during war hence no army goes through war unscath. The Nazis who were the greatest military force in human history with technology more advanced that their time lost WW2 due to logistics problems. Allied Forces during the highly overhyped and excessively celebrated Normandy landings in western history took disastrous losses due to logistics problems. So, having logistics problem during military maneuvers is as normal as being in the military itself - it's about how you regroup and mitigate against it, which the Russians have done during the 2nd phase of the war.
US also had a lot of logistics problems in Iraq and Afghanistan hence a lot of their regular forces and special forces were killed in ambushes. It's also the reason why insurgency was very effective against them in both countries. And these countries aren't on Ukraine's level. Iraq is half the size of Ukraine and it was already demilitarised with arms embargo for a decade since most of Iraqi weapons were of US origin (the US propped-up Sadam to fight Iran and turned on him after that). Almost all of Iraqi lethal weapons were grounded because they couldn't get parts due to US emgargo. So the US attacked when Iraq couldn't even fight and all of Sadam's generals and their troops didn't fight because they thought the US would give them power once they get rid of Saddam. And once that didn't happen - they started the insurgency that broke the US' back, hence people tend to call the Iraqi insurgency the real US-Iraq war. As for Afghanistan: the country had no military and they're basically tribal goat herding militias with AK47 and RPGs. Evidently, none of these two countries had any army, if we're being honest. Ukraine (the 2nd biggest country in Europe) on the other hand had the largest army in Europe (only 2nd to Russia before the war) that was trained for 8yrs by NATO and was supplied the most sophisticated weapons.
The logistics problems Russian forces faced during the initial phase of this campaign were actually exaggarated due to this being arguably the first global war that happened during the social media era where you can see everything in real time and a lot of it is also propaganda. Most of these logistics problems weren't even because the Russians were incompetent - it was mostly because they didn't go in with an intention to fight a war of attrition. They went in thinking Ukrainians wouldn't put up a fight and would try to save their cities. Then both can get to the negotiating table. Hence they invade with a smal number of combatants and kept matching without guarding their rear. And that's basically why those ambushes were successfully. However, since they moved on to phase 2 and put their feet down to fight - how come the exaggerated logistics problems disappeared?
LMAO @ CSG and MQ-9B like China and Russia don't have advanced EW that would jam those overrated interfaces. Small Iran captured a much more advanced US drone that's superior to MQ-9B, with EW, without breaking a sweat. Ever wondered why even American F-35 stopped going anywhere near Iran? Well, it's because Russia gave Iran radars that can detect them from far away and knock them out of the sky. Now, imagine what Russia and China would do to them. Some of you just throw out names without any understanding of what the other side has.
BTW, China just launched semi-submersible surface ships. Russia on the other hand has stealth Corvettes that are fully submersible - so they can go under water or act as surface ships. NATO countries including the US don't have those capabilities. And when it comes to EW - there's no match for Russia right now in the world. Something to ponder on apart from all the other advantages they have.
I thought I.. I .. Igbofam said China has abandoned Russia, what am I seeing?
Igbofam this is fake news right
You take that one serious?? Person wey get mind dey talk say Ukraine Dey beat Russia like pikin na em u Dey reason?? Same person that said Russian troops of 200k can be replaced easily but Ukraine troops of 700k has impossibilities been replaced at the fire front!! Abeg avoid him oo
Same weapons they used to bleep USA during Korea war
How was the USA bleeped when China and North Korea lost more men than the USA and South Korea?
North Korea's invasion of South Korea despite North Korea getting support from China and USSR was also succesfully repelled by USA and South Korea.
In addition, by the time North Korea was repelled, North Korea had only gained 1100 sq km, while South Korea gained 3,900 sq km.
Ps: And talking about further success, South Korea with the backing of the USA has since advanced economically and technologically, while North Korea with the backing of China is a mess.
These clowns don’t understand how advanced Russian EW is.
They didn’t even use any of their modern stuffs when the Ukraine confrontation started. But now, they’re just using about 5-10% of what they have and Ukraine has crumbled and NATO has started shitting its panties, lol.
Fear Ruskies - they’re a different breed whenever they decide to fight. Ask Napoleon and Hitler, lol.
It's just laughable and it shows those who have no clue about the military and warfare. Logistics problem is part and parcel of warfare and no military can avoid it during war hence no army goes through war unscath. The Nazis who were the greatest military force in human history with technology more advanced that their time lost WW2 due to logistics problems. Allied Forces during the highly overhyped and excessively celebrated Normandy landings in western history took disastrous losses due to logistics problems. So, having logistics problem during military maneuvers is as normal as being in the military itself - it's about how you regroup and mitigate against it, which the Russians have done during the 2nd phase of the war.
US also had a lot of logistics problems in Iraq and Afghanistan hence a lot of their regular forces and special forces were killed in ambushes. It's also the reason why insurgency was very effective against them in both countries. And these countries aren't on Ukraine's level. Iraq is half the size of Ukraine and it was already demilitarised with arms embargo for a decade since most of Iraqi weapons were of US origin (the US propped-up Sadam to fight Iran and turned on him after that). Almost all of Iraqi lethal weapons were grounded because they couldn't get parts due to US emgargo. So the US attacked when Iraq couldn't even fight and all of Sadam's generals and their troops didn't fight because they thought the US would give them power once they get rid of Saddam. And once that didn't happen - they started the insurgency that broke the US' back, hence people tend to call the Iraqi insurgency the real US-Iraq war. As for Afghanistan: the country had no military and they're basically tribal goat herding militias with AK47 and RPGs. Evidently, none of these two countries had any army, if we're being honest. Ukraine (the 2nd biggest country in Europe) on the other hand had the largest army in Europe (only 2nd to Russia before the war) that was trained for 8yrs by NATO and was supplied the most sophisticated weapons.
The logistics problems Russian forces faced during the initial phase of this campaign were actually exaggarated due to this being arguably the first global war that happened during the social media era where you can see everything in real time and a lot of it is also propaganda. Most of these logistics problems weren't even because the Russians were incompetent - it was mostly because they didn't go in with an intention to fight a war of attrition. They went in thinking Ukrainians wouldn't put up a fight and would try to save their cities. Then both can get to the negotiating table. Hence they invade with a smal number of combatants and kept matching without guarding their rear. And that's basically why those ambushes were successfully. However, since they moved on to phase 2 and put their feet down to fight - how come the exaggerated logistics problems disappeared?
LMAO @ CSG and MQ-9B like China and Russia don't have advanced EW that would jam those overrated interfaces. Small Iran captured a much more advanced US drone that's superior to MQ-9B, with EW, without breaking a sweat. Ever wondered why even American F-35 stopped going anywhere near Iran? Well, it's because Russia gave Iran radars that can detect them from far away and knock them out of the sky. Now, imagine what Russia and China would do to them. Some of you just throw out names without any understanding of what the other side has.
BTW, China just launched semi-submersible surface ships. Russia on the other hand has stealth Corvettes that are fully submersible - so they can go under water or act as surface ships. NATO countries including the US don't have those capabilities. And when it comes to EW - there's no match for Russia right now in the world. Something to ponder on apart from all the other advantages they have.
You have idea about military and you just wrote that epistle.... Saddam was using American weapons? Guy, you do know the internet is free right! Iraq that was using Soviet weapons and equipment. Also, like do you guys have any idea of the map. Look at where America is and where Russia is compare to where Iraq is and Ukraine. You talk about Nazi Germany yet the same people ran through Europe like child's play but had problems taking on Britain because it wasn't on mainland Europe. I mean they reached Moscow before Hitler made his now famous blunder. And you're comparing America that basically had to airdrop more of its logistics with Russia that have land advantage.
Russia that couldn't drop a single battalion of paratroopers behind enemy line, something the US does time and time again.
Where you lost me was saying Bombers have EW capabilities to knock out CSG.. do you even know the capability of a Carrier Strike Group. An AWC could see the bomber from thousand of miles away and you're talking about using EW... Bro go read up at this point.
Also comparing an RQ-7, a reconnaissance drone with the Reaper... lol like how do you people type such crap with confident.
See lie, America don't have an F-35 forward base in the Middle East. How they Bleep would they be avoiding Iran with the Aircraft? F-35 is not a reconnaissance aircraft to begin with. Israel have been using theirs to wreck havoc in Syria with the same supposed Russia superior radar.
Same radar that couldn't detect small Ukraine Neptune anti-ship missiles....
You can support Russia, I don't have any problem with that but abeg don't come here parading lies and make believe like others don't have Internet too.
Gentle Reminder: Russia and China are successful "SPACE FARING " nations.
The USA and A number of European countries actually depend on Russia's Soyuz rocket for "SPACE transportation " whilst collaborating on the space station.
Consider what that entails
Now ask yourself what this advances might entail in terms of weaponry. (Keeping in mind that superpowers place a priority on weaponry).
When MSM starts to tell you about this or that country having poorly trained troops or faulty and or obsolete weaponry, do yourself a favour, switch channels.
Biden isn’t a weakling - he’s just a face of the power brokers and powerful force that run the US - just like every other US president. It’s by design and US presidents are mostly controlled puppets. Obama also wasn’t the one running things when he was the US president.
It’s also a misconception that the US was feared by all. That’s just make-believe like Hollywood movies. Those who fear the US are European countries and 3rd world countries. Countries like Russia and China have never feared the US. The US just never really troubled them until now. And what they’re doing now is basically reacting to American threats on their borders.
People tend to forget the poor China was the one that did most of the fighting during the Korean War against the US and allied countries and the Chinese technically won that war (but it’s regarded as a stalemate officially). And that was the US at its peak militarily because it was vastly superior to every other country on earth militarily (save for the Soviet Union) and China at its lowest both militarily and economically. So why would a country that pulled that off fear the US? And Americans have always been weary of Russia because it inherited almost everything Americans feared about the Soviets.
Regardless, NATO needs to be really scared. No NATO country has fought a country as strong as Ukraine on the ground since the end of WW2. Fighting defenceless goat herders is different from fighting a formidable peer military that has a lot of support. And Russia is currently doing that with a fraction of its military (less than 10%) despite being outnumbered by 4:1 and they’re achieving results (despite initial setbacks) whilst rotating forces to get the needed frontline experience and tactical battlefield awareness. Combine that with the Chinese and US + NATO countries don’t stand a chance in a real shooting match.
It's just laughable and it shows those who have no clue about the military and warfare. Logistics problem is part and parcel of warfare and no military can avoid it during war hence no army goes through war unscath. The Nazis who were the greatest military force in human history with technology more advanced that their time lost WW2 due to logistics problems. Allied Forces during the highly overhyped and excessively celebrated Normandy landings in western history took disastrous losses due to logistics problems. So, having logistics problem during military maneuvers is as normal as being in the military itself - it's about how you regroup and mitigate against it, which the Russians have done during the 2nd phase of the war.
US also had a lot of logistics problems in Iraq and Afghanistan hence a lot of their regular forces and special forces were killed in ambushes. It's also the reason why insurgency was very effective against them in both countries. And these countries aren't on Ukraine's level. Iraq is half the size of Ukraine and it was already demilitarised with arms embargo for a decade since most of Iraqi weapons were of US origin (the US propped-up Sadam to fight Iran and turned on him after that). Almost all of Iraqi lethal weapons were grounded because they couldn't get parts due to US emgargo. So the US attacked when Iraq couldn't even fight and all of Sadam's generals and their troops didn't fight because they thought the US would give them power once they get rid of Saddam. And once that didn't happen - they started the insurgency that broke the US' back, hence people tend to call the Iraqi insurgency the real US-Iraq war. As for Afghanistan: the country had no military and they're basically tribal goat herding militias with AK47 and RPGs. Evidently, none of these two countries had any army, if we're being honest. Ukraine (the 2nd biggest country in Europe) on the other hand had the largest army in Europe (only 2nd to Russia before the war) that was trained for 8yrs by NATO and was supplied the most sophisticated weapons.
The logistics problems Russian forces faced during the initial phase of this campaign were actually exaggarated due to this being arguably the first global war that happened during the social media era where you can see everything in real time and a lot of it is also propaganda. Most of these logistics problems weren't even because the Russians were incompetent - it was mostly because they didn't go in with an intention to fight a war of attrition. They went in thinking Ukrainians wouldn't put up a fight and would try to save their cities. Then both can get to the negotiating table. Hence they invade with a smal number of combatants and kept matching without guarding their rear. And that's basically why those ambushes were successfully. However, since they moved on to phase 2 and put their feet down to fight - how come the exaggerated logistics problems disappeared?
LMAO @ CSG and MQ-9B like China and Russia don't have advanced EW that would jam those overrated interfaces. Small Iran captured a much more advanced US drone that's superior to MQ-9B, with EW, without breaking a sweat. Ever wondered why even American F-35 stopped going anywhere near Iran? Well, it's because Russia gave Iran radars that can detect them from far away and knock them out of the sky. Now, imagine what Russia and China would do to them. Some of you just throw out names without any understanding of what the other side has.
BTW, China just launched semi-submersible surface ships. Russia on the other hand has stealth Corvettes that are fully submersible - so they can go under water or act as surface ships. NATO countries including the US don't have those capabilities. And when it comes to EW - there's no match for Russia right now in the world. Something to ponder on apart from all the other advantages they have.
Baba why you dey yarn dust. Even MangeAltkyo that know about Russia more than you has calm down.
Forget the US don't need a whole NATO to face Russia. Even small UK is enough for Russia. UK vs Russia 1 and 1 is the best comparison we can get here even seems technological unfair to the Russians. The US is far superior to them, recent experience in Ukraine has shown this. All the hyped Russian latest weapons dubbed to be on par with their western counterparts has been shown to be inferior. There mighty impenetrable t90ms with latest relik 5 ERA, not only was it destroyed but even the hull blown off as it's constant in most Russian tanks. The advanced su27, su22 even latest su34 fighter bomber blown out from the sky by old soviet SAM. Even the deadly Russian ka52 and Mi attack helicopters with all their countermeasures are still bested by old US stinger missile. The latest Sam are being destroyed by cheap less advanced Turkish drone. Even at their backyard they are having logistic problems. I might agree with you that no military can fully accomplish smooth mobilization of troops and weapons but comparing the Russia to US in times of logistics is a great insult to the global power reach of the United States military. Even in your fathers backyard they will assemble the greatest force concentration you've ever seen.
Baba forget for paper and real life the US no be Russia mate. Everything US pass them in times of quantities and quantities, in times of training and doctrines. Even for money to fund any campaign. China are just paper tiger until they are proven, they know the threat US possesses that's why they are wiser not to invade Taiwan. Nobody wants war, not even the US against Nigeria as war can be bloody and no matter your superiority you will also be bloodied.
You have idea about military and you just wrote that epistle.... Saddam was using American weapons? Guy, you do know the internet is free right! Iraq that was using Soviet weapons and equipment. Also, like do you guys have any idea of the map. Look at where America is and where Russia is compare to where Iraq is and Ukraine. You talk about Nazi Germany yet the same people ran through Europe like child's play but had problems taking on Britain because it wasn't on mainland Europe. I mean they reached Moscow before Hitler made his now famous blunder. And you're comparing America that basically had to airdrop more of its logistics with Russia that have land advantage.
Russia that couldn't drop a single battalion of paratroopers behind enemy line, something the US does time and time again.
Where you lost me was saying Bombers have EW capabilities to knock out CSG.. do you even know the capability of a Carrier Strike Group. An AWC could see the bomber from thousand of miles away and you're talking about using EW... Bro go read up at this point.
Also comparing an RQ-7, a reconnaissance drone with the Reaper... lol like how do you people type such crap with confident.
See lie, America don't have an F-35 forward base in the Middle East. How they Bleep would they be avoiding Iran with the Aircraft? F-35 is not a reconnaissance aircraft to begin with. Israel have been using theirs to wreck havoc in Syria with the same supposed Russia superior radar.
Same radar that couldn't detect small Ukraine Neptune anti-ship missiles....
You can support Russia, I don't have any problem with that but abeg don't come here parading lies and make believe like others don't have Internet too.
You dey mind that guy They're compare Russia with US. dey compare US ESR platform to Russia ESR, what a joke. US that have the greatest surveillance system in the whole world that they even hide sensitive info from their allies self. He should be comparing UK to Russia and not the US. I'm not a fan of any but in truth US is the world power.
It's just laughable and it shows those who have no clue about the military and warfare. Logistics problem is part and parcel of warfare and no military can avoid it during war hence no army goes through war unscath. The Nazis who were the greatest military force in human history with technology more advanced that their time lost WW2 due to logistics problems. Allied Forces during the highly overhyped and excessively celebrated Normandy landings in western history took disastrous losses due to logistics problems. So, having logistics problem during military maneuvers is as normal as being in the military itself - it's about how you regroup and mitigate against it, which the Russians have done during the 2nd phase of the war.
US also had a lot of logistics problems in Iraq and Afghanistan hence a lot of their regular forces and special forces were killed in ambushes. It's also the reason why insurgency was very effective against them in both countries. And these countries aren't on Ukraine's level. Iraq is half the size of Ukraine and it was already demilitarised with arms embargo for a decade since most of Iraqi weapons were of US origin (the US propped-up Sadam to fight Iran and turned on him after that). Almost all of Iraqi lethal weapons were grounded because they couldn't get parts due to US emgargo. So the US attacked when Iraq couldn't even fight and all of Sadam's generals and their troops didn't fight because they thought the US would give them power once they get rid of Saddam. And once that didn't happen - they started the insurgency that broke the US' back, hence people tend to call the Iraqi insurgency the real US-Iraq war. As for Afghanistan: the country had no military and they're basically tribal goat herding militias with AK47 and RPGs. Evidently, none of these two countries had any army, if we're being honest. Ukraine (the 2nd biggest country in Europe) on the other hand had the largest army in Europe (only 2nd to Russia before the war) that was trained for 8yrs by NATO and was supplied the most sophisticated weapons.
The logistics problems Russian forces faced during the initial phase of this campaign were actually exaggarated due to this being arguably the first global war that happened during the social media era where you can see everything in real time and a lot of it is also propaganda. Most of these logistics problems weren't even because the Russians were incompetent - it was mostly because they didn't go in with an intention to fight a war of attrition. They went in thinking Ukrainians wouldn't put up a fight and would try to save their cities. Then both can get to the negotiating table. Hence they invade with a smal number of combatants and kept matching without guarding their rear. And that's basically why those ambushes were successfully. However, since they moved on to phase 2 and put their feet down to fight - how come the exaggerated logistics problems disappeared?
LMAO @ CSG and MQ-9B like China and Russia don't have advanced EW that would jam those overrated interfaces. Small Iran captured a much more advanced US drone that's superior to MQ-9B, with EW, without breaking a sweat. Ever wondered why even American F-35 stopped going anywhere near Iran? Well, it's because Russia gave Iran radars that can detect them from far away and knock them out of the sky. Now, imagine what Russia and China would do to them. Some of you just throw out names without any understanding of what the other side has.
BTW, China just launched semi-submersible surface ships. Russia on the other hand has stealth Corvettes that are fully submersible - so they can go under water or act as surface ships. NATO countries including the US don't have those capabilities. And when it comes to EW - there's no match for Russia right now in the world. Something to ponder on apart from all the other advantages they have.
You have idea about military and you just wrote that epistle.... Saddam was using American weapons? Guy, you do know the internet is free right! Iraq that was using Soviet weapons and equipment. Also, like do you guys have any idea of the map. Look at where America is and where Russia is compare to where Iraq is and Ukraine. You talk about Nazi Germany yet the same people ran through Europe like child's play but had problems taking on Britain because it wasn't on mainland Europe. I mean they reached Moscow before Hitler made his now famous blunder. And you're comparing America that basically had to airdrop more of its logistics with Russia that have land advantage.
Russia that couldn't drop a single battalion of paratroopers behind enemy line, something the US does time and time again.
Where you lost me was saying Bombers have EW capabilities to knock out CSG.. do you even know the capability of a Carrier Strike Group. An AWC could see the bomber from thousand of miles away and you're talking about using EW... Bro go read up at this point.
Also comparing an RQ-7, a reconnaissance drone with the Reaper... lol like how do you people type such crap with confident.
See lie, America don't have an F-35 forward base in the Middle East. How they Bleep would they be avoiding Iran with the Aircraft? F-35 is not a reconnaissance aircraft to begin with. Israel have been using theirs to wreck havoc in Syria with the same supposed Russia superior radar.
Same radar that couldn't detect small Ukraine Neptune anti-ship missiles....
You can support Russia, I don't have any problem with that but abeg don't come here parading lies and make believe like others don't have Internet too.
You're obviously an ignorant turd and a poorly educated kid.
^There are loads more to unravel/unpack but I'll stop there for now. If you can read, that should give you an inkling on how Saddam was armed to the teeth by the US and UK with American and British weapons. Saddam only switch to Soviet weapons after they discarded him and Iraq was under arms embargo. And he couldn't even get a lot of direct lethal Soviet weapons. So most of his lethal weapons were American and British made and those weapons were effectively grounded due to lack of parts caused by embargo.
In essence, Saddam was basically disarmed before Iraq was invaded by the US in 2003. Anyone with a brain (which you obviously lack) would know that.
2. Middle East is basically the US' playground. Israel is like a mega US aircraft carrier with almost 10million people. The US has bases with tens of thousands of troops stationed in Oman, Kuwait, Qatar, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and a massive military base in Turkey. So, the US can basically put a million troops in Iraq within 24hrs without the need to mobilise. Russia on the other hand, despite being next to Ukraine would need to mobilise to be able to put the same number of troops in Ukraine because its military isn't a wartime military. Again. you have no clue and you're a slowpoke who understands zilch about the military.
3. Nazi Germany didn't take Britain because they didn't want to and never even committed their strongest troops to taking Britain. The attck on Britain was mostly a feint and Hitler's eyes were on the Soviet Union hence he committed about 90% of his elite forces against the Soviet Union. If Hitler wanted Britain, it would've been a walk in the park but he didn't really pursue it for the following reasons:
a. PM Chamberlain already cut a deal with Hitler by giving the Nazis Czech republic with the Munich Agreement (before Churchill got to power). There was also some sort of connection between the British Royal Family and Hitler.
There's a reason why the US and UK absorbed the Nazis rather than destroy them after the war like the Soviets did. And Nazis preferred surrending to US and British forces than Soviet forces. Heck, Nazis founded NATO after WW2 and a lot of American secretary of state post- WW2 have Nazi lineage.
b. All the resources he needs to achieve his dream are in the Soviet Union. Britain has no resources. Nazi Germany was also part of the capitalist bloc while the Soviet Union was an opposing ideology with communism.
c. Taking Britain would've got the Americans involved (the US was neutral at this point). And that would've made him compromise the amount of elite forces he committed to the eastern front against the Soviets which would've been a disaster because he sent all his elite forces to the eastern front against the Soviets. Alas, it ended up being a disaster because the Soviets destroyed all his elite forces.
^I'll stop here because history is way deeper than what a lot of you know. You have to read extensively to know a lot of things.
4. LMAO. In the next 20yrs, American paratroopers wouldn't be able to pull off what the Russian VDV paratroopers did at Gostomel airport. Even American veterans alluded to this on Twitter. 200-300 paratroopers against 3 elites Ukrainian brigades and hundreds of NATO special forces and they held the Kiev airport from Feb.24 until other Russian forces got there and never lost it in any battle until they withdrew. And less than 30 of them were killed. That's one for the history books. Those VDV paratroopers are the ones crushing Ukrainians in Donbass right now, lol.
This is a video on CNN when CNN reporters went to the airport a few days after the paratroopers took it and Ukrainians lied that they have pushed them out, lol: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b40r8RX5MoE
He rushed there thinking they were Ukrainians because Ukrainian propaganda lied that they pushed them out. Only to find out that the VDV badarses were still in control, lol. And they never lost it. CNN basically exposed Ukrainian propaganda in real time.
5. RQ-7? . No, Iranians captured US RQ-170 stealth drone with EW. It's the most advanced US drone that Americans claimed were invincible/invisible and Iran captured it with EW without breaking a sweat. So none of the trash you posted is a match for the Russians and Chinese.
6. Moskva was hit by a sea mine - not Neptune missiles. Even the most rabid pro-Ukrainian shill on Twitter who're veterans said it's not Neptune missiles because nothing on the ship showed it was hit by a missile. And that corroborates Russian claims.
7. What's AWC? Or you mean AWACS? Well, US AWACS are mostly overrated and Russian EW jams it often.
Anyway, this isn't about AWACS - it's about American MQ-9B drones. So read what Russians did to Americans in Syria from an American general below:
The US has been concerned by the battle-field success of Russian EW systems. At the U.S. Geospatial Intelligence Foundation’s 2018 GEOINT Symposium, General Raymond Thomas, then commander of U.S. Special Operations Command, said that Syria has become “the most aggressive E.W. environment on the planet. They are testing us every day, knocking our communications down, disabling our EC-130s, etcetera,” he said without directly mentioning Russia.
You dey mind that guy They're compare Russia with US. dey compare US ESR platform to Russia ESR, what a joke. US that have the greatest surveillance system in the whole world that they even hide sensitive info from their allies self. He should be comparing UK to Russia and not the US. I'm not a fan of any but in truth US is the world power.
Google it Russia has the best air defence system in the world...
In the issue of surveillance Russia can match USA in fact military equipment no nation can actually match Russia.
How was the USA bleeped when China and North Korea lost more men than the USA and South Korea?
North Korea's invasion of South Korea despite support from China and USSR was also succesfully repelled.
And talking about further success, South Korea with the backing of the USA has since advanced economically and technologically, while North Korea with the backing of China is a mess.
Ps: North Korea gained 1100 sq km, while South Korea gained 3,900 sq km.
Lol...lost more men according to your western masters
USA with the support of all UN force couldn't invade North Korea despite their superior firepower... onlyn to lost Seoul three times to North Korea....kikikiki this is when China is not even a world power Show me a single North Korea land lost to South Korea?
North Korea in mess you say? according to Western backed media dishing out false claim..while the so called poor North Korea possess Nuclear weapon that can wipe out South Korea in seconds
Read the report itself.... it's a bunch of analyst trying to decipher if the US will sanction India as they did Turkey or if the need to contain China will make them let it go
There's no official statement threatening to sanction India when they actually need India in the Indo-Pacific and unlike Turkey, India isn't fully immersed yet with the west.
^There are loads more to unravel/unpack but I'll stop there for now. If you can read, that should give you an inkling on how Saddam was armed to the teeth by the US and UK with American and British weapons. Saddam only switch to Soviet weapons after they discarded him and Iraq was under arms embargo. And he couldn't even get a lot of direct lethal Soviet weapons. So most of his lethal weapons were American and British made and those weapons were effectively grounded due to lack of parts caused by embargo.
In essence, Saddam was basically disarmed before Iraq was invaded by the US in 2003. Anyone with a brain (which you obviously lack) would know that.
2. Middle East is basically the US' playground. Israel is like a mega US aircraft carrier with almost 10million people. The US has bases with tens of thousands of troops stationed in Oman, Kuwait, Qatar, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and a massive military base in Turkey. So, the US can basically put a million troops in Iraq within 24hrs without the need to mobilise. Russia on the other hand, despite being next to Ukraine would need to mobilise to be able to put the same number of troops in Ukraine because its military isn't a wartime military. Again. you have no clue and you're a slowpoke who understands zilch about the military.
3. Nazi Germany didn't take Britain because they didn't want to and never even committed their strongest troops to taking Britain. The attck on Britain was mostly a feint and Hitler's eyes were on the Soviet Union hence he committed about 90% of his elite forces against the Soviet Union. If Hitler wanted Britain, it would've been a walk in the park but he didn't really pursue it for the following reasons:
a. PM Chamberlain already cut a deal with Hitler by giving the Nazis Czech republic with the Munich Agreement (before Churchill got to power). There was also some sort of connection between the British Royal Family and Hitler.
There's a reason why the US and UK absorbed the Nazis rather than destroy them after the war like the Soviets did. And Nazis preferred surrending to US and British forces than Soviet forces. Heck, Nazis founded NATO after WW2 and a lot of American secretary of state post- WW2 have Nazi lineage.
b. All the resources he needs to achieve his dream are in the Soviet Union. Britain has no resources. Nazi Germany was also part of the capitalist bloc while the Soviet Union was an opposing ideology with communism.
c. Taking Britain would've got the Americans involved (the US was neutral at this point). And that would've made him compromise the amount of elite forces he committed to the eastern front against the Soviets which would've been a disaster because he sent all his elite forces to the eastern front against the Soviets. Alas, it ended up being a disaster because the Soviets destroyed all his elite forces.
^I'll stop here because history is way deeper than what a lot of you know. You have to read extensively to know a lot of things.
4. LMAO. In the next 20yrs, American paratroopers wouldn't be able to pull off what the Russian VDV paratroopers did at Gostomel airport. Even American veterans alluded to this on Twitter. 200-300 paratroopers against 3 elites Ukrainian brigades and hundreds of NATO special forces and they held the Kiev airport from Feb.24 until other Russian forces got there and never lost it in any battle until they withdrew. And less than 30 of them were killed. That's one for the history books. Those VDV paratroopers are the ones crushing Ukrainians in Donbass right now, lol.
This is a video on CNN when CNN reporters went to the airport a few days after the paratroopers took it and Ukrainians lied that they have pushed them out, lol: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b40r8RX5MoE
He rushed there thinking they were Ukrainians because Ukrainian propaganda lied that they pushed them out. Only to find out that the VDV badarses were still in control, lol. And they never lost it. CNN basically exposed Ukrainian propaganda in real time.
5. RQ-7? . No, Iranians captured US RQ-170 stealth drone with EW. It's the most advanced US drone that Americans claimed were invincible/invisible and Iran captured it with EW without breaking a sweat. So none of the trash you posted is a match for the Russians and Chinese.
6. Moskva was hit by a sea mine - not Neptune missiles. Even the most rabid pro-Ukrainian shill on Twitter who're veterans said it's not Neptune missiles because nothing on the ship showed it was hit by a missile. And that corroborates Russian claims.
7. What's AWC? Or you mean AWACS? Well, US AWACS are mostly overrated and Russian EW jams it often.
Anyway, this isn't about AWACS - it's about American MQ-9B drones. So read what Russians did to Americans in Syria from an American general below:
The US has been concerned by the battle-field success of Russian EW systems. At the U.S. Geospatial Intelligence Foundation’s 2018 GEOINT Symposium, General Raymond Thomas, then commander of U.S. Special Operations Command, said that Syria has become “the most aggressive E.W. environment on the planet. They are testing us every day, knocking our communications down, disabling our EC-130s, etcetera,” he said without directly mentioning Russia.
I'm done. You're out of your depth like most of the clowns on this forum. Most of you just parrot utter nonsense without an understanding of anything.
First you said Saddam used American weapons, now you've included Soviet but not much right.
Wow! the west is all Nazi, they even had connection with Nazi. incredible... Please can you remind me again who Hitler shared Poland with? Who did He sign non-aggression pact with in 1939 but it's Britain that it didn't want to take but spend a whole lot of money and resources to build the largest battleship to sail in history that was sunk by the Royal Navy but but Hitler has connection to the British and didn't want to overrun them. I give it to you, you really know history.
Again you called a reconnaissance drone the most advanced. Exactly what do you know about military aircraft? The RQ-170 only gathers data and information by loitering. The MQ-9 does that and can still track target and take them out with pinpoint precision yet the of former is more advance. How? Jeeez
Russia EW is a joke when compared to America. They don't have a dedicated EW platform. The EC-130 is a reconnaissance aircraft, the gather information, they don't have jammer or other EW countermeasures. The AWAC on the other hand does and not only does it not fly alone, the goes with fighter planes and the Growler. You might want to research it capabilities.
This is a provocation.How can these two countries conduct a joint flight with bomber planes around the territory where the whole US President is holding a summit with his counterpart?
Read the report itself.... it's a bunch of analyst trying to decipher if the US will sanction India as they did Turkey or if the need to contain China will make them let it go
There's no official statement threatening to sanction India when they actually need India in the Indo-Pacific and unlike Turkey, India isn't fully immersed yet with the west.
Trump wants to sanction India
In June, India urged Russia to speed up its delivery of the missile system, as border tensions with China escalated. China received its own S-400 missiles from Russia in May 2018, for which the US sanctioned Beijing.
Trump also imposed sanctions on Turkey when it purchased the S-400 in 2019, refusing to sell Ankara F-35 fighter jets. In December the US said it still hoped Turkey was "willing to engage with us in trying to find a resolution to this."
Washington: President Donald Trump on Wednesday said that India "will soon find out" about his decision on the punitive CAATSA sanctions after India signed a $5 billion deal to purchase the S-400 air defence system from Russia.
Dalil8: Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.
Joe Biden is a weakling. Times have changed, the U.S is no longer feared or respected on the global stage.
Your opinion I guess. Biden being president doesn't change anything in American might, military strength and formation. If war should break out today, you go know say oga na master. With all the Russia effizies and parade of tanks ahead of Ukraine invasion, na disgrace dem still get. Its baffling how Ukraine treated their fuk up. I never believed it.
Biden isn’t a weakling - he’s just a face of the power brokers and powerful force that run the US - just like every other US president. It’s by design and US presidents are mostly controlled puppets. Obama also wasn’t the one running things when he was the US president.
It’s also a misconception that the US was feared by all. That’s just make-believe like Hollywood movies. Those who fear the US are European countries and 3rd world countries. Countries like Russia and China have never feared the US. The US just never really troubled them until now. And what they’re doing now is basically reacting to American threats on their borders.
People tend to forget the poor China was the one that did most of the fighting during the Korean War against the US and allied countries and the Chinese technically won that war (but it’s regarded as a stalemate officially). And that was the US at its peak militarily because it was vastly superior to every other country on earth militarily (save for the Soviet Union) and China at its lowest both militarily and economically. So why would a country that pulled that off fear the US? And Americans have always been weary of Russia because it inherited almost everything Americans feared about the Soviets.
Regardless, NATO needs to be really scared. No NATO country has fought a country as strong as Ukraine on the ground since the end of WW2. Fighting defenceless goat herders is different from fighting a formidable peer military that has a lot of support. And Russia is currently doing that with a fraction of its military (less than 10%) despite being outnumbered by 4:1 and they’re achieving results (despite initial setbacks) whilst rotating forces to get the needed frontline experience and tactical battlefield awareness. Combine that with the Chinese and US + NATO countries don’t stand a chance in a real shooting match.
Dalil8: Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.
Joe Biden is a weakling. Times have changed, the U.S is no longer feared or respected on the global stage.
What is your point? You want him to send US men and women to war and that will make him a strong man. you have no common sense. Why don't you go to war and show your family that you are a strong man. USA this USA that, you and your family and fellow citizens are living a miserable life in a sh.it hole country.
You and your kind should continue on praying for world War 3. USA as country will defend themselves at all cost but can you say the same for your country that can't even defeat common terrorists in you backyard ?
