Serious negotiations on security guarantees will not take place as long as NATO instructors and mercenaries remain in Ukraine, and until Russian-defined realities on the ground are recognized. This was stated in an interview with our agency by the director of the North America Department of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Alexander Darchiev.

"Until the pumping of weapons and finances to [Ukrainian President Volodymyr] Zelensky's regime stops, American and NATO military personnel/mercenaries/trainers are withdrawn, and the realities we have defined on the ground are recognized, it is premature to start any serious negotiations on security guarantees in peg to Ukraine and Euro-Atlantic. The ball is now on the American side of the field," the diplomat said.

rottennaija:
What is this symbol they are wearing?

Seems familiar!

rottennaija:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F89iypG7k8s

Aizenosa:
I wish you all watch this video and see how the west has fooled the world.

[url]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-57KOwG9co
[/url]

Aizenosa:
I wish you all watch this video and see how the west has fooled the world.
[url]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-57KOwG9co
[/url]

Parachoko:
You're been fed propaganda by this Pro Russian Military Analyst.

Russia Air force do not even have the capability to carry out SEAD deep inside Ukrainian territory.

Imagine if this war is between The USA and Mexico, by now, Mexico won't have any Air Defense or any jet. The F35 and F22 will totally dominate the Mexican Skies.


There's a reason the USA is called A Global Power.

Even if USA is to take on Ukraine from Poland,the US Air Force will be flying in and out of Ukraine anytime and any day they want.

The only reason USA can't take over the whole of Russia is because of Russia Nuke.

olugabbie:



Has the F-22 or F-35 used to carry out SEAD in any modern war? The answer is no. Ukraine has a lots of air defence systems. Russia has been able to destroy large amount of those defense systems. But they are just too many. Right now Ukraine is running low on the missiles for it S-300 and BUK defense systems and it does not has the capacity to produce new ones. That is why it is requesting for NATO air defense systems. Any super will find it difficult to gain air superiority in a country that has a lots of mobile air defense systems.

Ukraine used to be a fortress for Russia during the era of the USSR. Almost every infrastructure you see in Ukraine today was built by the Soviet. The rail systems, power plants e.t.c. Ukraine inherited huge military industry from the Soviet. It is not a push over country.

Parachoko:
This una talk dey always make me laugh

Una go dey swallow Russian Propaganda, but accuse other people of been the ones swallowing Western Propaganda

Parachoko:
Have Russians not been arming themselves since then too? In fact, the Russian Military have the advantage when the SMO began, they made use of the Element Of Surprise, with this advantage, they should be controlling most part of Ukraine by now.

Aizenosa:


At least the west said the truth with their mouths listen to what Angela Merkel stated.

The honest truth is that this war should never have happened I stand on that fact.

Aizenosa:


Russia has always stockpiled weapons. Since the 2nd world war.

Parachoko:
The Russians strike a lot of Ukrainian military arsenal when the war started. When the S300 misile run out, maybe NATO will supply them with evidence.

The Russian military is overhype, they had the element of surprise, if nah the USA attack Ukraine, the Ukrainian military would have been making use of only guerrilla tactics by now because of the way they will be crush by the US military might.

US Air force would have dominated the Ukrainian Skies by now.

The F35 will strike deep inside Ukrainian territory, anytime and any day they want to.

I'm sure if NATO gave Georgia the kind of support they are giving to NATO now, Georgia would have defeated the Russian military

Parachoko:
Nobody should complain about Ukraine stockpiling after Russia took over her territory.

olugabbie:


The US has not fought this kind of massive (modern) war before. So it is pointless to say they are capable when it has not happened in reality.

Aizenosa:


You see that video I post please watch it and let's see if you will still have this same opinion.

Me I sha see the lies the west is portraying. If you don't see it then no problem. Peace.

Parachoko:
Do you agree with me Nigeria will defeat Russia in a conventional war?

Base on Russia military performance in Ukraine, I don't see them defeating the Nigerian military.

olugabbie:


Likewise 150k US troops can not take Nigeria.

Parachoko:
The video is made by a person who is pro Russian.

I also blame the west for letting this war to happen. But the reality on ground is that, Russia do not have the capability to take on NATO.

The only reason NATO forces is not occupying every part of Russia right now is because of Russia Nuclear Bomb.

The Russian Airforce do not have the capability to perform a deep strike in Ukraine, the SU57 is scared of going toe to toe with the S300

The S300 will be useless against F35.

Parachoko:
Nobody should complain about Ukraine stockpiling after Russia took over her territory.

Aizenosa:


Because the person says facts, it means that the person is pro russian, I believe there are also pro Ukrainian, where are their own facts about the whole situation. The part of the whole gist that gets me mad is that Zelensky was voted massively because he campaign that he was going to honour the Minisk Agreement or a neutral Ukraine and allow the autonomy of the Donbass region. So why is he not honouring his campaign promises. The 2 European countries which brokered the Minisk Agreement with Russia and Ukraine of 2014 and 2015 what was their response. Remind you Angela who was president of one of the 2 countries has come out to say that the who agreement which was used to calm Russia was a lie.

So tell me who is to blame. Cus all I see is Russia here suing for peace and the west telling lies up and down.

Parachoko:
The West should be blame for not honouring and agreement and Russia should be blame for invading an Independent Country.

Aizenosa:


They started stockpiling after they failed to honour the agreement. Mind you Crimea was a gift from Russia to Ukraine when they were granted independence.
Also, majority of Crimean are russians by lineage.

Aizenosa:


That's explicitly what the video stated, so I don't understand why you said it's pro russian.

Plus I don't know how you come to the conclusion that saying facts about the situation makes the video pro russian.

Parachoko:
Lies!!! Crimea never belonged to the Russians by Lineage, go and make a research about Crimean and Crimean Tatars so you will cure yourself from this propaganda you are been fed by Pro Russian Propagandist while you think you're a Free Thinker

Don't also forget to make some reaserch about what Russians did to this Crimean Tatars.

Parachoko:
Russia also should be blame for this war, they have no right to invade an independent Country. Crimea was giving freely by the Russians.

Now, they are facing the consequence on the battle field.

If the USA is a weak country, Russia would have also return the money the US paid to buy Alaska and invade Alaska for flimsy excuse. They can't try the rubbish because they kjnow US is not as weak as Ukraine.