ogatboy:


Putin is bent on destroying Russia before destroying himself. The Ukraine war shows Russia is not really a super power and no one fears them as such again. Once them discover say all those nulear war heads are not as great as they project it, they will be boxed into a corner.

They won't even try and dear a NATO country at this point because they do not even have the resources

descartes400:


The IQ mumu test should be for you!

NATO with 36 countries contributing troops for the war in Afghanistan were not able to defeat the Taliban!

https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2009/sep/21/afghanistan-troop-numbers-nato-data
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/9-592-troops-of-36-countries-serving-in-afghanistan/2212251

Taliban defeated NATO! pure and simple!, the Major Nato big players had their troops in afganistan fighting the taliban...ie, US of A, Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Australia, Italy and new zeeland ...infact close to 36 countries contributed forces to fight the Taliban but what happen at the end of the day?
They could not continue to withstand the talibans resistance , Talibans that were not equipped with Billions of Dollars conventional modern weaponry but just their Russian AK47, their Turban, baggy pants and sandals and NATO cowardly JAPA!....

that's your food for thought!

Karnice600:


In summary, you're pro Russia. Simple.
All you've stated so far no hold water.

citygarden:

I don't have a problem if NATO have military based in Finland, but they should also allow Russia to have military based in Venezuela and Cuba. If NATO can allow that.
The west have used their Media propaganda to label Russia as a evil where the west are the real devil.

Russia have won Ukraine long time ago, the war you are still seeing in Ukraine is against NATO.

mach7:
Why don't you intelligently and factually critic what I wrote? That will be more helpful than this your shallow attempt at gas lighting. If I am pro-Russia or not is my business.

Perocom:


In as much i will not write off Russia totally, i do not think Russia can defeat the US even without any ally, the US is only careful with Russia because Russia, like the US , is equally armed with nuclear weapon, which if released, cause a catastrophic damages to innocent civilians, some less armed countries will be greatly affected. But if you leave the US vs RUSSIA in an all out war, omo, forget Russia, they will be diffused in days. The US uses common sense, wisdom to operate but Russia is arrogant and a bully, have u ever seen the US boasting of owning sophisticated weapon, where their President will visit testing sites and be hailing them, hmmm, these are childish behaviour, those who have the real thing dont boast. The US dissolved the former USSR in which Russia itself was among without an all-out war, is it Russia as a single nation that they cannot dessimate? What is happening right now is the subtle process that will eventually lead to the end of Russia and almost 1/3 of the world countries will support the US, it's just a matter of time. The day a very ruthless Republican President will assume office as a US president, you will see that most of these noisy countries will calm down. Do you know how many bases the US has all over the world, can you compare that to that of Russian? Do you know the budget for defence of the US, it's far greater than that of RUSSIA, CHINA, NORTH KOREA AND IRAN put together. Think again.

watersideboys:


America was attacked and nato invaded Afghanistan... do you remember the well known trade center attack? That's a major example

chachazzy:

Don't forget China and North Korea with other silent ones.
Only three Countries possess Hypersonic systems, Russia, China and North Korea, and they are allies.
The US just tested one and failed again for the second time.
Let's hope this does not snowball to WW3.

BUSHHUNTER:
Russia always flexing muscle with little nations...If Turkey is allowed they will wipe half of Russia it's a known fact. More reason Putin always urge dialogue/peace with Erdogan.

Fuckyoumod:
Cuba will not even entertain this option. Who wan suffer?

TWoods:


This is laughable... perhaps you should read what happened when Cuba tried this in the 1960s.

Karnice600:


It'll be a waste of time my friend. Please do well to enroll for the ongoing IQ test. Chat up the admin with your credentials.

mach7:
Your comments here isn't factual. Actually, Russia has 5,977 warheads which is more than the United States's 5,428 according to Wikipedia. However, the number of deployed warheads is 1,644 for the US and 1,588 for Russia, but Russia's overall warhead yield (destructive power) is greater than that of the US.

With regards to conventional warfare, I think you are very wrong. Important questions you should ask yourself is where will the war be fought and with which weapons. If it is a land war, Russia smacks the US as it has more land assets. if it is an air war, then it will a brutal stalemate as Russia has air to air capabilities combined with a very robust air defence set-up. So while the US will have the edge in terms of quality of planes and their quantity, Russia has the air defence means to protect its own airspace and serve as a backup to the air fleet. With regards to Naval warfare, Russia won't fight a surface war with the US as the US has an overwhelming edge so it will be a submarine based warfare and Russia currently has more subs (both conventional/nuclear) than the US. Furthermore, look at the map of Russia, and the map of the US and tell me how and where the US major conventional naval assets i.e. Aircraft Carriers can be deployed against Russia. They can't go into the Baltic, as Russia will destroy them from Kaliningrad, they can't go into the Black Sea due to the Bosphorus Straight, they can't attack from the Pacific as they have to pass the choke points of the Kuril Island chain which Russia controls or to alternatively go through the South China Sea (between Japan and Taiwan) and that draws in China..

Also note that the farther an Aircraft Carrier is from the area of operations, the lower the payload and operational range of the aircraft it carries as they have to carry more fuel and less bombs. If they attempt by any means to near the coast, then they come into range of land based anti-ship missiles such as the Bastion system.

On a side note, from February 24th to date, Russia has launched an approximate total of 7,560 air and sea launched cruise missiles at the rate of 60 per day. Even the US cannot keep up with such rate and this doesn't even include Artillery.

Russia's military industrial backbone is state-owned, while that of the US is privately owned. So their output ability at the moment isn't comparable. Secondly, the components and raw materials needed for the manufacture of most US weapons come from Europe or China/Africa (in terms of raw materials - rare earth metals). While Russia is self-sufficient in all its component needs (vacuum tubes and quartz crystals - Russia uses these in place of conventional chips due to their durability) and all raw materials are sourced from within its own territory.

Finally, what about food. To fight a conventional war, you need to feed your populace and also your army. US is a net-importer of food and means that any war that affects food supply to the US will cause major problems (just look at the current situation - US is not even directly fighting Russia, yet food inflation is already very high). On the other hand, Russia is a net-exporter of food. It can feed itself conveniently and also export to others. Hence, it won't be affected by food.

So these are points to note and digest before drawing conclusions.

Karnice600:


Baba I'll advice you to humbly go for that IQ test. It will help this platform a lot.

Pacesetter123:

But you want Ukraine to entertain de same option with NATO and suffer, right?

Thisis2raw:
Sometimes I just laugh at Russian threats, can Russia only go to war with NATO?

Russia needs to be calming down.

Fuckyoumod:
Ukraine was a pawn, they knew what they were getting into, they accepted it, they had the assurances of NATO, EU, UK, U.S and so many others. This is why they would still come together in the end to rebuild Ukraine after the war. As far as I'm concerned, Russia can not sustain a war in Europe and south America at the same time.

Bro, let me tell you, the aim of the Ukraine/Russia war was to weaken Russia politically, economically and militarily. Putin fell for it. This is spot on. And they are playing the long game. Where would Russia be 50years from now

After, 3 years of this senseless war, Russia would never remain the same.

Finally, The U.S is the police of the world, they have the sole right to have NATO anywhere on the world map as long as it keeps a rogue Russia in check and brings peace and security to the larger world.

Fuckyoumod:
Ukraine was a pawn, they knew what they were getting into, they accepted it, they had the assurances of NATO, EU, UK, U.S and so many others. This is why they would still come together in the end to rebuild Ukraine after the war. As far as I'm concerned, Russia can not sustain a war in Europe and south America at the same time.

Bro, let me tell you, the aim of the Ukraine/Russia war was to weaken Russia politically, economically and militarily. Putin fell for it. This is spot on. And they are playing the long game. Where would Russia be 50years from now

After, 3 years of this senseless war, Russia would never remain the same.

Finally, The U.S is the police of the world, they have the sole right to have NATO anywhere on the world map as long as it keeps a rogue Russia in check and brings peace and security to the larger world.

citygarden:
Putin is a kind of leader that doesn't give any Bleep about any country. He take his citizens first before any other countries.
I wish NATO can dare him and see the end result. They will now know Russia is only rehearsing in Ukraine.

silvoclaira:
Russia is the world power

Jacopini:


B like u dey watch bck of tv

Or u dey read history upside down

Karnice600:


In summary, you're pro Russia. Simple.
All you've stated so far no hold water.

smallrincowis16:


Where's did you get an these your PROPAGANDA??

I don't seems to understand you guys, Russia is loosing in Ukraine yet liberating cities Street cities, even after billions of weapons and money from NATO and EU COUNTRIES.

bigpicture001:


Sarap there!!! To bring peace and orderliness that enabled. Your. Father marry your mother and give birth to u in peace.. millions of allied soldiers died fighting the Nazis....

Sometimes u have to fight to be a man

citygarden:
Putin is a kind of leader that doesn't give any Bleep about any country. He take his citizens first before any other countries.
I wish NATO can dare him and see the end result. They will now know Russia is only rehearsing in Ukraine.

ClassicMan202:
Russia should think carefully.... No matter how big they are, they can't fight against the world.

It will soon be USA/UK/ Germany in fact NATO

Against

Russia, China and all those other sanction improvished countries like North Korea, Iran, Venezuela and the likes



Which countries, apart from the ones I listed?

watersideboys:
The only thing keeping NATO from demolishing Russia is their Nuclear threat. Nothing dey Russia. Stop all this fuss about Russia.

darediamond:

NATO demolishing who

Hmmm...

Please go and sleep boy.