Jesus (Blessed Be His Name) said to the crowd: Beware of false prophets, who [will] come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. You shall know them by their fruits. Do people gather grapes from thorns, or figs from thistles? Even so every good tree bring forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree brings forth evil fruit.

The prophet of allah took off his gown and put it on Om Ali and slept with her in her grave and they kicked dirt on him, saying: ‘Oh messenger of allah, we saw you do something no one else has ever done.’ He said: ‘I dressed her in my gown, so she can wear the gowns of paradise and I slept with her in her grave to relieve her of the torments of the grave.'” She was the best of allah’s creatures to me after Abu Talib.

There is no need to rewash a dead woman if her husband has sex with her after she dies….And there is no punishment for anyone who has sex with a dead woman or limits sex to sex with a dead woman.”

There is no restriction against sex with a dead woman or an animal.

Sharh Mukhtasar al-Khalil In al-fiqh al-Maliki
If a husband enters his dead wife -- any which way, from front or behind -- there is no penalty for him.

Following are excerpts from an interview with Moroccan cleric Abd Al-Bari Al-Zamzami, a member of the International Union of Muslim Scholars, and from an address delivered by Al-Zamzami.

Abd Al-Bari Al-Zamzami: A few days ago, I was asked by the Al-Sabbah newspaper about men who have sex with their dead wives. The truth is that this question took me by surprise, and I asked the journalist whether there really are people who do this deplorable and disgraceful act, which is not to be expected from a normal, balanced person. Only a mentally or psychologically unbalanced man would do such a thing.

In any case, I do not have the right to prohibit things. Fatwas are not shaped according to one’s will or whim. Rather, they reflect the law of Allah.
[…]
Therefore, I do not have the right to prohibit that act merely because I consider it deplorable.
[…]
The evidence I relied upon in this case was that a wife’s death does not sever her relations with her husband. A wife’s death does not sever her marital relations with her husband. She remains his wife post mortem, in the Hereafter, just as she was his wife in her lifetime.
[…]
It is perfectly clear that marital relations are not severed by a wife’s death. She remains her husband’s wife. This being the case, the husband has the right to do whatever he wants with her. For instance, he may kiss her. It is common for a husband to kiss his wife after her death, out of love and sorrow. This is something that is done, and there is nothing wrong with it.
[…]
The fact that such an act is permissible does not make it commendable or even acceptable. Having sex with your wife’s corpse is permitted. . .

Head of Al-Azhar University, Mohamed Hussein, decided on Sunday to refer Al-Azhar professor Sabri Abdul Raeuf to investigation over his recent necrophilia ‘fatwā’ [Islamic legal opinion]...
[...]
Sabri expressed in his fatwā that it was permissible for Muslim men to engage in sexual intercourse with their dead wives.
[...]
Sabri’s views were shared during a TV interview, broadcasted through privately-run channel LTC, where he stated that Islam does not consider sexual intercourse between a man and a dead woman as a ‘sin’, as long as the dead woman was his wife.

He explained that necrophilia was not a social norm that society could easily accept, and that any rational person would not partake in such an act.

“It is not favorable in Islam; however the Islamic law considers it as ‘Halal’ [translated into permissible]” he said. Sabri’s statements were in response to a question from the audience.

The university made a statement on Sunday that the investigation would focus on the medias’ role in the controversy, as the comments were shared without permission from the university’s administration..

Sahih Bukhari 15
The Prophet said "None of you will have faith till he loves me more than his father, his children and all mankind."

Kasim Khuram, 23, forced his way into a Co-op undertakers before violating a dead body at around 1.40am on November 11 last year (2018).

A court heard how he lifted the lids of several coffin before selecting his victim.

Khuram then removed the body from the coffin, took off her clothes and then ‘interfered with her’ in the chapel of rest, leaving her face down on the floor.

Another female body was found face down in a coffin with her lower clothing pulled down while seven other corpses, including a baby, were disturbed.

tctrills:
I would love Empiree, and Antichristian to shed more light on this.
Do Muslims have sex with corpses?

motayoayinde:


THIS ACTUALLY DOESN'T DESERVE ANY RESPONSE. BUT IT APPEARS YOUR QUESTION IS IN GOOD FAITH.

SO THE ANSWER IS A BIG, FLAT HELL NO!

tctrills:

Yes they are free not to respond. I believe in freedom of speech but those 2 guys are very active on the religious platform and they would be the best to explain the Muslim position.
Now when you say hell no, are you saying that the OP fabricated the event, that it never happened or are you saying that his narrative is correct but the interpretation is wrong?

fykes:
Can only be demonic and satanic

Ovacoma:
Islam is full of unimaginables! This is just one of the hundreds of reasons muhaMad man cannot be from The God of Israel. Many more horror events like this are recorded about the self acclaimed prophet. The shameless and gullible followers will soon come to defend the false prophet since they have lost their sense of reasoning.

sagenaija:
[size=6pt][/size]
ISLAM SPEAKS FROM BOTH SIDES OF THE MOUTH.

It is interesting that you run to the Bible when it is convenient for you but then turn around to claim that it is 'corrupted' when it exposes your lie. How do you guys find it so convenient to do that?

The writer you brought left the hadith in question and went to"on another occasion". This is to subtly divert attention away from the explaining the issue at hand. We can see through that.

When it will not serve your purpose a hadith becomes weak. When it will it becomes usable. How come Islam has not decided to jettison the hadiths it thinks are inauthentic? If they are questionable why retain them?

Even if we are to accept this man's line of argument, why do you guys have all these strange and conflicting and convoluted stories about this 'prophet' who is supposed to be your best example? What is the Moslem supposed to learn from Mohamed here? Is it to also do the same with a dead dearly loved one? Why is it that for every single issue in Islam you guys have dozens of positions? And this was supposed to be the CLEAR guidance to mankind?

You've ended up buying into TALES FROM ARABIA and wallowing in it without reasoning.

sagenaija:
Empiree, Lukgaf, Rashduct4luv, Antichristian, motayoayinde, mhmsadyq, haekymbahd or Realismailakabir is this your religion? Seriously?

AntiChristian:
Answering the Fallacious Claim of Necrophilia
Compiled, Translated & Annotated
Abu Khuzaimah Ansari

The ignorant people of other faiths, in their emotionally filled rants and outbursts against Islām allege the Messenger of Allah slept with the body of Fātimah bint Asad RaḍiAllāhū ʿAnha based on the wording of this ḥadīth. Such horrible claims are often regurgitated by people who follow and believe in Christianity.

Of course, brethren, we expect the mohammadans to deny this: but it isn't their job to deny or agree with anything. That is the job of their ulema: the scholars and clerics devoted to learning the doings and sayings of the founder of islam. Thus, the real question: Do the ulema agree or deny that necrophilia is permissible in Islam?
Well, let's hear them speak...

AntiChristian:
Your lies and hypocrisy are busted!

AntiChristian:

Islam still remains the one and only way

despite the lies and falsehood Christians peddle!

AntiChristian:


Mumbo Jumbo as usual! I think the treatise answered you and other "Holy Spirit" filled falsehood peddlers well. Read it and Reread it.
Get a pail!
Your eyes are pale!
Wail
as you ail.
Your lies and hypocrisy are busted!

sagenaija:
Empiree, Lukgaf, Rashduct4luv, Antichristian, motayoayinde, mhmsadyq, haekymbahd or Realismailakabir is this your religion? Seriously?

AntiChristian:
Answering the Fallacious Claim of Necrophilia
Compiled, Translated & Annotated
Abu Khuzaimah Ansari

The ignorant people of other faiths, in their emotionally filled rants and outbursts against Islām allege the Messenger of Allah (Sallalahu Alayhi Wasallam) slept with the body of Fātimah bint Asad RaḍiAllāhū ʿAnha based on the wording of this ḥadīth. Such horrible claims are often regurgitated by people who follow and believe in Christianity.

This is an outright lie and a desperate attempt to discredit Islām, such claims are often raised by people who have not read anything about Islām and rather just take some information from websites, who extend most of their efforts to concoct fallacious allegations against Islām.

This treacherous claim rests on the words فاضطجع They claim the word means to sleep, lay down ie he lay down with Fātimah bint Asad to have sex with her and this Arabic word is often used to denote to lie down and sleep with someone. We seek refuge in Allāh from such lies and aspersions. Āmīn


Answer

Firstly: we have shown this ḥadīth is weak in the preceding discourse, but let’s assume for arguments sake that it was authentic, then;

Secondly: The word اضطجع means to lie, lie down, recline, repose and sleep according to the well known Arabic dictionaries. It does not mean to sleep or to lay down for sex. This is also the word the Christians use in their Arabic translation of the Bible. Hence, they say وَدَخَلَ أَلِيشَعُ الْبَيْتَ وَإِذَا بِالصَّبِيِّ مَيْتٌ وَمُضْطَجعٌ عَلَى سَرِيرِهِ. [And when Elisha was come into the house, behold, the child was dead, and laid upon his bed. (2Kings 4:32) Kings James Version).

So one asks, does the word laid here also mean, ‘lay to have sex?’ Of course it does not! Then why is this meaning specified and restricted to the ḥadīth only.

Thirdly: the wording of the ḥadīth clearly mentions the Messenger of Allāh (Sallalahu Alayhi Wasallam) entered the grave after it was dug and the body of Fātimah bint Asad RaḍiAllāhū ʿAnha had not been lowered into the grave. The Messenger of Allāh (Sallalahu Alayhi Wasallam) lay in the grave after it was dug by his companions. The grave had a Laḥd, which is a horizontal opening in the vertically dug grave. The Messenger of Allāh (Sallalahu Alayhi Wasallam) also dug the grave and the Laḥd after which he lay in it. Thereafter, he stood up and eventually the body was lowered into the grave.

It should therefore be noted; the body was lowered into the grave after he stood up – the body was not even in the grave when he was lying down in it! What kind of necrophilia was this? We presume the claimants can further shed some light on this matter, for the claimants are likely to know the reality and details of necrophilia the best, perhaps from experience in the modern Christian atheistic world, because surely one only accuses others of things they have experience, practice and knowledge about.

So we ask again? How is the alleged incident even possible when the Messenger of Allāh (Sallalahu Alayhi Wasallam) did not even lie next to the body, unless the detractors have developed other forms of sex!!! Again, this would not be surprising because this is what happens when you abandon your scriptures by distorting the divine message they contained.

The wording of the report further shows the great care and love the Messenger of Allāh (Sallalahu Alayhi Wasallam) had for Fātimah bint Asad RaḍiAllāhū ʿAnha, the alleged wording says,

“When camphor water was brought, Allāh’s Messenger (Peace Be Upon Him) poured some water into his hands. Then Allāh’s Messenger (Peace Be Upon Him) took off his shirt and clothed her with it and used his own sheet of cloth as her coffin.”

This showed the love and care the Messenger of Allāh (Sallalahu Alayhi Wasallam) had for her due to her status. The detractors show more affection and care for animals and dogs and regularly bathe them, how about Fātimah bint Asad RaḍiAllāhū ʿAnha, who was his paternal aunt and looked after him just like his mother! At what expense is the human mind and intelligence being carelessly wasted.

Fourthly: another indication which shows the futility of this repulsive allegation is the fact that the Messenger of Allāh (Sallalahu Alayhi Wasallam) used his shirt and wrapped it around her and then used his own sheet of cloth as her coffin, the words are,

“Then Allāh’s Messenger (Peace Be Upon Him) took off his shirt and clothed her with it and used his own sheet of cloth as her coffin.”

Again, a sane, upright and normal human being asks, why would a person use their own shirt to wrap the corpse of his paternal aunt – a mother like figure, then use his own sheets as her coffin, then dig her grave with his own hands, then lie in her grave and supplicate to the creator to forgive and have mercy on her (allegedly as the ḥadīth is weak), then to have her lowered in the grave, then unfasten the coffin sheets and shirt and then indulge in necrophilia? Absolutely preposterous!

We would like to exercise our common sense by using our brains and minds, given to us by our creator and ask, what were the other companions doing during this incident of necrophilia? Why do this in the grave and not on the ground if they were looking?

These people have no idea about the stature, uprightness and credibility of the illustrious companions, that they would allow someone to do such a heinous act in front of them. The companions were powerful, they were Ūsāmah bin Zayd, Abū Ayyūb al-Anṣārī, ʿUmar bin al-Khaṭṭāb and the Abyssinian companion, May Allāh be pleased with all of them. Who does not know the lofty credentials of ʿUmar bin al-Khaṭṭāb, that even satan was forced to change paths when he would see him due to his, principles, morals, standards, character and firm belief. That the likes of these companions just stood there and watched this evil incident to unfold.

Fifthly: the detractors should know in Islām purification and cleanliness play a pivotal role in the daily life of Muslims. For example, Muslims are instructed to hold their private parts with their left hand because they have been instructed to eat with their right. They are instructed to sit down while relieving themselves, they are instructed to protect themselves and their clothes from urine and faeces, they are instructed to clean themselves with water, they are instructed to wash their hands everytime they relieve themselves, they are instructed to conceal their private parts from others and much more.

The Muslims were given these instructions by the Messenger of Allāh (Sallalahu Alayhi Wasallam), whose words in the Religion are taken as divine texts, ie from the Prophetic Ḥadīth. This said, the rules, regulations and etiquettes for sexual intercourse between legally married partners in Islām require a greater level of purification and cleanliness.

The point being, on another occasion the Messenger of Allāh (Sallalahu Alayhi Wasallam) asked his companions to help lower a body into a grave, and he asked them if any of them were in a state of sexual impurity, ie if they had spent the night with their lawful wives. One of the companion who was in a state of sexual impurity was asked not to help in lowering the body (Bukhārī).

This honours the deceased, ie the people who help lower the deceaseds body are in a state of ritual purity and clean. So when a person is in a state of sexual impurity and he is not allowed to partake in lowering the deceased, then how about the act of sexual intercourse with a corpse! Let alone the rules and regulations Muslims have when it comes to intimacy and intercourse.

We mentioned examples of how Muslims uphold purification and cleanliness while relieving themselves and at the same token the clever people who regurgitate these treacherous lies about the Messenger of Allāh (Sallalahu Alayhi Wasallm), are the same people who do not even wash their hands when they go to the toilet, they have cascades of urine droplets on their clothes and toilet seats. They are the same people who would not bathe for weeks, just less than 100 years and when they would bathe, the whole family would use the water, whereas our glorious Prophetic Divine teachings go back 1400 years.

Therefore, it is absolutely absurd and a despicable aspersion to even suggest this notion of necrophilia, which is an outright treacherous lie.
Share this and receive reward.

https://www.salafiri.com/answering-the-fallacious-claim-of-necrophilia/

mhmsadyq:

Continue barking while we move!

motayoayinde:


THIS SHOULD DO FOR ANY SANE PERSON.
BUT ISLAMOPHOBES ARE NOT.

JAZAAKALLAH

BetterHeadline:


Make sure you don't move into the vaginas of dead women, alright!

motayoayinde:


THIS SHOULD DO FOR ANY SANE PERSON.
BUT ISLAMOPHOBES ARE NOT.

JAZAAKALLAH

Ovacoma:

Without lies Islam dies!

BetterHeadline:

I agree. It remains the one and only way to dead women private part.


Islamic Scholars say in islam it is permissible to copulate dead people.